broader issues. Inaddition to a common living arrangement, scholars experience their first year engineeringcourses as a common cohort, attend a thematically linked weekly seminar, have a dedicatedscholars’ community advisor and engage in volunteer service and field trip venues that give thecommunity theme a broader context.Engineering programs are rigorous and demanding, from which it is difficult for all but the mostwell-adapted students to graduate in four years without the assistance of support structures.Scholars’ communities integrate this support into a very natural context (one’s livingarrangement) that makes it easy, natural and ‘socially acceptable’ for one to participate. Therelationships that are formed are not only functional, but
students actively solving theoretical or practicalproblems over an extended period of time by deepening their knowledge of the domain, hasbecome prevalent in engineering education in recent years.6 There is clear evidence that PBLprovides contextualized and authentic learning, which has been demonstrated to foster higherorder thinking while promoting acquisition of content-area knowledge. In order to evaluate theeffectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to PBL focused on students’ work with real-world problems, this study investigates the impact of two different PBL approaches(competitive or collaborative) on students’ learning motivation, creative thinking and projectperformance, including professional skills, communication skills, creative
engaged students prior knowledge of a number of technical areas as well as their professional skills of working on teams, time management, writing, and oral communication.2. The paper on the impact of the emissions regulations on society awakened students to the complexity of the effects of technology changes on society as well as the difficulty of making such assessments quantitative.3. The aspect of the course most commonly identified as valuable in the reflective essay was the intensive experience of working in a team to deliver five parts of a project during the semester. Nearly 75% of the class discussed teams in their essays.4. There was a clear message from a number of students that they wanted more of the class to be
students learning is affected by external factors, such as COVID-19 pandemic and community service. Before joining SJSU, she worked as a faculty member at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and at the University of Cincinnati. She earned her PhD at Georgia Tech in 2012 working on the monitoring and tracking of helicopter blade deformation. She earned a BS and MS from Politecnico di Milano (Italy) in 2004 and 2007 respectively, with majors in Aeronautical Engineering. She is an Amelia Earhart Fellow – Zonta International Foundation.Nataliya Grigoryan, San Jose State UniversityDr. Radha Aravamudhan, San Jose State University Radha Aravamudhan’s research interests include Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Community cultural
-University or College) for 2023 and the Fairfield University’s Jeffrey P. von Arx SJ Award for Excellence in Community Engagement 2023-24. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Empowering Electrical Engineers: Project-Based Learning for Environmental SustainabilityAbstractEnergy demand continues to rise annually. As we prepare electrical engineering students for theworkforce, the curriculum primarily emphasizes the design of reliable electrical and electronicsystems, power generation, and energy distribution, often placing less focus on theenvironmental impacts of energy consumption. To promote energy security, some schools offercourses on renewable energy resources and
GPA. In the follow-up interviews, the students consistently praised SITE for: Working in teams Working with students of different backgrounds Exposure to other fields Meeting faculty on a close basis Working on projects with real applications Integrating material learned in courses to solving complex problems Opportunity to think about careers in industry Good for the resume At this early stage in their educational careers, SITE represented one of the first times that many of these students were able to engage in and reflect upon these important aspects of STEM training. The following highlights some markers of positive impact on students: 22% of students
when individuals are required to make a series of decisions (Vohs et al., 2008). • The case should present increasing risk, and personal costs, as each decision point is reached and completed. • The case should be written in the first person, to create a near role-playing environment to engage students (Hunger, 2013; Alpay, 2011). This enhancement of the emotional engagement of the students studying the case should yield increased retention, as described in (Newberry, 2004). • The case should be undertaken by teams of two or more students, thus requiring discussion and deliberation, and introducing peer pressure influence on their decisions. • Case implementation should directly impact the students’ course
completed in 2013 andhas already been reported in detail.2“The results from multiple universities and multiple course offerings demonstrate that failurecase studies can be used to provide indirect, quantitative assessment of multiple student learningobjectives. Several outcomes that constitute the professional component of the curriculum maybe assessed in this way.The strongest results were for student outcomes (f) an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility, (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context, (i) a recognition of the needfor, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.Although
