. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Reflection and Metacognition in Capstone DesignAbstractReflection is a valuable skill that is not immediately familiar to many of our students. Our facultyteam has introduced systematic reflection in a two-semester multidisciplinary engineering designcourse at the United States Military Academy at West Point. A course goal is to produceengineers competent in designing with current technologies who are able to anticipate and torespond to change. Because a key component of the course has always been the assessment of thedesign against the requirements, we chose to augment the design process with multipleopportunities for reflection.This year’s course consists of 18 capstone
. market is clearly global, the incentives for understanding such policy issues areclear.These examples are given to suggest that exploring some of these "soft" design issues inthe capstone design course could contribute to the general education component of acurriculum. These experiences could also be structured to provide evidence forachievement of outcomes 3(h) and 3(j).Professional societiesSeveral of the engineering societies are major standards developers. They have or are Page 10.746.4developing materials that can be used to provide basic background on standards and Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
think-aloud method asks researchparticipants to verbalize their thought processes during a task, allowing researchers to capture thedetails of their behaviors. Ten mechanical engineering students were recruited and asked togenerate potential solutions for a design problem. We analyzed patterns in students’ conceptgeneration practices to uncover why they limited divergent thinking. Participants narrowed theproblem that restricted potential solutions, eliminated potential ideas due to financial costs,directed themselves away from potential solutions outside of their knowledge, and focused oncriticizing existing solutions that led them to suggest concepts that were minor improvements onthose existing solutions. By understanding specific behaviors
potentialfindings. For this case, the intervention led to a change in the sketches as well as in how thestudent was talking about people who would use the designs. This case study suggests that achange to instructions during conceptual sketching—requiring representations of people—mayfoster engineering students’ engagement in human-centered design practices.IntroductionHuman-centered design (HCD) requires a deep understanding of people in the design context[1]–[3]; however, research documents that engineering students have struggled to consider thepeople who will use their designs [4]–[9]. Empathy is a key mindset in human-centered design inorder to effectively understand people’s experiences and incorporate them into design decisions[10]–[12]. Empathy
and demand specification to go on. The goal of the project described here is toenhance the current curriculum in order to better prepare students for this senior design course,which will in turn help them to better understand the application of chemical engineeringknowledge in general. Page 4.547.1Rather than add new courses or completely change the curriculum in place, we propose thatdesign projects be included within the six core courses of the chemical engineering curriculum.This "vertical integration of design" will expose students to the concepts of applied design whilethey are learning about a particular topic. There are several reasons
students to gain experience in design, but experience alonedoes not guarantee learning of skills and knowledge, or the ability to transfer this knowledge tonew situations. Researchers and theorists have long trumpeted the value of reflective practice asa differentiating factor in the effectiveness of practitioners. As shown by the growing number ofpublications on the topic in engineering education literature, teaching students the process andvalue of reflection is increasingly recognized as an essential component of engineering designeducation.To support teaching and learning of reflection in engineering capstone design courses, this studyseeks to understand how students reflect—individually and as a team—as they are engaged in adesign project
. This is useful for showing features of parts that students wouldnormally interact with when in the classroom. Figure 3b shows examples of failed prints from3D printed parts in order to facilitate a discussion of typical issues encountered in 3D printingand how to minimize those in the design process. With the elimination of sharing physicalobjects between students, this camera has the ability to replicate some of those activities. (a) (b) Figure 2: An OKIOCAM document camera shown (a) folded and (b) unfolded (a) (b) Figure 3: Examples of using a document camera in class for (a) engineering drawings and (b
SpatialVis had on these institutions and students was not possible. However, qualitative informationregarding learning outcomes was established through instructor feedback. Both courses hadsimilar learning outcomes such as understanding engineering design methodology anddemonstrating the role of graphics in the engineering design process, organizing and deliveringeffective verbal, written and graphical communication, and applying relevant sketching, 2D and3D techniques and skills using modern engineering tools. Developing spatial visualization andreasoning skills, related directly to the Spatial Vis app, was also one of the primary learningoutcomes for both courses.Additionally, the digital nature of the app allows for the quantification of data
Paper ID #13265Tracking Student Engagement with a Touchscreen App for Spatial Visualiza-tion Training and Freehand SketchingProf. Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His interests include robotics, biomedical devices, product design, and engineering education. He is co-founder of Coactive Drive Corporation, a company that provides force feedback solutions. Since 1999 he has taught engineering design and been the director of the Mechanical Engineering Design center at UC San Diego. In fall 2012, Dr. Delson introduced a
AC 2010-211: A SURVEY OF GRAPHIC PROFESSIONALS FOCUSED ONDISTANCE EDUCATION TRENDS IN TECHNICAL/ENGINEERINGAaron Clark, North Carolina State UniversityJeremy Ernst, North Carolina State UniversityBrian Downs, North Carolina State University Page 15.100.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Survey of Graphic Professionals Focused on Distance Education Trends in Technical/Engineering Graphics Education in the United States; Part IIAbstractResearch was conducted in the fall of 2008 to explore emerging trends in technical/ engineeringgraphics education. The study surveyed Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)members
