the engineering major [2]. As a result,programs that expose students to engineering experiences and/or projects early in their collegestudies might have a greater chance of both enticing students to persist and interesting them inspecific sub-fields of engineering.In the paper, the authors will present a project that is motivated to explore how to improve STEMlearning outcomes and retention of engineering majors by introducing hand-on projects, whichcombining STEM learning with entrepreneurship, into the freshman engineering curriculum(MEEN 1310-Computer Based Graphics and Design I and MEEN 1320 Fundamental ofNumerical Method). This project is supported by HP Catalyst Initiative to develop a new STEM-preneur learning environment through
promoted in four ways2: 1. Mastery experiences, where students demonstratemastery by overcoming obstacles through effort. We promote mastery by using hard problems,and emphasizing explanations. 2. Reinforcement by seeing peers achieve mastery. We usecooperative learning, teamwork, and class presentations to create a learning environment inwhich students see the mastery experiences of peers. 3. Social encouragement. Students wererepeatedly given encouragement that the problems are hard, but can be solved with hard work. 4.Students must learn to manage emotional and physical reactions, such math anxiety, or the knotin the stomach when facing a challenging problem on a test.Transfer requires learning with understanding3. To achieve this we have the
professionalcompetencies in comparison to studying in a conventional engineering curriculum.Wei Xue7 introduced a hands-on, project-based experiential learning module into a course onmicro-and nanotechnologies for mechanical engineering students. This module was combinedwith the existing theoretical course structure and the laboratory activities were designed tointegrate textbook theoretical principles with real fabrication and characterization processes. Thishands-on experience enabled the students to obtain a better comprehension of the classroomprinciples. Based upon student feedback obtained via surveys, it was learned that theintroduction of this experiential, design-oriented module was very effective in helping studentsunderstand concepts related to micro
Table 2 show an insignificant difference in the means of both groups,however, the p-value is approaching the limit value to have a significant difference sothat performing a more conservative statistical analysis there could be a greatersignificance, even so, it can be observed that the civil engineering group has a highermean than architecture students, an expected value based on the nature of both careers.As it is known, civil engineering is a technical career, so the elaboration of their work iscolder and objective, a characteristic that makes them more susceptible to the assertiverole of masculinity. On the other hand, architects see their designs more emotionally,they look to improve the experience of those around them, and mainly the
programs today have a comprehensive entrepreneurshipoptions (or series of classes) that teach the entire process from inventive idea to launching asuccessful business. Many business courses teach how to run a business or how to helpemerging or established companies be more successful—they do not teach how to invent aprocess or product and then start up a company.Based on the experiences in these three courses, as well as other creative problem solving,design, and invention classes, the following factors and conclusions are deemed important foreffective learning, an effective academic program, or successful company: • Support by administration or managers and peers—there must be a climate that makes innovation and creative thinking not
—theirdepartment.Without greater discussion of faculty and student reception of the PEPC course, one could arguethat this research unreasonably privileges the author’s intentionality. This has been partiallymitigated. For example, certain pedagogical choices (i.e., the integration of queer and criticalrace pedagogies) decenter the author’s desires and re-center students’ needs. However, thiscourse was not designed in a vacuum—void of student perspectives. This research emerges fromwhen the author was an undergraduate computer science student. This is not to suggest thatauthor’s vision should not stand in as the collective vision of all undergraduates for computingeducation. This research emerges from very specific experiences as a computer scienceundergraduate
Professor of Civil Engineering at Quinnipiac University (Hamden, CT, USA) with expertise in ecological engineering and green stormwater infras- tructure. Her teaching is grounded in experiential learning and service-learning experiences. She serves on the executive board of the Mill River Watershed Association and steering committee chair of the Mill River Urban Waters Initiative. Her scholarly collaborations span a variety of entities including both public and private agencies, educational institutions, and non-profit organizations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Community-university-government partnership to advance environmental justice and address river
capacitor discharges Page 5.722.3and this is also shown using a red line. The switch is shown as either closed or open accordingly.The graphs of the output voltage, the inductor voltage and current across the inductor are shown.These graphs are displayed slowly so that the user can understand how the output voltage or theinductor voltage or the current across the inductor is changing with the opening and closing ofthe switch. The average values are also shown along with the actual sketch and thecorresponding values are marked. The user can experiment with a different set of values. Figure 1b shows the plot generated by Pspice for the buck
mission as a part of its mandate, Project STEP, short forScience and Technology Enhancement Program, was conceived of at the University ofCincinnati (UC).Project STEP is a National Science Foundation funded GK-12 program at UC whichinvolves graduate and undergraduate Fellows, secondary science and mathematicsteachers, University of Cincinnati faculty and a graphics/web developer, working inteams to design, develop, and implement hands-on activities and technology-driveninquiry-based projects which relate to the students' community issues, as vehicles to teachscience and math skills [2]. Activities are incorporated into lessons, demonstrations, Page
