working in an experimental labenvironment. One of the authors requires that all of his new graduate students take this course inorder to prepare them for conducting research experiments. Page 26.184.10References[1] "Stirling Engines", G. Walker (1980), Clarenden Press, Oxford, page 1[2] “Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach”, Yunus A. Cengal, Michael A. Boles (1998), WBC McGraw-Hill, ,pp. 504-505[3] Silicon Carbide, SiC Ceramic Properties, Accuratus Corporation, [4] “Engineering Thermodynamics”, J.B.Jones, R.E.Dugan (1996), Prentice Hall, New Jersey pp. 300-305[5] “An Introduction to Low Temperature
Paper ID #26005Evidence for Design of Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Alex C. Szatmary, King’s College Alex Szatmary teaches mechanical engineering in a new program at King’s College, Wilkes-Barre. His scholarship in engineering education is driven by considerations that arise in new programs; so far, he has written about problems with the use of the Fundamentals of Engineering exam in curricular design and as- sessment, as well as sources of evidence to consider when designing mechanical engineering curriculum. In his technical research, he uses mathematical models to study how cells get to places in the body
six groups of4 (approximately) members each. The instructor meets with each team individually and discusses theirquestions and explains to them how specific questions can be clarified and improved. Although, theentire activity from start to finish is carefully monitored by the instructor with continuous feedbackand grading of team-performance, independent team work and individual responsibility are alsoemphasized. This activity can be replicated in other CGT courses as well other disciplines. The resultssuggest that it can be an effective means to strengthen CG course pedagogy. This approach willfacilitate assessment of tactile learning methods in CGT course curriculum and help with a continuous‘Course Improvement Plan’. Ultimately this
Engineering Approach, 6th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc , 2008.4. Sonntag, Richard E., Claus Borgnakke, and Gordon J. Van Wylen. Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, 5th Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1998.5. Excel in M. E. Project Website. 2007. University of Alabama, 17 January 2008 Page 13.431.19
Research Center inBioengineering Educational Technologies has conducted research and development on methodsto improve bioengineering education for the last 6 years. This project has sought to synthesizelearning science, learning technology, assessment and evaluation and the domain knowledge ofbioengineering so that new approaches to bioengineering education could be developed andtested. This project has resulted in a number of innovations that have been shown to improve theeducational process in bioengineering. We are currently developing methods to disseminatethese findings and make then available to the bioengineering educational community.I. IntroductionRecently, there has been a significant concern expressed by academic, scientific, business
Paper ID #43416Classification of Alternative Grading Approaches: Review and Reflectionsfrom PracticeDr. Simon Li, University of Calgary Dr. Simon Li is an associate professor of the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Calgary. His research interests include mechanical systems of buildings and engineering education.Yves Pauchard, University of CalgaryDr. Ahmad Ghasemloonia, University of Calgary Dr. Ahmad Ghasemloonia received his BSc in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Tabriz in 2003 and his MSc in Applied Mechanics from Tarbiat Modares University in 2006 with a research
EngineeringProgram at Methodist University has made it a priority to integrate writing throughout theengineering curriculum that exposes students to writing instruction each year. Althoughindividual course assignments are still used as the main avenue to practice writing, theimportance of writing for the discipline and connection between each course are stressedthroughout program. With the introduction of Methodist University’s new Quality EnhancementPlan (QEP) on writing, the Engineering Program plans to strengthen the integration of writtencommunication within the curriculum.Writing Across the CurriculumMethodist University embraces writing across the entire campus through several initiatives onwriting improvement and appreciation for students and faculty
will provide candid comments from the student engineers on their thoughtstoward the utility of the program and what they gained from it. BackgroundThe University of Wyoming instituted a new undergraduate Computer Engineering curriculum inFall 2000 in response to a nation-wide shortage of computer engineers. The hardware designportion of the curriculum consists of traditional course and laboratory work in digital design,embedded controller programming, and advanced digital design. Although this curriculumprovides a thorough technical education, other concepts need to be incorporated into thecurriculum including: competition, quality design, teamwork, systems design, interdisciplinaryprojects, and
rigors and prescriptive natureof a CU-Boulder ME Degree. Forward thinking administrators encouraged the development of amore flexible degree program that could complement the resources allocated to the Partnership.Hence, CMU’s MET Program was launched in January 2010. Few faculty and small studentnumbers, along with limited resources designated for a single program, forced an innovativeapproach in developing the curriculum for the MET Program.It is interesting to note that CMU is one of only nine universities nationwide that offers degreesin engineering (E) and engineering technology (ET) under a single umbrella.1 Although the twodegrees are granted by separate institutions, the common umbrella is that the programs areadministered under the
, with upper division classes averaging about 15 students.• Women’s (Masters L): A small women’s college of approximately 1,792 undergraduates in the Northeast with fifty majors, including computer science, biology, biochemistry, bio- statistics, chemistry, environmental science, health informatics, mathematics, and physics degrees in STEM, but no engineering degrees. This institution offers a liberal arts education for its undergraduates integrated with professional work experience. Class sizes are typically 6-12 students, with the largest class size around 20.A qualitative methods approach was used to investigate how students studied, how they preferredto study, and why they did so. Rather than focusing on the prevalence of
