-Purdue University, Indianapolis Page 25.633.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Faculty Perceptions and Use of a Learning Management System at an Urban, Research InstitutionAbstractWhen universities develop and implement learning management systems for their institutions,how do the faculty feel about those systems? Do they believe they are engaging their students byusing the learning management system? What elements do they consider crucial in a learningmanagement system to benefit students, themselves, and their departments?This study examined an online
the College, they are assigned mentors. Furthermore, the College sponsors a variety Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering Educationof workshops and brown bags seminars on instruction, grant proposal preparation andprofessional development during the faculty members’ critical first years. We were approachedby the professional development coordinator to address the NEEs and specifically provideinstructional “tricks of the trade”. Mississippi State University, Mississippi’s land-grant researchuniversity, places a great deal of emphasis on the research productivity of the engineeringfaculty, in addition to
through personal research, and writing papers.• Teaching: Equally as important as becoming a successful researcher is demonstrating excellence in the area of teaching. For a new faculty member, this translates into developing new course material, teaching courses, managing teaching assistants, and seeing students outside of class. In the department discussed here, a full teaching load is three courses each semester and, in addition, new faculty must assume the responsibility of advising twenty to forty undergraduate students.• Service and Professional Development: Finally, a tenure-track faculty member must perform university and professional service such as reviewing external materials, serving on departmental and
Engineering: Perspectives of Engineering Faculty (Work in Progress)IntroductionDespite a growing emphasis on engineering in grades K-12, persistently high dropout ratesplague undergraduate engineering programs [1],[2]. Prior studies indicate that engineeringactivities have the potential to increase interest in engineering pathways [3] or develop anengineering identity [4]. Less clear is whether pre-college engineering instruction alsocontributes to students' success in engineering career pathways by adequately preparing studentsfor undergraduate engineering. One concern is that K-12 engineering lessons "may mislead orunder prepare [students] by providing activities that they enjoy but which have little relation toengineering
Fellow. As a former electrical engineer, she is concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and career attainment, problematizing traditional notions of academic achievement and what is mean to be successful yet marginalized, and STEM identity and identity development in high-achieving students of color. She is currently the PI on two studies funded by NSF, the first of which investigates the causes behind why African Americans remain one of the most underrepresented racial groups in engineering faculty positions. The
network with respect to theorganization than tenured faculty. For evaluating the availability of resources, the faculty werealso asked to rate their level of satisfaction with resources available for nine distinct aspects oftheir academic career. Among all respondents, the lowest areas of satisfaction were with industryrelations and research equipment. Tenure-track faculty reported significantly higher satisfactionthan tenured faculty in five of the nine categories: teaching training, grant writing, professionalnetworking, professional development, and overcoming bias. Gender differences between tenure-track faculty satisfaction were shown to be insignificant, with the exception that women weresignificantly more satisfied with resources for
service and altruism.The summit participants frequently mentioned the need for university support and additionalresources to help encourage faculty members to engage in LTS activities which can havesignificant personal and professional benefits. Finally, there was consensus that there is room togrow with respect to the development of effective and relevant assessment tools for LTSactivities and that these tools will help bolster facultyengagement and support for LTSinvolvement in the future.BackgroundLearning Through Service (LTS) is a student-centered pedagogy where the objectives of studentlearning are balanced with real, positive impacts for a community partner.1LTSencompasses both
develop a profile of an effective mentor for womenengineering faculty based on available literature, an empirical survey, and interview data.Overall, the findings of this work increase the understanding of the preferred mentor functionsand qualities. The mentor functions and qualities identified in this study indicate a careerenhancing mentor 1. works in the protege’s department, 2. acts as the protege’s tenure coach, 3. has an agreeable personality that is compatible with the protege’s, 4. interacts with the protege in an honest and respectful manner, 5. is willing to share his/her experiences, network, contacts, and time, 6. begins developing the protege early in her career
68 faculties participating in the program. Eachfaculty is expected to participate in the program by visiting a university outside of Indonesia forthe duration of 2 weeks to 3 months. Many different activities may be conducted during the visit:writing textbook or developing teaching material; sitting-in classes or comparative study ofteaching and learning; planning collaborative scientific activities; doing research and writingscientific paper; attending and presenting a seminar; developing a curriculum, and observingteaching-learning techniques. One of the 68 faculties selected in the 2013 SAME program wasfrom Polinema.Cal Poly as a Host of Faculty Exchange with a Student Success LessonPolinema is a polytechnic institution which started in
like the classroom. In this project, we seek to understandfaculty conceptualizations of health and well-being that developed through their undergraduateand graduate experiences.Our preliminary results show that the undergraduate experiences of faculty included elements ofthriving and well-being such as self-knowledge and self-control. Some identified key turningpoints in realizing their best strategies to maximize their well-being and academic success, whichenhanced their decision-making abilities. Furthermore, some participants achieved academicsuccess despite poor well-being and thriving outcomes, which raises questions about the culturaland systemic factors that promote such dualism. In terms of the messages they received aboutwell-being
