addition to designing and buildingthe bridge, students were required to estimate failure loads. Many students were able to estimatethe failure loads using Working Model within a couple of hours. And Working Model allowedstudents to do trial and error design techniques. Page 3.33.72.5 PROBLEMSAs with most new technologies, there were some problems that arose. One of the mostsignificant was that computer laboratories were overwhelmed by the exploding computer usageon campus. Another problem was that we had two main versions of Mathcad in use, and the fileswere not backward compatible. The older version 5.0 was in use in most labs, although version7.0
AC 2012-4226: EMPHASIZING CORE CALCULUS CONCEPTS USINGBIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS TO ENGAGE, MENTOR, AND RETAINSTEM STUDENTSDr. John D. DesJardins, Clemson University John DesJardins received his Ph.D. in bioengineering from Clemson University in Dec. 2006 and has worked for more than 15 years as a biomechanical research engineer. He has co-authored more than 150 peer-reviewed journal and conference publications in the areas of biomechanics, biomaterials tribology and mechanical testing, and is the director of the Laboratory of Orthopaedic Design and Engineering at Clemson University. He currently leads or participates in many multi-disciplinary research teams on projects funded through NASA, DoD, DoT, NSF, biomedical
, profitability, quality and manufacturing; economic analysis; flow charting; sketching CAD; and teaming. A term design project is included2.This course is the first course that an engineering student will usually take in their curriculumand is a four semester hour, open-ended design course. The course has three components;laboratory, projects and modeling with six contact hours3.Initial PlanningThe critical elements of the MEP Summer Bridge Program were to introduce the incomingstudents to the campus, university life, and the engineering curriculum. When the planning forthe program began, the MEP determined that there were five program goals that needed to beincorporated into the curriculum of the two week program. These goals were quickly
fiction places the student inanother world to examine important human conflicts, issues, questions, and desires. Second,science fiction provides a mental laboratory in which students can perform thought experimentswith new technology. Third, a science fiction course can allow engineering students to interactwith students in less technical disciplines. This cross-fertilization is often very helpful inworking through issues of technology and its interaction with the human society within which itis embedded.I. IntroductionArchibald Putt has said “technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understandwhat they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand.” We generallysuppose engineers, the designers of technology
questions to document learning gains in a small statics class,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2016.[4] M. Muñoz-García, G. Moreda, N. Hernández-Sánchez, and V. Valiño, “Student reciprocal peer teaching as a method for active learning: An experience in an electrotechnical laboratory,” Journal of Science Education & Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 729–734, Oct. 2013.[5] D. Missingham, and R. Matthews,“A democratic and student-centred approach to facilitating teamwork learning among first-year engineering students: a learning and teaching case study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 412–423, July 2014.[6] D.G
swarms, and we utilize our understanding ofhuman-swarm interaction as a model for organizing their research experience. Students gainfirst-hand knowledge of the nonlinearity and robustness of robot swarm behaviors throughobservations and interactions during hands-on experiments. We give students ownership ofengineering problems formulated as challenges their “swarm” must solve. With this activelearning approach, students’ creativities are stimulated, and they become more confident,comfortable, and competent in solving complex robotics problems [4], [5].We utilized a sequential mixed methods evaluation design for triangulation, complementarity,and development [6], [7]. This allowed us to leverage analysis of collected data to informdevelopment of
directly with the tools, data, theories and models involved with conductingscience. Advances have been made towards replicating the ability of online learners to completelaboratory experiments that traditionally are conducted in-person. Virtual laboratories, where studentscan conduct experiments online to explore engineering concepts and theories without physicallystepping into a lab, provide opportunities for students to access scientific knowledge regardless oftheir ability to access equipment and facilities. Research has shown that there is virtually no differencein student ability to acquire knowledge of scientific concepts though the use of a virtual laboratoryexplorations versus being physically present to conduct an experiment [57]. Offered
