workshops will beoffered in the senior class. The interaction has just begun with the sophomore course andwill not be discussed in this paper. The expectation is that this interaction is on the vergeof expanding to other courses and other departments in the College of Engineering. IntroductionIn “Why Johnny Can’t Write, Even Though He Went To Princeton,” the Chronicle ofHigher Education1 highlights the problem of students progressing through theirundergraduate education without developing the writing skills necessary to communicateeffectively in their chosen fields of study. A reduction in general communication skills isan added problem for colleges of engineering who have been under increasing pressurefor many
Paper ID #23310Supporting Student Learning Through Peer-led Course Support InitiativesJenai Kelley Brown, Clemson University Jenai Kelley Brown has a background in college life coaching as well as career counseling. Before com- ing to Clemson University, she was a Senior College Life Coach at Florida State University working primarily with first generation college students. Jenai is currently the Assistant Coordinator for Tutor- ing in Clemson’s Academic Success Center where she trains and manages approximately 60 tutors each semester. While her roles in Higher Education have changed, her primary goal has remained to help
teaching lab courses and mentored both undergraduate and graduate students interested in teaching. Her areas of expertise include qualitative and quantitative assessment, STEM curriculum development, and graduate student training. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Piloting a Flexible Deadline Policy for a First-Year Computer Programming CourseAbstractThis complete research paper details our analysis of how implementing a generous flexibledeadline policy impacted student performance across course assignments over one semester in alarge introductory computer programming course. Our goal was to help students stay on track forthe course by posting regular
described Carnegie Mellon’s Engineering Design Projects Course in which teamsof upper class and graduate students from engineering and other academic areas, includinghumanities, business, and fine arts, work on design projects sponsored by industries, non-profits,government agencies, or institutes within the university. The course provides the participatingstudents a hands-on, integrative, multidisciplinary experience in the important field ofengineering design, together with instruction in key design-related topics not usually addressedelsewhere in the curriculum.The course’s success is demonstrated by both projects sponsors and students returning toexperience the course for more than one semester. At the end of the most recent semester, fall2003
Education Network (KEEN) was started by the Kern FamilyFoundation in 2005 as a collegiate initiative to complement programs that they had developed atthe K-12 level to increase the quantity and quality of U.S. engineering talent. The Kern Familystrongly believes that instilling an entrepreneurial attitude and skill-set is key to helping theUnited States maintaining its economic position in the increasingly competitive global marketplace. KEEN’s mission is to graduate engineers equipped with an action-orientedentrepreneurial mindset who will contribute to business success and transform the U.S.workforce… The KEEN program aims to fulfill this mission by supporting the creation ofprograms that develop technical leaders with strong skills and an
has held these dual responsibilities since 2011. Jeff is currently leading a campus-wide strategic planning process focused on creating more transforma- tive educational experiences for lifelong learners. Jeff first joined UW-Madison’s faculty in 1989 as an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, where he co-founded the Construction Engineering and Management Pro- gram and developed the construction curriculum. In addition, he has authored and co-authored papers on the subject of educating civil engineers. His body of work demonstrates his commitment to using emerging technology in the classroom to prepare the next generation of engineers and other students for the
social implications or social responsibility in engineering. At the implicit level,SDP teams understanding of engineering ethics varied across teams, and it did not directlyinfluence their ethical decision-making. Some SDP teams, however, did demonstrate implicit andbroad understanding of social implications of engineering, particularly when coupled with ethicsexperts, and when the atmosphere was collegial. When it comes to research laboratories,voluntary ethics discussions were rarely present. Based on our results, we suggest a situatedapproach, such as midstream modulation in engineering labs and collaboration with ethicsexperts to improve engineering ethics education programs. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section
environmental engineering from the University of North Dakota. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of diversity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She is Co-Director of
Methods and Standards in Higher Education Literature. Dr. BrianBeatty is generally credited with originating the terms "Hybrid-Flexible" and "HyFlex.” His“Four Principles of HyFlex Course Design” [4], [6] are commonly referenced (e.g., [7], [8], [9],etc.) to summarize key challenges to the instructor: • Learner Choice: Provide meaningful alternative participation modes and enable students to choose between participation modes daily, weekly, or topically. • Equivalency: Provide learning activities in all participation modes, which lead to equivalent learning outcomes. • Reusability: Utilize artifacts from learning activities in each participation mode as “learning objects’ for all students. • Accessibility: Equip
live in with the mechanics models they will use in their studies?2. In what ways do showing students how to abstract the physical world into tractable engineering science problems affect their future-oriented motivation, and to what extent do students make connections between what they learn and the physical world they will work in upon graduation?Course developmentThe course being developed is a new version of an existing statics class. This is a foundationalmechanics class taught to sophomore students in civil, environmental, biosystems, biomedical,and industrial engineering. Approximately 5-600 students take the class each year in sections ofroughly 40 students. The class has an existing syllabus that lists the topics that are
