with students in efforts to improve theirinterest, capacity, and belongingness in engineering. As part of a larger NSF-funded study on theinteractions of engineering professional formation with diversity and inclusion, we will use semi-structured interviews to investigate an electrical and computer engineering (ECE) faculty’sintention to implement inclusive teaching practices, using Fishbein and Ajzen’s reasoned actionmodel to define intention [1]. The interviews will be focused around an inclusive teaching “tipsheet” that was recently distributed to the ECE faculty. These interviews will allow us tocharacterize factors that influence the development of such an intention within the context of anengineering department, in order to make
degree and is an encouraged path for professional certification.There are similarities between the MEng and the traditional Bachelor of Science modelcommon in the United States.From the months of September to March, students work together to tackle a major civilinfrastructure project. Figure 1 depicts the ICD course schedule in general terms. Students’time is split between all-class sessions that take the form of lectures on both technical andnontechnical topics, optional workshops on specific aspects of their designs (e.g. long-spanstructures), design advice rotations with mentors from industry, and simulated clientmeetings. Students have group working time built into the schedule. Figure 1. Weekly ICD Course
solving proficiency, self-directed learning strategies, and teamparticipation skills [4]In the fall semester of 2006, a new project experience was introduced into the 2 credit hourElectronics I lab [5]. This project had the following objectives: 1. Provide students with the opportunity to apply the concepts learned from the lectures and the instructor’s predefined labs. 2. Allow students to work on projects that motivate them. 3. Provide a fun and enjoyable problem solving real life learning experience 4. Engage the students in the analysis, synthesis and evaluation process to generate a working solution for their projectsIn this exercise the students were given the opportunity to propose and work on projects of theirpersonal
-worldtype problems and demonstrating key concepts using modern nuclear analysis software. Theeducational package will consist of four independent educational modules, and each module willconsist of three or more 50-minute lectures which will focus on one of the following specificareas: cross section processing, criticality calculations, lattice physics, depletion and spent fuelisotopics. These lectures will be developed to include optional problem sessions that can becarried out in and/or outside of class. This educational package is intended for use by college-level nuclear engineering departments and programs. However, it may also be used tosupplement personnel training packages at organizations throughout the nuclear industry; such asthe NRC and
Session 1626 Iconic vs. Text-Based Programming in the Introductory Programming Sequence† Donald J. Bagert, Ben A. Calloni, H. Paul Haiduk Texas Tech University Abstract Research has been undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of using iconic (as opposed to visual)programming environments in teaching the first two computer programming courses. The authors havedeveloped a Windows-based iconic programming language named BACCII, which allows the user to programwith icons representing
pioneering efforts in learning community development.Learning communities were first implemented here in the mid-1990s. The initial learningcommunities were generic and did not include any major-specific content. They were taken bystudents admitted through IUPUI’s undergraduate education center. The undergraduateeducation center admits exploratory students or students who lack the prerequisites to get in theschool of their choice.There were several prompting factors that drove the creation of learning communities at IUPUI.Chief among them is that IUPUI is mainly an urban, commuter campus resulting in much less instudent life and interaction compared to that found on the traditional residential campus. In otherwords, many of our students could be
an accelerometer and data acquisition system. They thendynamically determine the damping of the system using the log decrement method. Finally, theycompare the measured acceleration response from the test to a Simulink generated response ofthe same system. In the lab report they must compare the results to those obtained in Lab 1, anddiscuss intelligently any differences. They must answer questions such as: Based on theseresults, what was the maximum acceleration of the mass? How does this compare to thedisplacement that you observed? Does it make sense? Emphasis is placed on comparingtheoretical to experimental results, and intelligently discussing any differences.Laboratory 3: Response of SDOF System to Harmonic ExcitationThe experimental
