problem framing; instructors may introduce toomany constraints as a means to make grading feasible [24]. Alternatively, when problems areunder-constrained, students may flounder amidst too many decisions [25, 26]. And, even whendesign projects are ill-structured, students may not recognize their roles in framing problems.Thus, understanding more about students’ responses to a range or realistic design challenges caninform engineering education researchers and practitioners on ways to provide increasedopportunities for students to develop problem framing capacity.MethodologyWe investigated how students perceived engineering projects as part of an intramural experience.Using a pre/post design, we sought to answer the following research questions
impact the ways these teachers address the frameworks in their classrooms. Previousresearch in this area has shown that perceptions about engineering and technology can changepositively after preservice teachers took on their own design projects1. Little, however, is knownabout the design processes that teachers use in such projects. Additionally, there is a significantlack of research in this area regarding inservice teachers. Knowing more about these processes,as well as effective methods of supporting teachers during the learning process, will help toinform teacher education efforts.This paper outlines a research project aimed at developing an understanding of the designprocess of inservice teachers. This project focuses on twelve
. Someengineers design bridges or structures, some software and other manufacturing tools andassemblies. In addition to job requirements that demand design skills of engineers, current ABETcriteria require engineering programs to identify, assess and demonstrate evidence of design Page 7.493.1competency1. In order to satisfy these demands, engineering programs must understand design“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”and successful design practices. This can be accomplished by studying the
2006-1301: NEW ENGINEERING DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR SUSTAINABLEPRODUCTSSerdar Tumkor, Istanbul Technical University Dr. Serdar Tumkor is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. He has been a full-time faculty member since 1996. Dr. Tumkor received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in 1994. His teaching interests are Machine Design, Engineering Design, and Computer-Aided Technical Drawing. His research interests include Ecological Manufacturing, Design Methodology, Design for Disassembly, End of Life Strategies, Automated Disassembly, Electronic Packaging, PCB Soldering, computer integrated
AC 2005-307: DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING GRADUATE PROGRAMS INENGINEERING EDUCATIONAlex Aning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityHassan Aref, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityHayden Griffin,Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityJean Kampe, Michigan Technological UniversityJenny Lo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityMarie Paretti, Virginia TechMark Sanders, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityMichael Alley,Richard Goff,Susan Magliaro,Thomas Walker,Vinod Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Page 10.422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2005
national design competitions. Civil engineers, for example, holda national concrete canoe competition. Mechanical engineers have several car competitions.Chemical engineers work a common design project. It was felt that a similar competition couldbe of value to our profession and to our students by providing a common theme on which tocompete, and understand what to improve upon if necessary in future competitions. It couldprovide good publicity, and generate an esprit des corps amongst our students.Recommendations: As a result of this meeting, and the discussions held, it was felt that thefollowing items should be addressed:1. We should consider archiving instructional materials and case studies and create a sharededucational infrastructure in a
materials that need special handling in the safety guidelines. Hence,it is essential to make students contact appropriate people whenever they are not sure of anysafety issues.9. ConclusionStudents in project-based engineering design and manufacturing face a variety of safety issuesdue to the diverse nature of design projects undertaken each semester. We use an on-line systemfor providing basic safety training to students and documenting the results. Understanding thesafety guidelines helps engineering students to recognize and evaluate safety issues in differentphases of their design projects. Furthermore, the policies help instructors to recognize safetyissues in multidisciplinary design projects.We try to make sure that following safety
the public and the professional community. [2] describes these educationalapproaches in detail. Page 4.555.1In addition to the senior capstone design course, the College of Engineering at KuwaitUniversity have launched two new efforts. First, the introduction of a corner-stonedesign course at the sophomore level starting Fall 1999. Such early introduction todesign concepts and applications will aid in providing better understanding andappreciation to the challenges facing engineering disciplines; thus, stimulating studentscreativity and interest in engineering. Second, the integration of design into the civilengineering curriculum through examples
expected that the students will have an understanding ofthe professional practice issues in civil engineering such as: procurement of work; low-bidversus quality-based selection processes; how design professionals and constructionprofessionals interact to complete a project; how the project impacts the economy and society;and how to be a team player in order to execute the project.In most capstone design projects, the focus is in the activities within the design team and theinteractions with the client and consultants (practitioners). The project team, senior designclass, at MSU interacts or communicates with two additional entities—the subcontractors andthe public. The subcontractors are the lower-division engineering or engineering
understanding the daily practice of course design.Further, the focus on aspects such as content selection, course format, and strategies for studentengagement suggests that heuristics in this field may align with the Design Heuristics approachof exploring transformations of the design object [11] rather than the instructional designheuristics approach of considering guidelines for the overarching design process [6].MethodsIn this study, we explored the patterns of differences among course design heuristics, identifiedin engineering education settings, from three distinct datasets: (1) course design team meetingrecordings, (2) educator retrospective interviews, and (3) course design papers (i.e., designartifacts). First, content analysis revealed a
