NOEL KRIFTCHER is Executive Director of the Packard Center for Technology and Educational Alliances at Polytechnic University, where he also holds an appointment as Industry Professor of Humanities. At the Packard Center, he coordinates an extensive array of faculty© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 development services, directs a consortium of colleges known as the Knowledge Workers Educational Alliance, and organizes varied hands-on scientific experiences and competitions for students in middle and high schools. He works closely with NSF-funded projects to connect them with the pre-college community and has won grants from the U.S. Dept. of Education, the NY
-presence boundaries were observed after the overseas trip. It wasobvious that living together for 9 days and the common experience had erased the boundariesand barriers of communications, at least at the personal level. A clear evidence of the newly-developed bonding was the high-level of interaction between students during class-breaks inwhich several in-class LAI students engaged in chats (both text-based and audio-visual) withtheir classmates from other universities. Another evidence was the high level of participation atthe end-of-semester celebration for the class that was held at LAI. All but one of the remotely-participating students attended. The absence was due to conflict with final exams.The main challenge brought about by the diverse
Paper ID #26638Using Reflection to Facilitate Writing Knowledge Transfer in Upper-LevelMaterials Science CoursesDr. Jennifer C. Mallette, Boise State University An Assistant Professor of English at Boise State University, Dr. Jenn Mallette teaches technical com- munication at the undergraduate and graduate level. In addition to working with STEM students in her undergraduate technical communication course, she collaborates with faculty in the College of Engineer- ing to focus on enhancing writing education in engineering courses. Her other research focuses on women engineering, and she has recently published the results of a
– particularly forstudents from historically marginalized communities. Unfortunately, due to the origins of theselearning experiences being textbooks, they often still look like text-heavy ebooks instead ofevidence-based, interactive learning experiences.This paper uses data from a computing education platform used in dozens of US universities andthousands of students to explore the relationship between how much time students spend readingcompared to the amount of text in the reading assignment. Specifically, we do multipleregression analyses to understand how independent variables including word count, assessments,and whether students engaged with code, affect dependent variables such as assignment gradeand how student’s time was spent.We find that
, analyzing, andpresenting a case study that demonstrates ethical leadership; and 2) creating a code of conductfor a research group or a project team. The code of conduct assignment requires students toanalyze organizational context and to develop micro-policy that promotes an ethical culture.Therefore, this assignment also assesses student outcome 2.1, for it demonstrates students’ability to impact group culture. Finally, student outcome 2.2 is assessed through pre- and post-survey using the ethical leadership questionnaire (Langlois, et al., 2014) as well as a reflectionpaper completed by students at the end of the semester. As we suggest in the literature review,most published instruments for measuring EL are based on report from employees led by
well as make significant contributions to society. Problem solving and criticalthinking skills are the foundation of engineering. These require not only technical (content)skills, but also fluency in engaging with a variety of information. Consequently, students who arecomfortable with engaging multiple representations of information are likely also more robustproblem solvers and critical thinkers.We are engaged in a multi-phase investigation to study whether exposure to diverserepresentations results in statistically significant differences in student problem solving, criticalthinking, or communication skills. To accomplish this, it is useful for educators to be able toidentify and track the representations used in their individual classes
University Engineering1, we aim to provide students with broad based Requirements(15)Requirementsengineering fundamentals and problem solving skills, (75 quarter (69 quarterhands-on application of appropriate and sustainable credits) credits)technology, the ability to effectively engage with theglobal community, and avenues for character formation. GE-ASESome of these outcomes are addressed in specific courses Concentrationand others are addressed throughout the curriculum. The Degreecurriculum is also designed according to the ABET Requirementscriterion3 for engineering curriculum includinga) one year of a