role bystudents (as well as faculty), more consistent advising across groups, and a better overall designexperience for the students. Many issues were discussed during the process, with eventualresolution to everyone’s agreement. Primary issues that surfaced during the discussions were: • Frequency of meetings with student groups • Content of group meetings • Project management role • Overall responsibility for project success • Grading responsibilities • Review and input of student’s design logbooks • Approval of milestones • Attendance at presentations and other eventsAs a result of this process, three documents were developed to clearly define the role of thefaculty advisor and
engineering from Howard University.Prof. John V Tocco JD, Lawrence Technological University Page 26.1432.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model for Collaboration among Faculty, Practitioners and Writing SpecialistsAbstractThis paper presents the principles, procedures, materials, and assessment of a new approach toimprove the teaching of writing in engineering. The Civil Engineering Writing Project aims toimprove students’ preparation for writing in industry by developing new
Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student
faculty experience is the process of teaching. Learning how toteach is a skill learned through teaching experiences. TA experiences are intended to preparegraduate students for teaching and being faculty, but the training programs for this process areoften insufficient within engineering. However, student teaching within preservice teacherpreparation programs has extensive research, developing many techniques for fostering andenhancing the learning experience while practicing teaching. Scaffolding processes areapplicable within these preservice teacher preparatory programs. Some specific methods frompreservice teacher training which have been proven to enhance the effectiveness of learningexperiences or practicing teaching are reflexive practice
that walked faculty from introducing the interventionto modeling the intervention and ended with providing a list of resources to aid in attendee’simplementation efforts once they were back at their institutions. However, an apparentdisconnect remains between published research and what is happening in computer scienceclassrooms. Barker reported that “despite widespread development, research, and disseminationof teaching and curricular practices that improve student retention and learning, faculty often donot adopt them” [3, p. 604]. Hovey and colleagues [4] found that CS faculty admitted tolecturing more often than using student-centered instructional techniques when asked. “Theseresults...suggest that there is a need to increase the use of
Technology (ET) faculty and local industry representatives to form the primaryR&D team. Students majoring in the Industrial Design and CAD / CAM programs at WWU havealso played a major role in helping to develop interior, exterior and chassis design concepts. TheR&D team met with a cross section of transit authority members from across Washington Statein order to capture the needs of a variety of stakeholders involved in public transportation.Through the efforts of a multidisciplinary team that is utilizing automotive industry bestpractices such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Design Failure Mode Effects andAnalysis (DFMEA), a paradigm-shifting vehicle is being developed for intended productionimplementation by 2015. The team is in
operations research from the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1999. Since then, he has held visiting faculty positions at the Naval Postgraduate School and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (the latter visit was partly funded by a German Science Foundation Fellowship for Young Researchers). He is currently a senior research scientist at the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. He works on the modeling of decisions that people (laypeople and experts) make or should make with limited time, information, and computation.Chad Foster, MIT Chad Foster earned a BS degree in Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines in 1998
Industry Engagement versus Faculty Mentorship in Engineering Senior Capstone Design CoursesAbstract:The senior design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems. During the course, a student team defines a problem, plans an approach,develops a solution, and validates their solution, which culminates in oral and writtendissemination. Typically, undergraduate programs have provided students with facultymentors to develop a solution for a specific project. In order for projects and teams to besuccessful, the mentors must provide invaluable support, collaboration, and interest in
materials science and engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. She has been involved in STEM education research since 2012 under the direction of Professor Stephen Krause. Her research interests in STEM education include faculty development, best classroom practices, and improving undergraduate engineering student retention through understanding what makes students leave engineering. She will be pursuing her PhD in Materials Science and Engineering starting in 2016 at the University of California Berkeley. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How do Male and Female Faculty Members View and Use Classroom Strategies?AbstractResearch indicates
recommendations are specific, data-driven, and due to faculty deliberation, thememo both facilitates and validates subsequent actions by the Chair. Thus, the SO-committeedeliberations create momentum for curricular refinements that ultimately improve our Programand the SO attainment of our students.3. Develop performance indicators.Section 2. above (“create seven SO oversight committees”) described the routine function ofeach SO committee, once the CI regimen is up and running. However, when the Program firstimplements this CI regimen by recruiting its inaugural seven SO committees, each committee’stop order of business should be to devise two-to-four “performance indicators” for the SO intheir purview.The performance indicators for a given SO define
