Paper ID #31651The sociotechnical core curriculum: An interdisciplinary EngineeringStudies degree programDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural history of technology, and the aerodynamics of sports projectiles.Dr
. Page 14.764.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Integrating Professional Topics and Engineering Constraints Across the CurriculumAbstractMost of us do not learn a skill the first time we try something. Same is true forengineering knowledge and attitudes. Therefore, developing engineering knowledge,skills, and attitudes cannot be relegated to single coverage within the curriculum. Topicsmust be introduced and wrestled with early in the curriculum, sustained throughadditional application during intermediate years, and engrained through integratedapplication during senior design. The concepts of globalization, public policy, andleadership and engineering constraints such as sustainability and ethics
introductory designcourses and their last year in senior capstone design courses. In most engineeringundergraduate curricula, throughout the sophomore and junior year, design is not necessarily afocus. Some efforts have been made in an attempt to incorporate design through every year ofthe engineering curriculum. Some of these notable efforts include the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) initiative implemented at various universities and the Institute forDesign Engineering and Applications (IDEA) at Northwestern University, both of whichshowcase a completely restructured curriculum. While the CDIO framework and the IDEAprogram have been proven effective, not all institutions desire or are practically able todrastically restructure their
learning curriculum and student success in the engineering workplace, overtlystating that the project-based learning curriculum was responsible for creating individuals whowere well-prepared for the workplace. Following are some of the comments they made thathighlighted the impact of a project-based curriculum on skill in particular domains, verbalcommunication, collaboration with others, and problem solving. One employer who spoke to thecontributions of a project-based curriculum to skill in students’ chosen fields of study stated,“They have students that are highly motivated, and typically they have some type of practicalhands-on experience … that adds to their level of knowledge and proficiency in various electricalengineering and computer
AC 2008-691: SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES: THE SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERINGDESIGN CURRICULUM AT JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYEric Pappas, Dr. Eric Pappas is Associate Professor of Integrated Science and Technology at James Madison University. He developed, and was director of, the Advanced Engineering Writing and Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) from 1993-2003. Dr. Pappas was on the faculty of Virginia Tech from 1987-2003 and taught classes in technical writing, creative writing, American literature, interpersonal communications and public speaking, creative thinking, leadership, engineering design
AC 2010-1428: INTEGRATING ETHICS CURRICULUM WITHIN ASERVICE-LEARNING DESIGN CONTEXTCraig Titus, Purdue University Craig Titus is a Ph.D. candidate in Philosophy at Purdue University and a graduate assistant for the EPICS Program, participating in the curriculum development and the research teams.Carla Zoltowski, Purdue University CARLA B. ZOLTOWSKI is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University, and is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.William Oakes, Purdue University William Oakes is the Director of the
Session 3530 Portfolio Assessment and Improvement for a First-Year Engineering Curriculum Larry D. Stetler, Stuart D. Kellogg, Jon J. Kellar, David J. Dixon, Glen A. Stone, Larry A. Simonson, Zbignew J. Hladysz, Jason T. Ash, and Heidi L. Sieverding South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701Abstract:For the past five years, the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology has redefined its first-year engineering curriculum. The program, now required of all first year engineering students,incorporates curricular elements developed by the Foundation Coalition and elements from theEPICS program at the Colorado School of Mines. As part of the course, students are required
. Page 25.409.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Designing and Implementing an Online Offering of a Nuclear Engineering CurriculumAbstractVirginia Tech restarted its nuclear engineering program in the Fall of 2007. The program hasgrown from a class enrollment of 60 students to about 200 students in 2009. When we restartedour program, we took the opportunity to be innovative and find ways to differentiate our programfrom other programs nationwide. In addition, we targeted the nuclear industry within our state byoffering the majority of our graduate nuclear engineering curriculum via distance learning. Weinitially started with live video teleconferencing to remote
Session 3257 Planning for Curriculum Renewal and Accreditation Under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 Michael S. Leonard, Donald E. Beasley, Katherine E. Scales, Clemson University and D. Jack Elzinga University of FloridaAbstractThis paper presents a set of integrated methodologies for the enhancement of engineeringacademic programs and for preparation for accreditation review under ABET EngineeringCriteria 2000. The Curriculum Renewal Methodology builds on a
Session 2004-911 Linking Courses and Essential Experiences in an Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Curriculum Michael A. Butkus*, Marie C. Johnson, and Jason C. Lynch Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996* corresponding author, (845) 938 –2820 (p), (845) 938 – 3339 (f), Michael.Butkus@usma.eduAbstract Many undergraduate engineering curricula develop introductory level knowledge ofcommon engineering processes by using highly constrained problems, which call for a single“right” answer. This teaching
Paper ID #9133LiftOff to Best Practices in K-12 Engineering Curriculum DesignMs. Margaret Baguio, University of Texas at Austin Margaret Baguio is the Sr. Education and Outreach Coordinator for NASA’s Texas Space Grant Con- sortium in Austin, Texas. She has worked for over thirty years in youth development and education. During that time, Margaret has worked in public schools, for the Texas Cooperative Extension Service 4-H & Youth Development Program, managed a USDA Science and Literacy project for at-risk youth, and promoted space education to students, teachers and the general public through the Texas Space Grant