. (ABET, 2024) Part IISignature Course [...] Technology and Society• A signature course for all School of [...] Students.• Required in the first year.• Examines technological change and its impact on human needs and concerns.• Ethical and societal dilemmas framing technological change are emphasized.• Upon completion, students can critically evaluate the implications of technology on society. [...] Technology and Society [Embed course video][Present live walk-through of course in Canvas] Part IIIProfessional Development Professional DevelopmentInstructor and Subject Matter Expert Training Trainings and ResourcesMandatory PD All Staff• Inclusion at
Machine Design. Page 26.1102.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Machine Design: RedesignedAbstractMachine design is a cornerstone foundation course in any Mechanical Engineering program. Thetraditional objective of this course is to engage students with analysis techniques to guard againstspecific failure modes or to predict a product’s life cycle based on a loading scenario. Generally,the course is taught by introduction of a topic first, e.g. static failure criteria, then examples arepresented and homework sets are assigned to allow students to practice
: Plan of Action: Collected Data:Participatory action research (PAR) is a research methodology inwhich individuals impacted by a particular issue engage actively Our action plan investigated whether system change is possible? Wewith researchers throughout the research process. This assembled a diverse and engaged team representing eight countries, We examined national education datasets relevant to engineering and computercollaborative approach seeks not only to deepen understanding ten first languages, and thirteen home universities.of the problem but also to facilitate collective efforts to drive
shared space/time among the courses, (meetingjointly, in groups and/or meeting electronically) in which students are engaged in collaborativeprojects with defined learning outcomes that have been developed by faculty from the identifieddisciplinary areas. In essence, two courses sharing an ILB will cover the same topics, butapproach the material from different perspectives. In our case, the students will be assessingethical considerations in the context of their specific design project, while studying closelyrelated topics in the “Ethics and the Professions” course. The ILB concept was recentlyintroduced at the University of Hartford, at the freshman level2.One of the major problems with implementing a design course is selecting a set of
dialogue. The course wasoriginally designed to have scientific content that would be accessible to non-engineers butinterest engineering students. The course consisted of lectures on the basic physics of work andpower, energy sources, and alternative energy technologies. In addition, there were 5 visits toalternative energy companies in Brazil. The course aimed to cover alternative energy systemsand their impact the environment. It emphasized how energy resources and analyzed growth,distribution, environmental and socio-economic issues of these technologies in the US andBrazil. The course aimed to explain relevant alternative energy technologies in an interactiveenvironment, where students engaged in the field visiting companies and examined its
faculty assess the performance of the Department based on this material. Any changes implemented are tracked to determine their impacts (positive, negative, or neutral). A summary of these annual assessments is contained in the section Reflection on and Evaluation of Content.Each faculty member is required to review and evaluate the student materials contained in eachoutcome portfolio at the end of each semester (Table 2). The need to provide comments inaddition to ratings is crucial to the assessment process. The Department then holds a facultymeeting each semester to discuss the results, including the impacts of any changes implementedas a result of the assessment process. The meeting minutes will serve as the reflective
theme varying based on agegroups. The workshops engage students by using engineering concepts that are relatable tostudents’ everyday lives.3 In another part of the state, students from Colorado School of Mines have teamed up withresearchers at IBM to visit middle schools in the Denver area. This engineering outreach effort isknown as “Engineering Your Future.” This outreach effort brings several engineering studentsand a faculty member into local 7th and 8th grade classrooms each month throughout the schoolyear to teach fifty-minute sessions. Local schools were chosen based upon poor performance onstate tests in science. All of the schools were low income with a high minority studentpopulation.4 The goal of the monthly visits is
-technology interaction (HTI) theory.SFSU is a primarily undergraduate institution (PUI) and Hispanic serving institute (HSI) servingthe diverse community of the San Francisco Bay Area. Engineering is one of the fastest growingmajors at SFSU; however, in the past few years, only 29% of Hispanic engineering studentsgraduated in six years (average time to Bachelor’s degree at SFSU) [6] and only 14% ofengineering students secured employment before graduation. Civil Engineering (CE) is anengineering discipline with a broad basis that works on large pieces of infrastructure (e.g.pipelines, buildings, bridges) with few opportunities for hands-on engagement. In SFSU’sComputer Science (CS) department, underrepresented minority (URM) students have
