strategies employed for earlier classes.2. Educators have focused on the re-design of traditional calculus courses. Additional collaborations between math and engineering faculty to align related courses could be impactful.3. A limited number of records included tangible materials that could be used by other educators. A centralized, online database to host shareable materials would widen application of successful innovations.4. Impact of calculus innovations could be better captured through the use of more rigorous assessment, including design/use of validated instruments and comparison to control groups (when possible).AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1741611
conceptperformance after its first year of operation, and a discussion of changes incorporated into the classfor the spring 2001 semester. The reader may examine the on-line course materials at the web sitehttp://cavern.uark.edu:8900/ by entering as a guest user and then selecting course MGMT 5383.I. IntroductionWidely divergent engineering and science societies across the country have convened workinggroups from industry, government, and academe to examine the education received by technologydegree students in our colleges and universities. These groups were convened not because the USeducational system was broken, but rather to identify characteristics that would move it to the nextperformance level for the good of our students, businesses, and
Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She is also the Co-Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering at Louisiana Tech.Mr. Casey Kidd, Louisiana Tech University Casey Kidd is a graduate student in the College of Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. His focus is on project-based learning. He earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in Spring of 2004.Mrs. Lindsay K. Gouedy, Louisiana Tech University Lindsay Gouedy is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, serving as a National Security Fellow at Air Force Global Strike Command, specializing in virtual reality (VR) training methodologies. Concurrently
$50,8262. BTC offers high- quality education in trainingprograms where the training is high- tech, hands-on and student centered. BTC’s vision to be arecognized leader in providing innovative and effective technical education, maximizing studentpotential and supporting the regional economy through development of a competitive workforcedirectly aligns with the purpose of the ATE grant competition.WWU participation fosters the project’s academic rigor and will provide undergraduate researchopportunities. The Institute for Energy Studies at WWU combines the fields of science,technology and engineering with economics, business management, public policy, andsustainability to meet the demand for education and training related to the production and use
Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Edward J. Berger, University of Virginia Edward Berger is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. He was one of the co-leaders for the Mechanics VCP in 2013
State, she held faculty positions at Cabrini College and the New Jersey Institute of Technology. She also held a number of positions in industry and government including an Electronics Engineer for the Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, PA and a Software Engineer at Motorola in Horsham, PA. Dr. DeFranco received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Penn State University, M.S. in Computer Engineering from Villanova University, and Ph.D. in Computer and Information Science from the New Jersey Institute of Technology. She is a member of ASEE and has had numerous publications in journals and conference proceedings. She is also on the curriculum advisory board for a local technical high school.Mrs. Sally Sue
fabricated would allowthe student to devise it with a more strategic approach. With more buildingknowledge and floor experience, the student could create structures that wereeasier to build and less prone to error. Ideally, such things would be taught inschool and then put into practice on co-op. The student understands that school’smain intent is learning the “why,” but realizes that it is also important to know the“how.”It is ironic that the more the student has been taught at school and on co-op, themore he realizes how much new knowledge is available. By taking advanced andinteresting engineering courses, like thermodynamics and materials science, thestudent has merely scratched the surface on a whole new world. Now more thanever the student has
) MEMS Education Chip.opportunities. The initial course offerings includedhands-on laboratory fabrication of devices, supported by a grant from the National ScienceFoundation. Once the relatively high level of funding ended, the courses emphasized finiteelement modeling software tools for predicting MEMS device performance. In 2004, the coursestransitioned to design for fabrication using a commercial process with hands-on testing ofexemplar devices. Eventually, an array of functional devices was possible that became known asthe MEMS Education Chip. This chip is the cornerstone of a MEMS educational laboratorysystem.It has long been recognized that the science and engineering fields are best learned by doing,especially when there is intellectual
Modules,” a joint collaboration award with the University of Texas, in Austin. He has authored approximately 50 papers with more than 20 on using finite element learning modules in undergraduate engineering. He was the PI for the ini- tial four-year NSF CCLI grant entitled ”The Finite Element Method Exercises for use in Undergraduate Engineering Programs.”Dr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dan Jensen is a professor of engineering mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (mechanical engineering), M.S. (applied mechanics) and Ph.D. (aerospace engineering science) from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin
requiredadjustments to ensure maximum participation. This was resolved by developing a detailed schedule with flexibletimeframes, along with providing asynchronous learning materials to accommodate diverse academic calendars.Furthermore, participants occasionally faced difficulties in bridging the gap between theoretical concepts and theirpractical applications in manufacturing. To address this, we incorporated hands-on projects and real-world casestudies, which facilitated experiential learning and reinforced the practical relevance of the topics. Regular feedbacksessions allowed participants to voice concerns, enabling iterative improvements to the program's structure andcontent. From these experiences, several key lessons emerged: (1) Ensuring equitable
