for current and future applications of AMusing modern 3D printers. In order to address the growing workforce needs on AM technology,the Department of Engineering Technology at Miami University, Ohio has also launched aninitiative for developing an Additive Manufacturing Laboratory (AM Lab), partially funded by astate equipment grant, for supporting educational and research activities in various engineeringtechnology concentrations offered by the department. This paper presents the recently formedAM Lab initiative and discusses the use of the lab in supporting instruction and researchactivities in engineering technology. The paper also discusses the challenges and opportunities ofintegrating AM technology in engineering technology curriculum
Paper ID #14500Design and Development of a Non-Contact Thermography Device for EquineResearchDr. Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University Faruk Yildiz is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Sam Houston State Uni- versity. His primary teaching areas are in Electronics, Computer Aided Design (CAD), and Alternative Energy Systems. Research interests include: low power energy harvesting systems, renewable energy technologies and education.Ms. Haley Claire CollinsDr. Jessica L. Leatherwood, Sam Houston State UniversityDr. Marcy Miller Beverly, Sam Houston State University Dr. Marcy Beverly is
laboratory- andsimulation-based research, and foster the development of research communication skills. A moredetailed description of the REU program structure, objectives, and elements is included in priorwork evaluating initial student outcomes from the program 1.The current study presents a follow-up, second-year evaluation of a research experiences forundergraduates (REU) program that is currently in progress, funded by the National ScienceFoundation and focused on the integration of biology and materials. As in the first year of theprogram, participating students completed measures of research-based skills and experience,likelihood of pursuing graduate school, and openness to collaborating with others both prior toand after completion of the 10
, misses much of the largerpicture and places too much of the onus to change on the faculty members.BackgroundIn 2006, the author completed a study that was aimed at shedding some light on the parts of theuniversity teaching picture that for too long had been left in the dark: the good teaching.[1] Theresearch was initially inspired by the disjuncture between the plethora of negative critiques ofteaching in research universities and the author’s personal experience as a graduate student andinstructional consultant in those settings. Excellent teaching in those settings had been generallyoverlooked in the literature, and much of the existing research on effective teaching was focusedon instructors’ actions – what they did in their classrooms
Paper ID #30971STEM-Oriented Alliance for Research (SOAR): An educational model forinterdisciplinary project-based learningDr. Jacob Murray, Washington State University Everett Dr. Jacob Murray graduated with his Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering and PhD in Electri- cal and Computer Engineering from WSU in 2010 and 2014, respectively. Today, Dr. Murray works as Clinical Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator for the School of Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Science at WSU Everett. Dr. Murray’s research interests include sustainable computing, wireless network-on-chip architectures, dynamic thermal
solving, design, and research are presented to studentswho are then asked how this framework could benefit their project work. In addition to thequalitative feedback, comprehension of the three definitions was measured by asking students toclassify common engineering challenges as primarily problem solving, design, or research. Page 12.555.2Students were also prompted to think about skills that limited their performance in problemsolving, design, and research. This was initiated by asking students to process a Venn diagramprepared by the authors that highlighted learning skills likely to be associated with each process.Skills that are common to
experiences as well as research on learning in informal settings; and an expert on genderstudies. One early piece of feedback from one of our expert reviewers was to focus theengineering behavior coding scheme around key engineering behaviors, rather than exploring allpossible engineering behaviors. While the data we have collected provides rich insights intoearly engineering behaviors and engineering thinking, a more focused analysis allows for Page 23.635.10stronger initial findings, where we investigate how (and when) children engage in specificengineering behaviors, and how the children’s ways of engaging in specific engineeringbehaviors may
not well structured to support that methodology.Students were not familiar with the needs and goals of industry in which new productsare developed in anticipation of a market demand. They had been educated abouttheories, working to grasp and understand concepts, without having the opportunity to seethe challenges encountered when attempting to apply those concepts and theories in thereal world.By striving to meet the following initial goals we continue to work to attain that vision: • Develop curriculum through course materials derived from ERC research. • Impact the culture of research by involving undergraduates and graduate students in cross-disciplinary research teams with industry and systems-level activities. • Develop
