M.A. in Psychological Measurement from Ewha Womans University. Her scholarly trajectory aims to improve education for underserved and un- derchallenged students with impactful research and evidence-based interventions. Longitudinal research methodology is the main area of her expertise, which has enabled her a) to investigate growth trajecto- ries of motivation and career choices; b) to identify opportunity gaps within underserved groups; and c) to evaluate and improve educational interventions in STEM. With the expertise in quantitative research methodology, she is engaged in collaborative research with entrepreneurship education and other interdis- ciplinary programs. American
]. In a survey conducted among American uppersecondary students, although most of the students claimed to be aware of the ethical course ofaction in various situations, most of them were not able to choose a correct ethical alternative evenwhen posed with situations that were easy to comprehend [2]. A very high proportion of highschool and undergraduate students were found to be engaging in academic dishonesty consideringdifferent motives and possible outcomes. Even other kinds of unethical behavior were found to bepresent among school students, which demanded establishment and education of a common set ofsocially acceptable standards on morality among students [3,4]. Past research also hints at studentsat the tertiary level lacking basic
course modification, are discussed in detail, followed byconclusion and future plan.Learning ObjectivesME-335/L and 435/L are aligned to several key ABET outcomes and hence are crucial coursesfor the Mechanical Engineering (ME) curriculum. Both these courses provide students withtheoretical knowledge and hands on experience. The ABET outcomes for ME-335/L class are asfollows:1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering, outcome (a),2. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, outcome (b),3. an ability to communicate effectively (3g1 orally, 3g2 written), outcome (g), and4. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
doubt that this content issignificant to not only medical and biotechnology students and professors, but to industryleaders, and the general public. The significance of e-document technology delivery for theuniversity laboratory experience through distance delivery is what this study is all about.Time is of the essence, when communicating cutting-edge biotechnology discoveries. There is notime to wait for a book to be published. The need for global dissemination of new procedures toa wider audience has resulted in a change in pedagogy on how higher education content isdelivered. Page 11.962.4III. How the electroporation technique is being
centersstudents on learning by engaging them in interactive practices [36]. Active learning comprises abroad range of pedagogical practices, from initiating student-to-student discussions, integratingreal-world applications in class, facilitating group activities, using formative feedback, askingstudents to lead activities, and many other potential learning activities. The important part ofactive learning is engaging people directly in the learning process so they actively participate intheir knowledge acquisition. There is a broad body of knowledge emphasizing the efficacy ofactive learning over traditional, instructor-centered practices [37], [38], [39]. Active learning canincrease student engagement in the learning process. Within STEM disciplines
Ohio Northern University, where he currently teaches first-year programming and user interface design courses, and serves on the college’s Capstone Design Committee. Much of his research involves design education pedagogy, including for- mative assessment of client-student interactions, modeling sources of engineering design constraints, and applying the entrepreneurial mindset to first-year programming projects through student engagement in educational software development. Estell earned his BS in Computer Science and Engineering degree from The University of Toledo and both his MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern
projects developed encompassed seven critical skills, they do not “hook” students early in theirclassifications (Student Life, Assistive Technologies, college career. Courses that engage students in hands-onOutdoor Activities, Appliances, Personal Use innovation and entrepreneurial activities are one way toConveniences, Environmental/Road Management/Office create that hook. At Michigan Technological University, weArrangement, and Phone/Portable Technologies). Over piloted modifications in a first-year engineering course thatthe course of the semester student teams completed allow students the opportunity to learn about innovation andproject deliverables. This
. The most striking feature, aside from its small size, is the color reversal of the keys;the naturals are black and the accidentals are white. Figure 1. Mozart's fortepiano,1 now housed in the Mozarteum in Salzburg.The major differences may be seen and heard at Reference 2.These differences had a major impact on the way classical composers composed, and it isdifficult to understand music of the late 18th and early 19th centuries completely withoutunderstanding (and hearing) these differences. Accurate reproductions of Mozart’s piano areavailable but these can cost in excess of $60,000 new, due to the large number of parts that mustbe hand carved from wood, as well as the string/soundboard system. The high cost limits theavailability