students to reflect on the results of the Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineeringentry skills survey, the aggregate results of which were provided to each section. Additional“one-minute” papers ask students to reflect on the reasons behind writing lessons and tospeculate on the effects of different approaches to writing. “One-minute” papers are tied to theweekly lab report, and 5 percent of the student’s grade on a lab report is awarded for completion(correct or incorrect) of the “one-minute” paper before the lab report is submitted.Inspired by the format of focused writing being promoted in general
. Page 12.133.79) Group mentee social activitiesMentees enjoy meeting other students and making new friends in a relaxed setting. Mentorsoccasionally schedule group outings at the campus coffee shop or meet for pizza and gameswhile talking about the topic of the week. Since mentees were placed to mesh with mentors,students in a mentor’s group usually mesh very well together, forming new friendships. Once ortwice a semester, mentors will schedule fun (hanging out, movies), games (dodge ball,volleyball, basketball) and food for all program mentees to socialize even more.10) Mentor Handbook DevelopmentUsing upperclassmen as mentors creates a regular significant turnover as the mentors and thecoordinators graduate, leave for co-op and internship
undergraduateliberal arts college with engineering.The mission of the program is, consequently, to provide the student with a solid basis inelectrical engineering and the underlying mathematics and science within the framework of aliberal arts college. The graduate can be expected to be successful in seeking employment orpursuing graduate studies in the area of her/his specialty and, through the General Educationrequirements and the relatively large number of free electives, to be a cultured member of societyand of the multicultural, multinational world to which we all belong. The program objectiveswere chosen to fulfill this mission. They are: (1) To provide a grouding in mathematics, science and fundamental concepts in engineering. This core is
Aerospace, Inc, a small engineering firm she founded while a graduate student.Prof. Jill L McNitt-Gray, University of Southern California Dr. McNitt-Gray is a professor in the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Biological Sciences at the University of Southern California and is the director of the USC Biomechanics Research Lab. She and her interdisciplinary research team study the control and dynamics of movement during physically- demanding goal-directed tasks using an integrated experimental and dynamic modeling approach. She is a USC Mellon Mentor and is currently the chair of the Dornsife Women in Science and Engineering Committee and a member of the USC STEM Consortium Steering Committee. Dr. McNitt-Gray is also
process, which involved the creation and maintenance of an electronicportfolio, in a single class period or, in one case, via Email. Student participation in the processwas voluntary, however, response rates were relatively poor. In two courses, a nominal gradeincentive tied to student responses was used as a participation motivator.Approximately two thirds of 84 eligible students in four courses participated. The quality of thematerial that students submitted was, in general, good or moderate quality; however, studentshad difficulty associating their educational experiences to appropriate educational outcomes.The data and reports that were automatically generated by EnableOA were judged to be veryuseful for continuous improvement and
Paper ID #45462Developing a podcast project to supplement chemical & biological engineeringelective coursesDr. Justin Vento, Villanova University Justin Vento graduated with a chemical engineering degree from Manhattan College and became a process engineer in the petrochemical industry. After a few years, he pursued his PhD in chemical and biological engineering from NC State, where he studied and developed tools for microorganisms within the human gut microbiome. He then worked for a few years as a scientist at a synthetic biology company Ginkgo Bioworks in Boston, MA. He is currently a Visiting Assistant Teaching
degree in Computer Science with a concentration of Software Development from Columbus State University. She works as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Auburn University and recently began work for the City of Opelika, AL in the IT department as Assistant CIO. Her research interests include digital learning, UI/UX, web development, cybersecurity, web accessibility. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Teacher-Guided Project-Based Coding Practice Enhances High-Level Programming Language LearningAbstractJava is a required course for many undergraduate computer science programs and is widely re-garded as a challenging programming language due to its complexity and
Paper ID #34209Development and Assessment of a Polymer Processing Learning ModuleDr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan Tech. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development and Assessment of
AC 2011-1602: NOVEL CURRICULUM EXCHANGE RESEARCH-BASEDTEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES TO SUPPORTELEMENTARY STEM CURRICULUMJohn C Bedward, North Carolina State University John Bedward is in the Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education at NC State University. Is a Science Education doctoral student and graduate research assistant with the Graphic- Enhanced Elementary Science project at the NC State Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. He received his BS/MS in Technology Education from NC State, taught middle school technology education, and led informal science investigations at the Science House, a learning outreach initiative at NC State. His research interests include STEM
soils, advanced soil testing & interpretation, and finite el- ement modeling of soil systems. He also conducts research on sustainability and resiliency assessments of various civil infrastructure and thrives on educating the next generation of civil engineers prepared to tackle future challenges. He received about two million (PI/Co-PI) in grant funding from various state and federal agencies and has published in noteworthy journals. He is a licensed civil engineer in the states of Texas and Idaho, he is also a member of Chi Epsilon and Tau Beta Pi Honor Societies. He is also the founding president of the ASCE’s Southern Idaho Geo-Institute chapter.Dr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an