the Sloan Center on Online Education at Olin and Babson Colleges.Stephen Schiffman, Olin College Dr. Schiffman is an associate professor of entrepreneurship at Olin and Babson Colleges. Prior to Page 11.1255.1 joining the Olin faculty, Dr. Schiffman was the dean of the Undergraduate Program at Babson College and a Senior Partner at Olin College. In his two years as a Senior Olin Partner, Dr. Schiffman worked closely with the faculty to develop and improve the Olin curriculum. He has been a Babson faculty member in Entrepreneurship, Mathematics and MIS since 1986. He was the
. Page 14.364.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Content in Capstone Design Courses: Pilot Survey Results from Faculty, Students, and IndustryAbstractCapstone design courses are a common culminating experience in engineering programs acrossthe country. A pilot study was developed to probe the content included in capstone designcourses. The study was motivated by a desire to understand not only what is taught in capstonecourses, but how that content is covered, how well students think they have learned the content,what content proficiency is expected of entry level employees, and how important the content isfor student learning from the perspective of faculty, students, and industry employers
diversity and inclusion issues.10, 11, 12, 13In short, it is imperative to develop strategies to work with the culture that exists in engineering,especially in male dominated areas where there may not be any women, to make sure that aculture into which women are introduced is hospitable. It is of critical importance to engagedirectly with the majority faculty to foster departmental climates that will be attractive andsupportive to underrepresented faculty whether or not they are already present in the department.This research aims to proactively address the climate in which those women will be embedded toincrease their attractiveness and ability to support faculty who differ from the majority currentlypresent.Feminists working within engineering
in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network) President from 2002-2003. She received her M.S. in Higher Education Administration from Texas A&M University and a B.S. in secondary education from Abilene Christian University.Sherry Woods, University of Texas at Austin Sherry E. Woods, Ed.D., is Director of Special Projects in the College of Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. Her responsibilities include promoting the College’s faculty development and continuous improvement efforts. Prior to assuming this position in 2001, she served as Director of the Women in Engineering Program at UT Austin for over six years. Dr. Woods received her B.A. in Social Science
AC 2008-1202: FACE-TO-FACE, HYBRID, OR ONLINE?: ISSUES FACULTYFACE REDESIGNING AN INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING GRAPHICSCOURSETheodore Branoff, North Carolina State UniversityEric Wiebe, North Carolina State University Page 13.602.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Face-to-Face, Hybrid, or Online?: Issues Faculty Face Redesigning an Introductory Engineering Graphics CourseAbstractA hybrid introductory course was developed and piloted during the Fall 2007 semester in threelaptop sections (i.e., all of the students owned and brought laptops to class each day). The onlineportion of the course included voiced-over content presentations, software
-Champaign and a research assistant professor with the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer En- gineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual change and development in engi- neering students, and change in faculty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the webmaster for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division
recognized as one of the strongest influences on academic scientists’ and engineers’productivity1 and satisfaction2. Perceptions of climate reflect policies, practices, and interactionsat both a local level, as within a lab or department, and at more global level of the college oruniversity. The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE), anemerging voice from Harvard University about faculty careers, measures climate to include (a)personal and professional interactions with colleagues, (b) opportunities for collaboration, (c)sense of fit, (d) intellectual vitality of the senior faculty, (e) fairness of evaluation, (f) equitabletreatment, and (g) support for professional development. Perceptions of climate at the more locallevel
outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education. Page 24.502.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Practice in the Academic Plan: External Influences, Faculty, and their Teaching RolesRecent calls to align engineering education with the needs of industry have focused onthe development of non-technical skills for the workplace1. Faculty with professionalengineering experience may have some insight into how to
students in the program, impact on faculty workload andappropriateness of sample size. One of the challenges in implementing a successful directassessment process is engaging the faculty and achieving a high level of participation andsupport. Here we describe the development and successful implementation of direct assessmentprocesses for a large mechanical engineering program with 1750 students and 42 faculty at aland-grant, research-intensive doctoral granting university. This process was piloted in Spring2011 to identify potential issues, and fully implemented by the Spring of 2012. Assessment ofthe process itself indicates high level of faculty satisfaction and involvement, suggesting that theprocess is a sustainable one.IntroductionContinual
Engineering. Her dissertation research broadly focused on global issues related to sustainable waste management and plastic pollution. After earning her PhD 2021 from the University of Georgia, Amy developed skills in qualitative research methods in engineering education at Oregon State University. As part of this training, she used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine engineering faculty well-being and collaborated on the development of a reflective tool for researchers to build skills in semi- and unstructured interviewing. Building on her postdoctoral training, Amy aims to merge her methodological interests to pursue research questions in the nexus of engineering education, sustainable development