observation period.The second group participants worked on the design challenge with different degrees of successon the design activity. Even before the challenge officially started, three female participants weretalking about what they could do to try and complete the design task. One design team containeda member designing her own solution which was to construct a raft for Tinker Bell while herteammates worked on a type of bridge construction. Many design teams successfully completedthe design challenge of getting ‘Tinker Bell’ (ping-pong ball) across the water, but then chose tokeep working on more solutions to the given task. Both classes experienced a few studentsdisengaging in the design task but the majority of the students were fully engaged
prior. One of the new emphases of the survey is to gain a better understanding ofhow the specific post-graduation activities in which our alumni are engaged relate to theirperceptions of preparedness, as well as the importance they assign to selected competencies orabilities. In previous studies, we have evaluated how graduates in successive class yearsperceive various aspects of their education. For this study, the response data have beenpartitioned in a new way, categorizing alumni based on whether they pursued full-timeemployment directly after earning their undergraduate degrees or if they went on immediately tofull-time graduate school.II. Impact of Post-Graduation Activities on Perceptions of Preparedness and Importanceof Selected
potential as a STEM instructional approach. By capitalizing onthe design process teachers can enhance student engagement, motivation, application ofknowledge, and self assessment; elements essential for deep learning in STEM. Yet, many K-12educators are not familiar with the structure, elements, and process of engineering design. Theirunfamiliarity indicates a need to address K-12 teacher knowledge of engineering design toprepare them to use the process for instruction. We answered this call by making engineeringdesign a theme and focus of a residential four-day summer institute for K-12 teachers. Througha combination of presentations, hands-on activities and examples of profession engineeringapplications, we provided 250 K-12 educators with
processes that engineering is capable of bringing to the table. Thisis one of the most important initial messages that is a part of teaching engineering education forthe K-12 classroom.As an example, the use of a kit that allows students to assemble a pre-designed heart rate monitormay not impact critical thinking [14]. An activity that uses the monitor in the course of takingmeasurements is more of a pure science or mathematics activity than engineering. In fact, anypurely procedural activity runs the risk of losing its connection to engineering if it lacks problemsolving or design. This does not mean that the activity is somehow lesser, but it does mean that itdoesn’t meet learning objectives for engineering.This type of message is an example of
) Before DuringFigure 3. Students' identified support grouped by type of support Common themes from the open-ended responses emerged regarding how students’ socialinteractions and supports changed during the pandemic. Here we describe these themes usingquotes from the students by situating them within the framework and give preliminaryrecommendations for strategies to support students’ social support during remote instruction. SeeFigure 4 for a summary of recommendations.Support Peer-to-Peer Interactions The students reflected on how the pandemic impacted social interaction they had withtheir peers. Students expressed the value of peer support and how they missed face-to-faceinteractions with peers during the pandemic. For example
and provide handouts fortheir usage without losing course time to teach writing MATLAB scripts. Having to learn anotherprogramming (scripting) language along with C is manageable provided that the content from bothlanguages is properly managed. To keep the students engaged in programming, the author introducesa project toward the end of the course. Rather than just writing code to display data on screens or writeto files, the project was to show colorful animated pictures to illustrate a very rudimentary videogame. Most students, being recent high school graduates, have played video games. This project helpsthem realize some inner workings of video games and animations seen on TV. To make it interactive, Proceedings of the
tedious setup work eachsemester. This carries through to university assessment projects which require extracting resultson specific rubric lines from several assignments at the end of each semester. For teams using theLMS alone, this was a tedious task for graduate students that usually took at least half a day.Those who use the grading tool are now able to quickly complete similar regular tasks ofuploading student feedback, regardless of student numbers. For example, in Spring 2018, it tookone of the authors about 33 minutes to fully engage in manually uploading detailed feedback(grade breakdown and detailed comments included) on one programming assignment (with twoproblems) for a total of 57 students. The grading tool has reduced this labor to
