. Wagiran, A. Aziz, M. Noor, M. Osman, J. Noorzaei and F. Abdulaziz, "Assessment Strategy for an Outcome Based Education," in International Conference on Engineering Education, 2008.[11] M. O. Otta and F. Pozzia, "Towards a model to evaluate creativity-oriented learning activities," Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 3532-3536, 2010.[12] ETAC, 2013-2014 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), 2012.[13] D. A. Bodner, J. P. Wade, W. R. Watson and G. I. Kamberov, "Designing an Experiential Learning Environment for Logistics and," Procedia Computer Science, pp. 1082-1091, 2013
Education. Paper ID #24059Dr. Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University Kwok Siong Teh received his B.S., M.S., Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, and University of California at Berke- ley in 1997, 2001, and 2004, respectively. He is currently an associate professor of mechanical engineering at San Francisco State University. His primary research interests are in: (i) the synthesis, characterization, and applications of metal oxides, conductive polymer, and low dimensional carbon nanostructures for en- ergy generation and
Page 7.501.1 "Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education" f 2 (a, b, c) = Σm(0, 2,3,5, 7)If we wish to AND these two functions together, we could use standard Boolean postulate andtheorem solution methods, and would solve for f1@f2 in the following manner. f1 (a, b, c) = Σm(0,1, 2, 7) = a c + a b + abc f 2 (a, b, c) = Σm(0, 2,3,5, 7) = ac + bc + a c f1 i f 2 = (a c + a b + abc)i(ac + bc + a c) = a c(ac + bc + a c) + a b(ac + bc + a c) + abc(ac + bc + a c
. I got theProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright C 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationdistinct feeling that neither the syllabus nor the text hadbeen studied. The second class period, after allintroductions had been made, degenerated into the productionof ideas followed by mild put-downs. There were very fewfollow-ups to ideas, and individuals preferred to offer put-downs and alternate ideas.This was supposed to be an action class, where the highlevel of activity, as defined by the students, createschange. This looks like the typical college student routineof coming to class without much or any preparation, hopingsomething will happen. And if it doesn’t, so
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference The literature shows that many instructors use some form of computer-aided simulation ofproblems3 and some further employ problem solving software and interactive computing4,5,6,7,8.Dynamics is a required course for all students in the fourth semester of our eight-semester generalengineering program. This course is offered to the entire sophomore class in two sections with apopulation of thirty to forty students each. In prior reports9,10, I described my efforts to completely transform this course into a computer-based learning experience where problems and even class notes were taken via computer, similarto a course
. Figure 5 shows a screenshot of the computer engineering group’s final poster design. Inorder to provide more opportunities for the interns to exchange experiences and network in thebigger community, the interns’ written papers and posters were revised with the help of facultyadvisor and submitted to various national and regional conferences such as the American Societyof Engineering Education (ASEE) regional conference, and the Society for Advancement ofChicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS) National Diversity in STEMConference. Figure 5. Screenshot of the computer engineering group’s final poster.IV. Assessment of the Research Internship ProgramPre- and post-program surveys were conducted on the closing
SAMPLE OPINION SURVEY QUESTION I would like to have more courseware like this available to help me learn. Strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Strongly agree Page 10.1460.5 Figure 5. Sample test and opinion survey questions. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering EducationProcedure. We evaluated students’ knowledge before and after using the prototype. Figure 6shows the sequence of the evaluation activities. Inventory of
of American Helicopter Society (AHS), Association for Unmanned Vehicles International (AUVSI), and American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Amar Raheja Dr. Amar Raheja is currently a professor of Computer Science at California State Polytechnic University- Pomona. He received his PhD in Biomedical Engineering from University of Toledo, OH in 1999. and MS and BS from Indian Institute of Technology, India iDr. Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic Institute, Pomona Dr. Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering in 1985 from Karadeniz Technical University-Turkey, his MS degree in 1991 and Ph.D. degree in 1995 both in Electrical Engi- neering from Southern