.ABSTRACTConstruction courses in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at thePennsylvania State University focus on the subjects of planning, organization, monitoring andcontrol of the construction projects. There is currently a scarcity of information relating to ethicalconduct in these courses. Government regulations, environmental permits, and other bureaucraticcontrols continue to grow. Projects also continue to get larger and more technical, requiring morespecialized people, high-tech equipment, and better project control systems. This trend requiresthat project managers have technical, business, organizational, ethical, and leadership savvy.Many new regulations and specifications (for example, those of OSHA and ACI) requireconstruction
and Recruitment at Mayfield College of Engineering, Tarleton State University. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering from New Mexico State University. Her research interest is in supply chain and student success.Olugbenro Ogunrinde, Tarleton State UniversityTyler Rider, Tarleton State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementation of a Project-Based Learning Approach in an Upper-Level Course in Engineering TechnologyAbstractProject-based learning (PBL) is characterized as one of the most efficient approaches toengineering education during recent years. It has been applied from elementary education
teams because of the lack of team skills. In his spare time, he enjoys doing photography and learning new things. You can reach him at: alhawajr@spu.eduDr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University Prof. Melani Plett is a Professor in Electrical Engineering at Seattle Pacific University. She has over sev- enteen years of experience in teaching a variety of engineering undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus how faculty can best facilitate student learning. Page 26.1492.1 c
encouraged across an increasinglywide range of disciplines, the approach to teaching entrepreneurship has not been standardized.There are a number of competing perspectives regarding the most effective curriculum forteaching entrepreneurship. To make the matter even more complex, these perspectives differfrom school to school (e.g., from the business school to the engineering school) and also fromstudent level to student level (e.g., from undergraduate student to graduate student).1Business schools were the initial locus for entrepreneurship education, although a fewengineering programs such as the one at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology can laylegitimate claim to being pioneers of the genre. Still, it is not in dispute that
available, and present their findings before a panel of professionals. The acquired experience willbe presented with examples and partial results of the project.Keywords: NASA space grants, curriculum supplement, engineering technology2. Background2.1. Engineering Technology ProgramIn a small and relatively new Engineering Technology (ET) program with 5 different concentrations, suchas the one in Southeastern Louisiana University, the curriculums are designed to meet the schoolrequirement, Board of Regent (BoR) requirement, the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) through its Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC)requirement, as well as the requirements of the Southern Association of Colleges and
civil and environmental engineering department at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Southern California. Dr. Ozis is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona. Before joining CMU, Dr. Ozis was a faculty member at Northern Arizona University, and at University of Southern California. Dr. Ozis enjoys every dimension of being an engineering educator. She teaches across the curriculum from freshman introductory level, to graduate level courses. Dr. Ozis conducts research related to engineering classrooms and innovative pedagogical strategies. Dr. Ozis
Session 2251Teaching Students Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Design Project for Sophomore Engineering Students Kathryn A. Hollar and Beena Sukumaran Department of Chemical Engineering Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Rowan University Glassboro, NJ 08028AbstractUniversities can be leaders not only in research advances in reducing greenhouse gasemissions, but also have the potential to be leaders in practices that reduce greenhousegas emissions. All 56 colleges and universities in New Jersey recently
in Transition. Association of American Colleges and Universities (pub.).5. Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.6. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.7. Lee, W. S. (1993). Social scientists as ideological critics. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 221-232.8. National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.9. National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The
Math Usage by Practicing Engineers: What does it mean to Curriculum Planners? Mike Ellis, Brian Williams, Habib Sadid, Ken W. Bosworth, and Larry Stout Idaho State UniversityAbstractEngineering programs are constantly assessing the material required to earn an engineeringdegree. This assessment leads to squeezing in additional courses, often at the expense ofrequiring additional credits beyond that for a typical Bachelors degree. The common practice ofincluding new material while not changing what already exists is pushing the number of requiredcredits for an engineering degree in excess of what should be expected. A fundamental questionnot typically
-enrollmentcourse was taught using innovative active learning techniques and new course materials. To aidin the development of the course, 211 students were asked to self-report their study habits in an 8question survey. A cluster analysis was used to identify three study habit profiles. Knowinghow students allocate their time and the effectiveness of their strategies can promote moreeffective guidance for students who are struggling to learn the material while managing theirtime, and could drive course design with proper emphasis on each aspect of coursework.I. Introduction and BackgroundIn Fall 2006, an active-learning approach modeled after Beichner and colleagues’ SCALE-UPmethod1 was implemented at our institution to teach sophomore Mechanical
