Retention of First-Year Students in Living-Learning Communities and First-Year Experience Courses,” College Student Affairs Journal, 29(2), 2011, pp. 95-112. Page 26.304.10[17] I. Wait and J. Gressel, “Relationship between TOEFL score and academic success for international engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 2009, pp. 389-398.[18] G. Zhang, M. Padilla, T. Anderson, and M. Ohland, “Gender differences in major selection and academic success for students leaving engineering,” 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology
characteristics in engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, 109: 213-229, 2020. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20310[10] A. Esmaili Zaghi, S. M. Reis, J. S. Renzulli, J. C. Kaufman, “Exploring the creativity potential of ADHD students in engineering programs.” International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity 5(1), August 2017; and 5(2), December 2017. Pp. 125 – 136.[11] B. Rentenbach, L. Prislovsky, and R. Gabriel, “Valuing differences:: Neurodiversity in the classroom.” Phi Delta Kappan. 98(8): 59-63, 2017. doi:10.1177/0031721717708297.[12] D. H. Cropley, “Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 9, No. 2, 161-171, 2015.[13] S. Burgstahler, “Universal
programming course for Engineers.Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.[9] Recktenwald G. & Hall D. (2011). Using Arduino as a Platform for Programming, Design, and Measurement ina Freshman Engineering Course. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.[10] Prempraneerach, P., Kulvanit, P., (2010). Implementation of Resolved Motion Rate Controller with 5-AxisRobot Manipulator Arm. The First TSME International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 20-22 October,2010, Ubon Ratchathani.[11] Hamrick, Todd R., Robin A. M. Hensel. (2013). Putting the Fun in Programming Fundamentals – Robots
development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Makayla Headley, Clemson University I am a doctoral student in Engineering and Science Education. My research interest include
the Engineering School of Galileo University and has taught courses at Francisco Marroquin University, Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala, and Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. In 2004, he founded the Teaching Assistants Department of Galileo University, where he was responsible for all the Teaching Assistants of several schools of Galileo University. In 2006, he was awarded the ”Excellence in Teaching” Award of Galileo University. Currently, he is the head of Operations Research at Universidad Galileo. His current research interests include complex systems, general systems theory, and efficiency and creation of teaching tools for engineering education. c American
”Self Have good life Make money or enjoy job 0.241 Important “my role as a future engineer is very important.”Societal benefits Advance humankind “As an engineer, I am supposed to look for the betterment of humans whenever I can.” Economic concerns “My role as an engineer is to serve the customer in the most efficient and ethical way possible.” Educate and inform “entrusted with using our knowledge and abilities to protect 0.624 humanity and reveal possibilities for our fellow people.” Improve quality of life “help our society function more effectively” Joy/fun related
the relationship between gender & science identity,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 2769–2790, 2021.[20] R. Campbell-Montalvo, H. Cooke, C. A. Smith, M. Hughes Miller, H. Wao, E. Puccia, M. Mayberry, and J. Skvoretz, ““Now i’m not afraid”: The influence of identity-focused STEM professional organizations on the persistence of sexual and gender minority undergraduates in STEM,” in Frontiers in Education. Frontiers, 2022, p. 184.[21] A. Haverkamp, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q.-L. Driskill, “Calling for a paradigm shift in the study of gender in engineering education,” Studies in engineering education, vol. 1, no. 2, 2021.[22] A. E. Haverkamp, “Transgender and gender nonconforming
Paper ID #9067Finish my Research! Find a Job! Feel Better! Seminars to Support Engineer-ing Graduate Students’ Professional and Personal GoalsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational
Course for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education.” https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/05/f62/STEM- Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf (accessed Feb. 14, 2023).[3] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, 2014, pp. 311-334.[4] I. F. Goodman, et al., “A Comprehensive Evaluation of Women in Engineering Programs,” Cambridge, MA: Goodman Research Group Inc., 2002.[5] M. E. Reyes. “Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities,” Harvard Educational Review, 81st
and technology out11. One exception can be found in the state of Massachusetts. Thisstate has integrated engineering and technology into the curriculum, and its students are outperforming their peers from the other states on international science and mathematics tests11.Researchers have argued that creating an educational environment where students are learninghow to apply science and mathematics through the use of engineering and technology is likely toyield a deeper knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of these subjects in students.Researchers have further argued that engineering education should begin in elementary school inorder to positively influence students' beliefs early in their education concerning engineeringideas, the
inindustry, government, and academic institutions”.8 Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3 Another study by Sonnert et al.9 on outcomes of undergraduate female students in STEMfocused on four basic factors: “(1) the percentage of faculty who are women in the students’major science/engineering area; (2) the students’ disciplines (biology, physical sciences, andengineering); (3) the type of institution in which students are enrolled (‘‘Research I’’ vs. others);and (4) a time trend (1984–2000)”. The authors found that
