using a computer andcommunication infrastructure. Remote labs offer students a convenient opportunity to accessequipment 24 hours a day, seven days a week without geographic proximity restrictions. Thisapproach also promotes collaborations among peers and offers improved accessibility to studentswith disabilities [7]. Unlimited access to resources in the remote laboratory context could havefar reaching consequences for education and can present a paradigm that promotes student-centric environments and autonomy that contributes to motivation [8]. The benefit of remote 2experimentation is not limited to higher education but can extend to industry
Paper ID #32549Systems Thinking Assessments: Approaches That Examine Engagement inSystems ThinkingMs. Kelley E. Dugan, University of Michigan Kelley Dugan is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University. Before pursuing her Ph.D., Kelley worked in the consumer appliance industry for two years. Her current work focuses on the development and assessment of systems thinking skills. Research interests also include front-end design practices, socially engaged design, and sustainable design.Dr. Erika A
Paper ID #33175Negotiating Belongingness: A Longitudinal Narrative Inquiry of a LatinaFirst-generation College Student’s Experience in the Engineering CultureDr. Dina Verd´ın, Arizona State University Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education Systems and Design in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial En- gineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Her research broadly focuses on broadening participation in engineering by
and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. She has a Master’s Degree in Power System and is also working as an Assistant Professor and Department Chair in the Electronics Technology at Lake Washington Institute of Technology, Kirkland.Ms. Shruti Misra, University of Washington Shruti is a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. She is interested in the various ways that universities and industry come together and participate in driving technological innovation at the regional and global level. American
University, College Station. She completed her Bachelors in Electrical Engineering with a Minor in Mathematics from Mississippi State University.Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hillary E. Merzdorf is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests are in assessment of design skills, educational technology evaluation, and the ethical use of student data in and for assessment.Dr. Blake Williford, Sketch Recognition Lab Blake received a PhD in Computer Science at Texas A&M University. He previously received a M.S. in Human-Computer Interaction and a B.S. in Industrial Design from Georgia Tech, and has worked professionally as an interdisciplinary
is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineer- ing at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial Engineering and PhD in En- gineering Education. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research in- terest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first- generation college students
Paper ID #240602018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Exploring the Experiences of First-Generation Student Veterans in Engineer-ingDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army
Paper ID #242182018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Understanding How Engineering Identity and Belongingness Predict Grit forFirst-Generation College StudentsDina Verd´ın, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship. Her
students, she told us how when they are watching amovie, she poses, instead, the following choice to herself: “when they’re like watching amovie I’m like, ‘Uh sleep or homework?’” Sleep or the lack thereof is a repeated themein students’ reported experiences. Having to give up a good proportion of a regularnight’s sleep on a routine basis is regarded as a necessary component of being anengineering student. Amelia, second-year student at Oliver described her nighttimeschedule in this way and in the process made an illuminating comparison with working asan engineer in industry, which she regarded as decidedly less difficult than engineeringeducation. This is an important idea that other students did not articulate as directly asAmelia, but we infer
TARDEC.Todd French, Mississippi State University Dr. Todd French is an assistant professor in the Dave C. Swlam School of Chemical Engineering. Dr. French received a B.S. from the University of Louisiana Monroe in microbiology. He completed an M.S. at Mississippi State University while working at US Corp of Engineer’s Engineering Research and Development Center located at Vicksburg MS. Following the completion of his Ph.D., Dr. French was hired into the School of Chemical Engineering to collaborate on biofuels research efforts. Converting lignocellulosic sugars into microbial fats is the main focus of his research activities. Dr. French to date has been responsible for teaching Freshman Seminar
pressure for educators to take a serious look at curricula,especially in the areas of mathematics and science, selected to support local, district, state, andnational learning priorities. Creating and implementing both rigorous and relevant mathematicsand science curricula is also necessary to support U. S. business and industry in meetingemployment and training needs for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)careers (NSF22, 2004).Despite the standards based movement to improve science and mathematics curricula in schools,the nation continues to lag behind others. The 1999 Trends in International Mathematics andScience Study looked at the ways that mathematics and science instruction differs among sevencountries. High-performing
