course to course but may include PowerPoint charts, class notes or text lectures, online laboratory submissions, online testing, and possibly, even, class discussion forums.The research presented in this paper examines student satisfaction and learning levels fortraditional and online courses. A lack of variation between these two course formats is a strongindicator of the value of the blended format.Examples of Blended Hybrid Course EnvironmentsBlending at Fairleigh Dickinson University - Besides being required to take at least one onlinecourse per year (8), all freshmen at Fairleigh Dickinson University are required to take an onlinecourse called "The Global Challenge," which is a revision of a class the university has
performance prediction and comparison of predicted and measured behavior ‚ Use prefabricated parts to emphasize design over fabrication ‚ Use content from first-year mathematics, physics, and engineering coursesAlthough the course content of calculus has remained the same, innovations have beenintroduced in the laboratory portions of the courses to support engineering students. In Page 11.690.4mathematics, the laboratory portion is devoted to MATLAB, rather than Maple, because of itsutilization in subsequent engineering courses. In physics, some of the experiments performed inthe laboratory portion of the course have been designed to connect
group projects in which they are given a great deal of latitude to choosetheir own focus and goals.Thus far these courses have been quite successful. Each of them has been at or nearly at fullenrollment and the course evaluations have been among the best we’ve ever seen. We arelooking forward to more detailed evaluation to further explain the benefits and limitations ofsuch an approach.Model II – Embedded in Required CourseEmbedding ethics education in a required core course presents ethics concepts and technicalconcepts in comparable ways. ASU’s new doctoral degree in Biological Design provides anunusual opportunity to embed ethics education. In the first year, students in Biological Designtake a single core course, “Fundamentals of Biological
AC 2011-1050: COMPUTATIONAL EXPERTISE IN ENGINEERING: ALIGN-ING WORKFORCE COMPUTING NEEDS WITH COMPUTER SCIENCECONCEPTS.Claudia Elena Vergara, Michigan State University Claudia Elena Vergara. PhD Purdue University. Fields of expertise: Plant Biology and STEM Education Research. Dr. Vergara is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) at Michigan State University. Her research interest is in STEM education through research projects on instructional design, implementation and assessment of student learning, aimed to improve science, engi- neering and technology education.Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Director of Instructional Technology Research & Development
, planning our future has been in place throughout our lives. For example; from birth, our parentstypically plan for us to be completely independent of their care within approximately twenty years. Beginningwith the essential activities of eating and sleeping, they gradually guide us toward that end. After a few yearsunder the direction of parents alone (or their designated representatives), the government becomes involved inthe process by requiring formal education up to age sixteen which also contributes to our eventualindependence. At some variable point in our maturation, we make the plan our own so that we determine suchthings as future career direction and preparation, make choices regarding employment, residence, spouse (ifany) and children
, planning our future has been in place throughout our lives. For example; from birth, our parentstypically plan for us to be completely independent of their care within approximately twenty years. Beginningwith the essential activities of eating and sleeping, they gradually guide us toward that end. After a few yearsunder the direction of parents alone (or their designated representatives), the government becomes involved inthe process by requiring formal education up to age sixteen which also contributes to our eventualindependence. At some variable point in our maturation, we make the plan our own so that we determine suchthings as future career direction and preparation, make choices regarding employment, residence, spouse (ifany) and children
courses.IntroductionThe College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech has replaced the traditionalcurriculum for freshman and sophomores engineering majors with an integrated curriculumwhich incorporates mathematics, engineering and science. The curriculum integrates topicsacross the disciplines and incorporates active/cooperative learning, various technologies,freshman and sophomore design projects, and hands-on-laboratories. During the freshman year, Page 6.452.1the mathematics portion of the integrated curriculum focuses on differential and some integral“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Paper ID #34800Learning Social Innovations and Social Entrepreneurship During COVID-19Pandemic: Lessons LearnedDr. Ajay P. Malshe, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Malshe is a R. Eugene and Susie E. Goodson Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Materials and Manufacturing Research Laboratory (MMRL), Purdue University. His fields of academic and industrial interest are advanced manufacturing, food-shelter-clothing and re- lated life insecurities, bio-inspired materials and designing and system integration. He has overlapping 24 years of academic plus overlapping 15 years of