Paper ID #36214Teaching of Professional Ethics in Engineering DesignProf. Rajpal S Sodhi, NJIT Raj Sodhi, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Master Teacher at NJIT. Prof Sodhi is active in the areas of Mechanical Design, Biomedical Design and Design of Mechanisms. Prof Sodhi has served in the past as Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Chair, Director of Manufacturing programs and Faculty Council President. He has published over 150 refereed papers and five text books. He holds two patents. He is winner of several awards including N. Watrous Procter & Gamble Award, Ralph R. Teetor Engineering
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Game Design in Computer Engineering Capstone ProjectsAbstractThe purpose of a capstone design project course is to provide graduating senior students theopportunity to demonstrate understanding of the concepts they have learned during their studies.As with many computer science and engineering programs, students of the computer engineeringprogram at Utah Valley University (UVU) conclude their degree programs with a semestercapstone design experience. The intent is for students to utilize competencies developed in thefirst three years of the curriculum in the solution of an embedded design problem.Recently many of our computer engineering
coursesoffered at the authors’ universities. There are significant differences between the SDR designcourses at these two institutions to include length, emphasis, certain topics, and studentbackground, but this paper will largely ignore the distinctions and describe them as if they wereone course.A. Goals and prerequisites Most of the students in the course have some background in communications engineering. Thegoal of the course is to build on the students’ knowledge of conventional radio systems toestablish proficiency as SDR design engineers. This includes building an understanding of thetechnologies that underlie SDR including hardware and software technologies and architectures.Furthermore, the student must learn design challenges, design methods
,campus publications, athletics, community service, etc).9 Its five major goals for students arethat they learn to access, understand, and evaluate information, use it ethically, and create newmaterial (papers, presentations, or other products) based on that information. While theuniversity program started in the spring of 2008, progress toward its goals was already underwayseveral years before within the eight-semester engineering design course sequence.The engineering science design curriculumThe Engineering Science program at Trinity University requires a minimum of 129 hoursconsisting of a 51-semester-hour engineering core, 33 hours in math and science, 33 hours in thecommon curriculum, and 12 hours of elective, leading to a Bachelor of
projected to become available.Alternatives • Explain the limitations to gasoline alternatives. • Provide a definition of sustainability and explain the concept of sustainabilitySustainability by providing a concrete example. • Describe the characteristics of a sustainable engineering design.Alternative • Provide examples of alternative energy sources.Energy • Explain the short/long term costs and benefits are for alternative energy.At the end of the semester, students will complete a 12-question survey to assess their perceptionof: a) the overall design project, b) how the project related to their major, c) how the projectimproved their understanding of sustainability and d) the
/4for PhD level.2. Description of the ProgramThe first idea was to design a program of under graduation level, full time students, etc but afterdiscussions the team chose to start with a graduation program Master and/or PhD level due to thenecessity to provide professionals qualified to solve highly complex social problems at thepresent.The curriculum has been designed for the students to understand the basic mechanism of thesociety in a deeper level in order to avoid stereotyped ideas. It includes economics and sociologybesides basics of national law system, public policies, planning and environmental issues, amongothers.At graduation level the program is offered to civil, industrial engineers as well any otherspecialty once it is a new area
bedefined when engineers have a comprehensive design specification and a thorough knowledge ofthe process models. Students should understand the accuracy of models for constitutive models,such as friction factors, heat transfer coefficients and equipment efficiencies. They must knowthe assumptions that limit the regions of application, for example, laminar or turbulent flow,horizontal or vertical tubes, etc. Also, they should acknowledge the uncertainty in the modelstructure and the danger in extrapolation beyond the data used in model building; a goodexample is reaction rate expressions, whose structure as well parameters are uncertain. This author prefers to have the students use first principles to determine the limiting, or“worst case
spring semester take this class in the fall semesterpreceding the spring semester. When they take this class, the students have already completedmost of the junior and senior level classes except the electives. The text for the course is TheMechanical Design Process by David Ullman3. The text is chosen as it clearly outlines andexplains the processes involved in developing an engineering design. In addition, the text coversdifferent phases involved in developing and marketing the product based on the selected design.The chapters on product development are not covered, as the emphasis of the course is to teachthe design process. Thus, the text is only followed closely for the first eight chapters so that thestudents understand the steps involved
Session XXXX Design Exercises and Projects in Energy Engineering Course Kendrick Aung Department of Mechanical Engineering Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710Abstract Energy Engineering is a senior elective course for mechanical engineering majors in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. In order to increase the designcontent in elective courses, team-based design projects and assignments were extensively used inEnergy Engineering. The course covers four parts