senior students to work in an industrial setting [32]. Students are expectedto work in a group to develop a working-testable solution for a real world problem provided bythe stakeholder (e.g., industries or individual clients) [30]. Consequently, aside from theirengineering design skills, students must also learn and develop managerial and communicationskills. Working in a team is more than the delegation of tasks. It is about balancing power andresponsibilities among the team members to accomplish the design goals [33].Self-Regulated Learning Getting engaged in a design project is not simple and straightforward. It requires thedesigner to self-direct his or her design, communication, and management skills in an iterativemanner to attain
State University in Organizational Performance and Workplace Learning. She earned her doctoral degree in Educational Studies from the University of Cincinnati. Her current work and research focuses on pedagogical and curricular reform in higher ed- ucation with special attention to increasing the success of underrepresented students in STEM.Ms. Ann E. Delaney, Boise State University Ann Delaney graduated in 2016 with her Masters in Materials Science & Engineering with an interdisci- plinary emphasis in Public Policy and Administration from Boise State University. Her thesis was entitled, ”Nanomanufacturing Outside of the Lab: An Academic-Industry Partnership Case Study.” She also re- ceived her B.S. in
tools in scientific and industrial research was proven beyond doubt when itspredictions matched behaviour of physical models in high-stake cases (e.g., safety of cars andplanes, emissions from engines, and approaching storms). Its use was uniquely justified whena study was impossible to do experimentally because of its size (too big such as the universeor too small such as subatomic systems), environmental conditions (too hot or dangerous) orcost. Science and engineering done computationally eventually demonstrated to be generatinginsight, just like experimental and theoretical research and this ultimately led to therecognition of computation as a third pillar of doing research.28In practice, the scientific method has often been taught as a one
with dynamic processes where the students learnhow to strive for minimum variance with a computer-based advanced control strategy,which in chemical engineering, goes by the name constrained model predictive control(CMPC). Developed in the late seventies in industry, CMPC remains the state of art in theprocess industries till today. Now, static processes in life and commerce vastly outnumberdynamic processes, perhaps by as much as 9:1 and, therefore, it is essential to teachengineering students, in fact, all students the wherewithal of how to achieve the bestpossible performance of static processes.Fundamental, mechanistic approaches to problem-solving should always be preferred but,when sufficiently detailed knowledge of the process or
Americanindustrial or research agendas—all in the name of progress. For example, the current model forengineering education stems from the national agenda to win the Cold War [12] whilemaintaining domestic comfort by protecting “private production and consumption” through thecreation of a new type of engineering industry, the “defense contractor.” Moreover, Downeyconvincingly explains how the dominant theme of “low cost, mass use” has governedinterpretations of success in American society and in the production of engineers, as the middle-class model for self-realization via consumption requires a significant output of standardizedengineering graduates as products to sustain the “American way of life.” Thus, our currentmeasure of the success of an
A&M University Delivering significant results in pivotal roles such as Sr. Consultant to high-profile clients, Sr. Project Manager directing teams, and Executive Leader of initiatives and programs that boost organizational effectiveness and optimize operations have been hallmarks of Dr. Wickliff’s career spanning more than 24 years with leaders in the oil & gas and semiconductor industries. As an expert in the areas of Executive Leadership and Team Development, Strategy Design & Execution, Supply Chain Optimization, Change Management, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of
primary goal inviting students to explore their own cultural practices.The course was designed as an interactive, three-credit-hour interactive lecture format. Thesyllabus had 15 weekly units, outlined here in brief. Units 1-3 offered a brief history of the world through about 1600, grounded in Jared Diamond’s (1999) thesis on the rise of agriculture. Units 4 and 5 introduced the themes of comparative religion and cultural conventions. Units 6-8, the second historical segment, included the Industrial Revolution, 19th-century imperialism, and post-colonial nationalism. The previous historical and cultural units laid the groundwork for Units 9-14, five weeks on economics, 20th-century politics, the
earned distinction as Dr. Bruce D. Nesbitt Campus-Community Collaborator Awardee in 2016. Rick is also a co-founder of St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented 4th and 5th-grade boys to hands-on, inquiry-based STEM activities. SEBA accomplishes its goals through an innovative educational curriculum and by engaging students’ fathers and/or male mentors who learn STEM alongside them. This project has been recognized and funded by local organizations, the University of Illinois and most recently, the National Science Foundation. Currently, Rick is the Program Manager for St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of
of graduate students brought together by the National Science Foundation(NSF)-funded Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program“Global Traineeship in Sustainable Electronics.” During its tenure, three cohorts comprised ofstudents from Purdue University and Tuskegee University participated in the program. Anintegral part of this two-year traineeship was an international trip to India. This visit wasdesigned to promote several of the program’s objectives: 1) developing systems thinking andinterdisciplinary collaboration relative to sustainability and global supply chains, 2) encouragingleadership in cross-cultural teams, and 3) help students recognize barriers while building bridges.The CIA was initially introduced