AC 2011-2557: TEAMING IN AN ENGINEERING PROGRAMMING COURSECordelia M Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette Cordelia M. Brown is an Assistant Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer- sity, her M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Tuskegee University. Her research interests include assessment of instructional methods, laboratory design, collaborative learning, and retention and recruitment issues in engineering education.Dr. Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Introducing High Performance Computing to Undergraduate StudentsAbstractRecently, President Obama issued an Executive Order to ensure the United States’ leadership incomputing. Necessary hardware and software design skills should be introduced into universitycurricula. Computing has been advanced to High Performance Computing (HPC) throughout thepast decades. However, undergraduate students are still lacking of experience in how HPCfunctions especially in minority-serving institutions, because our current computing curricula donot adequately cover HPC contents. To address this problem, a team of faculty members haveobtained external funding supports to improve undergraduate computing
Education and Outreach Program and the overall vision of theEngineering Research Center?Campers were asked to complete pre-/post- written assessments. An advanced-level graduateresearch assistant, specifically trained in research design and procedures and supervised byfaculty, administered the assessment instruments. Data were subsequently analyzed forkeywords. Prior to data collection, Institutional Review Board approval and camper and parentalinformed consent were obtained. Summer campers reported high levels of satisfaction with theNano-to-Bio Summer Camp experience, including enhanced understanding of complex conceptssuch as the relationship between human tissue and engineering.Seventeen high school students completed the general and content
) have provided seven techniques, often called declarative learning. Several, or all of these techniques help the instructors to assess prior knowledge. The principle to emphasize on the “value-added” nature of university higher educational methodologies.4. Self Assessment : Sally Brown, Phil Race & Brenda Smith provide several techniques for implementation of Self-Assessment. (Brown, Race and Smith, 1996). The students should be provided with an opportunity to express their “satisfaction-rating” of courses, laboratory experiences and the educational experience as a whole. This serves as a very useful tool and provides valuable assessment data upon which the department can take appropriate action to stay at the “edge of
that providesstudents with educational offerings in key technical and managerial areas of construction.Technical educational areas include soils and foundations, structural analysis and design,mechanical and electrical systems, materials, temporary structures, and surveying. Managerialtopics covered are cost estimating, project scheduling, cost control, contracts, and projectmanagement. The construction program does not require nor provide technical and designofferings that meet ABET requirements, and is currently a candidate program for ACCEaccreditation.Students lacking an undergraduate degree in engineering (ABET accredited) are not eligible forthe graduate programs in engineering at UNLV. As a result, prior to the development of amaster’s
Service learning as a catalyst for sustainable change in Ecuador B.M. Wright, C.W. Swan, and D.M. Matson Tufts UniversityAbstractThe student chapter of Engineers Without Borders at Tufts University allows students the opportunity ofservice learning while exploring sustainable solutions to real world problems. Interdisciplinary teamsresearch potential technologies and propose implementation strategies, conduct laboratory research at theuniversity on performance trade-offs, and then gain field experience by traveling to the target communityto develop personal relationships which support sustainable social change. One such investigation hasfocused on water quality
[27, 28]. Some of the most recent pedagogical innovations, suchcollaborative pair debugging [24, 29], which makes use of socially mediated metacognition [30],were inspired by the cognitive apprentice classification.Affective Research on DebuggingIn addition to cognitive models, we also want to address the affective components of debugging,such as emotions. Debugging inspires a wide range of feelings. When bugs are encountered,some students may experience frustration, fear, and anxiety that cause them to becomedisengaged and avoid the subject [31]. They might also fail the course because they don’t havethe patience to “fix” their issues [12]. Fields et al. [32, 33] observed feelings of comfort andcompetency when high school students designed
Engineering at Oklahoma State University. She is both a licensed structural engineer and architect. She graduated from Oklahoma State with Bachelor’s degrees in Architectural Engineering and Architecture. She received a MS in Architecture from University of Cincinnati, focusing in the history and theory of tectonics in architecture. Professor McCoy received a MCEng with a Structural emphasis from University of Kansas. Her professional experience at Thornton Tomasetti gave her experience in long span structures, high rises, and steel connection design. Professor McCoy’s interests lie in the intersection of structures and architecture. Of particular interest are instances where building technology leads the cutting edge of
