: evaluating content knowledgein a group context or creating a learning environment. To assess individual ability, an exam isgiven to each student. The individual exam is evaluated and typically forms the majorityc e f he de c e. Af e he d d a e a , he e a g c e , h chcan either be a required part of the exam (evaluation goal) or considered a bonus (learningenvironment goal). Groups of 3 to 4 students collaborate on the group test. Larger groups reducethe impact of individual voices, and groups of two often suffer from a dominant (but notnecessarily stronger) partner. The group exam can be given in the same class period, if time isavailable, or in the following period. Providing a gap between the two exams can be
, which engage students inthe learning process. Such activities may include group work, peer discussions, case-basedlearning, peer teaching, and interactive polls. Active learning emphasizes student engagement andparticipation, in opposition to passive learning, a lecture-based learning method, where studentssit and listen and are expected to absorb the communicated information.A main advantage of the lecture-based teaching is that the teacher can present a significant amountof information in a shorter time and explicitly share their knowledge and expertise on a subject [1,2]. However, the lecture approach does not work well with students of different learning styles andwho can get overwhelmed with the amount of information presented during
thecommunication of laboratory work in a formal report. During the training activities, componentsof that formal laboratory report are added sequentially; the initial emphasis is on readable figuresand captions. After several activities that each focus on another section of a conventional report,the final training activity brings all sections together in a full, formal laboratory report. With afew weeks remaining in the course, the students apply what they have learned in trainingactivities to tasks needed by another ersatz client. These present somewhat ambiguous problemsthat students must first clarify. Their responses to the client’s challenges are presented in aformal laboratory report.The explicit emphasis on communication skills, recognition of
,” Proceedings of the ASEE conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[9] Danforth M. et al., “Impact of a Hands-On, Exploratory Engineering Outreach Program on Knowledge and Attitudes of High School Students (RTP),” Proceedings of the ASEE conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[10] Sundaram, R., “Partnerships to Create Synergistic STEM Communities,” Proceedings of the 2018 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, San Jose, CA, October 2018.[11] Sundaram, R, “How to Engage and Educate First-Year Engineering Students through Short and Structured Engineering Laboratory Activities,” Proceedings of the 2016 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Erie, PA, October 2016.[12] J.E. Mitchell, B. Canavan, J. Smith, “Problem-based learning in
the hierarchy of knowledge production. 2. Revise their syllabus to reflect the diversity of ways in which communication and collaboration, scientific inquiry and innovation, debate and engagement can be done in a more inclusive society/classroom. This outcome will be accomplished when participants share a current syllabus, choose new readings, craft new activities, assignments and assessments, as well as new models for engaging and interacting with students. Participants will exchange feedback on the updates they’ve made to their syllabi and will be encouraged to bring a playful note to their course design and to borrow from each other in an effort to bring previously excluded perspectives to their
to a studentcentric model, where students become part of the means of their own instruction. Active learningprovides a number of different strategies to accomplish this and these techniques have beenresearched and have been shown to be effective means of instruction2.Literature on active learning generally includes the following characteristics: • Students are involved in more than listening. • Less emphasis is placed on transmitting information and more on developing students’ skills. • Students are involved in higher-order thinking (analysis, synthesis, evaluation). • Students are engaged in activities (e.g. reading, discussing, writing). • Greater emphasis is placed on students’ exploration of their own attitudes and values3
credits) met five of the seven generaleducation requirements at the University. Only the writing and discourse and quantitative andsymbolic reasoning requirements were not explicitly met, although both were integral to thecourse. ES met three times each week. A 75-minute period on Tuesday allowed the wholegroup to meet with a guest speaker or faculty lecturer. A second 75-minute class on Thursdayswas devoted to discussion of the speaker and the week’s readings. A three-hour workshop onFridays provided a block of time for field trips or activities of longer duration. On Thursdaysand Fridays, students generally met in smaller communities of 20-30 students. In addition to atraditional text book that spanned all four semesters, students were asked to
learners tobring their real-life challenges to bear on program content and group discussions.The military research organization’s supervisor programs are further grounded in social,constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. The cohort model is social by design.They allow participants to engage in ongoing professional and social journeys together [9].Social learning theory acknowledges that the learner is part of a community, and the teacher isresponsible for creating a learning conducive environment where learners observe desiredbehaviors modeled by the teacher and peers[7]. The OHD team, academic partners andinstructors are intentional in creating the sense of community amongst all those involved. Thissense of community results
and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the
for them and their peers.Introduction The sciences and engineering disciplines are often characterized by the lack of humaninteraction and a personalized relationship between students and professors [1], [2]. Thesepractices result in students switching majors or dropping out of college. The aspect of studentengagement through high-impact practices as an effective tool for retention calls for effectiveand well-planned research activities, where undergraduates feel involved and included as part ofthe research community [3], [4]. One common strategy is undergraduate research experiences(UREs), where undergraduate students engage in research activities [5]. URE programs providestudents with a further understanding of how knowledge is
