abilities are. Alternatively, questions of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American So ciety for Engineering Educationincreasing difficulty can be asked to identify where the students’ difficulties are. The task seither take the form of multiple choice questions or a series of calculation based tasks. Thestudents are at liberty to collaborate in groups to obtain an answer. The peer instructionnature of the learning is deliberate and a positive contribution to t he learning process. At theend of the working period the students respond with an answer. The variations in responsescan be recorded and then presented to the class as a whole. At
, the School ofEngineering has often sought to collaborate with the Office of Freshman and TransferStudents, recognizing that engineering students are first-year students first andengineering students second. Without a solid infrastructure of support, student successwould be left to chance.Most recently, the School of Engineering has implemented an Alumni MentoringProgram (AMP) for first-year students that builds upon more general mentoringinitiatives sponsored through the Office of Freshman and Transfer Students. The goal ofthis program is to foster in first-year engineering students a practical look at areas ofcareer interest, build professional and personal contacts, and develop a supportiverelationship with a Western New England College
committed to innovative methods of learning to better prepare students for entry into arapidly changing and highly competitive marketplace. Key objectives of Rowan University’sEngineering Curriculum include: • Creating multidisciplinary experiences through collaborative laboratories and coursework; • Stressing total quality management for solving complex problems; • Incorporating state-of-the-art technologies throughout the curricula; • Creating continuous opportunities for technical writing and communication, and • Emphasizing hands-on, open-ended problem solving, including undergraduate research.To best meet these curriculum objectives, the four engineering programs of Chemical, Civil andEnvironmental, Electrical and
Juki Girls, Good Girls: Gender and Cultural Politics in Sri Lanka’s Global Garment Industry and the forthcoming book Making Needles, Making Lives: Age, Work, and Value in an American Factory .Alisha L Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Alisha Sarang-Sieminski is an Assistant Professor of Bioengineering at Franklin W. Olin College of En- gineering. Her research interests include how cells respond to and influence chemical and mechanical aspects of their surroundings and how people respond to and influence the schemas and power dynamics in their surroundings.Lynn Andrea Stein, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Lynn Andrea Stein is Professor of Computer and Cognitive Science and Director of
number of authors have studied pedagogies that improve engineering student learning. Amongthose studied, enabling students to make connections between theoretical concepts and real-world, experiential or hands-on experiences have been found to strengthen student learning formany students. Pedagogies such as problem or project based learning, cooperative experiences,collaborative learning, or community projects are examples of such. Context-driven engineeringeducation experiences, such as service learning or global education, have often been designed tointegrate experiential learning with academic subjects, with the result of enhanced studentmotivation and learning.1,3,5,14,15 One might imagine that an integrative learning experience couldalso
interests and goals. Ashort paper was also assigned on the same topic to encourage students to reflect more deeplyabout the subject matter and provide the opportunity to practice professional/technicalcommunication in both the written and oral/visual forms.Table 1: Sustainability-related group presentation topicsPresentation 1 Presentation 2 Water scarcity Risk Assessment Energy usage Industrial Ecology Poverty Life Cycle Assessment Population growth Building design to reduce impacts Urbanization “Green” materials (be specific) Climate change Design for energy efficiency Toxic, persistent
the student schedules. The students are taught learning skillsthrough the “Guaranteed 4.0 Plan” developed by Donna O. Johnson. 19 The Plan is the onlyguaranteed learning system in existence. Johnson offers any student that she trains $100 whichshe will pay if the student follows the Plan 100% and does not received straight A’s. Ms.Johnson has yet to pay out any money. The most difficult part of the plan may be to get at least8 hours of sleep each night. The Academic Success Class helps the students to do wellacademically, as well as broaden their general knowledge about engineering, including resumes,internships, research, networking, portfolios, career planning, graduate school, industry (throughindustry speakers with graduate degrees), and
