presented at ASEE increased from 2006-2020. Insome ways, the topics of research stayed consistent over time while some concepts were presentfor only a particular period of time. For example, in each segment of five years, there was a focuson pedagogy (e.g., education, learning, engagement, motivation) and designing games forlearning ( e.g., evaluation, strategies, projects). These concepts were a uniform thread over time.Conversely, special topics of interest appeared and disappeared. Initially, the gaming studies wereprimarily in computing fields and this expanded into other STEM areas over time. From2016-2020, interdisciplinary work increased and gaming research in mathematicsdecreased.With the advancement of VR and AR technology, many games are
Paper ID #32632Program Encryption Toolkit: A Tool for Digital Logic Education andUndergraduate ResearchDr. Jeffrey Todd McDonald, University of South Alabama Dr. Jeffrey ”Todd” McDonald is a Professor of Computer Science in the School of Computing at the University of South Alabama. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from Florida State University in 2006, his Master of Science degree in Computer Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in 2000, and his Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the U. S. Air Force Academy in 1990. His research interests include program protection and
Engineering from U-M. Dr. Finelli is responsible for advising the U-M College of Engineering on educational endeavors, conducting research in engineering education, planning and facilitating workshops for faculty and graduate student instructors, and generating a community of researchers in engineering education. She is also a member of the U-M Steering Committee for the President’s Ethics in Public Life Initiative and the College of Engineering’s Diversity and Outreach Council. Dr. Finelli is a member of the Executive Board of the ERM Division of ASEE and was program co-chair for the 33rd Frontiers in Education Conference and for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. She participated
7 Biotransport 4 Bioinformatics 42.4 Ethics component Page 13.128.5 Since ethics is a crucial component of undergraduate engineering education – and playsan especially important role in research, medicine, and health – we took advantage of the REUprogram to provide our students with a rich initial grounding in bioethics, both professionallyand in a broader sense. A substantial ethics component was critical for at least three reasons.First, students who will be researchers or engineers should be aware of the ethical obligations,hazards, and
AC 2008-970: RESEARCH ON THE EVOLUTION OF COLLEGE INSTRUCTORS'PERSPECTIVES OF TEACHING AND LEARNINGBugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an assistant professor of Science Education at Texas A&M University. He worked as a post-doctorate research fellow at VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Northwestern University. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Science Education from the Pennsylvania State University and an M.S. degree from the Middle East Technical University. He specializes in design and assessment of learning environments pertaining to science and engineering subjects in K-12 and postsecondary levels. Address: Texas A&M University; Teaching, Learning, and
theAccelerated STEM Pathways through Internships, Research, Engagement, and Support(ASPIRES) project, a collaborative initiative that addresses identified barriers to student successusing high-impact educational practices that have been shown to enhance interest, increaseparticipation, and improve outcomes for underrepresented minority students in STEM. One ofthe main components of this project is a three-tiered internship program that that is suitable forcommunity college students and provides multiple exposures to undergraduate researchopportunities. This paper focuses on the first tier of this initiative, the development andimplementation of the ASPIRES Scholars Research Program: a two-week introduction to researchinternship experience. Held during
Paper ID #18274Impact of a Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Research Program onStudent and Faculty Perceptions of CreativityMegan Huffstickler, Pennsylvania State University Megan Huffstickler is an Educational Psychology graduate student at Penn State who is interested in student learning in STEM fields.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Senior Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied
: Initially, I thought creativity had to do with art majors and I thought that I wasn't creative at all but I think creativity is being able to—with research being able to come up with new parameters if something in your protocol fails, so yeah it helps you realize that creativity is not just about the arts, it's about being able to solve this and change this, yeah.Relatedly, multiple students felt that the experience helped them to understand the linkbetween research and creativity. I've been taught that [research is] supposed to be far more creative. There's a definite creative process that's supposed to be involved in research. They emphasize that several times throughout several workshops, so I've been
Paper ID #26450Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student IntegratedIntern Research Experience (SIIRE)Dr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in
Paper ID #15524Disciplinary Specificity in Engineering Communication: Rhetorical Instruc-tion in an Undergraduate Engineering Research ClassDr. Jessie Stickgold-Sarah, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jessie Stickgold-Sarah received a joint B.S. degree in electrical engineering and computer science, and the Science, Technology & Society program, in 1997 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and the Ph.D. degree in English and American literature in 2011 from Brandeis University. She is a lecturer in Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication in CMS/W at MIT.Dr. Rebecca Thorndike-Breeze
Page 26.669.8 the project from initial stage to end. The student's practical ability is exercised, research interest is motivated, and creation thought is stimulated by employing self-determination design and development mode in this project. Figure 1 Simulation result of a mobile robot trajectory generated by Fuzzy Logic modelThe interactive self-assessments are beneficial to discover the strength and weakness of teachingand learning cycles with research components. The self-assessment was acquired from students inthis ELEE4400/5400 as follows corresponding to ABET outcomes [6]. 1. Question 1 - “I can understand structures of artificial neural networks and perform training for neural networks and profoundly
