Paper ID #9031A Critical Review of Measures of InnovativenessMs. Jessica Menold Jessica Menold is a doctoral student in mechanical engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. As an undergraduate at Penn State she was heavily involved with a STEM outreach program called the engineering ambassadors. She currently works as a graduate mentor for entrepreneurial student groups on campus as a part of Penn State’s Lion Launch Pad team. Her interests in entrepreneurs, as well as engineering education, has led her to the study of innovation in engineers, working with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow. Her current research focuses on
for all learners. Valerie has over 15 years of experience working in higher education, primarily in online graduate education, faculty support, and instructional design. She holds an M.S. in Instructional Design and Technology and an M.A. in Anthropology from Brandeis University.Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur is a researcher and evaluator with the Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She holds a dual appointment with the Center for Project-Based Learning and the Morgan Teaching and Learning Center. She holds a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from Temple University and has more than ten years of experience researching professional learning of educators
graduate of West Point and has graduate degrees from Stanford University; he is a licensed PE in California. Page 15.645.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Homebrewing 101: A Vital Part of a Civil Engineering Program!AbstractIn this paper the author shares his experience over several years of teaching civil engineeringstudents to brew beer. This fun exercise, named HB101 (Homebrewing 101) by the students, wasinitially designed solely as a fun social event, but has become a beneficial extracurricularteaching tool that adds value to the overall civil engineering program at the United StatesMilitary Academy at
Paper ID #22983First-year Engineering Teaching Assistant Training: Examining DifferentTraining Models and Teaching Assistant EmpowermentAndrew Phillips, Ohio State University Andrew H. Phillips graduated summa cum laude from The Ohio State University in May 2016 with a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and with Honors Research Distinction. He is currently fin- ishing his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and then he will pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. His engineering education interests include first-year engineering, active learning, learning theory, and teaching design, programming, and
for use bystudents in later semesters. This provides later students, working on similar designs, with quickaccess to the references and work of the earlier teams.JPL Topics & Mentors – In 2007, graduates of the department who had gone on to work at JPLbegan to suggest design topics for student design teams. This has now evolved into a system inwhich JPL provides design topics and mentors for student teams. Usually, a list of eight to tentopics is provided, giving teams a choice of design problem. The mentors work with the teamsthroughout the semester and a subset of the JPL mentors come to campus to hear the final oraldesign presentations at the end of the semester.The mentors at JPL provide the design teams with expert advice and keep
very logical and intuitive model for helping people learn fromexperts at other institutions. It is based on a number of assumptions, such as the assumption thatthere are people who know more about a given topic who are outside the local community thanthose who are inside that community, and/or the visitors would receive more “respect” or “expertstatus” because they are not part of the local community. From experience, we do know thatsometimes novelty, or being outside a community, can lend credibility to a message. Manyinstitutions have Schools of Education, but in teaching and learning theory, there are fewengineering schools that take advantage of the wealth of expertise, experience, and resourcesthese schools (frequently on their own campus
AC 2012-4150: THE INTERLACE PROJECT: EXAMINING THE BAR-RIERS TO IMPLEMENTING COLLABORATIVE, INQUIRY-BASED IN-VESTIGATIONSDr. Morgan M. Hynes, Tufts University Morgan Hynes is a Research Assistant Professor in the Tufts University Education Department and Ed- ucation Research Program Director for the Tufts Center of Engineering Education and Outreach. Hynes received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2001 and his Ph.D. in engineering education in 2009 (both degrees at Tufts University). In his current positions, Hynes serves as PI and Co-PI on a number of funded research projects investigating engineering education in the K-12 and college settings. He is particularly interested in how students and teachers engage