Paper ID #11798K-12 Teachers as Curriculum Designers in Engineering Professional Devel-opmentMr. Ayora Berry, Boston University Ayora Berry is a doctoral student of curriculum & teaching at Boston University. He received a B.S. from the University of Massachusetts, a B.A. from Portland State University, and a Master’s in Teaching from Boston University. His current research focus is on engineering education, teacher professional development, and curriculum development.Dr. Don DeRosa, Boston University Donald A. DeRosa is a Clinical Associate Professor of Science Education at Boston University where he teaches science
Paper ID #34558Transforming Curriculum to Improve STEM Learning and Advance CareerReadinessDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Dr. Ekaterina Koromyslova is an Assistant Professor in Operations Management. She teaches several courses, including Operations and Supply Chain Management, Engineering Economic Analysis, and De- cision Making in Management. She has several years of industry experience as an analyst-consultant for manufacturing companies and as a leading manager in supply chain and logistics. Her research inter- ests are in engineering education, including learner-centered teaching strategies
Paper ID #11725Developing Leaders by Putting Students in the Curriculum Development DriverSeatMiss Yazmin Montoya, LEADMr. Aaron Eduardo Pacheco Rimada, University of Texas at El PasoErwin Delgado, Univerity of Texas at El PasoIsaiah Nathaniel Webb,Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan received her PhD from The University of Texas at Austin where her research focused on the design of a low-cost, volume adjustable prosthetic socket. Now an Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, she is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to help students to bridge the gap
AC 2010-1296: "BRIEF ENCOUNTER:" A REFLECTION ON WILLIAMSPROPOSALS FOR THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritius of Trinity COllege Dublin (Ireland. Formerly Professor of Education and Chair Department of Teacher Education.Has published over 50 papers on topics related to engineering and technological education and several books. His book "Engineering Education; Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction" received the best reseach publication award of division i (professional) of the American Educational Research Association in 2005. previously he has been awarded a premium of the Education, Science and Technology division of the
Environmental Resources Engineering at Humboldt State University and a Faculty Research Associate at SERC. She is an alumna of HSU where she received her B.S. degree in Environmental Resources Engineering. She received an M.S. in Energy Policy and Analysis and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Dr. Cashman currently teaches courses in engineering design, water quality, computational methods and environmental fluid hydraulics. At SERC, Cashman is currently involved in a feasibility study for hydroelectric resources for the Yurok tribe and the H2E3 university curriculum project.Peter Lehman, Humboldt State University
curriculum in theirclassrooms. A thematic analysis of the data revealed that teachers associated computationalthinking with specific coding activities, an interdisciplinary subject, and a problem-solvingprocess.IntroductionOver the years the presence of engineering as well as computer science (CS) education in K-12classrooms in the U.S. has increased. In essence, numerous programs and curricula have beendeveloped to support pre-college engineering and computer science education for formal andinformal learning settings [1-3]. This presence and integration of engineering/CS in K-12 is animportant phenomenon due to the implications it has for the future of STEM education [4]. Infact, a variety of positive outcomes have resulted from engineering
specializations are computerscience, software engineering, networking, and computer engineering. In this curriculum, thestudents matriculate into the CNS department after successfully completing the requirements of30 hours of core courses common to all computer science students. The students continue takingcore courses until the first semester of their junior year, when they begin choosing their electivesfrom different specialization areas.Digital logic design courses are fundamental core requirements in both computer engineering aswell as computer science departments, in which students get their first exposure to hardwaredesign. It is important that the content of such courses reflect the current design styles used inindustry.This paper describes a
Session 3209Meeting the ABET Computer Competency Requirement in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Tennessee State University M. Bodruzzaman, S. S. Devgan, and S. Zein-Sabatto Tennessee State UniversityIntroductionIn the Information Age, access to timely information in appropriate form is power. Engineers oftomorrow must be proficient in developing computer tools and applications to facilitate access toinformation anywhere any time. ABET criteria for computer use and computer facilities inengineering curriculum and specifically Electrical, Electronic(s), Computer and similarly
Session 3232Meeting the ABET Computer Competency Requirement in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Tennessee State University M. Bodruzzaman, S. S. Devgan, and S. Zein-Sabatto Tennessee State UniversityIntroductionIn the Information Age, access to timely information in appropriate form is power. Engineers oftomorrow must be proficient in developing computer tools and applications to facilitate access toinformation anywhere any time. ABET criteria for computer use and computer facilities inengineering curriculum and specifically Electrical, Electronic(s), Computer and similarly
data and synthesis of findings. Although we have completed just one yearof our multi-year project, we have achieved significant results in terms of instructor skill gainsand attitudes. We are poised to make a meaningful impact on students as we have begunintroducing new curricular and pedagogical changes. In this paper, we will share our currentprogress and core activities related to each objective, which include establishing a supportivealliance structure, developing new computing curriculum that includes a socially responsiblecomponent at each site, creating the structure and content for the first faculty learning community(FLC), and implementing the collective impact model. In addition, we also share survey data,including feedback from both
respect to integrating computation, and attempts to outline the common challenges thephysics and engineering communities face and the opportunities they have to cooperate to theirmutual benefit in curriculum development efforts.This paper starts tracing recent physics education developments using data from a nationalsurvey that was commissioned by the magazine Computing in Science and Engineering (CiSE).This publication is co-sponsored by the American Institute of Physics and the IEEE-ComputerSociety, hence its interest in working at the intersection between physics and engineering. Thepaper continues with a description of an effort by the Committee on Instructional Technology –the counterpart to CoED within the American Institute of Physics
have not practiced.Even given this troubling backdrop of faculty perspective, an encompassing view of studentneeds includes several areas that compete for their slice of the instructional pie: Page 7.290.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering Education ¾ fundamental knowledge of computing, programming and computers ¾ awareness of and preparation in emerging aspects of computing ¾ computing requirements in the other courses of their curriculum ¾ knowledge and skills required by engineers in their
to their learning.Future efforts will involve developing a full semester course as well as disseminating the curriculum tohigh school and post-secondary populations.IntroductionCEN1990 - IN-COMMAND, an Introduction to Computing through Mobile Application Development,was developed as a three-credit course designed for students with little to no background in computing(with basic mathematics and computer skills) and with a variety of interests. This course would be offeredto students in their last year of High School or first year in College/University. IN-COMMANDcapitalizes on the ubiquitous nature of smart-phones, engaging students through a topical technology. Thecourse excites students to the possibilities of Computer Engineering and
methods to solve the system ofnonlinear differential equations that govern fluid flow and heat transfer, with some initial andboundary conditions. However, due to the limited computational resources available for classroominstruction, the problems used for illustration and laboratory assignments are limited to simplecanonical types. This means that students will not be able to analyze realistic problems withpractical applications, which are inherently complicated, computationally expensive, and requirehigh-performance computing (HPC) clusters that take advantage of massive parallelization. In thispaper, a course in the curriculum that addresses this issue is proposed. In this course, thefundamental theories of high-performance computing will
; Collins, T.L. (2013). Student attitudes toward STEM: The development of upper elementary school and middle/high school student surveys. In the Proceedings of the 120th American Society of Engineering Education Conference. 4. Forssen, A. V., Moskal, B. M., & Harriger, A. R. (2011). Measuring the impact of a high school intervention on students' attitudes in information technology: Validation and use of an attitude survey. In the Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education. 5. Goode, J. 2010. Connecting K-16 curriculum & policy: Making computer science engaging, accessible, & hospitable for underrepresented students. In the Proceedings of the 40th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on
teachers’ intentions tointegrate physical computing concepts in their future classes? Design and Implementation of the Professional DevelopmentRecruitment and selection of participantsThe PD was advertised to public school district STEM curriculum coordinators acrossPennsylvania through email, a STEM outreach center website from the state’s land-grantuniversity, and posts on state STEM education association social media pages. To participate,educators had to attend as a team from their school district, requiring two teachers: (a) anelementary educator teaching in grade four or five and (b) a middle school educator teaching in aSTEM-related area. These parameters were intentionally created because the workshop content,materials, and
Paper ID #6774Weaving a Computer Science Tapestry: Results of a Workshop Promotingthe Recruitment and Retention of Girls in High School Computer ScienceDr. David R. Wright, North Carolina State University Dr. David Wright earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science from North Carolina State University, where he continues to work as a Research Associate. His research interests include Computer Science and Software Engineering education and curriculum, improving diversity in Computer Science, security and privacy in computing systems, research and professional ethics in Computer Science and Software Engineering, and the
solve engineering problems of increasing complexity grows with the increasingavailability and power of computational resources. Engineers rely on computational thinking intheir approach to modern problems, but training in these skills is a challenge in manyengineering programs [1]. Since student experience varies [2], [3], instructors must ensureeveryone has the necessary foundational skills but do so in a way that does not take time awayfrom content instruction. Individualized support outside of class through office hours or tutoringcan be effective if the TAs have the necessary experience and resources [4]. Other obstacles inthe implementation of computational-focused activities in the curriculum include time needed todevelop quality course
(ECET)program. The first course in the sequence is an introduction to computer games, where asoftware platform, Alice, is adopted to develop programming concepts and working knowledgeof multimedia applications using audio, image, animation, and video data. The second courserequires students perform multimedia programming using the well-known software, DirectXwith a Microsoft Visual C++ platform. Students learn how to integrate graphics, animation andsound assets into interactive environments.We find that the sequence courses stimulate students to achieve their learning objectives in theECET curriculum via developing their computer game assignments and projects as a vehicle.Furthermore, the student retention is greatly improved. In fact, the