engineering: A case study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam”, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 273–289, 2018. doi: 10.1177/0020720918773050. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/0020720918773050. [7] A. Fauzi and Z. I. Rizman, “Field trip education approach beyond classroom: Microwave course case”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4S1, pp. 89–94, 2015. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p89. [8] M. Seifan, D. Dada, and A. Berenjian, “The effect of virtual field trip as an introductory tool for an engineering real field trip”, Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 27, pp. 6–11, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ece
Dynamics and Controls and believes that student aerospace design competitions are ideal avenues for students to express their creativity while complementing the knowledge gained in the classroom with hands-on experience as well as promoting greater collaboration and learning across disciplines. Dr. Gururajan’s research interests are interdisciplinary and in the fields of fault tolerant flight control, real time systems, experimental flight testing using small UAS, and the design/development of natural language interaction with drones. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comSTUDENT PAPER: Learning Outside of the Classroom
Faculty as well as faculty from other colleges and universities on STEM related grants, activities, and endeavors. Dr. Fontenot teachers Professional Communications for Engineers: practical applications to written, oral, and Internet communication as well as an introduction to engineering ethics and service learning. She sits on numerous councils and boards, including the Texas Alliance for Minorities in Engineering Board, Texas Tech Teacher Education Council, the Pre College Engineering Council, and the Service Learning Faculty Advisory Council. She publishes in engineering related journals and presents at STEM conferences like ASEE, STEM Best Practices, and Frontiers in Education.Mr. Richard A Burgess, Texas Tech
Paper ID #12857Teachers’ Use of Argumentation in the Development of Integrated STEMCurricula (Fundamental)Corey A Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering
Assistant Professor of Engineering at Cal State East Bay. I received my doctorate in Architectural Engineering at Penn State with a minor in Educational Psychology. I am strongly focused on my teaching and research. In my teaching, I strive to provide an engaging and active learning experience to my students, by applying innovative technology and researched pedagogi- cal interventions. I translate this passion for pedagogy in my research by evaluating the intersection of innovative technology and learning.Tiffany A. Mathews, Pennsylvania State University Tiffany A. Mathews is the Director of the Office of Science Engagement in the Eberly College of Science at Penn State. Her focus is helping undergraduate find research
-hispanic-americans-see-more- representation-visibility-as-helpful-for-increasing-diversity-in-science[6] J. Qadir and A. Al-Fuqaha. A Student Primer on How to Thrive in Engineering Education during and beyond COVID-19. In Education Sciences, 9(2020), no. 236, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090236[7] L.M. Dos Santos. The motivation and experience of distance learning engineering programmes students: A study of non-traditional, returning, evening, and adult students. In International Journal of Education and Practice: 134-148, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.134.148[8] L. Zhao, Y. Ao, Y. Wang, and T. Wang. Impact of Home-Based Learning Experience During COVID-19 on Future Intentions
on pre-algebra readiness and states of engagement. The Studio STEM Project (DRL 1029756) proposes to engage middle school students in science and engineering in an after school setting. Guided by engineering teaching kits, participants work with under- graduate mentors to explore the science of energy as they build-test-rebuild dwellings to protect penguins from climate change. Dr. Evans teaches graduate courses in the learning sciences and interactive me- dia design and development. He has published in Educational Technology Research and Development, the International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, and the Journal of Educational Computing Research. More information on projects can be found
/thayerschool/sets/72157626513266429/ ; last accessed January 1, 201217) Goff, R. and Terpenny, J; Capstone Design, Mechanical Engineering Project or Personnel Management challenge?; ASEE Annual Conference and Convention Proceedings, 2006, paper #167618) Personal verbal communication between the author and one of the Formula HybridTM competition judges during the 2010 competition event at Loudon, New Hampshire19) Schuster, P., Davol, A., Mello, J.; Student Competitions – Benefits and Challenges, ASEE Annual Conference and Convention Proceedings, 2006, paper #183520) Chang, I, et al; Designing and manufacturing of Formula SAE-Hybrid racecar for a new engineering education program, 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion
Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2018.Pitterson, N., Case, J., Agrawai, A. & Hasbun, I. "Investigating the ways in which Student Agencydevelops through Engagement with Knowledge," 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference(FIE), 2018, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658556.Stefanou, C., Lord, S. M., Prince, M. J., & Stolk, J. (2012). The effect of different active learningenvironments on student outcomes related to lifelong learning. International Journal ofEngineering Education, 28(3), 606-620. 11Vieira, C., Magana, A.J., Roy, A. et al. Providing students with agency to self-scaffold in acomputational science and
2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2019: IEEE, pp. 535-543.[19] I. Makdoun, G. Mezzour, K. M. Carley, and I. Kassou, "Analyzing the needs of the automotive job market in Morocco," in 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2018: IEEE, pp. 1-6.[20] I. Khaouja, I. Rahhal, M. Elouali, G. Mezzour, I. Kassou, and K. M. Carley, "Analyzing the needs of the offshore sector in Morocco by mining job ads," in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2018: IEEE, pp. 1380-1388.[21] S. Meganck, J. Smith, and J. P. D. Guidry, "The skills required for entry-level public relations
.[3] “Makerspace course list,” BeAM Makerspace Network, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://beam.unc.edu/makerspace-course-list/. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2022].[4] Y. Murai et al, “Facilitating online distributed critical making: lessons learned,” in Proc. of the FabLearnEurope / MakeEd 2021: An international conference on computing, design, and making in education, 2-3 June2021, St. Gallen, Switzerland. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3466725.3466759.[5] M. Kinnula, I. Sánchez Milara, B. Norouzi, S. Sharma, and N. Iivari, “The show must go on! Strategies formaking and makerspaces during pandemic,” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 29, 100303,2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100303.[6] K
Lessons Learned,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, vol. 131, no. 3, July 2005.[3] H. Yuying, “Implementation Strategy of College English Online Blended Teaching Model,” in 2020 5th International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2020), July 2020, Atlantis Press, 2020. pp. 279-282.[4] S. McCoy, A. Lynam, and M. Kelly, “A Case for Using Swivl for Digital Observation in an Online or Blended Learning Environment,” International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, vol. 2, no. 2, 2018.[5] P. Kranzfelder, J. L. Bankers-Fulbright, M. E. García-Ojeda, M. Melloy, S. Mohammed and A. R. M. Warfa, “The Classroom Discourse Observation
Engineering. Cynthia participates on various Boards and Committees in support of higher education and diversity, eq- uity and inclusion – including the Engineering Dean’s Advisory Committee, the Chemical Engineering Advisory Committee, the Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Advisory Committee, the Leadership in Engineering Advancement Diversity and Retention Advisory Committee (LEADR) and the Avenue E Community College Transfer Program Advisory Board at University of California, Davis; the Engineering Dean’s Advisory Board and the International House Board of Directors at University of California, Berke- ley; the Engineering Dean’s Advisory Board at University of California, Los Angeles; the Broadening Opportunity
Approach to Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Identities and Academic Relationships,” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 440–465, 2020.[27] E. Ramirez, “‘No One Taught Me the Steps’: Latinos’ Experiences Applying to Graduate School,” Journal of Latinos and Education, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 204–222, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2011.581105.[28] E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and D. L. Peters, “Drivers of research topic selection for engineering doctoral students,” IJEE, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1283–1296, 2017.[29] S. Santa-Ramirez, “Sink or swim: The mentoring experiences of Latinx PhD students with faculty of color.,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol
contrast, very few engineering Master’s programs in the United States are ABET EACaccredited. The number on the ABET website of institutions with ABET EAC accredited MSprograms is ten, as of January 3, 2020. There are an additional seven international programs [1].Therefore, arguably, ABET EAC currently has minimal effect on graduate education in the US.In this paper, we present a discussion of the EAC/ABET Master’s level criteria, provide somecontext regarding MS programs that are accredited by EAC/ABET, summarize perceptions ofsome stakeholders within the academic community, and finally, provide recommendationsshould ABET and professional societies choose to promote master’s level accreditation.Current Master’s Level CriteriaThe question is why