educational application of engineering principles and concepts throughreal-life, community and service based projects. These projects vary in scale and application, asthe community need will determine the scope and overall individual goals of each proposedproject. Service learning projects may also support an engineering department’s specific programoutcomes to satisfy ABET criterion 3. As an example, this department’s Program Outcome 9states that “students will demonstrate recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.” The department has devised four performance criteria to assess the achievementof Outcome 9. One performance criterion assesses the students’ engagement in activities thathelp educate the public about
are discussed in this paper.Component One: Presentations and DiscussionsWhen asked to respond to “Inauguration and Meeting Mentors (1/5/2012) contributed to mysense of community, engagement and encouragement (Or check if you did not attend____)”,seven students responded Strongly Agree and two students did not attend the event. Thisquestion was not explicitly related to Links to Engineering events, but both authors attended theevent and met with the students. The inauguration was attended by Deans and Faculty of CitrusCollege as well as outside mentors from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (peermentors) and the California State University, Fullerton (faculty).When asked to respond to “Open Forum with Dr. Harmonie Hawley (4/13
engineering industries. CPP WEpromotes a close community for female engineering students through proactive retentionactivities and seeks to create an environment in which women can thrive in the classroom andbeyond in their careers.Program’s Outcomes1. CPP WE will engage current students through K-12 outreach activities for young women to increase awareness of and exposure to multiple engineering programs and their great impact on society.2. CPP WE will provide a welcoming environment for prospective students to learn about the college of engineering and the women in engineering programs.3. CPP WE will retain and graduate current female students by fostering a supportive community and enriching their experiences within the college of
the K-12 classrooms, would have a significant impact on theengineering profession1, especially because it encourages secondary students to considertechnical careers. Although some may argue that it would be better to emphasize thefundamentals of math and science as college preparation for engineering rather than teachingengineering. There are counter arguments about career awareness and that both objectives can beaddressed by making sure that fundamental math and science is connected to the engineeringcourse. Engineering courses show how the subjects of mathematics and science arefundamentally helpful for students because they show the connection between the real worldsituations and science and mathematics. Unfortunately, few schools offer
student preferences. By integrating such technologies into thelearning ecosystem, educators can create a more adaptive, accessible, and effective educationalexperience, paving the way for innovation in teaching and learning practices.References[1] A. Smith and B. Jones, "Long video formats and student engagement," Journal of OnlineLearning, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 23–34, 2020.[2] J. Zhu, H. Yuan, Q. Zhang, et al., "The impact of short videos on student performance in anonline-flipped college engineering course," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,vol. 9, p. 327, 2022. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01355-6.[3] FFmpeg Developers, FFmpeg. [Online]. Available: https://ffmpeg.org/, 2021.[4] A. Radford, et al., "Robust speech recognition via large
limited, the FederalWork-Study Program can be used to engage students in meaningful learning experiences. Theactivities described in this paper involve little to no equipment and students can be easily trained.Also, the topic of pavement management is one which is relevant to almost every community. Assuch, the educational tool could serve as a model which could easily be implemented in otherschools. Students who have participated in the program have indicated that it was very beneficialin increasing their engineering professionalism.Bibliography 1. Parkinson, Gerald. Hands on learning Chemical Engineering (New York). v. 101 no. 10 (Oct) 2. Kerr, Arnold D.; Pipes, R. Byron. WHY WE NEED HANDS-ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION. Technol Rev. v
demographics of the targetstudent population. 2The design of the supplemental program is based on the high-impact educational pedagogies andstudent engagement strategies outlined in the literature surrounding first-year initiatives [11],[12]. It draws on the knowledge that students who are more engaged and supported are morelikely to realize academic, professional, and personal development goals and ultimately persist tograduation. The primary theoretical models and principles used in the AcES program design arepresented in the following sections.Institutional InclusionConsidering prior experiences, commitments, and personal characteristics, a student’s