, literature on rubricsconsistently specifies either a checklist or a grid in which to communicate the levels ofaccomplishment that an artifact exhibits when assessed for specific desired qualities. In general,published examples of rubrics include all possible combination of criteria and standards filled in,as shown in Table 1.Table 1. Basic grid format for standard rubrics. Each cell in the table corresponds to a differentcombination of criterion and standard level. In this example, three criteria are evaluated againstthree possible levels of standards. Standard level 1 Standard level 2 Standard level 3 Criterion 1 Description of meeting Description of meeting Description of meeting
Paper ID #27648Engagement in Practice: Using STEM Outreach as a Platform to ImproveSocial Awareness and Learning SkillsDr. Robert Schaffer, Santa Clara University Dr. Bob Schaffer is a full-time lecturer at Santa Clara University where he teaches general Engineering classes and upper-division and graduate classes in Electrical Engineering. He also teaches as an adjunct professor in the Engineering department at Mission College (Santa Clara, CA). His classes include Intro- duction to Engineering, STEM Outreach in the Community, Digital Signal Processing, and Programming for Engineers. c American
Elementary Education from the University of South Florida. His experiences include over 30 years teaching in Kindergarten through fifth grade classrooms and 1 ½ years as a resource teacher. Chuck has curriculum writing experience and has presented at various state and national venues.Kim Parsons, Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School KIM PARSONS is the Reading Coach for Kindergarten through Third grade at Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School Center for Mathematics and Engineering. She earned a B.A. in Elementary Education from Florida Atlantic University and a Master of Arts in Education from the University of South Florida. Prior to her position as Reading Coach, Kim’s experience
problem solving. It has been shown to be one of the most efficient and effectiveteaching methodologies by numerous papers and articles 2, 6, 8, 9. Active learning has been widelyused in classrooms for effective teaching 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10. At the university, OPL is a core, requiredcourse in the Computer Science curriculum. It is designed to theoretically investigateprogramming language constructs and to illustrate the implementations of the constructs in avariety of programming languages. Generally speaking, OPL can be taught either horizontally orvertically. In the horizontal strategy the instructor first discusses the constructs in theory andthen demonstrates the concrete implementations in real programming languages. In the verticalstrategy the
Session 1406 “Show-And-Tell-And-Let-Apply (SATALA): An Innovative Multi-Media Approach for Teaching Manual Architectural Engineering Drafting” Dr. Wafeek Samuel Wahby Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IllinoisBackgroundVisualization ability is essential for architectural drafting and blueprint reading. Frompreliminary sketching, to design, to implementation, architecture students and practitionersneed to find innovative ways through which they enhance their visualization and problemsolving skills. (1)This paper presents selected visual examples from an
good programming practices.In addition to these topical areas discussed in class, the thrust of the instruction revolvedaround student projects. Each participant was expected to devise a project related to theirthesis research that could be augmented by applying high-performance computing facilities. Because the course was intended as an introduction to high-performance computing,it was assumed that the students brought virtually zero knowledge to the class. While notuniversally valid, the expectation was justified. As a result, some relatively basic informationwas covered initially, followed by progressively more technical content. The semester wasdivided into three primary topical areas. 1. “How to” type of instruction to acclimate the
engineering (BME) course that requiresstudents to integrate over foundational coursework in physics, biology, electrical and mechanicalengineering, computer science, and technical writing. Students explore current and classicmodels of instrumentation, nerve, muscle, and biomechanics. Preceding 2004 the course wasthree credits consisting of a lecture- or lab-format; each week featured either traditional lecturesor hands-on dry or wet laboratories. A consequence of the either-or structure was gap generationin lecture, leading to lack of continuity in substance and theme, and a lack of thought or energypreceding or following labs.In 2005 the lead author expanded the course to four units. Several improvements were institutedsimultaneously, including the