. This course series was designed and implemented toprovide students a unique opportunity to acquire hands-on experience interacting and engagingin operations and maintenance activities of a functioning research reactor. Students whosuccessfully completed all requirements identified within the course series were afforded theopportunity to be tested by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) and acquire aReactor Operator License on the Oregon State TRIGA® Reactor (OSTR). Five studentscompleted all requirements and are presently USNRC licensed reactor operators at the OSTR.Oregon State University houses one of only 30 functioning civilian research and test reactors inthe United States. Facilitating this opportunity for nuclear science and
at an offcampus location was in place. However, in this first course offering, no separateaccommodations were requested.Discussion labs are where the online course and on-campus course differ in that the onlinecourse did not have a discussion lab. The discussion lab is a time when students in smallergroups of 24 students review additional example problems, take check-point quizzes, andparticipate in hands-on laboratory experiments with the teaching assistants. The decision not tohave a discussion lab for the online course was one that was made with much reservation. Thedriving factor was the dilemma of how to schedule a time when all 39 students would be able toCourse Format On-campus Statics
course materialfor a total of 129 to 132 hours of course work. Considering the rising costs of each program,simply adding hours to accommodate additional emphasis on technical writing is not a workablesolution. Given this problem, are there solutions? In simple terms, yes there are, but are theschools, professors, and students willing to undertake them? That is a more difficult question.From my experience as a program evaluator for program accreditation for the past twenty plusyears, one of the most frequent items noted is in the use of multiple choice or fill-in-the-blankreports being used in technical laboratory courses. While it reduces the time required to grade apaper, it also robs the student of an opportunity to practice technical writing
, faculty treated laboratory, clinical, andfieldwork experiences as supplementary learning activities that reinforced students’ mastery ofthe knowledge transmitted to them.”3 3. NEEDS-DRIVEN TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONAfter three decades, higher education at the engineering schools is still primarily tied to thesingular linear research model of science-driven technology development and the didacticapproach to professional education. There, the goals are viewed primarily as teachingundergraduates and, at the graduate level, as research for the discovery and dissemination of newscientific knowledge and the graduate education of future teachers and academic researchers. Atpresent, the graduate education of engineers has basically evolved
empathy. Thispotentially surpasses that of the faculty-student relationship. Capturing these elements and implementing them into theFreshman Engineering experience requires commitment and resources; however, in application to recruitment andretentio~ the numerous benefits outweigh initial investments. The Freshman Engineering Seminar at the University of Pittsburgh is a non-credit course required by allfreshman engineering students. It traditionally included guest speakers and panel discussions, and lacked involvementby upper-class engineering students. During the 1995-96 academic year, a redesign of the seminar occurredemphasizing small group discussions facilitated by student peer mentors. Content was expanded beyond
’ Perceptions about Learning Quantum Mechanics via Computer SimulationsAbstractQuantum mechanics (QM) is an important topic in engineering and physics, necessary forboth the mathematical and physical prediction and explanation of a particle’s behavior atatomic and subatomic levels. Computer simulations provide an advantage for helpingstudents make sense of abstract concepts and visualize complex phenomena in the process ofdeveloping a conceptual understanding of quantum knowledge. Students’ experiences andattitudes about learning via computer simulations can inform educational design and improvecontent delivery. In this paper, we studied students’ perspective about how simulationsinfluenced their QM learning. Results of this study
support staff, enabling issues to be addressed before being reported by endusers.KeywordsUndergraduate laboratories, undergraduate projects, user experience, network analytics, K-12schools, technology management, cloud services, performance monitoring© American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE National ConferenceProblem statementK -12 schools across the nation are moving the resources that their information technologydepartments once provided locally, to Cloud Services offered by many different providers [1],[2], [3]. A 2013 study by the Fordham University, Center for Law and Information Policy,conducted a nationwide survey of school districts to determine the prevalence of cloud servicesin the