the ASEE ECE Division, served as an as- sociate editor for the ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, and served on the IEEE Committee on Engineering Accreditation Activities, the IEEE Education Society Board of Governors, the ABET EAC (2009-2014), and EAC Executive Committee (2015-2018). Dr. Rover is a Fellow of the IEEE and of ASEE.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student
in Elementary Schools is a two-year research project fundedby the National Institutes of Health. The Engineering Design Models in ElementarySchools project model is comprised of teacher professional development, cross-curriculargrade level teacher planning, and ongoing programmatic alignment. The teacherprofessional development phase provides implementation strategy including ensuringfoundational understanding of Engineering, Science and Technology, using engineeringas a core subject integration tool, using recording and assessment tools to documentstudent process and learning outcomes. Additionally the teacher professionaldevelopment involves implementing problem based learning approaches andunderstanding competency alignment with an
American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Complexities of Engineering Design and System ModelingAbstractOne of the many challenges facing the engineering profession and its system of engineeringeducation is the need for effective problem solving and decision making in the midst of theincreasing complexity of contemporary technological systems. Simple observation reveals thatengineered products are becoming more complicated over time. Perhaps more importantly, theinteractions between technological artifacts and the humans and societies who create and usethem, as well as the interactions between the technological artifacts and the living world in whichthey are embedded, are multiplying. Understanding the nature of these
goal for the year, for the entire team and theindividual sub-engineering groups, and (3) develop a detailed documentation strategy, i.e., aresearch notebook, that future teams can easily understand. We have found our teams to beextremely successful in research, while at the same time developing a tremendous awareness ofthe advantages of working together via an interdisciplinary effort.I. IntroductionUndergraduate research many times takes a back seat to Industrial or Competition based projectsin Senior Design or Capstone Design courses. At LeTourneau University, with its strictlyundergraduate engineering student population, our two-semester senior design sequence is one ofthe few courses in which a faculty member has the opportunity to enlist
design process course has beenimplemented for the past several years. The main objective of this exercise is to familiarize thestudents not only with the nature of redesign of a mechanical system, but also the ongoingprocess of investigating and understanding of the engineering principles behind the new productsentering the market. In addition, as part of the assignment, student design teams working onvarious products must come up with at least one concept to improve the performance of thesystem being studied for their reverse engineering project. Page 25.1130.2Due to its very nature, reverse engineering is a common practice in diverse fields
framework members is discipline-dependent, the construction of the argumentis field- invariant. When using argumentation in a classroom environment, the instructor plays animportant role by helping the student understand theories and principles, but the instructor is notthe authority to explaining why a principle makes sense for solving a problem. Table 2 providesexamples of the appropriate questions and actions that teachers can use to develop the student’scognitive skills via argumentation. Through the lens of engineering practice, an argumentation-based framework (Table 1) is used to support the rational decisions that design teams make whenanalyzing, deliberating and compromising on the solution to an engineering problem (Jin andGeslin, 2009
. He has conducted research in the areas of environmentally-responsible manufacturing, globally-distributed engineering teaming and early engineering education development and has over 30 years of combined academic and industrial management experience. He received his BSME and MSME degrees from Michigan Technological University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Rapidly Deployable Prototyping Activities to Teach Engineering DesignAbstractThis paper describes kits that were deployed in a freshman engineering design course and used toenhance understanding of the engineering design process. In a first-year engineering designcourse student teams were given instructions and a kit of
Paper ID #17498Enhancing Multiple Thinking through the Engineering Design ProcessDr. Jaby Mohammed, Petroleum Institute Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE. He received his PhD in Indus- trial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open Uni- versity (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at Indiana Purdue Fort
course features a multidisciplinary group of students with a diverse scope ofinterests.Due to these diverse interests, the course’s primary learning objective is broadly formulated sothat the course content is of relevance to all engineering disciplines. The primary objective, forstudents to gain an understanding of the engineering design process, is presented via threeseparate content modules: • Design Methodology: Students learn how to systematically address an open-ended design problem by learning project management techniques, structured concept generation and selection methods, and design communication principles. • Graphics Communication: Students learn how to graphically communicate their design ideas through
reality by superimposing information onto what is already visible. Augmented reality(AR) is a technology that blends computer-generated elements with live video in real-time hence,incorporating AR in authentic learning activity has the potential to help understand how usersview the real world and make informed decisions to improve workplace decisions.This paper serves as a literature review for a larger study that investigates how engineeringstudents set priorities in engineering design to assess their preparedness for industry. The largerstudy seeks to answer the following research questions: • How do students perceive their undergraduate education prepares them to set priorities in engineering design? • How do authentic learning