empirical studyconducted in EE440, a pilot electrical engineering course that was revised to employ CPBL, toanalyze the pedagogical impact of CPBL and develop a better understanding of the learningcharacteristics of minority students. The first stage work was conducted in year 2013 to 2014,and the findings were reported in our previous ASEE publication [9]. The second stage of Page 26.479.2research is to leverage the findings from stage one study to enhance the design of theinstructional system that incorporates CPBL in order to produce a more engaging learningexperience and increase student success.This paper presents the progress and findings of
(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.While outcome (c) is the one that explicitly addresses design, the value of the course in terms ofboth student and programmatic assessment reaches far wider. Design courses typically offer a“capstone” experience in which students integrate concepts
, universities, and commu- nity organizations to use evaluation to both ”prove” and ”improve” their programs. Her research and capacity-building efforts attend to both outcomes and systemic change. To that end Cathy has conducted evaluations of campus-based change initiatives including conducting a national evaluation of institutional support for civic engagement, developing indicators associated with student success, helping to set up the Corporation for National and Community Service Learn and Serve America LASSIE national data collec- tion system, and conducting multi-site evaluations on campus-wide change initiatives. Cathy recently was co-Principal Investigator of the evaluation of the Campus Compact Connect to Complete
learning environments. One approach thatresonates with students is gamification in education, which applies game-like elements to routinetasks [1, 2]. Game-based learning provides an interactive and engaging method for students toexplore topics that might otherwise seem mundane. By leveraging gamification, faculty canspark interest and motivate students to solve problems, acquire knowledge, and develop bothtechnical and social skills through gameplay [3-5]. Research by Subhash and Cudney highlightsthe benefits of this approach, including improved academic performance and increased studentparticipation [5]. Integrating game-based strategies enables faculty to create more impactful andmeaningful learning experiences for college students.The term
socialinnovation along with the social entrepreneur. Figures 2(b) and (c) highlight the evaluation metric foreach social innovation case study. Each week, students researched the assigned case study to highlightimportant aspects of social innovation and its implementation. Each student analyzed the case studybased on their ongoing research area(s) through the lens of key parameters (e.g., science andengineering approach, impact on the community, and others), from the rubric for their 15-20 minutesweekly presentation and discussions. Through their research, varied academic backgrounds, andexperiences, a diverse set of viewpoints were presented each week along with interactive discussionamong the cohort. Consistent with the course title, each week’s
student’s academic development. Since designcannot be taught in one course, this activity should help students develop even more this abilityand be better prepared to tackle other major engineering design experiences. In regards to theEngineering Criteria 200013, the contest addresses more specifically (a) an ability to applyknowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) thebroad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context, (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues, and (k) an ability to use the techniques,skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
and community development. Dedicated to promoted social justice and peace in the engineering profession. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Work In Progress: The Sky’s the Limit: Drones for Social GoodAbstractA full semester course, with a focus on engineering design to promote social good, wasdeveloped for second-year engineering students. The course, The Sky’s the Limit: Drones forSocial Good, engages students with drone technology as well as the awareness of the needs,challenges, and resources of diverse communities and how drones can serve these communities.Humanities, ethics, and human centered design are explored in the context of engineering, andinterwoven throughout the semester. The
edbaker@ecs.umass.edu Model Wind Turbine Students Testing their Wind Turbines Abstract-Many issues surround the global energy crisis, attending college and studying within the STEM fields, and toincluding climate change and peak oil. One crucial issue that is improve the skill sets needed to pursue any major in college.often overlooked is awareness about energy issues and thesustainable and renewable technologies being implemented andresearched to solve them. Spreading awareness among youth is a More specifically, the objectives of the curriculum are toway to engage the next generation in such topics, build their improve communication through writing
