2006-2270: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION TOOL FORAN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LEARNING COMMUNITYMani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina (SM’98) received the B.S. degree, the M.S. degree in physics, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Iowa State University, Ames, in 1982, 1985, 1987, and 1989, respectively. He has research experience in applied electromagnetics, microelectronics and device physics, nondestructive evaluation, instrumentation, networking and physical layer issues. He has had industrial experience in the areas of instrumentation, system integration, and design in nondestructive evaluation and handheld computer systems. Currently
clearobjectives that are agreed upon by various stakeholders are essential for many purposes such asassessment, curriculum design, and collaborative efforts among professors. Our most interesting and challenging interpretive task arose because our starting hypothesiswas not confirmed! In particular, one of our initial beliefs was that faculty and perhaps studentswould recognize that most of the objectives are not being effectively learned. We also thoughtthat students and perhaps faculty would recognize that most of the objectives are not being Page 8.924.12emphasized (e.g. How many professors focus on teaching students how to be metacognitive
AC 2012-3291: FROM DEMONSTRATION TO OPEN-ENDED LABS: RE-VITALIZING A MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS COURSEDr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Bridget M. Smyser is an Assistant Academic Specialist and Director of Laboratories, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering .Kevin McCue, Northeastern University Page 25.655.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 From Demonstration to Open Ended: Revitalizing a Measurements and Analysis CourseAbstractThe course entitled Measurements and Analysis with Thermal Science Application is a requiredcourse
., University of North Carolina, Charlotte Patricia A. Tolley, Ph.D., P.E., is Associate Dean for undergraduate experiences in the Lee College of En- gineering at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. Her responsibilities include the introductory en- gineering and engineering technology courses, a large freshman residential learning community and peer retention program, a junior/senior multidisciplinary professional development course, student leadership academy, employer relations and industry-sponsored senior design, and ABET and SACS accreditation. Her research focuses on engineering education research using quantitative methodologies.Dr. Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Kimberly Warren is
Education at Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include the role of motivation in learning engineering as well as retention and diversity concerns within engineering education and engineering as a profession.Ruth Streveler, Purdue Universtiy Ruth A. Streveler is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University
. The average self-reported time to doctoral degree completion was 5.48 years, with time to degree completionranging from 3 to 10 years. The average age at doctoral degree completion was 32.5. Thedoctoral degree recipients participating in this study represented the following engineering andapplied science disciplines: applied science and technology (1), bioengineering (1), chemicalengineering (2), civil engineering (1), computer science (1), electrical engineering (2), materialsscience and engineering (1), mechanical engineering (2), and industrial engineering (1). Themajority of the sample completed doctoral degrees at predominantly white institutions, with theexception of one informant who earned her doctoral degree from an HBCU. Eight of
libraries. By integrating these serviceswith the library’s information resources’ points of access, librarians can create an environment Page 24.318.2that allows users to interact directly with the library staff." The author then discussed thefriendly nature of the collaborative content management system, the numerous types of designfeatures available for displaying information resources, and the capability for user interaction.Many other aspects of this product have been discussed in the literature, Stitz, Laster, Bove, andWise8 described the process of moving from static web-based subject guides that are difficult tomaintain to the
Engineering for Honors (FEH) Program in the OSU Engineering Education Innovation Center. He teaches the two-semester FEH engineering course sequence and is active in engineering education research. He is also a Professor of Practice in the Me- chanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and conducts scale model investigations of gas turbine installations for jet engine test cells and for marine and industrial applications of gas turbines at the Aeronautical and Astronautical Research Laboratories at Ohio State. Dr. Freuler earned his Bachelor of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering (1974), his BS in Computer and Information Science (1974), his MS in Aeronautical Engineering (1974), and his Ph.D. in Aeronautical and
, and technology knowledge and skills; and 3) promote engineering habits of mind,including systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication, and attentionto ethical considerations.According to OECD31, differences in young people‟s career choice can be attributed totraditional perceptions of gender roles and identities as well as the wide acceptance ofcultural values associated with particular fields of education. Therefore, high school students‟attitudes to engineering may be an important predictor of not only being adequately preparedto engineering but its pursuit. If more high school students acquire positive attitudes towardsengineering, more of them will be motivated to choose engineering as a career.An attitude is a
Paper ID #6639”Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Dis-cussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrativeDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the Uni- versity