interest inresearch on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) technologies. Undergraduate students from 2- and4-year institutions are involved in a multidisciplinary research projects at the Cal Poly Pomona.The REU site supports 10 students for 10 weeks of summer research per year, with the projectsfocusing on research on the Dynamics and Control of UAVs, Obstacle & Collision AvoidanceSystem for UAVs, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision, and Flight Testexperience. Another goal is to attract students from community colleges to STEM programs at 4-year institutions and encourage the participants to pursue their studies for graduate degrees.This paper presents an overview of student activities, lessons learned so far, and the
). Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section ConferenceIn this paper, our experiences in incorporating a research proposal in four courses inbioengineering for upper-level undergraduates and graduate students are presented.Bioengineering is a very broad field undergoing rapid development and has many opportunitiesfor students to write research proposals on the advancement of science and engineering. Theability of students to propose new research will help prepare students to engage in life-longlearning once they graduate.Research ProposalA research proposal was required in each of the following courses: Biochemical Engineering,Biosensors, Cellular Aspects in Tissue
designers’ beliefs about design character. These studies have highlighted the importance of cross-disciplinary skills and student engagement in large-scale, real-world projects. Dr. Exter currently leads an effort to evaluate a new multidisciplinary degree program which provides both liberal arts and technical content through competency-based experiential learning.Ms. Iryna Ashby, Purdue University Iryna Ashby is a Ph.D student in the Learning Design and Technology Program at Purdue University with the research interests focused on competency-based education and assessment, micro-credentialing, and program evaluation. She is also part of the program evaluation team for the Transdisciplinary Studies in Technology – a
impact in the international engineering community. 2) Introduce future engineers to humanitarian engineering issues. ASME identifies engineering solutions for the developing world as one of the key issues facing engineering in the next 20 years1. By working in a developing country on humanitarian Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University engineering issues – specifically issues associated with explosive remnants of war (ERW) remediation – students are able understand and meet the unique constraints that exist when engineering in this context (e.g., cost constraints and availability and/or quality of materials).As mentioned, the goals of this collaboration are
faculty, with tremendous Page 14.992.2opportunities to fulfill their annual evaluation criteria and in the process, benefit students, theuniversity and industry2, 11.The author’s expertise on a variety of leadership issues, including diversity management andcreative thinking, has been emphasized in his teaching, scholarship and service activities. Inthe paper the author provides examples of how consulting/training activities have contributedto his teaching, scholarship and service initiatives. Given the interrelated nature of teaching,service and scholarship, some of the examples provided may overlap.Consulting and TeachingFaculty engaged in
find their unique needs andwhere our industry partners see themselves fitting into the Bridge Experience through IDProserve as additional new lenses through which we can see the impact of both IDPro and theBridge Experience on student learning and preparation for industry throughout and followingtheir undergrad. ReferencesCaputo, F., Evangelista, F., & Russo, G. (2018). The role of information sharing and communication strategies for improving stakeholder engagement. In Business Models for Strategic Innovation (1st ed., pp. 101–120). essay, Routledge.De Maria Sanchez Aguirre, F., Ivonne Del Carmen Alcaide-Aranda, L., Luz Castaneda Alvarado, E., Francisco Ludena Gonzalez, G., &
individuals from other fields and backgrounds, • be responsible for maintaining communication with and deadlines of subcontractors, and • take the lead on their own learning: researching and becoming well-versed in a variety of topics for various ongoing projects.Upper level engineering classes tend to have prerequisite courses that preclude students fromother fields, ensuring that by the time engineering students are juniors, they will rarely completeprojects with or interact in depth with students of other fields, except in general educationcourses (Richter & Paretti, 2009). However, students graduating in these other fields – technicalwriters, environmental scientists and educators, policy makers, technicians, and many more –play
closed off bythe time each new part of the process is introduced. Therefore, the focus of the studio is aroundthe activities in which the students can engage to help construct a comprehensive knowledgebase necessary to design, optimize and build complex structures.The potential impact of the studio is to improve the education, professional behavior and atti-tude of students as they prepare for various aspects of the building industry. The students havethe opportunity to understand how the separate courses they have taken in architecture, struc-tural engineering, and building performance are integrated. They comprehend that contemporaryconstruction is not a simple separate, sequential process, but rather a system characterized byintegration and a
students to spend time at industrial and government labs; and 6) createan interdisciplinary community of learning, discovery, and engagement that will promoteexcellence and internal and external collaboration in the bioenergy area.This paper will present an overview of the Center along with survey and focus group assessmentand evaluation of Bioenergy Center activities impacting student skill development needed toaddress current and future engineering challenges.IntroductionFig. 1 summarizes the Center’s research thrusts and themes. Alcohols, Fisher-Tropsch fuels, andhydrogen have established markets or are considered to be promising alternative transportationfuels. However, these alternative fuels have not been commercially produced from
environment as thepandemic caused the closure of community college campuses where the program was to be held.Program modalities and curriculum were modified to shift to an online experience. In Fall 2022,the program was able to return to an in-person format.CICSTART’s leadership team disseminates best practices through presentations, social media,publications, and workshops at national conferences. The four-day Summer Teachers’ Workshopbrings high school and community college educators from throughout the United States toexperience the same program that is used for the high school students. CICSTART’s outreachefforts and the national dissemination of best practices for engaging underrepresentedpopulations in technology careers has a national impact