(Kenneth Boorom, JamesBuffenbarger), SCP (John Rosato), and Zilog (Timothy Carns). Numerous others have availedof guest lecturing opportunities. Student evaluations have consistently indicated that thepractical experiences provided by these instructors were highly valued.III. The HART projectThe following is a small research project that has been chosen as an example of the novel waysof interaction that are being encouraged as part of the graduate studies in the College ofEngineering. The anticipated impact on graduate curricula and student skill sets is alsodiscussed.The project was initiated in the Fall of 2000 as a 2-dimensional modeling venture of vapordrying processes in high aspect ratio trenches (HART) in a semiconductor
conceptual discussions.Problem definitionTo overcome that deficiency, to improve teaching, and enhance learning of students, instructorshave over time developed novel and innovative concepts [7] that include, but are not limited, to: 1. Course projects Page 25.231.2 2. Software assignments 3. Journal reading and research 4. Online help, class handouts, and other ancillary materials.However, most of such efforts rely on instructor’s experience and his/ her desire and initiative toimprove teaching skills. Since many OR instructors are not familiar enough with the vastresources available in the area of student learning, they usually do not
interdisciplinary undergraduateresearch program. We interviewed 10 participants, evenly split by gender, of whom four have transitionedto the workforce and describe what they gained from the experience. The findings offer insights intostudent skill development and provide perspectives on the benefits of the experience from recent alumniwho have transitioned to the workforce after participating in the undergraduate research experience.Introduction The 2012 "Engage to Excel" report emphasized the significance of dedicated research projects inenhancing undergraduate STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education.Supporting this idea, initiatives aim to increase active learning while decreasing reliance on traditionallectures [1
Protection Agency (e.g., [16]) and the National Institutes of Health (e.g., [17]).These initiatives may attract more scholars to CER, but there is a legitimate risk of theseindividuals failing to work in respectful and equitable ways with their community partners andexploiting and further marginalizing these groups. Researchers from underserved communitiesand/or historically underrepresented groups may be best situated to lead this research [18, 19],but they are often marginalized in academia when they engage in CER [20].A current ADVANCE grant (ADVANCE Partnership: Strategic Partnership for Alignment ofCommunity Engagement in STEM (SPACES)) is conducting training activities to help thoseinterested in CER in environmental engineering and science
Mobile Apps need to bedeveloped. This paper analyzes the growth of wireless communication in society, business andeducation, and describes how National University is meeting the need for increased applicationdevelopment skills in its engineering curricula. In 2004, National University initiated a uniqueMaster of Science in Wireless Communications (MSWC) program, in order to better preparewireless communications professionals. To date, many cohorts of students have graduated fromthe MSWC program and are now actively contributing to the field. In order to meet the degreerequirements, students of MSWC are required to complete a relevant research project that is thedeliverable product of the Capstone course. This paper i) investigates the outcomes
AC 2010-2389: COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION,RESEARCH AND TRAINING AT A HBCU - EXPERIENCES AND OUTCOMESRam Mohan, North Carolina A & T State UniversityAjit Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State UniversityNarayanaswamy Radhakrishnan, North Carolina A&T State University Page 15.301.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Computational Science and Engineering Education, Research and Training at a HBCU – Experiences and OutcomesAbstractComputational science and engineering (CSE) and high performance computing (HPC) havenow become an integral part of several engineering and science disciplines. Still the number ofstudents from
Engineering. Through scholarships and integrated industry supported workexperiences with on-campus research activities, SIIRE provides a pathway to a graduateengineering degree. This paper describes this innovative approach using company sponsoredwork experiences that aims to improve the way that students and faculty interact with industry.The experiences also intend to increase the likelihood that industry will better value engineerswith M.S. degrees. The SIIRE program advances the knowledge of how to integrate co-operative education with graduate research via the following elements: leveraged scholarshipsupport, a student cohort focused on engineering research initiatives, integrated one-on-onefaculty and industry joint mentoring, industry driven