. Page 7.162.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationRICHARD J. FREULERRichard J. Freuler is a Senior Researcher in the Aerospace Engineering and Aviation Department at The Ohio StateUniversity. Dr. Freuler is the Faculty Coordinator for the OSU Freshman Engineering Honors (FEH) Program andteaches the three-quarter FEH engineering course sequence. He is also the Associate Director of the Aeronauticaland Astronautical Research Laboratory and conducts scale model investigations of gas turbine installations for jetengine test cells and for marine and industrial applications of gas turbines. Dr
Education emerged. 12 The number of papers from the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) annual conference that included the terms “global” or“international” in their titles has been increasing, as shown in Figure 1. The diversity of thisliterature cannot be fully described here. However, the papers fall into a few general categories: - International experiences via exchanges, study abroad, and service projects - International collaboration via distance models - Developing student skills to work internationally Page 22.751.2 - Assessing global competencyFigure 1. Number of papers in the ASEE Annual
, applied in the framework of a senior capstone design course.Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy DANIEL D. JENSEN Dr. Jensen received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering Science from the Univ. of CO at Boulder. His industrial experience includes Texas Instruments (mechanical design), Naval Research Labs (computational dynam- ics), NASA Langley funded post doc (finite elements), consulting at Lockheed and Lawrence Berkeley National Labs (computational mechanics) MSC Software Corporation (educational multimedia develop- ment) and Creo Consulting (Mechanical Engineering Consulting). He taught at Univ. of the Pacific for 4 years and is currently a
Mechanics and Foundation Design, Machine Design, Mechanics of Materials, Statics and Dynamics, and Materials Science, and Structural Steel Design. He is a professional member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and serves as the faculty advisor for the Dordt College ASCE student chapter. Prior to coming Dordt, he served for several years as a structural design engineer for a consulting en- gineering firm in northwest Indiana, designing structural steel and reinforced concrete structures for a variety of facilities in heavy industry including steel mills, oil refineries, power plants, chemical plants, and substations. He has also served as an instructor
AC 2012-3181: COMPARING ENGINEERING STUDENT USE OF SOLU-TION MANUALS AND STUDENT/FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ACA-DEMIC DISHONESTYMs. Angela L. Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Principal Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, instructs freshmen and sophomore engineering courses via distance education to students at the USU regional campuses. Minichiello is a registered professional Mechanical Engineer and has more than 15 years industry experience as a practicing engineer. She holds a B.S.M.E. degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and a M.S.M.E. degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research interests include adult learning
the“whole system at different levels of fidelity and in different time scales” [1, p. 2]. Consequently,placing greater emphasis on undergraduate engineering education to train future engineers tosolve multidisciplinary problems and collaborate across boundaries has become a necessarycompetency [2], [3]. Hence, biologically inspired design has emerged as a unique approach forengineering teaching to achieve this goal in higher education.Bio-inspired design (BID) encourages inspiration from natural systems to develop solutions forengineering problems, leveraging biological analogies to support design ideation. Teaching BIDin higher education has several documented benefits [4], [5], [6]. BID integration can result incomplex and unique
topics relevant to seven engineering disciplines, including chemical, civil, electricaland computer, environmental, industrial and systems, mechanical, and “other” engineeringdisciplines. The civil engineering FE exam questions are categorized into 14 different subjects,including mathematics and statistics, ethics and professional practice, engineering economics,statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, materials, fluid mechanics, surveying, water resourcesand environmental, structural, geotechnical, transportation, and construction. Most questions onthe FE exam are multiple-choice format, with a single correct answer. All questions are scoredas either correct or incorrect; no partial credit is given. The exam is computer-based andadministered
March 2024, Marietta, GA: Exploring the Impact of CM-II Meditation on Stress Levels in College Students through HRV Analysis. 4. MSCS Master’s Thesis: CM-II meditation as an intervention to reduce stress and improve attention: A study of ML detection, EEG Spectral Analysis, and HRV metrics.Nasrin Dehbozorgi, Kennesaw State University I’m an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering and the director of the AIET lab in the College of Computing and Software Engineering at Kennesaw State University. With a Ph.D. in Computer Science and prior experience as a software engineer in the industry, my interest in both academic and research activities has laid the foundation to work on advancing educational technologies and
Paper ID #41440Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Experiences of Faculty RecognitionDr. Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno Kelsey is a recent PhD graduate from the Engineering Education program at the University of Nevada, Reno. She has a BS and MS in mechanical engineering and worked in the aerospace industry for four years before returning to academia to complete her doctoral degree. Her research focusses are in undergraduate engineering identity and is interested in exploring how it can be equitably supported through pedagogical practices.Dr. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Dr. Chatterjee has
