Engineering at Miami Dade College. During his academic career, he has taught more than 25 different undergraduate and graduate courses in Argentina, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and the USA, most of them in the Civil and Construction En- gineering fields. He is a California licensed professional engineer and a member of ASCE. Currently, he is a faculty member at Georgia Southern University and his research interests include structural analysis and design, vibrations, earthquake and wind engineering, remote sensing and education.Dr. Shahnam Navaee, Georgia Southern University Dr. Navaee is currently a full professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction in the Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Computing
for Educational Innovation at NC State University, Dr. Corn serves as PI of several large, statewide evaluation and research studies of innovations in K-12 schools and districts, including leading the evaluation of initiatives funded under North Carolina’s Race to the Top grant. Her research interests focus on leadership, professional development, teaching and learning, infrastructure, and evaluation for technology-enhanced innovations in public school settings.Mrs. Tracey Louise Collins, North Carolina State University Tracey Louise Collins is the Project Coordinator for the MISO Project. Responsibilities include imple- menting activities of the project, coordinating efforts among K-12 science, technology, engineering
Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Associate Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal
the United States, while the NTs and the NFs comprise 12 percent of thepopulation respectively. In this study sample, there are 6 NTs, 1 NF, 15 SJs and 5 SPs.SJ types (55% of this study) are often labeled as “good student” in academic settingbecause they valued hard work and demonstrated dependability. They do better in theoryclass when they can follow outlines and if the teacher pointed out how the theory applyto the real world before class. The research indicates that as long as what they arestudying are facts or procedures, they are comfortable. For the SJs to speculate, invent, orimprove, they often fail to deliver satisfactory performance despite their studiousdependability. SP types (19% of this study, despite its 38% representation in
Paper ID #7732Preparedness of Civil Engineering Technology Graduates for Design CareersDr. Harry G Cooke P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Dr. Harry Cooke is an associate professor in the Civil Engineering Technology program at Rochester Institute of Technology where he teaches courses in geotechnical engineering, construction materials, pavements, and mechanics of materials. His research interests include geotechnical engineering, civil engineering materials, and engineering education.Mr. Todd Dunn, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Todd Dunn, P.E., is an associate professor in Civil Engineering
Paper ID #15572Re-designing Design: A Technology-enhanced Graduate-level Biomedical De-sign CourseDr. Katherine E Reuther, Columbia University Katherine E. Reuther, Ph.D., is a Lecturer in Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University and the Assistant Director of the Columbia-Coulter Translational Research Partnership. She is is working on developing new instructional tools and programs to enhance graduate education in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. She has spearheaded the development of a graduate-level Biomedical Design program that covers all aspects of the design process, including needs identification
Session 3242 Systemic Issues in Asynchronous Delivery of Graduate Engineering Management Programs Charles Keating, David Dryer, Andres Sousa-Poza, William Peterson, Robert Safford Old Dominion UniversityAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to exa mine systemic issues that impact the design, delivery,and maintenance of asynchronous engineering management educational products.Asynchronous education continues to rapidly evolve as an alternative to traditionalclassroom delivery. An asynchronous educational system requires the effectiveintegration of technology
(IEW) at the University ofIdaho is formed of a diverse group of graduate students whose purpose is to develop anenvironment that fosters professional as well as technical excellence. This paper analyzes theactions taken each year by IEW leading to the formation of well-trained, collaborative, and highly-reflective cohort of graduate students that support design education. This team is developedthrough directed study courses, team projects, personal reflections and monumental technical andinterpersonal challenges. Since 1994, IEW has been successful in delivering hardware thatexceeds expectations of industry customers, shortening time frames required for large-scaledesign projects, enriching senior design mentoring, and expanding the number of
children and two grandchildren and enjoy biking, hiking, camping, reading, and hanging out with the grandkids.Dr. Barry Horowitz, University of Virginia Munster Professor and Chair of the Systems Engineering Department at the University of Virginia. Prior to joining UVa served as CEO of the Mitre Corporation. Member of the National Academy of Engineering and currently serving on the Naval Studies Board, the General Electric Academic Software Advisory Board and the Research Council of the Systems Engineering Research Center sponsored by the DoD and managed by the Stevens Institute.Dr. Thomas S. Brett, Dept of Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science Graduate of SUNY- Buffalo (JD), SUNY- Albany (MS
, 2007 Experience in Teaching Software Quality Management at the Graduate LevelAbstractRelatively little has been published on the issue of teaching software quality management. Thispaper reports a case study in teaching a graduate-level software quality management courseusing industry assessments as a learning vehicle. We explain the contents of the course, describethe process assessments the students perform at local software organizations as their termproject, and summarize the outcome and lessons learned during six years offering this course.The issues discussed in this paper might help educational institutions and college professors indesigning and implementing software engineering courses at the