when theuniversity competed in the student rocketry challenge. MSU won the challenge to commence arocketry program as the first HBCU college among more than 100 HBCU in the USA. Thus, itwas made possible via an initiative from Base 11 of Costa Mesa, California, which awarded a $1.6-million grant to MSU in February 2019 to develop a hands-on, experiential liquid-fuel rocketrylab.The director of communication at BASE 11 stressed the overall goal of developing a rocketryprogram in an HBCU as the growing aviation industries are in large demand of aerospace engineerswith hands-on experience and skills on liquid propulsion engines. The director emphasized on howestablishing a rocketry lab at an HBCU will significantly provide the students
challenged by the Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO)of the Assistant Secretary of Defense with the design, development, and functionaldemonstration of an unmanned marine system (UMS) with the intended mission of searching for,locating, and collecting information on objects that are potentially unexploded ordnance (UXO)underwater.The multi-disciplinary student team was comprised of mechanical engineering, navalengineering, and computer science students. The problem statement they received was simpleand purposefully generalized, “… assemble an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV),Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV), Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), or UnmannedSurface Vessel (USV) in a relatively short period of time that is capable of searching for
Page 4.339.2to expose students to multidisciplinary team design. Mechanical engineering majors candesign the drive train and other moving subsystems, electrical engineering majors candesign sensor, motor and actuator circuitry, computer engineers can designmicrocontroller interfaces, and computer science majors can design software toimplement the desired behavior. Students may also focus on a subsystem outside theirmajor to broaden their knowledge.When done well, such a robot design involves several individuals or small groupsworking concurrently on various subsystems and communicating regularly to considersystems integration and project management issues. Getting students to workconcurrently has been one of our biggest challenges in several
virtual lab experiences havemuch more possibilities without being limited to lab courses. The project team and faculty in EEsuccessfully integrated laboratory experiences into purely theoretical courses via Hardware-in-Homework (HiH) concept [13, 14]. The Analog Discovery kit is a good example of HiH, whichcan play an important role for students who learn EE materials in an online setting. The uniquemeasurement features of the Analog Discovery kit can be appropriately applied to lower to upper-level courses [14]. Due to its readily available and portable nature, it will be beneficial forstudents who learn well with hands-on activities. With a growing need of an integration of online labs in engineering curriculum, it isimperative that we
2433 An Assessment of Active and Project Based Learning in Energy Conservation Education for Non-Technical Students Sarma V. Pisupati, Jonathan P. Mathews, David DiBiase, and Alan W. Scaroni Energy and Geo-Environmental Engineering Department and John A. Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth & Mineral Sciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802AbstractA 3-credit general education course on “Energy Conservation and EnvironmentalProtection” was developed for mostly non-science/engineering students
. Remote ExperimentationThe lead author has been working on remote laboratory development and implementation for Page 23.807.3more than ten years. During this period, he has attracted research and development grants fromthe National Science Foundation and industries. Some of these developments are used to deliverlaboratory courses within an electrical engineering technology program. This section willprovide an outline of those developments.To maximize the benefit of remote laboratories, the facility design philosophy includes a numberof features: a) use of emerging technologies; b) individualized learning; c) knowledge-centeredlearning; d
Experiences with Collaborative Learning Activities in Undergraduate STEM Courses Fernando Altamura, Alice Cherestes, and David Titley-Peloquin Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill UniversityIntroductionA variety of collaborative learning activities have been implemented in STEM courses of theBioresource Engineering undergraduate program at McGill University. The purpose of theseactivities is to create a setting for deeper understanding and promote active learning and studentengagement.The benefits of collaborative learning activities have been well documented in the literature.Readers interested in studies on two-stage collaborative testing are
of the fall 2011reporting period, the number of undergraduates enrolled in ECE at OU is now 345. Prior workdetails our methodology, which is focused on advanced engineering technologies, innovativedemonstrations, and hands-on activities at a level that the individual student can understand andappreciate.2 The implementation of the program was likely more important than themethodology. One of the primary reasons for this 40% increase in ECE enrollment in only threeyears is a drastic change in the student culture. Prior to 2008, our ECE students had minimalinvolvement in recruiting and retention efforts. Since 2008, a radical change has been made thatresulted in students driving the process. Two of these students are co-authors of this paper
engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Bringing Aerospace to K-12 Students Using Non-Traditional ApplicationsAbstractThere is a growing need to increase gender and ethnic diversity within science, technology, engineeringand mathematics (STEM) related fields, and aerospace in particular. The intent of this project is to showthat early STEM exposure, along with the
an established course in optical signal transmission.Students with majors in physics and engineering have learned professional optics techniquesfor evaluating the characteristics of optical fibers and obtained hands-on experience with opticalcommunications.IntroductionThe primary objective of the National Science Foundation (NSF) optics education project atNorth Dakota State University has been the development of an undergraduate optics laboratoryto serve the needs of a general optics course (Physics/ECE 411/611) that is the jointresponsibility of the Departments of Physics and Electrical and Computer Engineering. Thiscourse includes ten experiments in a lab that was established with the support of NSF andadapted from work done at New Jersey