in various manufacturing and inspection processes. ApplicableABET Outcomes are: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 11. Applicable Track-Specific ABET Outcomes are: M1,M2 and M3.ABET Outcomes are: Engineering graduates have (1) an ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science and engineering, (2) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as wellas to analyze and interpret results, (3) an ability to design a system, component or process tomeet desired needs, (4) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams, (5) an ability toidentify, formulate and solve engineering problems, (6) an understanding of the professional andethical responsibilities, (7) an ability to communicate effectively, (8) the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of
as future technology innovators and industry leaders; and to advance trans-disciplinary learning, engagement, and use-inspired research addressing important state and global challenges.The Purdue Polytechnic Institute is transforming the students’ learning environments inan effort to respond to the changes in our students and society, in hopes that it betterserve their needs (purdue Polytechnic Institute, 2016b). Faculty are being asked toevolve traditional pedagogy while they shape the minds of the 21st century engineeringtechnology student. If the mission is known and supported by a faculty member and“every facet of life is becoming increasingly reliant on technology” (Edudemic, 2014, p.1), it should ultimately pull faculty
Physics & Astronomy at Siena College. In addition to teaching physics and electronics courses for the department, she’s also served as the director of informal STEM programs at Siena. She’s developing MARVLS (Manipulable Augmented Reality Models to Learn Spatially) for general physics, plasma physics, chemistry, and engineering. MARVLS Apps are available on the App and Google Play Store. In 2022, she received an NSF grant to develop and study the impact of using MARVLS in the physics classroom. She started a small business called MARVLS, LLC. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Embodied Learning with Gesture Representation in an Immersive Technology
that there are two basic approaches universities employ to surmount thisproblem, and the choice of this approach deeply impacts the manner in which the entire course istaught. Forty high-ranked electrical engineering schools were surveyed 1. Two-thirds of thoseprograms with undergraduate robotics-centric programs use commercially-available robotics kits.This approach permits a carefully-organized modularized method of teaching that prevents less-skilled students from lagging behind. It is possible to find kits with a variety of interesting sensorsthat can spark the imagination, and little supervision is required while building the kit. Becausethe mechanical engineering problems have been pre-solved, this approach also allowsconcentration on
that the course modifications have had on the university as a whole.Finally, the paper will present assessment results of pre- and post-course surveys of studentperceptions of the use of ACL and PBL to apply attributes of the entrepreneurial mindset. Thesurveys demonstrate a positive shift in perceptions.1. IntroductionLawrence Technological University has offered engineering students entrepreneurial educationprograms for many years. Recognizing that graduates entering industry will require business andentrepreneurial skills, the College of Engineering developed an entrepreneurial certificateprogram and founded the Lear Entrepreneurial Center. The entrepreneurial certificate programdevelops student skills in communication and business
"storytelling","story-driven learning", and "narrative", and paired each of these terms with the search terms"engineering education" and "entrepreneurial mindset". The search resulted in 309 uniquearticles. The papers were screened by title, abstract, and full paper based on the followingcriteria: written after 2010, original research papers, related to engineering or entrepreneurship,and content focused on undergraduate students. Papers were limited to post-2010 due to KaranWatson's discussion about the potential impact of stories to encourage change at the 2010ASEE Conference. A total of 33 papers remained after the screening process. We thenclassified the papers based on various parameters, including populations of interest, methods ofdata
designprocess was the focus of this research, and upper class students had higher self-efficacy for communicating a designversus constructing a prototype. In contrast, one study conducted by Minear et al.[46] looked at individual andgender differences using three forms of engineering self-efficacy, Tinkering, Math, and Design, betweeninexperienced (less than 24 credits, or first year students) and experienced (more than 24 credits, or sophomorestanding) students, finding a strong positive correlation between spatial skills and Design self-efficacy only in thefirst year engineering students.DISCUSSIONIn the studies included in this review, there were many different measures of engineering self-efficacy relating toacademic, skill-specific, and general