Page 22.868.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Industry Based Projects and Preparing Engineers for the 21st Century WorkforceIntroductionAt the October 2005 National Science Foundation Advanced Technology Education (NSF-ATE)Annual Meeting, Dr. Renee S. Lerche, an executive at The Ford Motor Company and a nationalauthority on global leadership and workforce development, said that, “employers need workerswith deep experience with scientific inquiry, design and problem solving solutions.” Studentsmust be able to apply what they learn to real world problems that are relevant and meaningful. Inparticular, research has documented that contextual learning
work within each of them. Table 1 summarizes this agreement.Table 1: Comparison of epistemic commitments and practices in mathematics, science andengineering Science Engineering Design MathematicsGoal Explain natural Solve a problem Identify patterns and phenomenon by through design, structures on which to building general changing the world base conjectures principles, regarding future understanding the patterns and world structures.Common • Ask and refine
designed by Michigan Tech created awareness amongmechanical engineering students. However, experts from Michigan Tech suggested that toincrease engagement in sustainability, the curricula should provide students with more real-worldlearning experiences [9].Similarly, BSU introduced sustainability in the civil engineering curriculum by adding a coursespecifically dedicated to sustainability; this solved the lack of S&R coverage and modified theexisting traditional teaching method [10]. Interviews were conducted with senior civilengineering students to understand attitudes toward S&R concepts better. The interviewquestions were based on students' knowledge by describing their understanding of S&R conceptsfrom the civil engineering
yield an artifact, system, or process torealize an opportunity or to satisfy a problem. Engineering design is complex and typically setwithin a system that may be interwoven into other systems. Furthermore, engineering designs areoften non-linear, iterative, and contain multiple interconnected variables. Therefore, thinking interms of systems in engineering design is a required skill for the successful engineer’s tool box.The aim of this research study was to understand high school students’ systems thinking whenengaged in an engineering design challenge. Specifically, emerging qualitative themes andphenomena related to systems thinking in engineering design were explored and analyzed. This study included 12 high school students. The
-funded project.IntroductionBucknell's College of Engineering is implementing Project Catalyst, a three-year effort todevelop a general-purpose model for the nationally recognized need of systemic engineeringeducation reform. The plan is to integrate instructional design techniques, transform the Page 7.399.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”classroom into a cooperative learning environment, and incorporate efficiently and effectivelythe use of information technology in the teaching
currentlyresearch being conducted to address this lack of feedback skills in industry at the professionallevel19 and in education at the instructor22 and student level23.For professors and teaching assistants, learning to give good feedback is an important aspect oftheir job. For students, it is an important aspect of becoming a professional engineer – givingfeedback is one of the many things an engineer does as part of their job16, 17. Research alsosuggests that evaluating other students’ design work and design processes helps improve theevaluator’s understanding of design24. So providing feedback to other students helps studentsdevelop a better understanding of design and also helps students to develop a professional skill.Research Purpose and QuestionA
rectifying the problemsituation and increasing professional skills.Related design principles:• A resource for engineering educators should help them break down complex teaching situations into smaller, more manageable elements. (Design Principle #1)• A resource for engineering educators should help them understand the purposes and benefits of mentorship, particularly instructional consultation. (Design Principle #3)• A resource for engineering educators should help them to see their engineering discipline represented in resource materials. (Design Principle #4)• A resource for engineering educators should help them to see themselves represented in resource materials. (Design Principle #5)Picture and caption. These elements add visual
and Genetically-Modified Organisms 2 The global economy has made understanding the needs and beliefs of people very different fromour own an essential skill for engineering students. “Companies as agents and drivers of global change,must be engaged in efforts to develop solutions to critical social and environmental issues” (Logan, Roy, &Regelbrugge, 1997, p. 115). Adding the word ‘engineers’ to ‘companies’ in this quotation serves as astatement of our goal. In the long term, socially beneficial and environmentally sustainable designs will beessential components in a company’s global competitiveness, and it is engineers that will create thesedesigns. We are
also develops resiliency and persistence, understanding setbacks as opportunitiesfor growth, not failures.Developing a reflective habit in the engineering design classroom can help students realize thesebenefits. Pragmatically, reflection assignments create an opportunity for students to review thesteps they took and to make plans for how to proceed [6]. In addition to producing a design, theaims of design courses also includes developing personal and professional skills, such creativity,communication, and program management skills. Documented through previous research [6–9],developing a reflective practice aids the acquisition of design skills, either directly or indirectly.For example, goal setting within reflection directly exercises
• Enhance the junior-level design experience with formal training in project management, entrepreneurialism, and system integration. (This is an interdisciplinary initiative between the Colleges of Business and Engineering.) • Utilizing an enhanced “Write/Speak to Learn” program to help the students better understand the systems they design.MethodsThe ECE curriculum is relatively traditional and is shown in Table 1. All of the required ECEcourses already include a laboratory component, and it is these laboratories that are beingadapted to include project-based system designs. Typically, the basic concepts being taught inthe labs remain very similar to what they were without the system level design, however thesebasic concepts