and supporting advanced education of U.S. militarypersonnel. This paper reports a collaborative research effort between (a) NU and its communityservice support of wildfire management, (b) the SOEC Master of Science in Computer Scienceprogram, (c) a graduate student with vision (author Allen), who is a recognized national subject-matter-expert on MAFFS, and (d) Colonel Brian Kelly, Vice Wing Commander of the 146thAirlift Wing, Channel Islands Air National Guard in California, the sponsor of this project.Beneficiaries of this research are residents not only in Southern California but throughout all ofCalifornia and other western states at large. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest
Department of Civil Engineering within the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Miller earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering and a M.S. in Envi- ronmental Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Iowa. Her educational research interests are focused on methods to attract and retain women and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Development of a General Education First-Year Design CourseIntroductionWe discuss the development of a new first-year engineering course at Boise
-setlevel), the following tasks:(i) math and science courses- in preparation for engineering“gateway” courses;(ii) a practical hands-on “pre-college” training period; and,(iii) fostering a“proper learning environment” to help students acquire desirable attributes such as: analyticalskills, curiosity and desire to learn, creative thinking, and the importance of team work (7, 8)Thousands of native Arabs (citizens of the Arab Gulf States) have completed their engineeringeducation at one of the eight main public colleges (Table 1) of the Region, and have sinceoccupied government positions or joined the private sector, side by side with expatriates. Somehave established their own business, and many have moved up the ladder into responsiblemanagerial
designed by a group of faculty teaching thiscourse so that each question is tied with the course (or student) learning objectives (CLOsor SLOs) and the program outcomes (POs). Sample assessment charts are presented at theend of the paper and discussed.Introduction and Literature ReviewThere is a lot of literature on educational research and teaching and learning techniquesavailable that deal with improving Mechanics education. ASEE J. of EngineeringEducation, J. of Science, Math, Engineering and Technology (SMET) Education, J. ofSTEM, etc., are only a few of many such dedicated journals devoted to engineeringeducation. Numerous textbook authors and the publishers have organized forums oncollege campuses and at several educational conferences such
knownow, 100 percent, I’d take it again!”On Critical Thinking Skills Development – Several questions on the end-of-course critiques,given in class at the end of every semester were designed to assess the student’s perspective onhow Engr 110Z fostered critical thinking. Figure 4 shows a summary of the responses for theClass of 2000. From these responses, we conclude that the cadets believe that Engr 110Zfostered critical thinking. These results are compared to the re sponses for all other freshmancourses, typically, English, History, Chemistry, Foreign Language, and mathematics (calculus).Multi-Dimensional Scaling Diagnostic – An educational psychologist in the USAFABehavioral Science Department acquired data for a listing of paired engineering
they as humans are acomponent. Six faculty members were selected from Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Biology, History andEngineering Departments to teach the different portions of the course. Each instructor gave individual orgroup assignments and one quiz.best for his/her material. Each instructor then handed over the students’grades in his/her portion of the course to the coordinator of the course. The students were also asked towrite a paper which was submitted to the coordinator. The coordinator was responsible for the overallgrade for the students. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Different Models All three models presented above have their
Page 7.386.6 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”definition type material including grammar and syntax facts which are covered in lectureand laboratories.The midterm and final examinations normally consist of writing code which allowsstudents to demonstrate an ability to solve problems using C++ programming techniques.The final exam covers material for the entire course.Assignment Quiz One Midterm Quiz Two Final Exam LaboratoriesWeight 10% 20% 10% 30% 30%Assigning heavy weights to the
leverage this appeal to educate and attract pre-college students to Page 10.887.10manufacturing, and engineering in general. The CAD front-end provides a level of interactivity Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationthat makes this concept appealing as a hands-on exhibit in a museum, theme-park or science andtechnology centers.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Chandra, V., Mohanty, S.R., Kumar, R., “Automated control synthesis for an assembly line using discrete event system control theory”, Proceedings of
across the nation to getstudents interested and participating more in STEM related activities and performing better inscience and math as well. Programs are being started in elementary schools giving students anintroduction into engineering and technology and continue the whole way through high schoolwith programs like STEM camps and STEM job experience days. The United States was oncethe leader in science and math but has fallen from the number one spot to ranks well below theglobal average. Having a strong and larger STEM workforce in America is extremely importantso that there is an innovative advantage and the USA can keep up as well as compete globally.Even with these encouragement programs female student participation is still greatly
terms andconcepts. It also presents various methods for solving technology-related business problemsto the students. Finally, the course requires the students to discriminate between variousmethods that can be used to solve a systemic problem in a business. The course uses material and concepts drawn heavily from contemporary businessliterature that should be more easily understood and absorbed by engineering and engineeringtechnology students. Some topics were: Strengths-based Management 7, 8 Emotional Intelligence 9 Theory of Constraints 10, 11 Lean Thinking 12 Strategy Maps 13Students operate in teams and prepare papers on each topic covered. They are required tohave a presentation ready for each