either term paperor term project. Term paper allows students to read some emerging and interesting topic relatedto the course. Typically, textbooks contain at least one year old material (even they are publishedrecently) because of editing, reviewing, publishing and press delays. Thus, term paper allowsstudent to read about recent advances in the topic and do some independent research. This helpsthem to be a life-longer learner and reader as well as technical writer. If students wish to design,analyze, implement and evaluate some interesting projects, they can choose term project andlearn how engineering systems are designed, implemented and evaluated. This provides somehands-on experience for students and provides learning by doing. Term paper
pedagogical methods and materials to enhance engineering education. Her most recent educational research includes the collaboration with Tennessee State University and local high schools to infuse cyber- infrastructure learning experience into the pre-engineering and technology-based classrooms, the collab- oration with community colleges to develop interactive games in empowering students with engineering literacy and problem-solving, the integration of system-on-chip concepts across two year Engineering Science and four year ECE curricula, and the implementation of an educational innovation that demon- strates science and engineering principles using an aquarium. Her work has resulted in over 90 journal and conference
Kids curriculum comprised a series of experiential learning activities designed to graduallyguide students in understanding the role of robots in manufacturing and developing skills on how to workwith these technologies. The student learning outcomes were that at the end of the program, students wereexpected to: (1) understand why cobots are relevant in today’s manufacturing, (2) be able to program cobotsto perform fundamental industrial tasks, (3) understand how advanced machine tools work, (4) operatemachine tools to make different items, and (5) perform basic 2D and 3D designs using Computer-AidedDesign (CAD) software. To achieve these learning and experience outcomes in a fun, engaging, andimpactful way, the curriculum adopted an activity
and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion systems. At Baylor University, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, and propulsion systems, as well as freshman engineering. Research interests include renewable energy to include small wind turbine aerodynamics, UAS propeller design and experimental convective heat transfer as applied to HVAC and gas turbine systems. c American Society for Engineering
investigation to the internal dynamics of the rest. In laboratory work this principle isused to construct reproducible experiments, but also mentally it is used to think about systems inhypothesis and mental experiments. Today laboratories, being more and more penetrated bycomputers, a free and easy distribution of a system between reality and virtuality has someadvantage. Certain well known aspects of a system can be represented in a formal way byalgorithms in the computer, others to be investigated in more detail are represented in reality, butcoupled to a dynamic surrounding. This allows completely new forms of easy experimental workand learning. Here hyper bonds come into play.In order to provide arbitrary boundary conditions, we must have a
provide examples of the curriculum,what is covered and how we cover it. We also provide examples of laboratory projectsthat are used to complement the class lecture sessions. We use MATLAB software in allthe lab projects.We also discuss possible implementations of the speech coding and processing usinghardware such as DSPs. In the future, we plan to introduce the use of FPGAs for thisapplication as well.Details of the course and our experiences in developing and offering them will bepresented at the conference.IntroductionPreviously, we have developed three graduate-level courses in the Multimedia area ofSpeech to teach the fundamentals of speech coding and voice-over-IP. They are a 3-course sequence (1) ELEN 421 (Speech Coding I) (2) ELEN 422
Engineering Occupation Spectrum. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering Educationprofession with a valued channel of new employees. This blurring in the biomedical engineeringoccupational spectrum provides individuals working in the broad biomedical engineering fieldhaving a wide variety of responsibilities, education, professional experience, and job titles aslisted in Table 1. Table 1. Biomedical Engineering Technology Job Categories.9 * BMET I: a junior biomedical equipment technician * BMET II: a biomedical equipment technician * BMET III: a senior biomedical equipment
Paper ID #25027Diversity and Inclusion and Research Partnership Development: Can SeedInvestments Really Help Promote Trans-Institutional Collaborations?Mr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include critical thinking, ethics, and process design and training.Ms. Christine Tysor, Virginia Tech Chris Tysor is a Program Manager as well as the Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator at the Institute for