entrepreneur, she served as Associate Dean for Thayer School of En- gineering at Dartmouth, where she co-founded the campus-wide Women in Science Project in 1990. She founded and served as chief executive of MentorNet, a large-scale online nonprofit global mentoring network advancing diversity in engineering and science (1996-2008). At Stanford, she was consulting as- sociate professor of mechanical engineering between 1998 and 2002, collaborating with faculty and staff to create ”New Century Scholars: Teaching, Learning, and Your Academic Career,” a summer workshop designed for new engineering faculty members. A Fellow of the Association for Women in Science, Dr. Muller and her work have been recognized with other national
. Next, the faculty meetings and model were used to guide the focus group questions. Atotal of 3 focus groups were conducted, 1 for each program being analyzed. Between 3-5people participated in each group. To get the depth of employability skills, students who hadparticipated in the co-op program were mixed with students who had done an unofficialinternship. The cut off was that the field of work had to directly relate to their discipline (ie.no general or part time positions were considered like retail, food industry, etc). Prior to theinterview, students were asked about their experience and the researcher made the finaldecision. During the interview, the students were asked questions about their experience ofcertain employability
Studies: Early UnderstandingsIdentity study developed primarily since the Industrial Revolution, with principal contributionsfrom theorists in the fields of sociology, psychology, anthropology, and education. In 1902,sociologist Charles Horton Cooley introduced the idea of the “looking glass self,” in whichindividuals’ self-concept is developed through an interpretation of interactions with others: “inimagination we perceive in another’s mind some thought of our appearance, manners, aims,deeds, character, friends, and so on, and are variously affected by it” [14]. Our ideas about howwe appear to others, and our interpersonal reactions, form our identity. Cooley discussed threemain components to the looking-glass self: our conceptualization of our
Paper ID #27378How Writing for the Public Provides Affordances and Constraints in Enact-ing Expert Identity for Undergraduate Engineering StudentsMathew D. Evans, Arizona State University Mathew D Evans is currently a doctoral candidate at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State UniversityDr. Michelle Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Uni- versity. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelle’s program of research focuses on social interactions in collaborative
industry. His primary interests lie in materials en- gineering, mechanics, and engineering technology education. He is also an experienced contra dance caller.Dr. Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut, her M.S. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and her B.S.M.E. at Western New England University. She has held c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15012 engineering positions
based on the need of the program constituencies. The current PEOs for the MEprogram at UTSA states that the within a few years after graduation, the graduates will: (1) haveengineering careers in industry, government, and/or will pursue advanced graduate orprofessional degrees, (2) apply their engineering skills to their careers, (3) continue to advancetheir knowledge, communication and leadership skills by using technology, continuingeducation, solving problems, and serving in technical or professional societies, and (4) applytheir understanding of societal, environmental, and ethical issues to their professional activities.These PEOs are consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs.ABET EAC used to require
described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu
Paper ID #14013A program to develop resiliency, self-confidence, intrinsic motivation, and asense of purpose in young adultsDr. Sergio William Sedas, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Dr. Sergio Sedas is a professor at the Mechatronics Department at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. He is former head of the Mechatronics undergraduate program and founder of multiple hi-tech companies. For over 25 years he has developed innovative industrial robotic and vision systems for Fortune 100 and Fortune 500 companies. Interested in innovating education, in 2010 he began to research the human brain and human behavior to determine how to improve
responses to thisassignment identify a number of strategies from the course that improved their work inengineering courses and engineering design challenges. Interviews with a number of theseparticipants highlight the value of adapting and applying skills in alternative settings tounderstand their value within an engineering context.Arguments for a liberal education for engineers identify a number of positive outcomesstemming from required courses in the Humanities and Social Sciences: through immersion inthe liberal arts students become more culturally aware, are capable of inter- and cross-disciplinary collaboration, have stronger communication skills, and are capable of learningoutside of their discipline even after leaving the academic
used in industry may make them more valuable to students.” [Arizona State University FG10] 7 Other educators also used alternative names for the activity and added that disguising the reflection activity can help as an entrée into getting students to actively engage in reflection at the beginning of the course, but they emphasized the importance of discussing the reflection later in the class so the students understand what it means and how to use it in the future [RoseHulman Institute of Technology FG01]. Be clear/explicit about the purpose of reflection. Educators highlighted the importance of discussing the reasons and rationale for