AC 2011-1763: EDUCATING ELEMENTARY TEACHERS IN ENGINEER-ING: A DESIGN METHOD AND BASELINEYvonne Ng, St. Catherine University Yvonne Ng, M.S.M.E, teaches computer science and engineering at St. Catherine University. Educated at Princeton University and the University of Minnesota as a mechanical and aerospace engineer, she worked in industry as an automation design engineer and contract programmer. She made computer sci- ence a more appealing topic for her all-women undergraduate student body by presenting this technically valuable course in a project-oriented comprehensive manner. She is currently the director of the Center of Excellence for Women, Science and Technology where she administers the college’s National
degrees awarded in STEM disciplines, only half of those bachelor’s degrees wereawarded in the hard sciences4. With a lower percentage of students showing interest and a lowerpercentage of those declaring STEM disciplines completing a degree in their intended field, theoutlook for increased percentages of STEM students entering the workforce is not promising.Institutions of higher education are being held more accountable by industry, government, andinstitutional leaders5-8. With the shrinking number of students interested in engineering and otherSTEM disciplines, institutions of higher education must attract and retain more students in thesedisciplines in order to increase the number of graduates. To do so, it is critical to devisestrategies that
information as they progress through theengineering curriculum, as well as showing them the importance of being correct in theircalculations. An 80% design is wrong in industry, so accepting that as a final product sets adangerous precedent for the student.2.4 Assessment by Benchmark Events A danger in teaching is the introduction of new requirements that have negligible effects.The desire to innovate is, in itself, admirable. However, an honest evaluation of one’s effortsmust occur at some point to avoid burdening students unnecessarily. Given the heavy workloadexpected of students at the United States Military Academy, this was of prime concern to theinstructors in CE364. The efficacy of the problem set was therefore measured through
reliability. Yet, we were concerned about the consistency of codingacross coders. To address concerns about inter-coder reliability, we developed a process thatcombines independent coding with collaborative evaluation and recoding. Teams of three to fourundergraduate students, under the supervision of Seron, Silbey and a graduate student, codeddiary entries by semester. In addition to each student‟s weekly allocation of diaries to be coded,each member of the team coded one, common diary entry. At weekly team meetings, eachassistant reported his or her codes for the commonly coded diary entry. This process provided anopportunity to discuss interpretations of codes and to examine why a specific code was, or wasnot, used on that entry by any member of
curriculum modules for science outreach programsChildren’s MuseumImagination Station Created displays for highlighting the technology used in theChildren’s Museum building’s operationHabitat for Surveyed community and developed standards for assessing sub-Humanity standard housingScience Bound Developed and implemented a project design for Science Bound students and performed a feasibility student on future collaborations with Science BoundMethodologyQualitative inquiry is an excellent approach to gain valuable information about people'sexperiences, perceptions, opinions, feelings, and knowledge 25. The focus of this study is to gaina better understanding of
the Center forResearch on Education in Science, Math, Engineering, and Technology (CRESMET) and TheCenter for Learning and Teaching Excellence (CLTE) at Arizona State University. The projectwas funded by the National Science Foundation b and highlights the success of FoundationCoalition engineering education reform activities on multiple campuses. The participatingfaculty represent the disciplines of Chemical and Materials, Environmental and GeodeticScience, Computer Science, Bioengineering, Mechanical, Industrial, Civil, and ElectricalEngineering, and come from the campuses of Arizona State University, Ohio State University,a Foundation Coalition members are: Arizona State University; Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Texas A&M
students and alumni is disproportionate, mixedrandom/purposeful, 6 x 3 x 2 stratified using the following strata: 6 engineering disciplines(biomedical/bioengineering, chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, and mechanical); 3 levels ofhighest degree offered (bachelor’s, master’s, and doctorate); and two levels of institutionalcontrol (public and private). Institutions in the final four-year sample are representative of thepopulation with respect to type, mission, and highest degree offered. This sample purposefullyincludes five case study institutions that were participants in a companion qualitative NSF study.One of these case study institutions only offers a general engineering degree, so three institutionsthat offer general engineering degrees
in 1995 as an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering. Prior to joining the faculty at Rose-Hulman he was an assistant professor at Virginia Tech and an instructor at N. C. State University. After completing his M.S. in electrical engineering in 1976, he joined the DuPont Corporation where he worked in various technical, design, and supervisory positions before returning to obtain his PhD. Dr. Moore directed the electrical and computer department’s senior design program for several years and is currently involved in externally sponsored multidisciplinary graduate and undergraduate projects as well as international project teams and collaborations. He recently spent a sabbatical year at the