, Kristina; and Malmström, Hans; 2010. “Engineering and Communication Integrated Learning - Collaboration Strategies for Skills and Subject Experts”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18.13. Levin, Tamar, and Wagner, Tili. 2006. “In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom”, Instructional Science Vol 34 pp 227–278.14. Quality Enhancement Plan, Old Dominion University. http://ww2.odu.edu/ao/sacs/qep/index.shtml. Last viewed January 5, 2013.15. Walk, Steven, 2008. “Long On Students and Short On Equipment: An Effective and Well-ReceivedMethod to Improve Laboratory Outcomes Given
(thecomparison group). We describe in the following part of this paper the details of theinstruction-comparison pilot test and what it means in terms of instrument development.Context of Teacher Professional Development INSPIRE has been conducting week-long teacher professional development“Academies” since 2006. During the summer of 2007 a group of teachers from one school,along with their district Science Specialist, participated in the Academy and pursued acontinuing collaborative relationship with INSPIRE. During the 2007-2008 year thecollaboration led to an interest in implementing engineering education throughout the entiredistrict. To partner in this effort, INSPIRE travelled to the district to conduct the regularweek-long academy on site
five semesters during that period. Six of those classes include three control andthree experimental sections where each pair is taught by the same instructor. This is a requiredcourse for both Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering majors. The course is also atechnical elective for Industrial and Systems Engineering majors, so the makeup of any particularclass tends to be a mix of these majors. Within the context of curriculum-wide reform by using Page 25.89.9portable laboratories throughout the curriculum, the value of the state machine module toincrease students’ understanding of state machine concepts and design, and enhance their
students.Dr. Jeff Ringenberg, University of Michigan Jeff Ringenberg is a lecturer at the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering. His research interests include mobile learning software development, tactile programming, methods for bringing technology into the classroom, and studying the effects of social networking and collaboration on learning. He holds B.S.E., M.S.E., and Ph.D. degrees in computer engineering from the University of Michigan. Page 25.123.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Accelerating K-12 Interest in Computer Science using Mobile
Vision 2025, which follows:6 Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine—the built environment; • stewards of the natural environment and its resources; • innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public
. Incontrast, ‘Enquiry’ was implemented at Michigan Tech as a means of developing spatialvisualization skills and to help students understand conventional methods of representingobjects.The collaboration across two international universities proved very beneficial in terms ofmodifying and improving the apparatus used in the activity but it also provided a means ofcritiquing and refining the courses in which they were implemented. The recommendationsfrom ‘Phase 2’ indicate that careful consideration should be given to the timing andapplication of ‘Enquiry’ within modules of study. This planning should take learningoutcomes and students’ prerequisite knowledge into account. For example, it may bebeneficial to facilitate experiential learning of various
measuring the achievement of program goals which are overarching.New task level rubrics were needed to guide online discussions and participation.As a result, methods to use Adobe Connect™ for remote lab demonstration7 were conceived andtested. All of the laboratory classes require demonstrations by the students which was a majorconcern at the beginning of this project. Sharing live video and simulations via remote desktopproved to be an innovative solution to dispel any concerns. Course developers were instructed onhow to use the system for lecture capture and storage on Blackboard™ and using AdobeConnect™ for collaborating. Instructors received training on building and delivering onlinecourses using Blackboard. Mobile studio boards were
industrial experience in automotive design, but has since shifted her focus to engineering education.Dr. Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre DameMs. Natalie Gedde, University of Notre Dame Natalie Gedde is the Engineering Learning Center Manager at the University of Notre Dame. She earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois and a master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Page 25.1026.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Participation in an Undergraduate Teaching Assistantship