. DELBERT HORTON, Ph.D., P.E., Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering Dr. Horton teaches a variety of IE courses, including: Industrial Operations Research courses, Industry Systems Design course and Engineering Management course. He has over 38 years experience in the product development and manufacturing, and intelligence systems development and integration for U.S. Government agencies and in academia. His experience includes various engineering development and management, and consulting roles at Electrospace Systems, E-Systems, Raytheon Systems and Stephen Meyers & Associates.Mary Johnson, Texas A&M University-Commerce MARY E. JOHNSON, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Industrial
computer system by experimenting and using the help facility, not by read-ing a manual. The consistent interface allows a natural expansion from one factor to the next,and the separation of factor use from issues of compounding frequency allows students not to Page 8.446.8worry about that dimension of the course until it is covered in class. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education A prototype has established the feasibility of all of the design features, and coding of thefull system is
problems, but the inability to visualize complicated, multi‐modal aircraft motions stillprevents students from in‐depth appreciation and understanding of the course material. FlightSimulation/Visualization software has been utilized extensively for instructional purposes,however this has been limited to aviation schools for pilot training [5] or for teaching moreadvanced concepts such as control system design [6-9]. For the more fundamental courses, oneexample of an innovative pedagogical strategy is the utilization of a “flying classroom” [10].However, since this involves that use of an actual aircraft, it is not easily transferable to otheruniversities while also not being cost effective. Several colleges, especially aviation schoolsutilize
living document needing to beupdated in order to be sustained. This point of view is the driving motivation for the redesign ofthe LWTL curriculum which will be discussed throughout this paper.A History of the CurriculumThe LWTL content was first implemented in 2007 for all first-year engineering students atLouisiana Tech University [14]. The goal of the curriculum is to provide a student-centeredapproach to engineering education that incorporates engineering fundamental concepts withhands-on experiences through fabrication, programming, and design. Due to the University’sunique quarter system that awards semester-credit hours, the yearlong three-course sequenceelapses three quarter awarding a total of 6 credit hours, 2 credit hours each quarter
State University. He has extensive international experience in cadastre and Land Information Systems and GIS. His current interests include land tenure issues, implementation of Cadastral, Land and Geographic Information Systems. Page 12.1291.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Spatial Data (GIS) Support for Multiple Disciplines with Land Surveying Engineering as the Lead Element: A Work in Progress at the Penn State Wilkes-Barre CampusAbstractGeographic Information Systems GIS) technology has been suitable for applications that maketheir attainment not only useful, but
inintroductory physics [3]. At that time, the first studies were carried out in which researchersfocused on instruments (concept tests, CT) to assess those alternative conceptions [4]–[6].Nowadays, there are still efforts to build concept tests that improve on the previous CT [7], [8] orto build new tests [9].The main use of conceptual understanding research is to design appropriate AL activities oreducational strategies that improve conceptual learning [10]. In the literature, there are manyactivities which can be used for auditorium format such as Peer Instruction [11], activities forrecitation sessions [12] and for classrooms integrated with labs [13], to name a few. In numerousreferences, it has been published that using AL strategies in the
at large and then rose to chair the Mechanics Division in 2012–2013. He currently is chair of the Mechanical Engineering Division after starting as member at large in 2017. Nathan also has been an active member of ASEE’s Engineering Technology, Computers in Education, Educational Research Methods, Multidisciplinary En-gineering, Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies, and Systems Engineering Divisions. He is currently nominated as a Program Evaluator for ABET. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Implementing i4.0 Tech to Engineering Systems Lab for Smart Manufacturing LearningAbstractManaging the manufacturing input such as designs