Innovation, 1988.16. Keating, D.A., Stanford, T.G., Cope, R.S., Leadership of Systematic Technology Innovation and the Advanced Professional Education of Engineers, IEE Conference Proceedings No 435: Fifth International Conference on Factory 2000, Churchill College, Cambridge University, 1997.17. Duderstadt, J.J., A University for the 21st Century, The University of Michigan Press, 2000.18. Schein, E.H., Professional Education: Some New Directions, Carnegie Commission, McGraw-Hill, 1972.19. Carnegie Commission Series on Higher Education, McGraw-Hill, 1972.20. Barwise, J. and Perry, J., Situations and Attitudes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1983.21. National Research Council, Committee on Science, Engineering
the 2019 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. NSF 21-319. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21319/.[5] H. Martins, I. Direito, A. Freitas, & A. Salgado. “Roses In, Roses Out - How the Framework of Management by Competencies in HRM Can Help Address the Issue of Doctoral Candidates and Graduates Soft Skills in Engineering.” INTED2022 Proceedings (pp. 9657-9664). 2022.[6] B. Hynes, Y. Costin, and I. Richardson. "Educating for STEM: developing entrepreneurial thinking in STEM (Entre-STEM)." Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. 165-194.[7] M. Feldmann, M. Gates, M. Ratnatunga, R. Devol
to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as coordinated decision making in stochastic supply chains, handling supply chains during times of crisis and optimizing global supply chains on the financial health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Wei Lu, Texas A&M University Dr. Wei Lu’s research work focuses on Higher Education in Agriculture & Engineering, K-12 (STEM) Education, Communications, Marketing, Economics, and Social Behaviors. She is a certified Instructional Designer and Graphic Designer
A. N. Nasir "Towards industrial revolution 4.0: employers’ expectations on fresh engineering graduates." International Journal of Engineering & Technology vol. 7, no. 4.28, pp. 267-272, 2018.[12] J.A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why Industry Says That Engineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says,” Proceedings 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. June, 2011. 10.18260/1-2--18809[13] J.E. Mills, and D.F. Treagust, (2003). “Engineering education - Is problem-based or project- based learning the answer,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2- 16, 2003.[14] M. Taks, P. Tynjala, and H. Kukemelk
computer engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His goal is to connect his core engineering skills with fields in which he can make cross-disciplinary connections and accelerate progress, like physics education. He joined the POINT team (Physics Outreach and Instruction through New Technologies) to focus on the outreach and research efforts.Katherine Zine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38032 I am a first year physics graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I did my un- dergraduate at
Paper ID #43764Experiences of Nuclear Workforce Pipeline Development and Maintenanceat a Historically Black College University (HBCU)Dr. Antony Kinyua, Morgan State University Dr Kinyua is an Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and currently affiliated to the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics at Morgan State University (MSU) as a lecturer teaching Engineering Physics and Earth Sciences. He has more than 30 years of experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Experiences of Nuclear Workforce Pipeline Development and Maintenance at a Historically BlackCollege University (HBCU
, "Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey ofmechanics test data for introductory physics courses," Am. J. Phys. vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64- 74,1998. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809[2] F. J. García-Peñalvo, H. Alarcón, & A. Dominguez, “Active learning experiences inengineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 305-309, 2019.[3] L. E. Lara Ramírez, M. I. Pérez Vega, P. T. Villalobos Gutiérrez, V. Villa-Cruz, J. O. OrozcoLópez, & L. J. López Reyes, “Uso de laboratorios virtuales como estrategia didáctica para elaprendizaje activo.” Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4211-4223, 2022. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i1.1794[4] D. R
. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advisory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a regional and chapter chairman of IEEE, SME, and ASEE, and as a session chair and as a member of scientific and international committees for many international conferences. Page 23.264.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 “By the Students, For the Students” A New Paradigm for Better
Paper ID #37724Enhanced Learning of Load Path in a 3D Structural Systemusing Virtual RealityJuan Andres Torres Juan is a master’s student in Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Systems. He obtained his Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador in 2019. He has research experience in Structural Engineering in the field of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete. His current research interests lie in the use of virtual reality for education in civil engineering, structural health monitoring and innovative structural systems.Ann C Sychterz (Assistant Professor) I
in Engineering Software, vol. 87, pp. 43–56, Sept. 2015. [4] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, p. e0250041, Apr. 2021. [5] W. Friedrich, “ARVIKA-augmented reality for development, production and service,” in Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, (Darmstadt, Germany), pp. 3–4, IEEE Comput. Soc, 2002. [6] R. Aggarwal and A. Singhal, “Augmented Reality and its effect on our life,” in 2019 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), (Noida, India), pp. 510–515, IEEE, Jan. 2019. [7] J. Paavilainen
university, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Dr. Karen Elizabeth Eifler, University of Portland I am a teacher educator with a special interest in teacher induction and retention.Dr. Timothy A. Doughty, University of Portland Dr. Timothy A. Doughty received his BS and MS from Washington State University in Mechanical and Materials Engineering and his Ph. D. from Purdue University. He has taught at Purdue, Smith College, and is now an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Portland. From 2009 to 2001 he served as a Faculty Scholar with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and has served as the Dundon-Berchtold Fellow of
learning into engineering education: A case study,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 836–847, 2023.[20] L. B. Buck, S. L. Bretz, and M. H. Towns, “Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2008.[21] M. R. Blanchard, S. A. Southerland, J. W. Osborne, V. D. Sampson, L. A. Annetta, and E. M. Granger, “Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction,” Science education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 577–616, 2010.[22] P. B. Johnson, “Open-inquiry in the laboratory: a case study of a scenario
and ACL methodshave been provided as Cards on the KEEN Engineering Unleashed platform [22], [23], [24].References[1] M. Frank, I. Lavy, and D. Elat, “Implementing the project-based learning approach in anacademic engineering course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol.13, pp, 273–288, 2003.[2] R. J. Durkin, “Experiential learning in engineering technology: a case study on problemsolving in project-based learning at the undergraduate level,” Journal of EngineeringTechnology, Spring, pp, 22-29, 2016.[3] F. M. Vanek, L. D. Albright, and L. T. Angenent, Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluationand Implementation. 2nd ed. Place of publication not identified: McGraw Hill Professional,2012.[4] The Mathworks, MATLAB
Conati and Kurt VanLehn. An intelligent computer tutor to support self-explanation while learning from examples. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems, pages 399–408. Springer, 2000. [5] H. Elizalde, I. Rivera-Solorio, Y. P´erez, D. Guerra, and R.A. Ram´ırez-Mendoza. Educational framework based on collaborative reverse engineering and active learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (5):1063–1071, 2009. [6] Alberto Gr´ajeda, Johnny Burgos, Pamela C´ordova, and Alberto Sanjin´es. Assessing student-perceived impact of using artificial intelligence tools: Construction of a synthetic index of application in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1):2287917, 2024. ISSN 2331-186X. doi
California, Berkeley with an M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering. He teaches Environmental Engineering for Community Development, Environmental Engineering Technologies, and Environmental Biological Systems.Dr. Michael A. Butkus P.E., U.S. Military Academy Michael A. Butkus is a professor of environmental engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. His work has been focused on engineering education and advancements in the field of environmental engineer- ing. His current research interests are in physicochemical treatment processes with recent applications in drinking water disinfection, lead remediation, sustainable environmental engineering systems, and con- taminant transport. Butkus is a Board Certified