Paper ID #37418The CARE methodology: A new lens for introductory ECE course assess-mentbased on student challenging and rewarding experiencesAya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received a BEng in Computer and Communications Engineering from the American University of Beirut. Aya is a graduate research assistant with the Designing Education Lab at Stanford, led by Professor Sheri Sheppard, and her research explores the accessibility of introductory electrical engineering education. She is supported by the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship
organizations in the Midwest and East Coast. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in refereed international conferences and other journals. He received the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship, the ASEE New Engineering Educators Distinguished Service Award, the Merl K. Miller Award from the ASEE Computers in Education Journal, and numerous other awards. He is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society and ASEE, and serves as an ABET Program Evaluator. At MSOE, he routinely teaches courses in software verification, software engineering practices, real time systems, secure software development, network security, and operating systems, and other cybersecurity related topics, as well as
years.In a systematic review of 55 studies spanning a decade of data collection (2009-2019) from arange of disciplines, higher education researchers found that the majority of interventions aimedat improving undergraduate retention target the first year [3]. Most of the barriers to studentsuccess are experienced intensely during the first year, and without proper support, students candrop out, receive lower grades, and ultimately delay their graduation [4]. Difficulties areexperienced in the transition from familiar academic and social demands to a new context inwhich university expectations, systems, and social groups can feel daunting [5]. These“transitional challenges” are mediated by mentoring programs and acceptance from peers [6]Peer
AC 2009-1490: AN ASSESSMENT OF A HIGH-SCHOOL OUTREACH PROGRAMTaryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles is a Professor of the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development.Tania Monterastelli, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Tania Monterastelli graduated Summa Cum Laude in 2008 with a BS degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland
departmental faculty outstanding teaching awards. Tarawneh serves the department as Graduate Program Director. Current expertise includes experimental heat transfer, thermal sciences, acoustics and vibrations, and railroad bearing research.Dr. Horacio Vasquez, University of Texas, Pan AmericanRobert D. Wrinkle, Center for Survey Research Page 25.684.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Guided Discovery Modules for StaticsAbstractStudents notoriously struggle to master the concept of free body diagrams. In Statics, forexample, they often fail to identify reaction
concepts.Specifically, the first law of thermodynamics describes the natural and proven law that all energyis conserved and allows quantification of energy. This project describes the design andconstruction of an apparatus that demonstrates the First Law of Thermodynamics andsubsequently energy quantification, energy conversion and energy efficiency along with learningmodules to be used in an educational setting.IntroductionSTEM has been a heavily invested topic within educational curricula, from pre-K through highschool and college. A persistent problem with science, technology and engineering related effortsis the ever-burdening costs of the student laboratory experiments. Also, the space associated withlaboratory activities, from storage to laboratory to
: Page 6.911.8 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education• 64% of students were "very interested" in attending SI, and 34% were "somewhat interested."• Almost half (49%) of the students expected to study only three to five hours each week for the class. Suggested study requirement for a three-credit hour College of Engineering course is nine hours per week.• 54% expected to get an “A,” and 43% expected a “B” as the final course grade. As previously discussed, SI courses are selected based on notoriously high DFW rates. Consequently, these high expectations explain the general trend
“Brick Paths Unlimited”The SPFB seeks to provide students with exposure to true-to-life engineering projects,and instruction in a variety of project management topics that can be used as tools toguide the future course of the projects. In order to assure that the teams are on track,during the Fall semester the SPFB gives assignments to verify: • a good understanding of the project (Project Concept Statement, Scope Presentation) Page 6.683.5 • a means to evaluate and update the status of the project (Timeline assignment) Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
/postdoctoral trainees how to design, engineer and testbioadhesives [29]. Trainees tested the adhesive strength of two different bioadhesives (i.e.,glutaraldehyde-crosslinked gelatin and cyanoacrylate) with two different substrates (i.e., chamoisstrips and polylactic acid strips) using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)standards. This IBL bioadhesives module resulted in significant learning gains and significantimprovements in scientific literacy for trainees at multiple education levels. Having demonstratedthis activity was successful for undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate trainees, wehypothesized that we could use Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) to adapt the modulefor middle school outreach [30]. The objective of this
or simply disengage when confronted with cultural difference. Howthese general education lessons translate to engineering courses has been explored in theengineering education literature.Paterson, Swan and Watkins (2016) most recently reported on intercultural awareness ofengineering student cohorts as measured by the IDI. Several interesting trends were reported. Forexample, lower IDI averages were reported from undergraduate teaching oriented schools thanfrom research oriented universities. Other findings included a tendency for engineering studentswith an intercultural mindset to be attracted to service-oriented international experiences.Additionally, the researcher’s validated previous research which found that student culturalgrowth is