AC 2012-4011: PROGRAMMING IS INVISIBLE OR IS IT? HOW TOBRING A FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMMING COURSE TO LIFEDr. Beverly K. Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Jaeger, Susan Freeman, and Richard Whalen are members of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a group of teaching faculty devoted to the developing and enhancing the First-year Engineering program at Northeastern University (NU). They also each maintain a close affiliation with the Mechan- ical and Industrial Engineering program at NU, bringing expertise from their majors to the first-year classroom. The focus of this team is to provide a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional, and
uninterestedand unqualified students from the population.I. IntroductionThe NSF funded SUCCEED Engineering Education Coalition is a collaboration of eight Col-leges of Engineering in the southeastern U.S.1 with a shared mission of creating sustainable en-gineering education reform on each of our campuses. SUCCEED has a vision of a curriculumthat will educate our students for success throughout their career by nurturing technical confi-dence, developing a skill base for success, and instilling a positive attitude in its graduates.While these schools are all publicly funded, there is great diversity in their size, mission, studentbody, experience, and academic strengths. This diverse “educational research laboratory” has 1 Clemson University, Florida
program sustainableover time.Rationale for the ProgramProblems related to keeping pace with the rapid development and adoption of technologyand information tools such as the personal computer and the Internet are myriad and welldocumented. For example, the 1998 report to the Governor by the Texas Science andTechnology Council concludes: Industry requirements for skilled technology workers are clearly growing faster Page 6.977.1 than our state's workforce pool. The Council believes that Texas currently has Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001
". Page 5.600.1At the same time an internal departmental review was taking place, a series of meetings werebeing held with the department’s external advisory board. In these meetings, the industrial andcommercial representatives were emphasizing the need for stronger communication skills fornew engineers entering the workplace. With the convergence of these two ideas, a completeredesign of the three-course sequence was undertaken. The disconnected three-course sequencewas to be replaced by a sequential three-course sequence where each course would build on skillsand knowledge developed in the previous course.Each of the courses was targeted to emphasize critical thinking skills and problem solving skillswith two major modes of instructional focus
need for general USIndustry, in particular Food Science, as well as Medicine. This project is a unique collaborationof Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, Food Science and Technology, and Agricultural andBiological Engineering. It brings together both Medical and Engineering Disciplines.Agricultural and Biological Engineering, as well as Food Science, are particular engineeringdisciplines where MRI will have major impact. The collaboration with Medical departmentsbrought state-of-the art MRI to these non-medical disciplines.The Web site1, shown in Figure 1, serves as a repository for technical education in MRI, as an Page 4.278.1information
wouldlook like failure on the part of the women. So, when asked, they respond with ‘whatgender bias?’.3. VALUES AND ENGINEERING ACADEMIAIn this section, we explore our dissatisfaction with engineering as we moved throughpostgraduate studies, and then the realisation that we bringing ourselves into the picture wouldsolve these problems.3.1 Bringing Our Values into EngineeringWhen Cynthia went back to university for postgraduate work, she went to a biotechnologydepartment: I’d been working in the biotechnology industry, and I wanted to learn more about how cells function so that I could design better bioreactors - I’d come to the conclusion that chemical engineers were generally ignorant of the requirements of these little living
and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Shanghai, China, 2016.[14] E. Cooney, S. Deal, A. McNeely, and H. Chaubey, “Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Research Project to Create Musical Effect Box,” in 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, 2019 CIEC, New Orleans, LA, February 2019.[15] E. Bezzam, A. Hoffet, and P. Prandoni, "Teaching Practical DSP with Off-the-shelf Hardware and Free Software, "2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK, 2019, pp. 7660-7664.[16] Y. Lin and T.D. Morton, “A Microcontroller-based DSP Laboratory Curriculum Paper,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 2017.[17] K.D. Coonley and J. Miles
educator since 2008, and curently works in the College of Engineering and Engineering Education department at the University of Tehran.Hannah Budinoff, The University of Arizona Hannah Budinoff is an Assistant Professor of Systems and Industrial Engineering at the University of Arizona. Her research interests include additive manufacturing, geometric manufacturability analysis, design for manufacturing, and engineering education.Philipp Gutruf, The University of ArizonaDr. K. ”Larry” Larry Head, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A pathway to create and validate an engineering design rubric across all engineering programs 1