currently no easy methods tosynthesize research results, share research data, and indeed validate research studies effectively.In general, topics related to data and data sharing are largely treated as taboos in the engineeringeducation research space. Data sharing mechanisms to enable fundamental research inengineering education that has the potential to address systemic problems have not yet beenclarified. The research goal of this paper is to identify and understand patterns for data sharingmechanisms in order to inform design requirements for data sharing practices and infrastructurein engineering education.1. IntroductionThe scientific community is increasingly recognizing the necessity for sharing scientific databeyond the initial purposes
Paper ID #16551Integrating a Research-Grade Simulation Tool in a Second-Year MaterialsScience Laboratory CourseDr. Aisling Coughlan , University of Toledo Aisling Coughlan obtained her B.Sc in Biomedical and Advanced Materials (2006) at the School of Sci- ence and Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland, followed by a Ph.D (2009) in Biomedical Materials at the Materials and Surface Science Institute, also located at the University of Limerick. Subsequently, she obtained a position at the Inamori School of Engineering, Alfred University, New York (2009-2013) as an adjunct professor and a postdoctoral researcher in
, Berkeley and a master’s degree in Higher Education from the University of Chicago. Her research expertise is in twentieth century American history and focuses on issues of gender, education and juvenile justice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19800Jennifer Keating, Carnegie Mellon University Jennifer Keating, Ph.D. Assistant Dean for Educational Initiatives Special Faculty, Department of English Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences Carnegie Mellon University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 “Speak Up!” A
Page 13.712.4questions, and one-on-one interviews.In the introductory algebra- and calculus-based physics courses pretests are administered beforeeach laboratory activity to assess the initial knowledge state of the student. Often, these pretestsare given after lecture instruction but before students engage in the modified laboratoryactivities. Posttests are typically given on course exams, although in some cases they are givenas graded or ungraded quizzes. Both pretests and posttests are integral components of the coursedesign and serve as both instructional tools for the students as well as assessment measures forthe researcher and teacher. Interviews, because of the large time investment, on the part of theresearcher, are given periodically
level for “research-based learning” which is inherent inthe graduate level but almost non-existent in the undergraduate level. To achieve this research-based learning at the undergraduate level, a new educationalparadigm is needed that, demands a commitment to the intellectual growth of individualstudents, redefines the role of engineering in society, and stimulates students to pursue careers inengineering and research. These goals can be accomplished by integrating research intoengineering education, serving to increase recruitment and retention and enabling futureengineers to become society leaders. To pursue these goals, we initiated an effort to translate state-of-the-art multidisciplinaryresearch examples and accomplishments
Page 23.563.2relationship.11 Researchers further show that mentoring is one of the most important factors forcreating satisfying UR experiences from undergraduates’ perspectives.12-14 Indeed, researchshows that a positive mentoring experience fosters greater understanding of a research topic,personal and professional growth, and acquisition of various skills for future careers.13Many of the UR program models across the U.S. have stated that a student’s primary mentor is afaculty member.15-17 They have suggested that UR students work side-by-side with a facultymember who generally initiates the project. However, a large body of literature suggests thatmany undergraduates frequently work with graduate students or post-doctoral fellows, and
AC 2012-4885: EXCELLENCE IN UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERINGEDUCATION : THE CHALLENGE FOR RESEARCH-ORIENTED PRO-GRAMS IN ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCEProf. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Cynthia C. Fry is a Senior Lecturer of computer science and Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering & Computer Science, Baylor University.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, cur- rently serving as the Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development for the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science. He received his B.S. in aeronautical engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo., and his M.S. in
) As an emerging academic field, what hadbeen the research trends in K-12 engineering education research from 1980 - Feb. 2010? (2) What werethe collaboration patterns among researchers in K-12 engineering education from 1980- Feb. 2010? Page 25.872.3 Methodology The K-12 EngE sub-database of this study was created from the aforementioned pre-existingdatabase including all EngER articles from 1980-Feb. 2010. A list of keywords relevant to K-12 EngERwas developed in this study to filter the pre-existing database and come up with the sub-database. Initially 66 keywords were selected from
Paper ID #8691Applying Research-Based Principles and Theory to Practice: The redesign ofa graduate student instructor seminarMrs. Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon is the Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, at the Pennsylvania State University, USA. She has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with
evaluation. During the initial stage of the project, a systematicprocess was developed for identifying a set of core engineering concepts appropriate forsecondary level education. This involved engaging with the literature to identify, refine, anddefine the concepts. Four primary concepts (and sub-concepts) emerged as the primary focus ofthe teacher professional development. These concepts are: • Design (constraints, tradeoffs, optimization, prototyping) • Analysis (life-cycle, cost-benefit, risk) • Systems (structure, functions, interrelationships) • Modeling (visualization, prototyping, mathematical modelsProject Goals and Research QuestionsBroadly stated, the goals of the project are to understand how science teachers