necessary part of their emergingworld. This emerging world for engineering students requires them to grasp the role ofleadership in the formation of engineering and its role in society currently and historically. Itserves as an expansion of the engineering student’s awareness of self and awareness as studentsare called on to interact with these leaders by understanding the principles and values of theengineering discipline.Exploration/Engagement. As students progress in their curricular pursuits and in establishingtheir personal roles in the class, the university and the community, they began to experiencethemselves interacting with their peers. They are placed into a context where seekingopportunities to explore their numerous interests is
respondents indicated that the lack of scholarships impacted their decision not to attend the university. Scholarships were the number one factor in the decision for 26% of respondents. A previous study of the same type conducted for the Fall 2003 semester showed very similar results with 55% of respondents indicating scholarships impacted their decision and 36% indicating scholarships or cost of tuition was the top reason for non-attendance. Many students that cannot afford to attend a four-year university for their entire education often start out at a community college. During their two years at community college, the aim is to get their “basics” out of the way, meaning calculus courses, physics
diversity. Located 30 miles east of Los Angeles, CA, CPP offersan affordable education in a vibrant and diverse community. CPP’s student enrollment in Fall 2024was approximately 53% Hispanic, 22% Asian, 3% African American, 14% White, with the balancecomposed of other ethnic minorities. Additionally, 46% of the students are female, 57% are first-generation college students, and approximately 40% of the total undergraduate population aretransfer students. CPP’s educational philosophy is “become-by-doing,” engaging students inhands-on research, scholarship, and creative activities. CPP has a high percentage of STEM majorsat 41%. CPP ranks highly as a top performer in upward social mobility, ranking at #3 (US News,2025) in the West, propelling low
a number of institutions to design summerprograms that engage students with academic content and build connections to the social settingof the university.Research on the design and efficacy of summer programs is sparse, and many such programs arefocused on improving students’ first mathematics course placement.8, 9 In this paper, we describefindings from our research on the effectiveness of a course (offered as part of a summer bridgeprogram) that was designed to improve engineering students’ success rate in their first semestermathematics course. Unlike other summer mathematics course offerings, we did not seekprimarily to remediate the weaknesses of students’ mathematical preparation that haveaccumulated over their K-12 schooling. Rather
humankindthrough literacy, which encompasses communication and critical thinking (Anderson-Inman2009).Educational research suggests that high-impact educational practices (HIP) augment studentengagement and retention. Such practices include studies of diversity and culture enhanced byexperiential learning and study abroad. These activities help students explore differentworldviews and cultures (Kuh 2008). The inclusion of a study abroad component was planned tonot only help students to become interculturally competent, as advocated in the literature (Akli2013), but also to enhance active learning, helping students to engage in such higher-orderthinking tasks as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation (Bonwell and Eison 1991).With the vision of STEAM in mind
more confident in professional communication, especially as I chose to be a group leader for this project, which is what I normally would avoid, as I tend to get anxious over organizing larger projects. This was a chance to get comfortable with professional emails, organizing meetings, and overall being the talkative one in group meetings.” - R.H. “This project not only challenged me but also showed the impact that thoughtful service can have on both personal and community levels.” - M.V.As this was the fourth year of the course offerings, we have integrated lessons learned over timefrom the students’ experiences and refined the courses to better provide active engagement withcontent, solutions-oriented
and asynchronous environments). These collaboration tools encourage criticalthinking and provoke thought among students, encourage learning from others and produce self-reflection, and help foster a sense of community and engagement among peers.Beachboard incorporates and integrates tools for the assessments such as Quizzes, Surveys,Dropbox, Rubrics which allow instructors to evaluate the course, check for understanding andhelp set expectations. It also provides many features for preserving academic integrity such asdisabling right click, timing the exam and automatically shutting down when it is over,randomizing answer choices and test questions, displaying questions one at a time, providingTurnitin anti-plagiarism feature, providing