process can take many different forms and be called manydifferent things. Collaborators, partners, participant, and people with lived experience are allterms that can be used somewhat interchangeably within this space. In the context of engineeringdesign, the most common word is stakeholders, which are defined as “actors that can affect or beaffected by the new product/service/product-service system” [24]. Stakeholders include directstakeholders, who directly interact with the system, and indirect stakeholders, who could impactsystem development or will be indirectly impacted by the system [2]. The term stakeholder isused throughout this paper as it is commonly used in the engineering design lexicon and otherrelated fields. It is important to
in their field of study and potentially enhancing future employment prospects. • Career Opportunities: The U.S. is home to numerous multinational corporations and industries, allowing international students to access internship and job opportunities to enhance their career prospects. • Pathways to Employment and Immigration: Some Indian students see studying in the U.S. as a pathway to securing employment or exploring immigration opportunities, primarily through CPT, OPT or the H-1B visa program.The combination of academic excellence, diverse programs, cultural exposure, and potentialcareer opportunities makes the U.S. appealing to students from India seeking higher educationabroad, especially in the
Conference on Smart Technologies (IEEE-SmarTech), Cleveland, OH, USA. He was Chair and Vice Chair of IEEE SEM - Computational Intelligence Chapter and was a Chair of IEEE SEM - Computational Intelligence Chapter and Chair of Education Committee of IEEE SEM. He has organized and chaired several special sessions on topics of Intelligent Vehicle Systems and Bio-inspired Intelligence in reputed international conferences such as IJCNN, IEEE-SSCI, IEEE-CEC, IEEE-CASE, and IEEE-Fuzzy, etc. He has extensively published in reputed journals and conference proceedings, such as IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, IEEE Transactions on SMC, IEEE Transactions on
the field of self-assembly of electronic devices and earned a Ph.D. in 2011 in electrical and computer engineering with an emphasis in novel metal deposition techniques. Her current research interests are related to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), specifically investigating treatment outcomes through a combination of FEM simulation and clinical data analysis. Sherry has worked in industry in the role of a senior system design engineer at Lumedyne Technologies, where she developed a software model for a time-based MEMS accelerometer. She then gained significant academic experience through six years of teaching as an adjunct professor at the University of San Diego. Sherry has been collaborating
Paper ID #42493Embodied Learning with Gesture Representation in an Immersive TechnologyEnvironment in STEM EducationMr. Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University I am a Graduate Research Assistant, and Lynn Fellow pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and Engineering (ESE) at Purdue University, West Lafayette IN. I earned a Bachelor of Education in TVET Industrial Technology – Electrical from the University of Technology, Jamaica, and a Master of Science in Manufacturing Engineering Systems from the Western Illinois University. I am a Certified Manufacturing
Benefits in a Developing ERC Gina Ristani, Seth Thompson, Keisha Varma Department of Educational Psychology, University of MinnesotaBROADER IMPACTS & SOCIETAL BENEFITS 2 AbstractResearch is crucial to humanity’s technological and theoretical advancement. It is equallyimportant research be conducted by a diverse, representative workforce. Sustained efforts byacademic and industrial institutions to increase diversity in research identify many factorsinfluencing recruitment and engagement of underrepresented minority (URM) students inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM
addresses the workforce (and student) shortagechallenge before students enter college by incorporating a stimulating curriculum, demystifyingthe civil engineering profession, and improving students’ engineering knowledge to succeed intheir academic careers.COURSE CONTENTThe course content was tailored to promote student interest in civil engineering and help increasethe pipeline of students pursuing engineering degrees. For the last four years (2020-2024), theone-week course was offered to groups of 30-40 students annually during the summer. A team ofthree to five instructors from various civil engineering disciplines collaborated annually on thecourse design and delivery. Although intended to be a residential course, in the first year thecourse