experience in many aspects neededin industry after their graduation such as brainstorming, preliminary and final design, testing andmeasurements and written and oral communication skills. The outcomes of the project wereevaluated against ABET learning outcomes summarized in Table 2. Performance assessment andfeedback were done through the evaluation of biweekly submitted reports. There were four maincategories toward the final GPA of the students: biweekly and final draft reports (15%), finalreport (50%), presentation (25%), and team work evaluation (10%). The details of the fourcategories are as follows: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration
. Under his term as the International Division Program Chair the international division expanded, broadened in topics, and the number of sessions increased from a few technical sessions to over eighteen sessions in the recent years. The ASEE International Division by votes, has recognized Nick’s years of service through several awards over the past years. Nick has been the recipient of multiple Service awards (examples: 2013, 2010, 2006, 2004, 1996), Global Engineering Educators award (example: 2007, 2005), Best Paper award (examples: 2016, 2010, 2005, 2004, 1995) and other awards from the International Division for exceptional contribu- tion to the international division of the American Society for Engineering
students in the United Statesare not fully aware of the STEM career opportunities available to them [3]. Furthermore, persistence inSTEM college majors is influenced by factors such as high school performance in math and science, resultsfrom STEM placement exams, the aspiration to pursue graduate degrees and a strong sense of self-efficacyin STEM fields [4]. Outreach events promoting STEM fields for K-12 students come in many differentforms [5]. Age-appropriate activities have been proven to benefit students at all educational stages, oftenencouraging interest in STEM-related careers and are effective in raising awareness [6]. This paper focuseson one such level-appropriate activity that would help impact students’ perspectives on STEM
Creative Approach to Teaching Project Management Service Learning Roya Javadpour California Polytechnic State UniversityIntroductionA project is a complex, non-routine, one-time effort limited by time, budget, resources,and performance specifications designed to meet customer needs[1]. Therefore, theyrequire a unique approach to management and administration. A creative approach istaken in designing and teaching the graduate level Technological Project Managementcourse offered as part of the Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering department’sprogram at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. The coursecovers the basic
for freshman engineering students under a Department of Education FII?SE grant. The new course,Introduction to Erzgineen”ng Methodology, represents a broader set of goals course than the old course, Eng”neen”ngProblem Solving, which was originally intended as an introduction to engineering problem solving. This existingcourse was based on traditional engineering topics such as circuit analysis, thermodynamics, and computingand students learned basic skills in a conventional lecture-recitation format. The existing course was found tobe lacking as a motivating and exciting experience for first year engineering students. Since these two factorsplay strong roles in student retention and persistence, an interdisciplinary team of faculty decided to
his doctoral dissertation, Dr. Rust served as an NSF GK-12 Graduate Fellow, which allowed him to develop hands-on engineering activities for high school students. In 2009, he joined the faculty of Western New England University where he currently holds the position of Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering. He currently teaches undergraduate courses in bioinstrumentation, physiology, lab on a chip, and global health. Dr. Rust is a member of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). His research interests involve the development of point-of-care medical technologies, including bioinstrumentation for use in low-resource settings
. Our Freshmen Academy Program, currently inits 4th year, is a unique seminar style course taught by engineering faculty for all freshmenengineering students. This exciting, interactive class addresses topics ranging from the ethicalissues that engineers face, current issues and future challenges for engineering and generalconcepts that provide a general foundation for problem-solving and engineering concepts. Thistype of early engagement assists freshmen students in visualizing a direct correlation betweentheir current classes and what they will be involved in later in upper division courses and withinindustry. In the past three years we have seen a significant increase in the freshmen year returnrate to the engineering major, from 85.4% in
videos and articles, and weekly emails toboost learning. Core concepts in the program included abundance gaps, positive emotions,gratitude, purpose-finding, the fundamental state of leadership, generalized reciprocity, positiveenergizers, and high-quality connections. An analysis of data from end-of-program surveys,budget narrative statements, and retrospective interviews revealed that faculty participantsvalued the program design; experimented frequently with gratitude, high-quality connections,and generalized reciprocity; and wrestled with the challenges of authentically enacting positiveleadership principles in academia. The paper closes with recommendations for implementingpositive leadership programs in other engineering higher education