reasons, the cases were well received by the faculty.This process was critical to the success of these cases.How can IEs and IETs in the service industries help us?The key benefit of all this interaction with IE/IETs in the service industries was thecreation of in-depth case studies and examples to be used in courses. Developing thecases was not straightforward or easy. As busy professionals, our graduates didn’t mindbeing shadowed, but they were not really interested in helping write cases or examples.In other words, they were happy to see us, but they didn’t really want any more work todo. Each connection began with an explanation of the amount of input they would needto contribute. We were very clear about limiting their involvement to the
AC 2012-3147: HYBRID DELIVERY OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY TOLARGE CLASSESKellie Grasman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Kellie Grasman serves as an instructor in engineering management and systems engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She holds graduate degrees in engineering and business admin- istration from the University of Michigan and began teaching in 2001 after spending several years in industry positions. She was named the 2011-12 Robert B. Koplar Professor of Engineering Management for her achievements in online learning. She serves as an eMentor for the University of Missouri System and earned a Faculty Achievement Award for teaching.Dr. Suzanna Long, Missouri
reoccurring comments included: “withself-selection you got to work with those you knew, however random selection better mimickeda realistic work environment;” and “random selection forced the project to keep on schedulebetter than self-selection.” However, most students stated that they “didn’t significantly preferone method over the other.”ConclusionsThis study found that selecting groups for team-based design projects in the context of asenior/graduate level digital circuit design course by either random selection or self-selectiondidn’t make much difference in terms of the project grades, the members’ ability, how well thegroup worked together, or the groups’ ability to complete the project. Random selection didhowever tend to slightly decrease
News. pp 1-2, July/August 1997Biographical Information:CLAYTON O. RUUD, Ph.D., P.E., Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Co-Director of TheQuality and Manufacturing Management Program. Ten years of manufacturing experience in the basic metals,aerospace and heavy machinery industries. Twenty-eight years in research and academia.MICHAEL P. HOTTENSTEIN, D.B.A., Professor of Operations Management in the Smeal College of BusinessAdministration, Associate Director of the Center for the Management of Technological and Organizational Change,and Co-director of the Quality and Manufacturing Management Program. He has over thirty-five years experienceat Penn State including service as department head, MBA Program Director, and Graduate
Session 2525 Integrating Product Optimization and Manufacturability in Graduate Design Course Mileta M. Tomovic Purdue UniversityAbstractAs CAD/FEA/CAM software tools are becoming increasingly user friendly and seamlesslyintegrated, it became feasible to use a number of them simultaneously in a senior/graduate leveldesign course in order to provide students with opportunity to experience all aspects of productdesign cycle, from concept design, product optimization, to manufacturability. In the past,teaching a hands-on laboratory
business challenges with technology solutions). His research focus are in cyber executive management, expert crowdsourcing, and decision analytics. Brian is also the Deputy Vice President for Digital Engineering Programs at Parsons Corporation.Nirup M. Menon, George Mason University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Doing Before Graduating: Experiential Learning with Part-time Internship & Grants Brian K. Ngac, PhD Nirup Menon, PhD Instructional Faculty & Dean’s Teaching Fellow, Professor, Information Systems & OperationsInformation Systems & Operations Management Management
Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 506produce a graduate who has the ability to apply theory and applications to solve a given problem.To develop this problem solving tool box, the Engineering Technology programs must offerstudents a strong theoretically-based curriculum, in addition to a strong applications orientedcurriculum. The applications in an ET program must instruct the students on the current tools andprocesses needed to solve industrial problems and implement needed solutions in their particularfield of study. Since the
1.11 8 Entrepreneurship 2.59/5 1.08 9 Business law 2.41/5 1.04 Other Topics List: Require a business plan for design Management projects increasing in completion Management of people. as you get close to graduation. People skills International studies/business. Public speaking, technical writing. Accounting Dealing with the corporate lifestyle. Business accounting. Quality system management. Activity-based accounting
annealing. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationSCOTT T. MILLER received his B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Penn State University in2002. He is currently a research assistant studying dynamic crack propagation. His other academicinterests include fluid dynamics and prime number theory.FRANCESCO COSTANZO came to Penn State in 1995 and is an Associate Professor of Engineer-ing Science and Mechanics. He earned a Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the TexasA&M University in 1993. His research interests include the mechanics of nanostructures and thedynamic crack propagation in thermoelastic
Session 2602 Adapting Graduate Degree Programs to the Distance Learning Environment Daniel Biezad, Jin Tso Aerospace Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University at San Luis ObispoAbstractA new graduate aerospace engineering program has been implemented for the distance-learningenvironment at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. The program is fullyaccredited and strives to maintain the hands-on “learning by doing” educational philosophy atCal Poly. It has been in operation for two years and
THREE STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING THE GRADUATION OF ENGINEERING MINORITIES Walter W. Fisher, Peter Golding, Stella A. Quinones, Roberto Osegueda, and Barry Benedict The University of Texas at El PasoThe University of Texas at El Paso [UTEP] College of Engineering serves a unique geo-politicallocation on the U.S. Mexico border and works in the El Paso community to support the growingdemand for high quality engineering and computer science programs that support sustainableeconomic growth in the region. Founded in 1914 as the Texas State School of Mines andMetallurgy, UTEP is the second oldest component of The University of Texas System
’ written communication skills, a professor of mechanicalengineering collaborated with an English graduate student to study the common mistakes madeby students and find ways to intervene and reduce mistakes before they graduate. In thefollowing sections, we will discuss the class profile, typical written mistakes, the interventionmethod, and the results of our findings.The Class ProfileThe seminar class consisted of 31 students with the following composition: three internationaland 28 domestic. Eighteen of these students received A (17 domestic, 1 international), tenreceived B (8 domestic, 2 international), and three students received C (all domestic) grades fortheir efforts in the English Composition class. Moreover, eight students took the
Session 3553 Practicing Teachers in a Graduate Engineering Course Lawrence J. Genalo and Melinda Gallagher Iowa State UniversityIntroduction:The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Centurystated that “Better mathematics and science teaching is therefore grounded, first of all, inimproving the quality of teacher preparation and in making continuing professionaleducation available for all teachers 1.”The "constructivist" paradigm 2,3 asserts that learning occurs through a process in whichthe student plays an active role in constructing the set of conceptual structures
Paper ID #14135How Enhanced Transcripts Can Help Evaluate Graduate School Applica-tionsDr. Randall D. Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio Randall Manteufel is Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He teaches thermal-fluid courses.Dr. Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in
. These incidences may sometimes cause thestudents to reconsider their intents for graduate study. Third, moving equipment to some remotelocation(s) is time consuming and carries some degree of risk of loss and/or damage, anddeprives the school of its potential use to teach, learn, or conduct research.Ideally, hands-on, online graduate programs should allow the students to learn the requiredmaterial at their convenience; permit adequate interaction with instructor and among thestudents; conduct hands-on exercises anytime and anywhere; individualize instruction tocapitalize the varied backgrounds and experiences of working professionals; provide adequateand up-to-date equipment for relevant and uninhibited exploration and experimentation; andmuch
The Retention of Graduates from Engineering Education Expansion in Kansas Roy Myose, L. Scott Miller, Steven Skinner, College of Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0044 and James Myose College of Arts & Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 Introduction In today’s increasingly technological world, nations and states must increase the number ofworkers with the appropriate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) skills that arenecessary to remain competitive. This viewpoint is confirmed by, "a number of studies [that] haveshown that 50 to 85 percent of
Paper ID #20043Challenges in Teaching an Introductory Graduate Level Course in Thermo-dynamicsDr. Amir Karimi P.E., University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in thermal sciences. He has served as the Chair of Mechanical Engineering (1987 to 1992 and September 1998 to January of 2003), College of Engineering Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (Jan. 2003
] Desimone, L., Smith, T. M., and Phillips, K., J., R. (2013). Linking Student Achievement Growth toProfessional Development Participation and Changes in Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of Elementary Studentsand Teachers in Title I Schools. Teachers College Record, 115 (5), 1-46. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.[14] Miller, B., and Winter, R. M. (2006) RET Site: Inspiring Educators in Rural America through Research. 2006AIChE Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings. New York, NY.[15] Bearden, K. K., Mainardi, D. S., and Culligan, T. (2009). In Search of the Active Site of pMMO Enzyme:Partnership Between a K-12 Teacher, a Graduate K-12 Teaching Fellow, and a Research Mentor. ChemicalEngineering Education, 43 (4), 273-278.[16] Kapila, V. (2010
An Engineering Team Approach to Mentoring Graduate Students through Projects Perry L. Heedley and Thomas W. Matthews Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering California State University, SacramentoAbstractThis paper describes a new approach to the mentoring of graduate students through their master’sprojects recently developed at California State University, Sacramento in the area of integratedcircuit (IC) design. Student engineering teams were formed to design, layout and test twoseparate pipelined analog-to-digital converter chips and a specialized biomedical chip. The goalof each team was to build a complex mixed-signal
humanitarian engineering topics in research. Currently, she is investigating the connections between humanitarian engineering projects, professional formation, and views of diversity and inclusion.Courtney Deckard, Lipscomb UniversityHannah Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to get a master’s degree in Architectural Design. She is currently researching the effects of humanitarian engineering projects on views of diversity and inclusion and professional development.Makenzie CohnNatalie