semantics of programming languages. The proposed sequenceincludes courses in problem solving concepts, algorithm design and development, solutionmodeling, and finally coding. We anticipate that the proposed course sequence will provideinsights on the development of a framework to teach not only programming but problem solvingin general. The proposed framework will make students appreciate the usefulness of problemsolving and will facilitate the use of appropriate programming languages to develop solutions.1. IntroductionThe last decade has witnessed an ever increasing demand for IT professionals. In fact, the USBureau of Labor Statistics forecasts an increasing demand for high level IT professionals. Forinstance, system analysts will see 110
AC 2010-1486: NEW FACULTY AND NAVIGATING THE CONTRACT RENEWALPROCESSJay Wierer, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Jay Wierer is Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin - Madison in 2008. He is a Member of the IEEE and enjoys teaching courses in communications, signals and systems, DSP, controls, and circuits.Roger Frankowski, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Frankowski is Vice-President of Academics and Professor of General Studies at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received his Ph.D. degree from Marquette University in 1992. He has been Vice-President
repository could be grew quiterapidly. It became evident that UMIPS could certainly serve the integrated circuit research com-munity as a whole.A second generation of the project, pictured in Figure 1, was developed but with additional func-tionality as compared to the original design. This design was completed by converting all of thepreviously disparate projects into IP blocks per a developed specification. These blocks markedthe founding contributions to the repository, the details of which were presented by McCor-quodale, et al.10 Shortly after its founding, UMIPS has received several submissions from bothwithin and outside of the University of Michigan.Figure 1. Die micrograph of the fabricated microsystem developed from independent research
Copyright2004, American Society for Engineering EducationII: Mathematical Formulation of Vibrating Systems As Finite Element ModelsThe general equation of motion for a single degree of freedom vibrating system with viscousdamping can be expressed as shown in equation (1).1mu&& + cu& + ku = p (t ) (1)In equation (1), m is the mass, c is the damping coefficient and k is the stiffness for the singledegree of freedom vibrating system. p(t) is the excitation force applied to the system as afunction of time. u, u& and u&& are the displacement, velocity and acceleration of the single degreeof freedom system respectively.Figure 1 is an illustration of a generalized single degree of a freedom system.1 Figure
in small group projects. Active learning exercises, specifically facilitated by the new tabletPC technology, were devised by the instructor for almost every classroom session. Studentswere able to capture the instructors electronic ink notes made on PowerPoint slides andelectronic whiteboards. Along with the instructor’s notes, the software also captures studentelectronic ink notes as well as e-ink input generated by other students. Throughout the course,students kept journals of their experience. Additionally, the performance of the Tablet PC groupwas monitored and compared to others in the sophomore cohort who took the course withoutTablet PCs. In general, students were very satisfied with the use of the tablet PC and their abilityto take
successful development of thisimportant field. These potential obstacles include the following: 1. Lack of interest in infrastructure preservation and management among civil engineering students. Students often choose to specialize in more traditional areas within civil engineering. This has resulted in low enrollments in civil engineering infrastructure programs throughout the country, leaving limited qualified professionals to address infrastructure management and renewal. 2. Lack of succession planning, which is creating a significant generation gap in infrastructure preservation and management academics. 3. Lack of significant investment by federal agencies and industry in high to medium-risk, and
Session 2420Writing Simulation Programs as a Tool for Understanding Internal Computer Processes Michael D. Filsinger University of CincinnatiAbstractThe usual approach to a hands-on understanding of process scheduling in a computer operatingsystem is to either modify an existing operating system or use a pre-written simulation program.In an Engineering Technology program, the first approach can be too difficult for the level ofprogramming expertise possessed by the students, while the second approach does not giveenough of a hands-on feel
Session 1426 GAS ADSORPTION INDICATOR METHOD: AN INNOVATIVE EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH FOR NDT LABORATORY INSTRUCTION OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS. Guido W. Lopez College of Engineering Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115 Nadezda G. Berezkina, and Ilya O. Leipunsky Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