the Contraction nozzle - a section that accelerates the fluid to the desired velocity.• Test Section, referred to as the Working area - a section with constant cross sectional geometry to conduct experiments.• Diffuser, referred to as the Diffuser nozzle – a section that returns the flow to near ambient pressure. Page 25.1390.5 Figure 1 Basic Components of a Wind TunnelTwo different configurations are considered during the initial research. A blow downconfiguration as seen in Figure 2, and a suck down configuration as seen in Figure 3. The Suckdown configuration is chosen over the blown down by virtue of the
Session 1332 S.P.I.R.I.T. Student Rocket Payload: Characteristics of a Long-duration Undergraduate Research Project Timothy F. Wheeler, Charles Croskey, John D. Mitchell, The Pennsylvania State University Rose M. Marra University of Missouri - ColumbiaAbstractStudent Projects Involving Rocket Investigation Techniques (SPIRIT) used experiential learningand vertical integration techniques to guide students of diverse backgrounds through a three-yeardesign and fabrication process for a
the studied levels in Table3 would require this calculation for the number of runs: 27×31×43×327 > 8.4×1014 runsThis is over 100 trillion runs. Hence, it can be observed that the generated experimental designsfrom the DACE process are far more efficient in terms of the number of runs. As an initial part of Step 4 of the DACE process, the Summer 2022 research teamgenerated Figure 5 to illustrate the estimated Pareto frontier [7-8] using their 48 retrofittingbuilding designs. The red points are building designs that define the estimated Pareto frontier(green triangle). The green point is the tiny home baseline building design from the blueprints.The first research finding was uncovering that there
Table 4. Inthe first example, the authors structured their analysis around the theoretical framework, ensuringalignment with the study's conceptual foundations. Due to the multiple participants in the study,the authors run into a substantial volume of interview transcripts. To navigate this data, theyemployed qualitative analysis using holistic coding techniques. Their approach was meticulous,documenting analysis and interpretation procedures, including the development of memos and astatement addressing researcher bias. Specifically, their focus on cross-case analysis allowedthem to derive conclusions that transcended individual cases.In the second example, the authors initially conducted within-case analysis, thoroughly exploringindividual
international education administrators (Germany and Japan.) She has an Ed.D. in Education Leadership and Culture Studies from the University of Houston.Ms. Sarah R. Phillips, Rice University Sarah Phillips is the Education and International Initiatives Manager for the National Science Foundation Partnerships for International Research and Education (NSF-PIRE) ”U.S.- Japan Cooperative Research and Education on Terahertz Dynamics in Nanostructures” grant at Rice University. In collaboration with the PI and Education Director, she manages all aspects of the NanoJapan: International Research Expe- rience for Undergraduates Program. Since 2006, this program has sent 130 young U.S. engineering and physics students to Japan for
, saturation control, and time-delay systems; closed-loop input shaping; spacecraft attitude control; mechatronics; and DSP/PC/microcontroller-based real-time control. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK 12 Fellows programs, funded by the National Science Foundation, and the Central Brooklyn Robotics Initiative (CBRI), funded by the Independence Community Foundation, J.P. Morgan Chase Foundation, Motorola Foundation, and NY Space Grant Consortium, among others, he has conducted significant K-12 outreach to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of several New York City public schools. He received Polytechnic’s 2002 and 2008 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award and
, skillset, and your identity asan engineer.Understanding of EngineeringThe transformative impact of UREs on students' conceptual knowledge, skillsets, professionalidentities, and career aspirations is evident in their reflections. According to Author #1, joiningDr. Teixeira's lab has been a transformative experience, especially considering her initial lack ofinterest and knowledge in asphalt and research. She commented how valuable was theexperience to engage with graduate students. “As an undergraduate entering my junior year, Iwas fortunate to have the opportunity to become a part of a research group primarily consistingof graduate and PhD students. This exposure allowed me to gain a new conceptualunderstanding of research methodologies
resources engineering, atmospheric water harvesting, waste-to-energy technologies, and environmental remediation. Her work integrates and highlights science communication and community needs-based research. Her passions include design- ing hands-on learning tools and leading public outreach initiatives for STEM awareness and engagement among all levels of learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engaging early-stage undergraduate students in research through a Science Communication FellowshipAbstractEarly engagement in undergraduate research opportunities promotes improved critical thinkingand scientific reasoning, increased academic performance, enhanced
improve efficiency but that fully automated codebooks wereunlikely to meet researchers’ needs [16].1.4 The Human AnalysisIn preparation for its upcoming effort to revise its computer science (CS) standards for K-12students, the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) engaged in several initiatives toprovide important background information for its standards writers. One of these initiatives wasto map all of the state CS standards to the CSTA standards as well as to tag a variety ofcharacteristics of the state standards (e.g., topic, grade level). Subject matter experts withextensive experience in CS education and standards development were recruited for this task andthen asked to analyze each state standard. Figure 1 summarizes the