development initiatives.In conducting our initial analysis the Mann-Whitney test has been used for gender relateddata, and Kruskal-Wallis was used in all other cases where we where we were comparingmore than two response categories. The goal was to identify trend in Mean Rank withina category. E.g. Student-centricity tends to be valued more highly as you move betweenemployment categories from Researcher, to PhD student, and then Lecturer to Professor.Gender differencesA gender based comparison of responses reveals a number of interesting results. Based onitem ITTF1, women are significantly more likely to value detailed course description thanmen (U = 24435.5, p < 0.05). ITTF1: I feel it is important that this subject should be completely
article by Crede and Borrego6 provided an initial exploration of mixed methods researchin engineering education through a content analysis. Their aim was to understand the types ofmixed methods articles being published in the field and to provide recommendations for futuremixed methods studies. The content analysis presented in this paper expands on the work ofCrede and Borrego6 by providing a more up to date and in depth analysis of the mixed methodsarticles published in engineering education journals and by providing a more in-depth analysis ofpurposes given for using mixed methods. Furthermore, this work extends the research conductedby Crede and Borrego6 by providing a strategy to evaluate mixed methods research articles thatcan be used by
challenges of such. The audience, particularly faculty new toundergraduate research, should obtain a well-seasoned perspective of the issues, including specificrecommendations, strategies, and pitfalls to avoid.Background:The author began establishing a research program shortly after commencing his academic careerin 1982 at Arkansas State University in a new, purely undergraduate Bachelor of Science inEngineering (BSE) program with professional concentrations in civil, electrical, and mechanicalengineering. This was at a university that historically had been strongly teaching-oriented, andhad no doctoral-level programs. Since he was initially the only electrical engineer on the faculty,initial teaching loads were 12-13 semester credit hours, usually
comfortable with engineering(98%). Furthermore, those that initially thought engineering could not improve everyday thingsfor people (44%) felt engineering could afterward (87%). While those that believed (pre) fixingthings was not something they were good at (38%) later felt it was something they could achieve(92%).IntroductionEngineering education has gained prominence in STEM education, with the integration ofengineering practices in the Next Generation Science Standards for K-12 education signifyingthe importance of engineering in pre-college education. Research suggests that integration ofengineering in STEM can improve students’ learning in science, mathematics, and technologicalliteracy as well as stimulate students’ interest in pursuing
faculty andgraduate student involvement in the commercialization of university-based research, oftenreferred to as “academic entrepreneurship.” This is driven by the desire of universities andgovernment entities to transform the huge investments being made in basic research, intoproducts and technologies that benefit society. To achieve this goal, institutions have becomemore proactive in working with engineering and science faculty to explore the commercialpotential of their innovations. Institutions are also delivering technology commercialization-related education and training, as well as building out entrepreneurial ecosystems, to cultivate thetalent and investment necessary to bring technologies to market.While these initiatives have raised
primary metric of the impact of thefaculty member, and frequent publication in highly cited journals is looked at most favorably.More broadly, the language used for assessing journals also promotes this view—the ImpactFactor suggests that relative citation levels are a good representation of impact.Defining impact as dissemination is a particularly researcher-focused approach; instead we callfor defining impact in terms of the contexts, populations, and change-initiatives associated withthe project goals. The institutional change literature is one prominent place that impacts oncontexts are discussed. In a review of three bodies of literature (STEM Education, HigherEducation, and Faculty Development literature), Henderson et al. [9] found that
have access to data collected on thepreviously implemented sessions. Moving forward, it will be important to collect this data sothat it can be used to evaluate the current approach and make future improvements.ConclusionThe plan to implement support for critical citation requirements for civil and environmentalengineering graduate research is still in its initial stages. Next steps include meeting with facultyin the CEE department to continue to develop this plan so that it can be rolled out as a pilot withgraduate students starting in fall 2023. Library support for critical citation practice will beessential for instruction and supporting students throughout their research process. As thesubject specialist for this department, I plan to