Technology. Page 26.205.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Online Course and Teacher Resource for Above Code Construction MethodsCommunity destruction and loss of life due to residential building code violations still occur toofrequently and increasing code enforcement is often not possible due to lack of funds andresources. Teaching the International Residential Code (IRC) to college-level constructionstudents is another way to encourage greater code compliance and enhance communityresilience. In a national curriculum review of construction
permission.Universities with existing missile engineering programs can use the model curriculum todetermine whether or not changes in their current curriculum should be made. Universitiesdeveloping new missile programs can use the model curriculum to guide their own particularcurriculum development. Some programs may wish to package the various topics in theproposed model curriculum in a somewhat different manner. Model curricula should be viewedas a time and knowledge sensitive assessment of minimum educational requirements.The presented curriculum assumes an academic quarter system as opposed to a semester system.It would need to be repackaged for a semester based system. A quarter based program, asopposed to a semester based program, may be more appealing to
new course at Purdue is based on fulfilling the needs for students inthe new Multidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) located in the new Purdue School of EngineeringEducation (ENE), which was founded in 2004. The ENE program is Purdue's answer to a needto better understand the learning and teaching of engineering.1 The MDE program is intended tobuild upon the success of the Purdue Interdisciplinary Engineering (IDE) program that hasenabled students to earn a degree at the interface between different engineering disciplines orengineering and other disciplines by providing a common multidisciplinary foundation for Page 11.993.3students who will then
systematic software performance optimization. She actively contributes to the academic community through roles in organizing committees and program committees for conferences like ICSE and ASE. At Stevens, Dr. Xiao teaches courses in software engineering and plays a significant role in academic service, including serving on curriculum committees and initiatives to enhance student-faculty interaction.Yu Tao, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences) Yu Tao, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Stevens Institute of Technology. Her research analyzes issues related to human resources in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as well as online privacy and
technical curriculum. Ibelieve that we need to do more to connect how we understand technology to the world’smost pressing challenges, and I attempt to emphasize this in my own teaching.Through this proposed research, I am working in a relatively new area that isn’t well-defined by existing theory and methodology formed in higher education. Although thereis a body of research on the teaching of engineering ethics and the integration of thesocial sciences with engineering, and that is certainly relevant to examining thetechnology/society interface, I am examining faculty beliefs and processes aroundcurriculum choice with respect to contextualizing science and technology curriculum.After some early reviews of existing literature, I decided that the
Paper ID #32751A Systematic Review of Multidisciplinary Engineering Education:Accredited Programs, Educational Approaches, and Capstone DesignDr. Lina Zheng, Tsinghua University Lina ZHENG got her Ph.D. degree in Public Administration from Tsinghua University, China. She was also a visiting scholar in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests include international engineering education, interdisciplinary engineering education. Recently, she focused most on the ”New Engineering” initiative launched in 2017 in China, as well as engineering education reforms globally.Prof. Dexin Hu
,” EdSurge, June 9, 2020. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-06-09-how-learning-engineering-hopes-to- speed-up-education[15] M. Grush, “Learning Engineering: New Profession or Transformational Process? A Q&A with Ellen Wagner,” Campus Technology, July 8, 2024. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2024/07/08/learning-engineering-new-profession-or- transformational- process.aspx#:~:text=Learning%20engineering%20is%20an%20emerging,can%20improve %20learning%20at%20scale.[16] S. Blake-Plock, “Learning Engineering: Merging Science and Data to Design Powerful Learning Experiences,” Getting Smart, January 29, 2018.[17] L. Totino and A, Kessler, “Why did we do that?” A Systematic Approach to Tracking Decisions in the
Ph.D in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She
A Novel Approach to Expose Students to Global Issues in Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management Antonella Sciortino, Lisa Star, and Tesfai Goitom Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management California State University, Long Beach.AbstractThe availability of new technologies has resulted in great achievements in the civil engineeringand construction engineering management fields worldwide. Young engineers should beequipped with the necessary knowledge to perform their jobs in any region of the world, andthey should be able to understand the unique cultural and societal environment in
for engineers and STEM outreach in early education. Page 22.180.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 An Innovative Mechanism to Establish Positive Association within the First Year of Civil Engineering CurriculumAbstractRetention of students after the initial year of class work is a major issue facing engineering programs today.The typical approach has been to create a common freshman or first year experience that faculty oradministrators have predetermined to be positive. This technique has been criticized as lacking depth orbreadth of