,Engineering and Mathematics grant1, Kansas State’s Enhancing Lives through Technology andEngineering (ELITE) scholarship program will help ensure the increase of associate andbaccalaureate degrees among the academically talented but financially needy students of Kansas.Our proposal fosters a mechanism that will enable qualifying students to secure an EngineeringTechnology degree from K-State at Salina. By building on current partnerships with highschools and enhancing those with community colleges, the ELITE program will provide a bridgeinviting interested students from around the state to submit their applications to become anELITE scholar. Thus, ELITE scholars will comprise freshmen, transfer or current K-Statestudents.This presentation will
nature of the ITEST program is demonstrated in both the technologies used withinprojects, as well as in the approaches these projects employ. Project descriptions for ITESTprojects can be viewed on the STELAR website, but the objectives listed below offer examples ofprojects’ focus: • engaging youth with age-appropriate, technology-rich STEM learning experiences fundamental to the engineering process; • developing and studying community-connected, integrated science and engineering curriculum units that leverage mobile maker space and digital notebook technologies to support diverse elementary students' science and engineering ideas, practices, and attitudes; • engaging in collaborative design, implementation
, impact student engineering team collaboration processes and learningoutcomes. A quasi-experimental field study of partially-distributed teams composed ofundergraduate and graduate engineering students at Texas Tech University and California StateUniversity, Northridge.The authors expect the distance and the frequency of communication to be major factors thatcould impact student learning outcomes when the students are working on projects whichinvolve virtual teams.Although this research is focused on engineering students, it is expected to have broad industryimpacts as well, as industry projects also often use partially-distributed or even fully-distributedteams. Thus the research project will provide better “real world” training for both
that have serious impact on studentperformance in a challenging course such as Fluid Mechanics. There is a wide diversity amongstudent body, including traditional students, students in different age groups with a large groupof students returning to school after a long break period, full-time workers, active militarystudents, veterans, students of underrepresented groups, and transfer students from communitycolleges. This diversity creates a non-coherent group of students in the class, with different studyhabits, background levels and needs that adds to the difficulty of the subject, and makes theteaching of the class very demanding. Another impediment is that the Engineering Technologymajor math requirements are significantly lower compared to
science to coordinating learning communities addressing mathematics curriculum as a persistent barrier impacting student success and retention in undergraduate STEM pro- grams. She is currently OI on a NSF DR K-12, Co-PI on a USDOE Title III Hispanic Serving Institution, internal evaluator on FAU’s NSF Advance early phase grant, and a member of the Advisory Board on the NSF STEM+C in Broward Schools and the NSF MSP at the University of Toledo.Dr. Ali Zilouchian, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Ali Zilouchian is currently the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University. He is also currently the Director of ”CAPTURE” program which
them, and why they matter,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, July 2018.[10] E. K. Faulconer, J. C. Griffith, Z. Dixon, and D. Roberts, “Comparing online and traditional student engagement and perceptions on undergraduate research,” Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 48–59, 2020.[11] E. K. Faulconer, Z. Dixon, J. Griffith, and L. Faulconer, “Perspectives on undergraduate research mentorship: A comparative analysis between online and traditional faculty,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, vol. 23, no. 2, 2020.[12] Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, “Virtual environment for communication: Teaching, outreach, and research (vector
the programcontinues to mature. The implications of integrating the X-matrix into a technical leadershipdevelopment program are many; (1) it becomes a motivational tool that helps participants relatetheir efforts to become a leader and its impact on their chosen student organization, (2) itdevelops their understanding of their responsibility to the larger organization, (3) it developstheir leadership communication abilities and (4) it develops their skill in using a valuableorganizational management tool that can be applied throughout their professional career.Training future technical leaders to apply engineering management tools while in college shouldlead to greater success for student development, their projects, their college, the