solving,” in The Nature of Intelligence, L. B. Resnick, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 231-236, 1976.[11] Flavell, J. H., “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry,” American Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 907-911, 1979.[12] Paris, S. G. and Winograd, P., “Metacognition in academic learning and instruction,” in Dimension of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, B. F. Jones, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 15-44, 1990.[13] Lawanto, O. and Johnson, S. D. (in print), “Metacognition in an engineering design project,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2011.[14] Butler, D. L. and Cartier, S. C., “Learning in varying activities: An explanatory framework and a new
sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Ms. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD student and research assistant in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She is interested in studying how macroethics are taught to engineering and computing students.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado
support TU students to improveequitable outcomes.References[1] NCSES, “Diversity and STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities,” National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Alexandria, VA, NSF 23-315, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd[2] S. R. Harper and S. Hurtado, “Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation,” New Dir. Stud. Serv., vol. 2007, no. 120, pp. 7–24, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1002/ss.254.[3] S. Hurtado, M. Mayhew, and M. Engberg, “Diversity courses and students’ moral reasoning: A model of predispositions and change,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 201– 224, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2012.670931.[4] L. I. Rendon
his multidisciplinary collaborations with leading scholars in the areas of agricultural science, human medicine, veterinary medicine, teacher education, and engineering, he investigates effective ways of promoting and evaluating the development of learners’ real-world problem solving abilities. His re- search has been acknowledged by receiving the Outstanding Practices Awards from the Association of Educational Communications and Technology in 2005 and in 2007, respectively. He has been an invited speaker at national and international conferences, including E-Learn and Global HR Forum, and at various universities around the globe.Dr. Yi-Chun Hong, National Central University Yi-Chun Hong is a Postdoctoral Fellow in
school classroom.Acknowledgements This paper was sponsored by a NSF supported grant titled, de Vinci Ambassadors in theClassroom, the Galileo Project (NSF Project #DGE-0139307). Ideas for this paper arise fromvarious discussions from the work with graduate fellows funded by the NSF project. Specialthanks for NSF and the Galileo Project PI, Dr. Kazem Kazerounian for funding this project.References1. Kazerounian, K. and R. Vieth. Teaching Engineering, Teaching Science: A Two-Sided Coin. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2003. Nashville, TN.2. Autran, L.F. and M. Gomes. Teaching Decision Making Analytical Skills to Engineeris: A New Paradigm. in International Conference on
; the Chemical and Biomedical Engineeringdepartments collaborated 35 times (21% of all collaborations). Biomedical Engineering alsocollaborated with most other departments. Industrial Engineering was the only department thatthe Biomedical Engineering department did not collaborate with. Interestingly, IndustrialEngineering was the department with the greatest number of internal collaborations (i.e.,collaborations between faculty members of the same department). Internal Industrial Engineeringcollaborations accounted for 13% of all collaborations. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceTable 3. Collaborative efforts between departments in the
. Belland, Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education: Strategies and Efficacy Evidence,Springer International Publishing, 2017.[6] A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev and S. Miller, Vygotsky's Educaitonal Theory andPractice in Cultural Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.[7] Magley, A., Furse, C., (2008) Lab report writing (and teching!) made easy, 2008 AnnualConference & Exposition, Paper ID; AC 2008-2528.[8] Feisel, L., Peterson, G., (2002) A Colloquy on Learning Objectives For EngineeringEducation Laboratories, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference.[9] Parkinson, J. (2017) The student laboratory report genre: A genre analysis, English forSpecific Purposes, 45 (2017) 1–13.[10
, Manufacturing Engineering,Materials Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. ENGAGE is inclusive of all College of Engineering majors, aswell as the Architectural Engineering major in the College of Architecture & Environmental Design, theBioResource & Agricultural Engineering major in the College of Food & Environmental Sciences, and the LiberalArts and Engineering Studies major, open to internal transfers only and collaboratively run by the College of LiberalArts and the College of Engineering.post-transfer; and c) transfer students pay an additional $36,000-$38,000 compared to their peerswho began their education in the University of California or California State University system[9]. Increasing access to and success for community
student in the Mathematics and Science Education Ph. D. program offered jointly through San Diego State University and the University of California, San Diego. Before this, he spent ten years teaching mathematics and computer science in private schools on the East coast and has a B.S. and M.S. in pure mathematics. His research interests lie at the intersection of educational analytics, big data, machine learning, and mathematics education.Kimberly C Csanadi Page 24.179.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Analysis of a Short-Term STEM Intervention