flexible assembly of curricularand learning modules from component pieces cannot be realized without consideration of seriousintellectual property issues. But advances in digital rights management offer the potential oftracking usage in a way that reputation can accrue to creators. Certainly this has bearing on howthe engineering education community formally recognizes scholarship.Communication and collaboration capabilities accessible through and in some cases supportedby NSDL offer the engineering education community the opportunity to foster the creation ofteam learning environments that pervade the entire curriculum. These could certainly extendoutside of the formal campus confines to include students from other campuses, practicingengineers
material (i.e., mathematics, physics, chemistry, English) being taken byengineering students. Thus the SUCCEED Coalition embarked on a set of experiments in 1992 toexplore different approaches to integrate the freshman year.Coupling subject integration in the first year with an introduction to engineering was ideally suitedfor the Coalition’s program given the large resources required to conduct large-scale experiments,the availability of a multiple-campus laboratory to determine robustness, the extended period offunding, and the visibility of this NSF program. The approaches to integration studied by thecoalitions required building teams of faculty from multiple disciplines and assessment experts toevaluate the program impact and designing and
as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of
links to resources and opportunities in one document, although lengthy, providesone single source for up-to-date links that can be of used by parents, teachers, students,professors, academic administrators, and engineering professional wishing to motivate andprovide background resources to help guide minority or women during their studies or careers inengineering, e.g. • children to consider careers in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), • undergraduate and graduate students to select and pursue a major in an Engineering or STEM discipline, and find scholarships to fund their studies • faculty to survive the tenure process and thrive in an academic environment • academic administrators to get
projects examining implementation of hightechnology, telecommunications and international networking in the classroom. Dr. Irvine has trained preserviceand inservice teachers in the area of electronic communication and technology integration. She serves as consultantto schools and business on design, implementation, and analysis of technology-based solutions to instruction andapplication development. Through field-based research, she has successfully worked to integrate Internet-basedactivities into educational programs for urban, rural, and at-risk K-12 students. Dr. Irvine has taught numerouscourses and workshops devoted to evaluation and assessment of the impact of technology on education. She hasdeveloped and delivered courses and training
Page 15.1046.2Page 15.1046.3the program: four Unified Robotics courses based on a “spiral curriculum” philosophy where thestudents are engaged in increasingly complex designs and various technical topics are introducedas needed. Each of these courses includes elements of CS, ECE and ME. To add cohesion withincourses, each course in the unified sequence has its own focus, such as locomotion, sensing,manipulation, and navigation. Students in the Robotics program also take other required andelective courses, selected from courses already offered by the various engineering departments.In addition, the program includes a component in social issues and another in entrepreneurship toprepare future “entrepreneurial engineers”7. Like all majors at WPI
goals that primarily drive engineering education [1, 2] are 1) improving student-learning experience and 2) preparing the students for a successful future career. Recent researchon effective engineering education [1, 2] suggests multiple approaches for student success in theclassroom and beyond. These learning approaches focus on the engagement of students in theclassroom and outside by creating a teachable moment using inductive learning [3, 4, 5], activelearning via in-class activities [6, 7], experiential learning [8, 9, 10], visual learning [2, 11], andproject-based learning [12, 13], to name a few. All the proposed learning approaches augmentthe traditional learning methods. A common factor among all these approaches is studentinvolvement
create authentic design experiences.18,19 Moreover,computer animations can enhance student engagement, promote visual learning, and enhance theunderstanding of complex concepts.20The Contest FormatBased on these considerations, we decided to use information technology to facilitate broadparticipation in the contest, to reduce its cost, and to enhance the realism of the designexperience. The resulting contest format is illustrated in the following sequence of events: • Competing individually or in teams of two, contestants access a website to register for the contest. • They download the West Point Bridge Designer software and use it to design a bridge, based on specified criteria and constraints. • They upload the bridge