laboratory experiments, specifying equipment necessary forthe above requirements), and assessing the educational deficiency in each institution and theconsequent cost of rehabilitating the present programs and facilities.3- Industrial linkages with academeActivities in this area included: industry involvement in EEDP policy making, settingindustrial links as criterion for funding, curriculum development based on industrial needs,accreditation based on industrial linkThe EEDP-promoted link between the universities and the industry was manifested by thefollowing cooperation activities: industry-supplied equipment to engineering colleges,university equipment lent to industry, and computer-related development programs for theindustry made by engineering
no longer practical. Presently, past the sophomore year electrical engineeringmajors, in some programs, may enroll in unrelated courses to satisfy the graduation requirement.This approach is neither beneficial to the student’s graduate education nor to the potentialemployers. A student who would like to pursue a degree in power systems or electricalmachines may discover that taking required courses in communication or design, layout, andfabrication of integrated circuits are not beneficial to the pursuit of his interest. The time may beappropriate to specialize the degree of bachelor science in electrical engineering to stand alonedisciplines. This paper discusses the present status in some electrical engineering programs withrespect to the
, thus he brings a unique perspective to NASA education programs. He has successfully managed major advances in enhancing the nation’s STEM workforce through experiential education. Zippay has implemented and designed new approaches to education program strategy among NASA projects through the use of new multimedia applications and web based tools for the purposes of student outreach and public engagement within NASA opportunities and professional development experiences. Zippay has a passion for research both in marketing and edu- cation and is dedicated to finding unique solutions that solve problems and have true and positive impact within the STEM education pipeline
Paper ID #10445Characterizing and Addressing Student Learning Issues and Misconceptions(SLIM) with Muddiest Point Reflections and Fast Formative FeedbackProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is professor in the Materials Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials science and engineering. His research interests include strategies for web-based teaching and learning, misconceptions and their repair, and role of formative feedback on conceptual change. He has co
and development engineer with AT&T’s Bell Telephone Laboratories and with ITT’s AdvancedInternational Technology Center; and service in the U.S. Air Force in navigational aides electronics technology.Herrick combines his rich engineering and technical experiences with an educational approach to education thatengages students in an active learning process that has been extraordinarily successful with his students.James Michael Jacob, the current George W. McNelly Professor of Technology, is an award-winning teacher. Hehas received the CTS Microelectronics Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching award as the best teacher in theElectrical Engineering Technology Department seven times. He has won the Dwyer Undergraduate TeachingAward as the top
fromthe traditional remote lab approach in that the whole lab environment is virtualized and hosted ona commercial public cloud (GCP) with better availability, scalability and usability [1]. A studentsurvey was conducted anonymously to evaluate the hands-on labs and lab environments. Theoverall feedback was positive. The whole experience may be useful for other institutions that areinterested in adopting commercial, public cloud platforms in laboratory education.2. MOTIVATIONOur Information and Computer Technology program focuses on learning by doing. Hands-onlaboratory is always a vital part of the curriculum. Laboratory courses serve not only on-campus,face-to-face (F2F) students, but also online, distance education (DE) students
, interactive classroom experience that improves understanding and learning for a broadspectrum of students’ learning style preferences. The approach presented in this paper has beensuccessfully used in an introductory environmental engineering course taught predominantly tonon-engineering majors as part of a three-course environmental engineering sequence. Currentdata suggests that the incorporation of this demo improves student understanding of massbalance concepts evidenced by improved quantitative testing scores over the past two years.Though longitudinal data is forthcoming on the efficacy on long term retention, we strive foreach non-engineering major in the sequence to be able to more broadly contextualize and solvecomplex problems using mass
(PBL) project implemented in a first-year electrical engineering course actively engagesstudents in real-world engineering experiences and, as a result, increases creativity and motivationin students. This work is based on a course implemented at Universidad T´ecnica Federico SantaMar´ıa in Chile and used as preliminary data to design a new study to be conducted at Texas A&MUniversity.1 Project-Based LearningProject-Based Learning (PBL) is described as “an ill-defined task with a well-defined outcomesituated within a contextually rich task requiring students to solve several problems, which whenconsidered in their entirety, showcase student mastery of several concepts of various subjects” 5 .As engineering content is traditionally known
