demonstration attempts withoutsignificant impact to the students’ schedules. It also offered the opportunity to use the fulldouble-period for the administration of exams, minimizing the effect of time constraints on examperformance.Borrowing from Sangelkar’s implementation, the grading scheme shown in Table 1 was used forthe five in-class exams administered to the mastery sections. The exam first administered to allmastery students for each set of concepts was assessed problem-by-problem as either “A” levelwork (correct or almost correct) or “try again” (retake or “R”). Students only re-took problems(concepts) for which they had not demonstrated the requisite level of competency. Subsequentproblems were drawn from the same concept area but of a lower
Paper ID #20319Application of Engineering Taxonomy for Assessing Problem-Based Learn-ing in Underrepresented GroupsDr. Leanne Petry, Central State University Dr. Leanne Petry is an Assistant Professor in the College of Science and Engineering at Central State University. Her expertise is in analytical and materials characterization techniques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electrochemistry. Her research interests include oxidation-reduction reactions at the surface of electrodes for sensor applications, corrosion mechanisms of materials, as well as their electrochemical degradation. She has
Paper ID #21944Lessons Learned in the Paths of Developing a Multidisciplinary CertificateProgramProf. Hsiao-Wen Wang, National Cheng Kung University Hsiao-Wen Wang is an Associate Professor with the Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering in NCKU. Her fields of expertise include river mechanics and restoration, sediment transport, ecohydraulics, water environment planning and assessment, and geomorphology. Her research interests also include innovative learning and teaching design in engineering education. She has been working on sustainability issues based on multidisciplinary collaborations, and established a new
Paper ID #22961Many Hands on the Elephant: How a Transdisciplinary Team Assesses anIntegrative CourseDr. David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute David DiBiasio is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Department Head of ChE at WPI. He received his ChE degrees from Purdue University, worked for the DuPont Co, and has been at WPI since 1980. His current interests are in educational research: the process of student learning, international engineering education, and educational assessment. Collaboration with two colleagues resulted in being awarded the 2001 William Corcoran Award from Chemical Engineering
. The learningcontent is provided in the form of Digital Learning Objects (DLOs) [20] on various SoftwareEngineering and Programming (SEP) topics, and tutorials for several SEP tools. DLOs are 5 to 10-minute chunks of critical learning content and have a practice assessment and a graded assessment.Unlike the DLOs the tutorials do not have an assessment component.In SEP-CyLE the embedded LESs are implemented as follows: CL - uses virtual teams to collab-orate to complete online assignments, posting comments on the work of other teams and sharinginformation that is helpful to the entire class via the class forum. GA - uses virtual points, a leaderboard, and the allocations of points based on various activities, such as completing assignmentsand
Paper ID #26447Analysis of Feedback Quality on Engineering Problem-solving TasksMiss Bahar Memarian, University of Toronto Bahar Memarian is a PhD candidate in Industrial Engineering and the Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education at University of Toronto, Canada. Her primary research interests are in Human Factors and Systems Engineering, specifically their application in Education (e.g. learning outcomes assessment, engineering problem solving). Before that, she completed her MASc. (2015) and BASc. (2012) in Electrical Engineering from University of Toronto.Dr. Susan McCahan, University of Toronto Susan
Paper ID #26740Analysis of Student Engagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Re-garding Online Graduate Engineering ProgramsPeter Wesley Odom, Purdue University Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University College of EngineeringFrancisco J. Montalvo, Purdue UniversityJason Marion Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Student
Evaluation.Dr. Amanda Portis Malefyt, Trine University Amanda Malefyt is currently Chair and Associate professor in the McKetta Department of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering at Trine University. She received her bachelor’s degree from Trine (formerly Tri- State) University and Ph.D. from Michigan State University. Her research interests include engineering education and nucleic acid therapeutics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing the reliability of a chemical engineering problem- solving rubric when using multiple ratersAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper discusses the preliminary validation of a project modifiedversion of the Promoting
, commercialization and technology policy. In particular, his research has recently focused on cybersecurity topics including intrusion detection and forensics, robotic command and control, aerospace command and 3D printing quality assurance. Straub is a member of Sigma Xi, the AAAS, the AIAA and several other technical societies, he has also served as a track or session chair for numerous conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessment of the Educational Benefits Produced by Peer Learning Activities in CybersecurityAbstractPeer learning activities may represent a solution to several problems in the cybersecurityeducation field. Peers have the potential
. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” J. Eng. Educ., 2008.[3] S. Parikh, H. Chen, K. Donaldson, and S. Sheppard, “Does Major Matter? A Look At What Motivates Engineering Students In Different Majors,” presented at the 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2009, pp. 14.500.1-14.500.13.[4] L. Dickson, “Race and Gender Differences in College Major Choice,” Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., vol. 627, no. 1, pp. 108–124, 2010.[5] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the Risk of Attrition in Undergraduate Engineering: Results from the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 319–345, Apr. 2012.[6] J. A. Gasiewski, M. K. Eagan, G. A. Garcia
Paper ID #29856Integrate Manufacturing related Materials and Quality Control Standardsinto Master Level Engineering EducationDr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Hua Li, an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University- Kingsville, is interested in sustainable manufacturing, renewable energy, sustainability assessment, and engineering education. Dr. Li has served as P.I. and Co-P.I. in different projects funded by NSF, DOEd, DHS, and HP, totaling more than 2.5 million dollars.Prof. Kai Jin, Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Kai Jin is a Professor of
Paper ID #28870Leveraging the Force of Formative Assessment & Feedback for EffectiveEngineering EducationProf. Junaid Qadir, Information Technology University, Lahore, Pakistan Junaid Qadir is an Associate Professor at the Information Technology University (ITU)—Punjab, Lahore since December 2015, where he directs the ICTD; Human Development; Systems; Big Data Analytics; Networks (IHSAN) Research Lab. His primary research interests are in the areas of computer systems and networking, applied machine learning, using ICT for development (ICT4D); and engineering education. He is the author of more than 100 peer-reviewed
Paper ID #30421Effects of a New Assessment Model on Female and Under-RepresentedMinority StudentsDr. Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University Geoff Recktenwald is a member of the teaching faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. Geoff holds a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning
Paper ID #28808Oral Formative Assessment as a Means to Increasing Total Learning andEngagement in an Engineering University ClassroomDr. Kristen M Ward, Arizona State University Kristen Ward has been teaching engineering at Arizona State University for the past six years. She is motivated by the individual successes of her students and continues to search for new ways to teach engineering and connect with her students.Dr. Yingyan Lou, Arizona State University Dr. Lou is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at ASU specializing in intelligent transportation systems. She has been teaching the Numerical Methods for
Paper ID #30835Student-Developed Learning Objectives: A Form of Assessment to EnableProfessional GrowthMs. Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University Lauren Singelmann is a Masters Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mr. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University Experienced Systems
AC 2007-849: ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SENIOR MECHANICALENGINEERS IN A CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCEOlga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left ventricular flows. She has served as faculty advisor to over thirty mechanical engineering seniors involved in biomedical engineering design projects and taught several mechanical engineering fluid mechanics
and Analysis Projects for a Junior Level Integrated Circuits CourseAbstractJust as the electronics industry can increase productivity with web-based tools, web-based designoffers opportunities to improve education in the area of electronics and integrated circuits. Thiswork describes a variety of web based design and analysis projects for a junior level electronicscourse and assesses their impact on student learning. Since the course using the projectscomprises the second quarter of electronics instruction subsequent to introductory circuit analysiscourses, the projects focus on relatively well-defined electronics subsystems. The projectsexercise students’ skills with a range of course learning objectives, ranging from
, opinions and accounts and, in the process, learn howto construct a logical assessment . . . and defend our conclusions with facts and lucidargument is literally costing us in lives, power, money, the environment and just aboutanything you can name.”The first author’s (i.e., MG’s) comment on this example: basically the same comments asthose for the Systems and Signals Analysis student participation memo quoted above.AssessmentAssessment of student learning when Socratic questioning was used in each of theaforementioned University of the Pacific engineering classes (Electric Circuits, SystemsAnalysis, Digital Signal Processing, Random Signals, Communications Systems andSenior Design Projects) at the end of each of the first author’s last six
Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Nationally Normed Exams for Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Technology Programs and Certification of Engineering Technology GraduatesAbstract:Four-year engineering programs often use the FE exam as a direct measure of outcomesfor EAC of ABET accreditation, but such use of the FE exam is not universallyappropriate for engineering technology programs. Many engineering technologyprograms are at the two-yr community college level, and graduates of those programs arenot typically eligible to sit for the FE exam. There are fifteen states or other jurisdictionsin the U.S. that do not allow graduates of 4-yr engineering technology programs to takethe F.E. Use of the FE exam
Excellence award in graduate research from the Mary Lou Fulton School of Education. Her creative research focuses on team learning and the role of self-efficacy on student achievement.Dale Baker, Arizona State University Dale R. Baker is a Professor of Science Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Arizona State University and was the Co-Editor of The Journal of Research in Science Teaching. She teaches courses in science curricula, teaching and learning, and assessment courses with an emphasis on constructivist theory and issues of equity. Her research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching. She has won two awards for her research in these areas
AC 2008-335: IDENTIFYING ROLES AND BEHAVIORS OF INFORMALLEADERS ON STUDENT DESIGN TEAMSDiane Zemke, Gonzaga University Diane Zemke is a PhD candidate at Gonzaga University in Leadership Studies. Her interests include small group dynamics, reflective practices, learning, and qualitative methods. She has co-authored papers on use of small teams in design engineering.Steven Zemke, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Gonzaga University. His primary responsibilities are Design courses and assessment. His research interests include effective learning environments and design teaching and learning. Prior to teaching he was a design engineer and
used to present relatedconcepts (theory – problem solving – experimentation).Pilot AssessmentThe assessment of the pilot efforts included a review of the educational technology,interviews with faculty, classroom observations, student evaluation surveys/interviews,and conventional student performance metrics (course work, HW, exams, etc.). Studentperformance on design-oriented problems by those using the Mobile Studio’s TabLabinstrumentation was significantly better than the group that did not participate in theMobile Studio sessions - in contrast with analysis-oriented problems, in which similarresults were achieved by both groups. The Mobile Studio allowed faculty to betterpresent course concepts and foster student interactivity &
IDEA (Individual Development Educational Assessment) Centerof Kansas State University during fall 2005 is also very encouraging, as shown in Fig. 3. TheIDEA center conducts the end-of-semester student evaluation every semester for this course.Among these three items, IDEA score on excellence of course has been improved from 3.7during spring 2001 (the first semester the authors taught this course) to 4.5 during fall 2005.Results like these greatly encouraged the first author as an instructor and help give her theconfidence and desire to do an even better job in teaching. Page 11.613.7 4.6 4.5
Iowa State University, started in 1994. In the 2002-03 Academic Year, learning communities at Iowa State attracted 1,654 students, whichrepresents 39.6% of the first year students. [4] An additional 485 students, identified as otherthan first year students, participated as well. Approximately 60.6% of first year engineeringstudents participate in at least one learning community. [5] Page 11.105.3Iowa State University, through its learning community initiative, has several subcommittees thatenable learning community activities. These subcommittees include- Assessment, CurriculumDevelopment and Enhancement, Peer Mentors, and Institute. The
AC 2007-245: SIX YEARS AND THOUSANDS OF ASSIGNMENTS LATER: WHATHAVE THEY LEARNED, AND WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?J. Shawn Addington, Virginia Military Institute J. Shawn Addington is the Jamison-Payne Institute Professor and Head of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the Virginia Military Institute. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He teaches courses, laboratories, and undergraduate research projects in the microelectronics and semiconductor fabrication areas; and, he remains active in curriculum development and engineering assessment. He is a registered professional engineer in the
a standing relationship with ASU and has contributed to collaborative development,deployment and assessment of sustainability-themed active and experiential modules.During the 2012-2013 academic year faculty at ASU and MCC piloted a water-for-energy waterfootprint module to introduce students to the concept of embedded, or virtual, water (i.e. waterrequired to generate or produce a product or service) and how their decisions, engineeringapplications and sustainability relate to the “real-world” global and complex issue of resourcedepletion today. Module implementation was piloted in one civil engineering course at bothinstitutions for the Fall 2012 and Spring 2013 semesters, see Table 1. MCC’s courses wereintroductory engineering courses