. As some scholars warn, fields that lack aninternational profile may not realize their full development potential, especially if isolatedresearchers are tackling similar problems and questions using rudimentary approaches.4It is therefore worth noting recent initiatives intended to both increase the field’s “globalcapacity” and encourage the formation of global networks of researchers. Perhaps most notably,in 2007 and 2008 JEE partnered with SEFI’s European Journal of Engineering Education(EJEE) on an initiative titled Advancing the Global Capacity for Engineering EducationResearch (AGCEER).5 At its core were ten AGCEER special sessions, held at engineeringeducation conferences in Hungary, Turkey, Hong Kong, Australia, the U.S., Denmark
similar book by Corti et al.[20] may also provide useful information, howeverit was more focused on United Kingdom based researchers and examples. Individual lecture schedule for the initial offering of the course is shown in Table 1. Theindividual lecture topics were divided into three areas: 1) broad concepts and best practices ofresearch data management, 2) outside experts to demonstrate specific areas of RDM, and 3) afocused application of RDM to active research projects. The Briney text provided the materialfor the lectures on broad concepts (with the chapter noted in parenthesis in Table 1).Approximately 10 lectures were based on the text. Additional lectures which completed thebroad concepts part of the course included RDM sharing
associatedopportunities, challenges, and risks associated with this growth are presented. Impacts andprogram significance will be presented in the form of data collected from over 60 programparticipants over the course of four years.literature reviewStudy abroad programs provide unique experiences in new and unfamiliar environments,improve cultural awareness, expanded worldview, and enhance critical thinking and globalcompetence. They offer an opportunity for students to gain diverse academic and life experiencesin and out of the academic environment as well as expand employment opportunities for futurecareers [1]. In addition to providing unique experiences, findings reported by the GeorgiaLearning Outcomes of Students Studying Abroad Research Initiative
Engaging Freshmen Women in Research – Feedback from Students and Best Practices for FacultyIntroductionIncreasing the participation of diverse populations in engineering and technology fields is achallenge for many universities. A significant means to address this issue is to increase theparticipation of women students. However, this can prove to be challenging. In a studyconducted by Marra and Bogue,1 it was found that although women engineering students enterthe university with high levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, those levels decline quicklyduring the first year. They also found through their research, that the initial levels were neverregained. One method to help retain diversity in engineering and technology
reminisce about them with the aid of instructor facilitation.Students also have the opportunity to explore multiple perspectives on various kinds of lifeevents by listening to other students’ stories, which is a form of joint reminiscence (Wang et al.,2017) among students and between students and instructors.Study Background Our research is part of a larger initiative that promotes story-driven learning (i.e., usingpersonal stories to drive student learning) as a novel pedagogical approach in biomedicalengineering education. This initiative seeks to improve undergraduate students’ entrepreneurialmindset. Through this research, we aimed to answer the following three research questions: (a)what pedagogical practices are identified when
own.KeywordsFaculty learning community, discovery learning, undergraduate research1. IntroductionIndustry expects students to conduct research, think abstractly, and work in teams. Incorporatingresearch into undergraduate classes can enhance student learning and performance in all thoseareas,15,16 but incorporating it bears two inherent challenges. Course content in most cases mustgive way to introducing or incorporating research. An even larger hurdle, faculty accustomed tocertain teaching methods and pedagogies have to change their approach and take the risk ofincorporating research into their classes. This paper presents an initial effort by an innovativeFaculty Learning Community during the 2015-2016 academic year to find the best ways toovercome the
2006-736: KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATERVEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATEEDUCATION AND TRAININGBrian Howell, Western Carolina University Dr. Howell is the Program Director for Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina UniversityStephen Wood, Florida Tech Dr. Wood is an Assistant Professor in Ocean Engineering at the Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Page 11.853.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATE
members.To achieve impact, early career engineering education faculty need to be involved in “takingstrategic and intentional actions or perspectives towards goals that matter to oneself,” [2, p. 50],[3]. In other words, they need to exercise agency. Impact in engineering education can occur in avariety of ways, whether through the design of innovative curricula, development of educationalpolicy initiatives, creation of supportive learning environments, translation of engineeringeducation research into practice, or conversations with students about difficult content and careerpaths. However, despite the progress made in the past, there are still many challenges toovercome, particularly if trying to create large-scale transformations [4].Accordingly