Meeting Schools Where They Are: Integrating Engineering OutreachCurriculum in the Classroom Without Forcing an AgendaAustin HayesAustin is a PhD student in additive manufacturing and wind energy. He is a co-founder of the Triple EInitiative and began the collaboration with STEM Launch for the Triple E Initiative. He overseesvolunteer coordination, partnership with the middle schools, and logistics of the Triple E Initiative. Hehas experience meshing classroom learning with hands-on lesson plans to engage K-12 students inSTEAM.Vani SundaramVani is a PhD student in robotics at CU Boulder. She is a cofounder of the Center for Equity inMechanical Engineering action subcommittee. She oversees outreach events, communicates withpartnering schools
the late 1980’s through early 1990’s. Many of the programs he instituted via external funding are still part of that office. He was the co-PI on the successful, long-term Operation Chemistry literacy program for all levels of teachers, and parlayed that national program into grant-funded summer and year-round workshops in Wisconsin, Nebraska, and North Carolina over a 15- year period. During his 7-year tenure at Northern Illinois University (NIU), Kelter worked extensively with middle school teachers in high-Latino population communities in the service of science education. He has been at the forefront of science literacy for postsecondary students via three major chemistry textbooks, aimed at the first-year
nanotechnology.The UW IPSE program is a National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded collaboration betweenthe UW Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) on NanostructuredMaterials and Interfaces and The James Lovell Museum of Science, Technology, and Economicsin Milwaukee, also known as Discovery World (DW), the largest science center in Wisconsin.UW IPSE’s collaboration between a research university and a science center is an innovativeprogram that draws on the strengths of each partner to bring cutting-edge science to the public.In the process, the UW IPSE interns receive technical training and engage in an iterative projectdevelopment process as they gain experience in communicating science, and students and thegeneral public gain a better
enjoys re-imagining higher education with others, then making it happen. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Presence, Participation, and Pedagogy: Revisiting Face-to-Face Learning in Engineering Programs (Work-in-Progress)IntroductionExploring students' and faculty members’ views on the significance and role of face-to-facelearning environments is important for adopting teaching methodologies to today's diverseeducational needs. While the transition to online learning offered flexible and accessible methodsof learning, it also generated concerns about decreased engagement, community feel andbelonging that is naturally fostered in face-to-face learning environments [1]. A broad range
, political, and economic context of Peru; (ii) develop an understanding and a framework for how to think outside of one’s own cultural context; and (iii) learn cross-cultural communication skills to prepare for effective collaborations with international student counterparts. Evaluation: Class sessions will be collaborative and experiential with a focus on conversation and engaged critical thinking. Students can expect to be challenged to “unlink” themselves from their own culture in a variety of ways. Daily Reflections: 50% of grade, Final Oral Presentation: 50% grade3.3 Module 2 (Weeks 2 and 3): Using Sensors to Collect Environmental Data Summary: The module applies the UN SDGs to specific needs and
inclusive human-centered pathway to engineeringAbstractThis work in progress paper shares our efforts to create an alternative and inclusive pathway intothe engineering major at the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, that integratesand teaches concurrently foundational mathematics and human-centered engineering.Despite stark warnings issued over 20 years ago, a recent study revealed that engineering schoolscontinue to “weed out” students, especially those weighed down by negative stereotypes. Ratherthan fostering excitement in students and engaging them in actual practices of the discipline,faculty and courses feature scope creep, passive presentations, grading on the curve, exaggeratedlevels of abstraction
imagined use scenarios. Share designs with users and implement imagined use scenarios. Receive feedback from both users and peers. Share the ideas for improvement. Reflect: Refine your design. Recognize what you learned from others. Revise the designs based on feedback. Reflect on the lessons students learned from users and peers, the impacts of their designs, and their contributions to the solutions. DESIGN BRIEF Goal: Design a piece of playground equipment for community people by understanding various users’ needs and values. Criteria: Adaptability: Consider a group of
primary aim of WSU’s summer bridge program is to attract futurehigh school age students from our local area, to help them and their families become familiarwith our campus, and to help them to gain confidence in their ability to succeed in a college 5setting. We plan to recruit high school students from our local community, working to targetprospective first-generation students, students from economically disadvantaged families, andacademically underprepared students. The program will consist of the students taking college-level classes on campus at an accelerated pace (7 weeks). Classes have been carefully selectedthat will either prepare students