Paper ID #15831Increasing Engineering Literacy among Non-Engineering StudentsJonathan Grunert, Virginia Tech Jonathan Grunert is a graduate student in Virginia Tech’s department of Science and Technology in Soci- ety, with backgrounds in history and library science. His broader interests are in the history of scientific representation. He has taught courses in American history, Science and Society, and Engineering Cultures.Dr. Stephanie G. Adams, Virginia Tech Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate
CyclePad10, which allows users to construct and analyze a wide variety ofthermodynamic cycles. However, most of these software are not free to academic institutions andnone of these resources, with the exception of EES, cover the diverse range of thermodynamictopics covered in a typical engineering thermodynamics textbook. Although EES can supplyJANAF data, solution of chemical equilibrium using equilibrium constants becomescumbersome for systems with more than a handful of species.For solving complex combustion and equilibrium problems, educators frequently rely onSTANJAN2 or, in the case of advanced analysis in a graduate class room, NASA CEA1, 11, bothwritten in FORTRAN. There are other applications such as GasEQ12, REACT13, REACT! 14,SOLGASMIX15
Consolidated Industries Inc. (a metal forging company) and Valley Tool andManufacturing (a machining and manufacturing services company). In this presentation,we will explain in details the program, the relationship created between Connecticutaerospace parts manufacturers, CCAT/NALI and the University of New Haven, theprogress made to date and the road ahead.IntroductionFor many small companies and their managers, lean is a concept that makes a greatdiscussion topic at conferences and in meetings – it looks nice on paper and makes senseonly theoretically. For them, unless the concept is put to practice in their workenvironment with tangible results that can be measured and are observable, the initiativeto implement lean could slowly dissolve in the
Consolidated Industries Inc. (a metal forging company) and Valley Tool andManufacturing (a machining and manufacturing services company). In this presentation,we will explain in details the program, the relationship created between Connecticutaerospace parts manufacturers, CCAT/NALI and the University of New Haven, theprogress made to date and the road ahead.IntroductionFor many small companies and their managers, lean is a concept that makes a greatdiscussion topic at conferences and in meetings – it looks nice on paper and makes senseonly theoretically. For them, unless the concept is put to practice in their workenvironment with tangible results that can be measured and are observable, the initiativeto implement lean could slowly dissolve in the
Consolidated Industries Inc. (a metal forging company) and Valley Tool andManufacturing (a machining and manufacturing services company). In this presentation,we will explain in details the program, the relationship created between Connecticutaerospace parts manufacturers, CCAT/NALI and the University of New Haven, theprogress made to date and the road ahead.IntroductionFor many small companies and their managers, lean is a concept that makes a greatdiscussion topic at conferences and in meetings – it looks nice on paper and makes senseonly theoretically. For them, unless the concept is put to practice in their workenvironment with tangible results that can be measured and are observable, the initiativeto implement lean could slowly dissolve in the
a full-time doctoral student in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh. He conducts research in the field of globalized engineering, including studying offerings in international engineering education, and the extent to which these experiences improve global prepared- ness of engineering students. Currently, Streiner’s research focus is on how best to operationalize and evaluate global opportunities within the engineering curriculum.Dr. Erin J. McCave, Clemson University Erin McCave is a post-doctoral researcher in the Department of Engineering & Science Education and a lecturer for the General Engineering department at Clemson University. Her research interests are in minority
Paper ID #21414Implementing Best Practices and Facing Facilities Realities: Creation of aNew University MakerspaceMadeleine F. Jennings, Texas State University Madeleine Jennings is an undergraduate researcher at Texas State University studying Manufacturing Engineering. Her research interests include ferrous metallurgy, ferrous continuous casting process im- provement, women and minority retention in STEM fields, and the effects and implications of university maker spaces. She has published at AISTech, Iron & Steel Technology, and ASEE, and is interested in pursuing graduate studies in Materials Science &