traditional textbook reading, with 11 of the 15 respondents statingthat the module was significantly better. The student who stated that the tool was somewhatworse than textbook reading stated that the ion transport tool didn’t provide the same level ofbackground information that a textbook would carry. All respondents found the online moduleto be as much or more preferable than a traditional lecture. As one student stated, “I am more ofa hands on person, so listening and taking notes is good, but then being able to apply thoseconcepts really helps me understand.” While the response was still positive, a few students stillpreferred traditional laboratory experiments, though as one student pointed out, “It is hard to seeion channels in a beaker
its inception, BAC, composed of members fromvarious BME sectors, had met five times to discuss departmental updates, accreditationfeedback, and the refinement of PEOs and SOs. Meeting minutes were maintained to ensuretransparency and track progress. 2.5 Criterion 5: CurriculumCriterion 5 ensures the curriculum prepares students for engineering practice by meeting specificeducational standards. Appendix J summarizes ABET requirements, including 30 semester credithours in mathematics and basic sciences with labs, 45 in engineering topics (engineering,computer sciences, design, and modern tools), a broad education component, and a culminatingmajor design experience integrating standards, constraints, and prior coursework.To meet these
what laboratories or facilities are useful to you?Weaknesses: Consider the issues that will be detrimental and may negatively impact your plans. For example, NSF may be a possible source of research funding but this may not be realistic unless your department has an on-going relationship with NSF.Opportunities: Examine unexplored areas that may be exploited for your benefit. Areas such as local economic development activities and synergy with current faculty research should be considered.Threats: Identify competitive issues that may impact your plans. For example, other universities may have programs or research plans that compete with your ideas.Once the SWOT analysis is completed, important department
Session 3232 Multimedia and Web Techniques for Teaching Circuits I Charles Slivinsky University of Missouri-ColumbiaAbstractA variety of computer and Web-based techniques are being employed for instruction in thesophomore-level electrical circuits course at the University of Missouri-Columbia. For theclassroom lectures, presentation software is used; the slides produced are based on an archive ofseveral years’ lecture notes and make effective use of graphics design techniques and simpleanimations; students use their paper copies to take notes during class. For homework
, design, analysis, procurement of equipment and materials, implementation, and performance verification. 2. Conduct necessary engineering experiments, make observations, collect and analyze data, and formulate conclusions. 3. Understand the ethical and societal impact of engineering solutions. 4. Communicate and function effectively and productively both as an individual and as part of an engineering team. 5. Recognize the need for and have the desire to engage in life-long learning. Outcome for all the Engineering Technology programs were exactly the same asthose listed in the TAC of ABET criteria. Nine assessment tools were identified to collectdata for the assessment of outcome achievement for the continuous
from mathematics to physics to engineering.Steve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren received a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively, followed by a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 1994. Dr. Warren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. Prior to joining KSU in August 1999, Dr. Warren was a Principal Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the
with the MATLAB unit, it was decided that an automated assignment managementsystem would be essential. The course was considered a challenge for several reasons. TheMATLAB course unit was relatively short (approximately half of a two semester hourcourse) and the class size was large (approximately 100 students). Multiple assignmentswould be needed to give students repeated practice in writing, debugging, and running theirprograms. Because only a few of the student’s have had previous programming experience,it was expected that many students would require lengthy, individualized instruction. Therelatively short duration of the unit also meant that rapid grading of assignments wasessential. It was decided therefore that automated systems be
: international and domestic undergraduate students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering education in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo
Session 3532 MC68HC11 Portable Lab Unit -- A Flexible Tool for Teaching Microprocessor Concepts Pamela J. Neal, George W. P. York U.S. Air Force AcademyABSTRACT One challenge when teaching assembly language and microprocessor basics is to provide enoughhands-on experience to both teach the concepts and keep the course interesting. At the Air Force Academy,we have designed a self-contained lab unit that is portable, durable, flexible enough to support threecourses, and relatively inexpensive. Centered around the Motorola 68HC11 Evaluation Board, the unit
the rationalebehind the teaching module, and to document the changes we made to the module as we assessedits impact over several trial runs.The PremiseThe premise of this research project was to devise an outreach program to 5th or 6th gradestudents that demonstrates an engineering idea in a fun, yet informative way. At the onset wedecided against “trial and error” exercises where the students would be asked to create somethingstrictly from their own imagination or intuition. Our argument against such tasks is that they donot accurately reflect the methods that engineers actually use. We also decided against a strictly“show and tell” approach, wherein an impressive experiment or demonstration is conducted toelicit a strong audience reaction
AC 2012-2975: ASSESSING INSTRUCTIONAL MODULES THAT ACCEN-TUATE STUDENT PERFORMANCEDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior
technicallabs, facilities and equipment (4) Access to databases and researchers (5) Access to research anddevelopment financing through programs such as SBIR – federal grant funding is greatlyenhanced when incubator clients submit a joint proposal with a university or federal laboratory(6) Additional services and resources including patent knowledge, alumni who may act asadvisors, business contacts and strategic alliance facilitators or investors, access to a far-flungnetwork of laboratories and technical expertise, and access to investment by universityfoundations.All the above mentioned research findings and other issues and environmental factors wereconsidered when designing the entrepreneurship programs at the University of Central
particularhypothetical drug “Vaxachug”.In working through the project, the students scale down their human-sized alcohol metabolismmodel to one of microscale proportions for a “body-on-a-chip” experiment and determine thefeed rates of water and alcohol needed to achieve the same performance as the larger macroscale“human” model. Similar to the traditional scale-up of chemical processes, students determinethe dimensionless ratio of flow rates in the human blood stream and those in a hypothetical poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chip and use that value as a scaling factor. Students alsolearn how scaling down processes can help with reagent consumption and practice a techniquefor process scaling that will be used in later design courses.Scaling was an
did provide a key difference between these courses and their university equivalentsbut substantial projects were done in some university programmes that were as profound [25,pp 317 – 365. 31, (university), 32 (technical college)]. It was within the projects that attentioncould and was paid to design and creativity and much was made of these dimensions (seebelow).9.7. Finally, the major difference between university courses and the sandwich courses of thedip.tech was the compulsory industrial training with its intention of being planned. But eventhen two or three universities had had experience of running sandwich courses and many hadarrangements with industry whereby a student did one year in industry before the three yearuniversity course
extremely important, since communication skills, trust, sharing ideas, etc. arecrucial in the workplace. In addition to demonstrating the strategies, the laboratory material isintended to add a fun component to the learning experience, allow for self-paced exploration thatimproves self-esteem. Page 6.946.11 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationb1) A strategy-oriented robotic task using off-the-shelf programmable autonomous (sensor-equipped
and love so well to the students themselves and their learning. We must ask not only whatdo we want them to learn, but also what do they know when they come in and how do theyinteract with and respond to the learning environment and content we provide." Severalengineering programs have initiated integrated freshmen curricula4,5,6 that integrate entry levelcontent from several disciplines. They show that these programs can be effective in developing abetter understanding of content and improving problem solving abilities. Experiments inproblem-based learning show that this approach allows for the incorporation of these newinstructional methods.The current educational model established in the 19th century was to facilitate an
Instituteof Technology (RIT), Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Iowa State University,California State Polytechnic University, and the University of Texas at Dallas Clarkson. Thesecourses informed our approach, but we noted that these courses were varied in their coverage andperspective of security. That is, each expressed a different opinion on what perspective securityshould be covered for software engineering students.This led to an effort to define what an appropriate software engineering perspective courseshould include, and how it should fit in the design and student experience in a softwareengineering program. This effort, described below, resulted in a new junior-level undergraduatecourse. Next, we map resources we researched to curate
University Dr. Bryner is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Arizona. He teaches courses in thermal-fluid sciences, experimental engineering, and air-breathing and rocket propulsion. Prior to joining Embry-Riddle he worked for over ten years in the propulsion and energy fields doing design, analysis, and testing on both the component and system level. His current research interests are development of engineering laboratory courses and gas turbine engine component design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Fundamental Instrumentation Course for Undergraduate Aerospace
, dueto limitations in terms of lab capacity and an increase in number of students taking the course, itis difficult to provide each student, or even groups of students, with an individual trainer. PortablePLC trainers, on the other hand, do not require a large lab space.Historically, out-of-date, rack-mounted PLC equipment was used in the Department to supportthis class. While this provided the students with a procedural introduction to PLCs, it did not allowfor conceptual understanding or real world experience with the equipment. The ET Programrecently developed an updated set of PLC units utilizing the B&R controller that allowed an openplatform for the laboratory components of the class while fostering a conceptual understanding ofthe
challenging enough for structural engineering students without thecomplexity of using a textbook with examples from unfamiliar engineering and scientific fields.Moreover, the open-source nature of Python means each library has a separate documentationwebsite to navigate, discern what functions are useful, and how to implement them.The idea of a senior project to develop a Python manual tailored to structural engineeringstudents came from the authors’ experiences in three structural analysis/dynamics computing labsin Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo’s architectural engineering (ARCE) curriculum. The teamrecognized the barriers, lack of confidence, and frustration that learners faced with existingprogramming resources. To determine the topics necessary to
each other and meshvery well. Engineering Economics is taught in a traditional method and relies heavily on thelatest edition of Engineering Economy by Blank & Tarquin. Readers are likely familiar with thistraditional approach. Project Management covers the high level concepts. It then primarilyfocuses on tracking and control using MS Project. Examples of recent student MS Project “P”Final Exercises are: design and implement a robot that mimics what people say, mimics facial Page 9.276.3 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &