experiences as womenfaculty were remarkably similar, we wondered about the experiences of others in the discipline.This led to an original survey that Lima and Christy developed and administered (withundergraduate researcher Cauble) to female faculty in BAE in 1998. Our objectives were (1) tosurvey this group on their motivations for choosing engineering, their personal and professionalexperiences, and their reflections on women in engineering, and (2) to make recommendations tobetter integrate women into all engineering disciplines. The work was presented at the 1999ASEE meeting (Cauble et al., 1999) and the full study was published in 2000 (Cauble et al.,2000).In 2005, we decided to re-survey the same population with a largely similar instrument
Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Educa- tion at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, conceptual change and development in engineering students, and change in fac- ulty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the Publications Chair for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division.Prof. Shengchang Tang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Shengchang Tang is an assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana
departments. A comprehensive programevaluation survey is done at the end of the mentorship experience and solicits feedback fromboth the student mentees and faculty mentors.Program ObjectivesAs originally designed, the primary objective of the program has been to help increase retentionof women students in engineering and technology majors. While this initial objective continuesto be important, the program has had numerous other benefits to both students and faculty. Withthis overall objective in mind, sub-objectives were developed to support the mentorshipexperience to assist and encourage the student participants to: • Form relationships with faculty and connect with upperclassmen and others within their departments and the
. Page 8.292.7 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education 3. Please describe the changes for women you have seen at SSU during the years you have worked here. Feel free to describe negative as well as positive changes.Since this study was modeled on the 1988 Needs Assessment, the categories developed by thetask force of women faculty under the auspices of the SSU Faculty Affairs Committee of theFaculty Senate to organize the data were retained. Those categories were: 1. General Climate 2. Gender-based Inequities a. Distribution of Women b. Salary
Paper ID #42768Engineering Data Repositories and Open Science Compliance: A Guide forEngineering Faculty and LibrariansAdam Lindsley, Oregon State University Adam Lindsley is the Engineering Librarian at Oregon State University. He teaches graduate research ethics, science/information literacy for undergraduates, and library research skills for both. Research interests include information literacy, data management, photogrammetry, pedagogy, and learning technology.Dr. Shalini Ramachandran, Loyola Marymount University Shalini Ramachandran is the Research and Instruction Librarian for STEM at Loyola Marymount University in
(2001). 1 Althoughthe ADVANCE program has contributed to the development of a more diverse science andengineering workforce, much remains to be done. Women face deep-seated challenges fromwhen they enter academia as students and these challenges continue through the faculty ranks[34, 39]. As undergraduate students, women encounter differential treatment within theclassroom, contributing to a different and inferior experience than men. Women’s contributionsto classroom discussions tend to be ignored or trivialized by men [40]. Women cope with thismarginalization by creating their own networks of support through close bonds with otherwomen and forming all female clubs [27, 34, 35]. Additionally, the inclination for males tooutnumber the females
penalty attached for taking advantage of such a policy. • Give adequate guidance as to what the criteria for promotion and tenure are at that particular institution. 2. Perform a cultural audit: • Develop an anonymous survey to see how women faculty perceive their work life balance. At least one question should ask for their suggestions about how their departments could better support them. • Create a series of focus groups of women faculty to discuss and expand upon some of the results of the survey. Action items or items requiring further follow-up as generated in these discussions should be addressed to the appropriate administrative office
. Page 15.598.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Fostering International Faculty Collaboration through Student Exchange Programs with a Research ComponentAbstractIn 2006, the College of Engineering at the University of Kentucky began developing anEngineering and German Studies Program, which included both study and work abroad, as wellas intensive language immersion options for the College’s students.Leveraging a new faculty member’s existing connection to German faculty members at theKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), an exchange program was conceived and then began inthe spring of 2007. The program is designed so that, each year, the US institution’s
faculty member, the better in terms of improved student engagement.The author has observed that students, in general, have developed study habits that lead them toexpect to obtain faculty input at non-standard hours; basically students are now desiring 24/7uptime of faculty. Since no faculty member can provide this access, the methods described inthis paper have allowed the author to effectively produce a faculty-student communicationenvironment that approaches 24/7 with little additional effort on the faculty member’s part.It is the intention of the author to help other faculty members increase their faculty-studentcommunication through utilization of similar methods of utilizing the described Web Page
better understand the veteran experience, its unique strengths and balances, and confrontbias [10]. Following Green Zone training, attendees usually receive some visual designation (e-badge or physical sticker) to signal their office or person is a veteran ally.3. Resultsa. Role and Level - The use of roles provides very interesting profiles, but additional definition isrequired to understand the experience level and course levels of instructors, senior instructors,associate, and full professors.Generally assistant professors have been faculty for fewer than 6 years, are heavily focused ongaining tenure generally through research, and, therefore, may teach more graduate level courses,depending on institutional priorities and faculty development
A “Bio-Basics” Short Course: Bringing Modern Biology to An Engineering Faculty James D. Sweeney1, Lokesh Joshi1, 3, Alyssa Panitch1, 3, Edward Hall2 Harrington Department of Bioengineering1, and Office of Engineering Research Services2, The I.A. Fulton School of Engineering, and The Biodesign Institute3 Arizona State University, Tempe, AZIntroductionIn our post-genomic world, engineers (including engineering faculties!) increasingly need atleast a working knowledge of biology and the life sciences. The Arizona State Universityfaculty short course “Bio-Basics” has
Paper ID #39123A survey of biological and agricultural engineering students and facultylearning preferencesDr. Lucie Guertault, North Carolina State University at RaleighThomas Dalton Stephenson Jr. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A survey of Biological and Agricultural Engineering students and faculty learning preferences (WIP)IntroductionWhile all individuals can learn using different modes of receiving and processing information[1]–[3] most learners exhibit preferences in the way they receive and process information [4]–[6], called learning preferences or learning styles
were implemented to support women faculty inengineering. In addition, this study provided recommendations based on the research findings that addressbest practices related to family-friendly policies, combating “flexibility stigma,” leadership development,and novel strategies related improving the effectiveness of informal and formal mentoring. Introduction This paper discusses the ways in which lives of tenured female faculty in engineering areinfluenced both negatively and positively by the policies and programs various universities haveimplemented to retain and promote women. While all three institutions in this study offer“family-friendly” policies, interviewees described important differences in how policies arecommunicated and
Paper ID #29170Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments forChemical Engineering FacultyDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskio˘glu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes
PAPER 2004-376 Energy Conversion and Conservation Division (ECCD) Optimizing Thermal Energy Storage for Cogeneration Applications: A Faculty and Engineering Technology Student Collaboration Using Excel Francis A. Di Bella, PE Assistant Professor Northeastern University, Boston, MA Mechanical Engineering Technology Mr. Andres Chamarro III M. E. T. Student (cl. of 2003)AbstractThis paper has a two-fold purpose. Not only does it solve a significant
Campus is home to university departments and centers, as well as corporate,government, and industrial partners. The campus has been under development since 1987, buthas seen the most significant growth in the last decade. The College of Textiles was the firstcollege to be located on Centennial, moving into a four-building complex in 1991. This Collegeis made up of two departments, with 50 faculty and approximately 1,000 undergraduates and 100graduate students. The College of Engineering, with nine departments, 333 faculty, 5,900undergraduate students and 2,800 graduate students, has been moving over in stages since 2004.At present, three of five planned engineering buildings are open, with six of the nine departmentspermanently located on the
Paper ID #37167Work in Progress: Faculty choice and reflection on teachingstrategies to improve engineering self-efficacySarah Lynn Orton (Dr.) Dr. Orton is an associate professor in Civil Engineering and is an active member of the American Concrete Institute and the American Society of Civil Engineers. Dr. Orton also serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Missouri. She has participated in several programs aimed at improving undergraduate education. Her research projects have involved the use of carbon fiber reinforced polymers to
. The data presented in this paper underscores the importanceof women faculty and mentors for the success of female engineering students.BackgroundUnderrepresentation of women in engineering, despite performing well academically, is a well-established fact and has been the focus of many researchers and policy makers. While lack ofrole models is considered one of the important factors, the gender of mentoring faculty hasrecently received some attention [1] and [2]. Because of a lack of introductory courses at thehigh school level, engineering faculty have the added responsibility of not only teaching thesubject but also introducing the profession and mentoring students and developing a sense ofbelonging [3]. The effect of virtually invisible
Paper ID #44064A Hybrid Approach to Natural Language Processing for Analyzing StudentFeedback about Faculty SupportNeha Kardam, University of Washington Neha Kardam is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. She is an interdisciplinary researcher with experience in statistics, predictive analytics, mixed methods research, and machine learning techniques in data-driven research.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor and associate chair of diversity, equity, and inclusion in electrical and computer engineering at the
Engineering. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the Frontiers in Educa- tion Conference, President of the IEEE Education Society, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) and the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). She and her coauthors received the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in JEE and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE ToE. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research. She is on the USD team implementing ”Developing Changemaking Engineers”, an NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Education (RED
AC 2009-972: PLAIN ADVICE FOR NEW ENGINEERING FACULTY ON HOWTO MANAGE CLASSES AND MOTIVATE STUDENTSSeamus Freyne, Manhattan College An ASEE member since 2003, Seamus Freyne is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Manhattan College in New York City. His research interests include concrete materials, sustainability, and ethics.Micah Hale, University of Arkansas W. Micah Hale is an associate professor at the University of Arkansas where he teaches courses in civil engineering materials and concrete design. In addition to his teaching interests, he also conducts research in the areas of concrete materials and structures.Stephan Durham, University of Colorado, Denver Stephan Durham is