that has served over 300 students. Dr. Rodriguez’ research interests include: control of nonlinear dis- tributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); control of bio-economic systems, renewable resources, and sustainable development; control of semiconductor, (hypersonic) aerospace, robotic, and low power electronic systems. Dr. Rodriguez has received the fol- lowing honors: AT&T Bell Laboratories Fellowship; Boeing A.D. Welliver Fellowship; ASU Engineering Teaching Excellence Award; IEEE International Outstanding Advisor Award; White House Presidential Excellence Award for
Academy of Arts and Science. Dr. Horowitz’s research interests are quite broad and span using EE and CS analysis methods to problems in molecular biology to creating new design methodologies for analog and digital VLSI circuits.Mr. Atindra Jha, Stanford University Atindra is an undergraduate student at Stanford University pursuing Computer Science and Mathematics. He works under the guidance of Dr. Mark Horowitz and Amy Fritz, aiding their electrical engineering education research. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Online, Interactive Tool for Studying How Students Troubleshoot CircuitsAbstractWe have developed a new tool to look at how
construction experience while working in the construction industry for different capacities, both in the office and the field. Mr. ElZomor worked as a Project Manager for several years and delivered complex projects, one of which was an iconic $150 million office park. Not only is Mohamed a specialist in the construction field, but also with extensive research within the advanced educational pedagogies, energy, and environmental disciplines. Mr. ElZomor developed an index to define small infrastructure projects’ scope and associated risk. The overall goal of ElZomor’s work is to leverage the integration of energy efficiency measures into construction, building design and operation processes for societal good.Prof. Kristen
known that Active Learning methodologies involve the students in their own learningand there is no doubt about their effectiveness in sharing knowledge with today’s students.Actually, undergraduate students taking traditional lecturing-based courses are 1.5 times morelikely to fail than those enrolled in courses where active learning methodologies are implemented[1]. Thus, our university has centered its attention on investigating, applying, improving anddesigning new active learning methodologies. Examples of such methodologies are: The MathOperatory Skills Laboratory (MOSL), introduced in [2], as a remedial mathematics course forfreshmen engineering students; and, the Guided-Lecture Team Based Learning (GL-TBL)targeted to teach mathematics
implemented in database-related courses, the learning methods,activities, and assignments are designed to fit a large spectrum of engineering and computingcourses, with the goal of being easily customizable to other engineering domains. The redesign isimplemented in a sequence of four courses starting with a required core course and continuingwith main courses in the Database and Programming Concentration of the BS in InformationTechnology program, consistently the largest program in the university with over 2,000 studentsenrolled. A unique aspect of this redesign is that six diverse adjunct faculty are involved in theproject bringing their own unique perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the project. Also, froma professional diversity perspective
and the University of Texas at Austin in Environmental Engineering. Most recently, he graduated with his Ph.D. from the Colorado School of Mines in Civil and Environmental Engineering. He teaches Environmental Science and Environmental Engineering Technologies. He also serves as a faculty advisor for the senior capstone design course and several independent research projects.Dr. Diana M Thomas, United States Military Academy Diana M. Thomas received her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1996. She then completed a National Research Council funded post-doctoral fellowship at the United States Military Academy and the Army Research Laboratory. In 2000, she joined the faculty of the Montclair State
student involvement is an essential aspect ofmeaningful learning. Also, engaging students in learning is principally the responsibility ofthe instructor, who should become less an imparter of knowledge and more a designer and afacilitator of learning experiences and opportunities. In other words, the real challenge incollege teaching is not trying to cover the material for the students, as many of us believe andpractice today; but rather uncovering the material with the students. This is a call for allfaculty involved with teaching engineering courses and as members of faculty teams whodevelop, maintain, and implement engineering programs , to consider not only the contentand topics that make up an engineering degree but also how students engage