four-year engineering degree from an institution with an ABETprogram.The accreditation criteria of EC-2000 of ABET requires a structured plan to measure andevaluate the attainment and evaluation of learning objectives and outcomes, as defined byengineering programs. This article focuses on the application of the ABET EC-2000criteria that requires engineering programs to formulate curriculum based on programoutcomes. It concentrates on three topics: (1) formulating the required learning outcomes,(2) generating a program that enables faculty to achieve the required learning outcomes,and (3) assembling a plan of curriculum development that satisfies accreditation standardsand fulfills the university’s educational goals. This article will propose
student-faculty interactions. The reader will find interesting historicalperspective on student engagement in Chen et al. 4, where the authors discuss the role of student-faculty interactions, curricula, and classroom learning.Similar need for connecting students to community and real world problems is activelyresearched for other levels of education. For example, the K-12 level in Bouillion et al.3, Tayloret al.15, and graduate education in Newswander et al. 11 (see also references therein).We have developed a new approach to teaching Calculus II by providing academicallychallenging motivating examples and projects demonstrating the use of calculus methods. Wehave created supporting instructional materials. The course content has been divided
is question isprocessed by the Question Mapping Module, and based on the KML estimate, returns the answerfrom the database: “Series field needs to be connected only when you are working with a seriesgenerator/motor or a compound generator/motor.” If necessary, the Intelligent Tutoring Systemalso points the student to the app appropriate ropriate page in the knowledgebase where the student can findadditional details on the topic. In the third instance, the intelligent tutor determines that thestudent incorrectly connected the circuit 5 times so that the Notification Module provided thecorrect circuit configuration to the student
be measured.Because MTEI faculty read all the comments, they develop a sense of teaching strengths andissues across departments and the college. This informs topic selection for other MTEIprogramming such as periodic Teaching Tip emails that go out to all teaching faculty andperiodic small group Teaching Discussion Lunches. In addition to general invitations to thelunches, individual invitations are sent to faculty for whom a topic might be particularly relevant.For example, when students raised concerns about lab courses across multiple departments, adiscussion lunch around lab courses was organized and all lab instructors were specificallyinvited and encouraged to attend. Ideas and potential solutions were shared across departmentsthat
Paper ID #25696Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity ProjectsProf. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he completed his PhD at the University of Rochester, and now focuses his efforts to further the areas of computer architecture, digital systems, cybersecurity, and computer engineering education.Prof. Raymond A. Hansen, Wentworth Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity Projects Aaron
Education, 2017 SCUPI Derby – A New Approach to “Introduction to Mechanical Design” D. Liang and A. Evans Sichuan University – Pittsburgh Institute Chengdu, Sichuan, People Republic of China F. C. Lai Anadarko Presidential Professor School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USAAbstractThe sophomore class of “Introduction to Mechanical Design” in SCUPI is rather unique in thesense that it pairs a traditional mechanical design class with an English writing class that iscentered on technical writing. To the
2006-2534: NONE OF MY LAB DATA MAKES ANY SENSE - LEARNING TOINTERPRET AND REPORT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSJed Lyons, University of South Carolina At the University of South Carolina, Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He has developed laboratory experiments for freshman engineering, engineering materials, measurements and instrumentation, and mechanical systems. He currently serves on the advisory board for the Center for Teaching Excellence, and is Chair of the Faculty Committee on Instructional Development Director, Director of the Center for Engineering and Computing Education, and Principal Investigator of a NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education award. With
Engineering from Florida International University.Robert Sterner, Rowan University Page 12.1374.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Experiments to Teach Engineering Using Sports ApplicationsAbstractThe context of sporting activities can be an exciting way to teach engineering principles. We arein the process of developing a series of hands-on modules in order to introduce engineeringstudents to mechanical, aerospace, and chemical engineering principles through application tosports and sports performance. The modules allow for students to explore topics such asaerodynamics, mechanics and transport in the context of