undergraduate studies.Tables 3 and 4 give an overview of students in the three disciplines, and their attitude towardscommunication. Engineers and accountants displayed very similar characteristics, but theengineering students were more comfortable in a formal environment. This is perhaps to beexpected, given the almost entirely numerate background of the engineering students (Table 1).Numerical analysis is generally well structured and the similarly structured framework ofinterviews and presentations may set the engineering students more at ease (i.e. the certainty ofthe domain giving reassurance). The more diverse educational (60% mixed) background of theaccounting students might account for the difference. There are however, more
oscilloscope, anarbitrary waveform signal generator and a spectrum analyzer. All of the test and measurementequipment is connected to a computer that enables real time screen captures and electroniclaboratory notebook and report preparation. The ISSL has four complete laboratory stations.ELEC 304 is a required course in both the electrical engineering (EE) and computer engineering(CE) undergraduate curricula. ELEC 305 is a required course for EE undergraduates, butoptional for CE undergraduates. ELEC 462 and 464 are senior technical elective courses and aretaken by approximately one fourth of the senior class of electrical engineering students. Eachfall semester ELEC 304, ELEC 305 and ELEC 462 are taught and each spring semester ELEC304, ELEC 305 and
Session 1426 Behavior of Materials at High Temperatures; Instilling a Healthy Uncertainty Daniel W. Walsh, Ph. D., David Gibbs, College of Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoThe events that occur in metallic materials heated to high temperatures determine materialfunctionality, formability and fabricability. Few laboratory experiences allow engineers to explorethe performance of real engineering materials at homologous temperatures greater than 0.8. Fewerstill enable students to relate
Page 8.1235.3by including all concepts that had been listed by at least two of our experts. These 28 concepts Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering Educationformed the basis for our subsequent rounds.Round 1. We developed both a web-based and a Word document version of our questionnaireusing the 28 concepts generated in Round 0. We asked each expert to rate each concept based ontwo factors: 1) the proportion of students that do understand the concept and 2) how important itis for a student to understand the concept. We used a scale of 0-10 for each question (0 = no oneunderstands this concept to 10
Session 1465 Integr ating Var ious Mathematical Tools with a Senior Mechanical Engineer ing Labor ator y Exper iment A.B. Donaldson Depar tment of Mechanical Engineer ing New Mexico State Univer sityAbstractA senior mechanical engineering laboratory utilizes a simple experiment to provide applicationof several mathematical tools, including: fitting of experimental data using multi-variable linearregression, integration of non-linear, ordinary differential equations, solution of the heatdiffusion equation by finite
create course materials for students and faculty. Thesetools can be categorized into four general categories: (1) HTML and XML-based tools, (2) texttools, (3) calendar tools, and (4) programming tools.Computing EnvironmentAll 4,200 students at the United States Military Academy are required to purchase a personalcomputer and, beginning with the graduating class of 2003, a personal digital assistant as well(see Figures 1 and 2). Handheld and desktop computer purchases are centrally managed, andwith very few exceptions all students within the same graduating class own the same computer,PDA, and software applications. Students purchase their personal computer and PDA prior to thebeginning of their freshman year, and they receive initial training in
concepts and skills generated thusfar.The second round of the Delphi process will ask participants to judge how important it is fortheir students to understand the various concepts and skills and, secondly, how many of theirstudents understand or can perform the concept/skill. First, the reduced list of 32 concepts and43 skill phrases in Appendix A were used to develop a technically sound statement (in sentenceform) for each item. These statements also represent a compilation of the explanations, etc., thatsome participants included in their original submissions. As the concept statements weredeveloped, some were ‘subdivided” to ensure one succinct concept per statement. Thus, thereare now 47 concept statements being used in the round two of the
Session 2315 A Methodology to Define the Body of Knowledge in Civil Engineering Wilfrid A. Nixon and M. Asghar Bhatti Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242AbstractPolicy 465 of ASCE proposes radical changes in the process and implementation of civilengineering education. A necessary step in that implementation is defining the Body ofKnowledge (BOK) required in various topics within civil engineering, both at the time ofgraduation and at the time of licensure. This paper will explore, for a particular