2006-788: SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FOR U.S.A. FACULTY ON TEACHINGLIBERAL EDUCATION COURSES IN JAPAN.John Krupczak, Hope College Associate Professor of Engineering.James Heisler, Hope College Professor of Economics.Thomas Ludwig, Hope College Professor of Psychology.Roger Nemeth, Hope College Professor of Sociology.James Piers, Hope College Professor of Sociology and Social Work.Neal Sobania, Pacific Lutheran University Executive Director of the Wang Center at Pacific Lutheran University. Formerly Professor of History and Director of International Education at Hope College. Page 11.1142.1
AC 2011-1120: ETHICAL AND SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS OF INTERNET-BASED ENGINEERING EDUCATION: FACULTY AND STUDENT PER-SPECTIVESK.L. Jordan, Michigan Technological University K.L. Jordan completed her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Tech- nological University in 2006 and 2008 respectively. During her undergraduate tenure she was an active member of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) and currently serves on the Board of Direc- tors. She is also the current President of the ASEE student chapter at Michigan Tech. As the recipient of a King-Chavez-Parks graduate fellowship, Ms. Jordan has agreed to seek an engineering faculty position upon completion of her doctoral degree
, 14(1), 1-13. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7314[8] Kohorst, K. & Cox, J. R. (2007). Virtual office hours using a tablet PC: E‐lluminating biochemistry in an online environment. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 35: 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.50[9] Kim, Y., & Lundberg, C. (2016). A Structural Model of the Relationship Between Student- Faculty Interaction and Cognitive Skills Development Among College Students. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 288–309. https://doi- org.libproxy.boisestate.edu/10.1007/s11162-015-9387-6[10] Dwyer, T. (2017). Persistence in higher education through student–faculty interactions in the classroom of a commuter institution
component of our role as engineering faculty. 1,2 Effectivelecturing has been shown to be essential to student learning and is a central part of studentevaluations of faculty. 3 There exists a robust body of work on the practice of lecturing, both interms of delivery of the lecture itself as well as lecture preparation. 4,5 However, even when wefollow the advice and practice outlined by the literature, our lectures may still fall flat, often forreasons unknown to the instructor. In this paper, we build upon the ideas presented in theexisting literature by highlighting an often neglected stage conducive to high-energy, effectivelectures: the pre-lecture stage.The pre-lecture stage consists of what we do in the time interval just before a lecture
2006-103: THE FACULTY PERSPECTIVE ON THE STATE OF COMPLEXSYSTEMS IN AMERICAN AND AUSTRALIAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPROGRAMSNadia Kellam, University of South Carolina NADIA KELLAM is currently conducting research in the Laboratory for Sustainable Solutions while completing her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering. Her research interests include engineering education, sustainable design, and complex systems science. She is a recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and institutional support from the University of South Carolina.Veronica Addison, University of South Carolina VERONICA ADDISON is a PhD Student in Mechanical Engineering conducting research in the
operations research from the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1999. Since then, he has held visiting faculty positions at the Naval Postgraduate School and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (the latter visit was partly funded by a German Science Foundation Fellowship for Young Researchers). He is currently a senior research scientist at the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. He works on the modeling of decisions that people (laypeople and experts) make or should make with limited time, information, and computation.Chad Foster, MIT Chad Foster earned a BS degree in Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines in 1998
AC 2007-284: FACULTY REWARD SYSTEM REFORM FOR ADVANCEMENT OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR INNOVATION: LOOKINGAT REPRESENTATIVE CRITERIA FOR MERIT PROMOTION IN ADVANCEDENGINEERING PRACTICE IN INDUSTRYRoger Olson, Rolls-Royce Corporation ROGER N. OLSON is Lead Stress Engineer, Rolls-Royce Corporation, and a director of ASEE-College Industry Partnership Division.Samuel Truesdale, Rolls-Royce Corporation SAMUEL L. TRUESDALE is manager of employee development, engineering business improvement organization, Rolls-Royce Corporation, and program chair, ASEE-College Industry Partnership Division.David Quick, Rolls-Royce Corporation DAVID H. QUICK is Manager, R&D Customer Requirements, R&T
Western Carolina University 7/New Jersey Institute of Technology 8 AbstractThis is the second paper in the special panel session focusing on issues driving reform of faculty rewardsystems to advance professional graduate engineering education for creative engineering practice and tostimulate leadership of technology innovation to enhance U.S. competitiveness. This paper addresses thecharacteristics that differentiate the pursuits of basic academic scientific research and of professionalengineering practice for the systematic creation, development, and leadership of new and improvedtechnology for purposeful innovation in industry and government service.1. Background and HistoryWhereas in the last
competitiveness and national security purposes.DiscussionThere is a large and growing need for the advancement of professional education for the nation’sengineers in industry. There is an especially critical need to develop engineers as ‘champions’,‘innovators’, and ‘leaders’ throughout their professional careers through professionally-orientedgraduate studies. This need is so large that it is not out of the question to consider creatingacademic departments [graduate centers] within existing colleges of engineering and technologythat cater solely to the professional graduate degrees. These “professional studies departments”[graduate centers] would have their own administrative structure, leadership, and faculty whoseprimary mission is to develop and