introduced in civil engineering courses at UnionCollege. All the projects require understanding of theoretical fundamentals and application ofthese principles to achieve a desired goal. The projects simulate problems encountered in real-world applications in the civil engineering field. Design components in these projects satisfiedattributes a, b, c, and e in Criterion 3 of ABET 2000. Written and oral components in theprojects satisfied attributes g and k of the same. In end-of-term official course evaluation,students indicated that they enjoyed the projects and liked the practical application of thetheories and concepts learned in the classroom. Many students thought that the projectsreinforced ideas which are otherwise difficult to appreciate
of Competency in Generic Skills," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 2-20, 2017.[3] L. J. McKenzie, M. S. Trevisan, D. C. Davis and S. W. Beyerlin, "Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study," in In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.[4] M. D. Kirschenman and B. Brenner, "Civil Engineering Design as the Central Theme in Civil Engineering Education Curriculum," Leadership and Management in Engineering, pp. 69-71, 2011.[5] M. C. Paretti, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, S. Howe, J. D. Ford, B. D. Lutz, K. Kochersberger, C. Gewirtz, L. M. Rosenbauer and S. Arunkumar, "From School to Work: Understanding the Transition from Capstone
Page 4.324.1teams and understand the global context of their work). The unique integrated approach enablesstudents to not just learn the fundamental principles and thinking skills but to apply them in thedesign process to achieve optimum solutions and, ultimately, to become innovators.This book evolved from an earlier work, Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for a ChangingWorld.1 Through feedback from users and from observing trends in engineering design education,we sensed a need to explicitly show the application of creative problem solving to engineeringdesign. The creative problem solving process can be used (and has been applied) in many differentpersonal and professional areas. Engineering design has been taught—albeit
Session 2525 COMPETITIONS AS A VEHICLE FOR TEACHING ENGINEERING DESIGN Wils L. Cooley, Parviz Famouri, Heather D. Collier, Brian Inman West Virginia UniversityAbstractThe Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering at WVU has had an engineeringSenior Design Project sequence for nearly 25 years. During the 1997-98 sequence, oneundergraduate student design team participated in an IEEE regional design competition. Theteam members chose their project specifically with the intention of entering their design in thisregional competition, in contrast to
is a methodical, disciplined approach for the design, realization, technicalmanagement, operations, and retirement of a system. The senior design project teams wereencouraged to review the NASA systems engineering handbook2 in the early stages of theirprojects. They were provided with supplemental systems engineering educational materials.The senior design teams were required to focus on the following systems engineering facets andto control their projects:The system engineering design concepts crucial for project success are:≠ Successfully understanding and defining the mission objectives and operational concepts are keys to capturing the stakeholder expectations, which will translate into quality requirements over the life cycle of
student teams have been in five consecutive Air Force University Nanosat competitions, taking second place three times. Their next student satellite, COPPER, is slated to launch in June 2012 as part of NASA’s ELANA-IV flight. Swartwout’s research interests center on the design and operation of low-cost space systems.Dr. Sanjay Jayaram, Saint Louis University Sanjay Jayaram is an Associate Professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department of Saint Louis University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in the area of mechanical engineering from Uni- versity of Central Florida in 2004. He teaches control systems/mechatronics, space systems engineering and astronautics related courses as well as engineering sciences
prepared to work in amore global market, where diverse ideas, knowledge and skills are utilized to generate creativesolutions to tough engineering problems. This implementation of a more team-orientedcurriculum could have a potentially positive impact on female engineering students who havetraditionally experienced what many researches call a “chilly” classroom climate33. Ifimplemented properly, group work can create a learning environment that is less competitive andmore attractive to female students. The team-based curriculum in the freshman engineeringdesign class offers students the opportunity to work as a team to develop solutions to variousprojects, while gaining valuable hands-on design experience.It is important to understand the
Paper ID #39190Incorporating Design Justice Activities in Engineering CoursesDr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit, Mercy Shuvra Das has been working at University of Detroit Mercy since January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, and Master’s and Ph.D. in
), conceptual combination24, SCAMPER25, and TRIZ26,27.Other published tools include IDEOTM Method Cards28, which focus on understanding aproduct’s users, and “Whack Pack” cards29 intended to help designers break out of habitualviews by providing general techniques and decision-making advice.However, despite the number of techniques that may be used to overcome fixation, many ofthese strategies lack published empirical validity in the context of engineering design. Indeed, inSmith’s systematic compilation of over 170 concept generation techniques, he concluded, “Ofthe hundreds of existing methods, only brainstorming has been subjected to a substantial batteryof performance tests. Moreover, these assessments have generally been inconclusive in
Paper ID #29779Implementing Bluebeam Software in Architectural Engineering Design CoursesMichael James Deigert P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDr. Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Anahid Behrouzi is an assistant professor of architectural engineering at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/graduate course delivery in the topic areas of engineering
Session 2525 Hands-on Inventive Solutions in Engineering Design* Daniel Raviv Department of Electrical Engineering Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431 E-mail: ravivd@fau.edu 561 297 2773AbstractThis paper describes an Eight-dimensional methodology for teaching inventive and innovativeproblem solving. It has been developed and taught as part of an on-going course at FloridaAtlantic University titled: “Introduction to Inventive