engineering graduates.This paper presents an innovative engineering management course based on the principles ofproject management and incorporating an introduction to planning a research project. Whilethere have been numerous attempts to integrate capstone design projects and engineeringmanagement [2] and more particularly especially project management [3-4], the opportunityafforded by capstone research projects for learning about engineering management is less welldeveloped.Course ConceptA new style of course in Engineering Management and Communication, MECH3600, wasdeveloped and implemented during 2003. It is a compulsory course for all juniors in MechanicalEngineering at the University of Queensland. The objective was to have the students
engagement requirement, we have established a design studio (hang space) for the fellows to work on projects. • Sense of community. We also have required students to participate as a cohort in some regional conferences on disability. These activities have built a sense of community within the LWD concentration.ConclusionsThe new LWD doctoral concentration, aims to educate professionals who can develop integratedapproaches to problems that impact the lives and education of individuals with disabilities. Inaddition, the broader impact of designing solutions for individuals with disabilities creates ahealthy tension between the “basic” and “applied” STEM disciplines. The practical problem ofdesigning more effective educational
with the use of Generative AI (GenAI) toolsin their Liberal Arts and Sciences courses. The choice of courses as the venue for this explorativeuse of GenAI was pertinent, as they are housed within an innovative Liberal Educationcurriculum focused on high-impact educational activities and connecting students to globalissues within the larger sphere of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. As aresult, the program emphasized the need for developing critical awareness of the digital realmand bridging the digital divide. Thus, the aim of the study was to explore, through a cyclical process of reflection andAction Research (AR), whether GenAI tools provide an opportunity for student empowerment inthese liberal education classes
),25 sections of MATH 200 (Calculus I), 12 sections of MATH 201 (Calculus II) and 9 sections ofMATH 301(Differential equations) per semester. Students in these sections include majors fromMath and partner disciplines ranging from the School of the Arts to Humanities and Science,Business, and Engineering. At the onset of the project, the two PIs (one from Math and one fromEngineering) conducted a faculty survey to gauge current attitudes, level of interest in theproject, and the degree to which faculty felt the math courses listed above impacted theirstudents’ success. Broadly, the survey showed that engineering faculty were interested in howmathematics courses were (or should be) preparing students for engineering courses and thatlower level
student outcomes [2](a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental
diversion scenario tested. The instructordiscussed the outcomes of the regression analysis with the students. The discussion focused on theimplications of the waste diversion policy from two perspectives: the sustainability impacts of thepolicy (i.e., organic waste diversion from landfills reduces greenhouse gas emissions) and theeconomic impacts of the policy (i.e., loss of revenue from energy generation because of thedecrease in methane production). This regression exercise was included in one of the CE 251weekly assignments that the students completed for credit.After the CE 251 students submitted the regression assignment, the instructor solicited a group of3-5 students in the class to present their analysis to the MCRO 224 class. The CE 251
excitement and fascination with building and designingreminded some of the engineering students of why they became engineers in the firstplace. It reminded them of the fundamental enjoyment of creating things and taking themapart. Being reminded of these basic emotions was inspiring and motivating for them.CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKFindings show that the BAS project is bringing current science and engineering researchto the public, impacting the STEM pipeline by bringing social capital (undergraduateengineers) to underserved communities and providing a model for families to learnSTEM concepts and build projects together. As a result of participating in this program,parents and children are doing more science activities at home and on their own time
.”To explore RQ 1c) Did students make connections between lessons learned in the game andapplication to real-life problems?, we asked several questions. First, how the game affectedstudents’ understanding of flooding issues in the real world. The average score was 2.93 (n=14)on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), with the majority clustering around 3 (moderately)at 35.71% and 4 (very) at 25.87%, signaling considerable learning. Students were asked howthey might apply their learnings to academic or professional work. They acknowledged theimportance of engaging a variety of stakeholders and promoting community involvement. Also,students highlighted the dilemmas arising from discrepancies between their personal values andthose of their
integrating and compromising conflict management styles will increase following their participation in a conflict negotiation training session. H4: Engineering students’ use of competing, obliging, and avoiding conflict management styles will decrease following their participation in a conflict negotiation training session.Conflict Competence Though communication is vital to constructively managing conflict [9], [16], individualsenhance their chances for successful conflict negotiation when they acknowledge theirimpressions as communicators, engage in appropriate and effective communication messages,and understand the effect that their actions have on their relationships [38]. Cupach and Canary[36] defined conflict
problem solving.6,9 To accomplish its goal, the professional development programs includethe following:• Standards-based STEM Professional Development Workshops are designed to address the academic needs of K-12 students through a hands-on, inquiry-based instructional strategy of applying problem- solving, engineering design and communication skills to mathematics and science principles.• Scientific Inquiry and Engineering Design compares the processes of engineering design and scientific inquiry through design challenges while enhancing problem solving skills.• Engineering Content Workshops provides a academic year and summer workshops that integrate real-world engineering applications into the middle and high school science or