, and develops student leaders to embody the principles of professional academic advising and leaders within their academic, professional, and social communities. These student leaders serve as invaluable resources for their peers, offering guidance, support, and insights into the biomedical engineering experience. Grounded in student development and servant leadership principles, the PALs program fosters ethical and inclusive leadership, building strong peer-to-peer relationships that facilitate knowledge transfer and personal growth. Dr. Paige’s unwavering commitment to guiding and educating students in higher education drives her to advocate for the development of critically reflective students, scholars, leaders
certified Quality Management Systems (QMS) Lead Auditor by the International Register of Certificated Auditors (IRCA) in London. He was elected a Fellow by ASQ in 2007. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Applying DOE in Performance Optimization of an Automated Position Control System -- A collaborated case study between two engineering technology coursesAbstract Hydraulic systems are widely used in industry, since they can produce large torques, high-speedresponses with fast motions and speed reversals. Automatic control of hydraulic systems has evolvedinto an increasingly superior alternative for many industrial applications
. Shelley, M. W. (2008). Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus 1818. Engage Books.2. Jordan, S. & Lande, M. (2016). Additive Innovation: Radical Collaboration in Design Thinking and Making. International Journal of Engineering Education. 32-2. May/June.3. Maker Education Initiative (n.d.). Maker Ed Resource Library. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://makered.org/resources/.4. The Tinkering Studio at the Exploratorium (n.d.). Scribbling Machines. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://tinkering.exploratorium.edu/scribbling-machines.5. Beard, B. (2016). Teaching Bioethics with Pool Noodles. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/imaginary-papers/teaching-bioethics-with-pool-noodles- ec9723baeea8#.jk87xmyyz.6. Louridas, P. (1999
Music and Eastern Michigan University, holds a PhD in Integrated Social and Cognitive Psychology from Wayne State University. Cole teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in human resource management (HRM), principles of management, and business statistics. Cole is an NSF grant recipient and has published over 40 journal articles and book chapters on the science of teams, team conflict, team leadership, entrepreneurship, research methods and models, the neuroscience of the self, positive organizational scholarship, Appreciative Inquiry, SOAR (Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations, and Results), SOAR-based strategic thinking, planning, and leading, and engineering education. Cole is the Associate Editor for the
, Coronado HS-EPISDCatherine Tabor, El Paso ISD and University of Texas at El Paso Catherine Tabor is a high school math and science teacher in El Paso, Texas. She is also a Ph.D. candidate in Computer Science at the University of Texas at El Paso. Her main focus is student achievement in STEM courses.Mr. Jeremy L Ramirez, University of Texas at El Paso Page 23.1332.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 An Early Report on Challenges Related to Dissemination of Programming- Centric Mathematics Lessons into 9th Grade Algebra Classes Eric A. Freudenthal
Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
. Krishna Kumar Nedunuri, Central State University Dr. Nedunuri holds appointment as a Professor at Central State University (CSU) in the International Center for Water Resources Management (ICWRM). He teaches Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics, Soil and Water Pollution, Water Chemistry, Water Supply, Groundwater, Wastewater Engineering, Streams and Lakes. He is an active member in the area of Faculty Development promoting distance education through video-conferencing and web-based learning. He is one of the fore-runners in adapting inquiry methods into traditional classroom environments at CSU. He earned his Ph.D. in Environmental and Hydraulic Engineering area of the School of Civil Engineering from Purdue University (1999
PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IV Feb 2005 – April 2007 Apr 2007 – Summer 2010 Fall 2010 - Ongoing Start ~ 2013 • Focus Groups • Workshops • Rubric for Design • AP® Engineering Design • Expert Interviews • Focus Groups Process (EDPPSR) • Dual-credit • Review of Syllabi • Expert • Inter-rater scoring • Scholarships • Workshop Interviews • Innovation Portal™ • Competitions • Pilot study of • Formation of • Database • ABET Tool Kit Course Model
National Science Foundation under NSF S-STEMaward DUE-2221250.References[1] B. Leidenfrost, M. Schutz, C. Carbon and A. Schabmann, "The Impact of Peer Mentoring on Mentee Academic Performance: Is Any Mentoring Style Better Than No Mentoring at All?," International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 26.1, pp. 102-111, 2014.[2] A. Ilumoka, I. Milanovic and N. Grant, "An Effective Industry-Based Mentoring Approach for the Recruitment of Women and Minorities in Engineering.," Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 18.3, 2017.[3] K. Hoffmeister, K. P. Cigularov, J. Sampson, J. C. Rosecrance and P. Y. Chen, "A Perspective on Effective Mentoring in the Construction Industry.," Leadership &
in teachingthe first version of the Mount Holyoke course validated this. Specifically, students had a Page 10.948.1limited “functional” understanding of the hardware they had used, and oftentimes they“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition” Copyright 2005, American society for Engineering Educationlacked the engineering strategies and intuitions that would enable them to identify systemrobustness issues and to integrate new hardware.This became tangibly clear during debugging sessions when student frustration levelspeaked. According to national statistics, 70