Revolutions, Regulations, and Realities: Licensure and Accreditation in the US and Canada Brandiff R. Caron Centre for Engineering in Society, Concordia University, Montreal, QCAbstract: In this thought piece I describe some recent successes in pushing forward a new (and potentially,revolutionary) kind of engineering education at my home institution: Concordia University. I situate thesesuccesses within the highly regulated context of engineering education in Canada. The piece ends with areflection on how some of the realities of engineering education in Canada often sit uncomfortably with theaspirations of those
value teaching as explicitpolicies and procedures. The more engineering administration values teaching, the moreengineering faculty will recognize the value of the faculty communities of practice that aim toadvance teaching engineering.Table 2Preliminary Themes to redesign faculty communities of practice for teaching innovation Theme Faculty Responses1. Involvement of New "Include new faculty participation, submit papers to conferences toFaculty disseminate what we do here, become a reference as internal grants for engineering education." "I think there is a very talented group of people currently involved in
Engineering Education dT q = −kA (3) dx x=LThus the rate of heat transfer at the base can be expressed by q = −2w hkδ (To − T∞ ) ( I 1 2 hL2 / kδ ) I (2 hL / kδ ) (4) 2 owhere w represents the width of the fin. The rate of heat removal from the base is equal to –q.Therefore, the fin efficiency can be determined by the following relation
Paper ID #37248Exploring Transformative Learning from a Summer Bridge ProgramMs. Sukeerti Shandliya, University of Cincinnati Sukeerti Shandliya is a doctoral student in Engineering and Computing Education and a GRA in the De- partment of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. Her research interests include engineering workforce development, DEI in STEM, experiential learning, development of global competencies and cultural competencies in higher education and the workforce. She has completed her bachelor’s in Electronics and Communications Engineering from Banasthali University, India
://engineeringunleashed.com/about. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2022].[9] L. R. Lattuca, D. B. Knight, and I. M. Bergom, “Developing a Measure of Interdisciplinary Competence for Engineers”, Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[10] L. R. Lattuca, and D. B. Knight, “In the Eye of the Beholder: Defining and Studying Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education”, Paper presented at 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010.[11] L. Alkire, C. Mooney, F. A. Gur, S. Kabadayi, M. Renko, and J. Vink, “Transformative service research, service design, and Social Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Service Management, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 24–50, 2019.[12] P. A
front panel of the base, as well as reading the end stops andcontrolling the motor driver circuits. Figure 1: L.J. Electronics ATLAS Robot controlled via an EMMA Microcomputer [6] Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 415After examining a disassembled ATLAS unit and consulting the ATLAS-II Robotic SystemTechnical Manual [7], the primary functions of the controller were able to be redesigned to drivethe motors via a National Instruments (NI) cDAQ-9174 with a NI 9403 digital I/O module,programmed with LabVIEW
Session 2354 Technology Based Entrepreneurship … an effective tool for promoting teamwork, creativity and innovation in students José A. Cruz, Jaime A. Pabón, Miguel A. Torres, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho University of Puerto Rico at MayagüezI. IntroductionTraditionally engineering and business education has been oriented towards preparingprofessionals for the private sector. Today this sector demands from the universities a newgraduate with skills that go far and beyond the traditional skills and competencies. Today’sgraduates should be able to communicate their ideas effectively both orally and
assistiant in the Curriculum and Instruction department in the Curry School of Education at University of Virginia. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University.Karina Sylvia Sobieraj, Ohio State University I am a third year Biological Engineering Student pursuing a minor in Biomedical Engineering. I am active in many clubs on campus including Make a Wish and the Society of Women Engineers and I am also an undergraduate researcher for en engineering education research group.Teresa Porter, Ohio State UniversityAlessandra St.Germain, Clemson University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
engineering to be fundamental to all highly educated people.”, Dan Mote, President of National Academy, October 2013.• "The problem solving, systems thinking, and teamwork aspects of engineering can benefit all students, whether or not they ever pursue an engineering career," said Linda Katehi, Chancellor of UC Davis, "A K-12 education that does not include at least some exposure to engineering is a lost opportunity for students and for the nation.“• “It is important to brand Engineering at the K-12 level to build pipeline for future engineering graduates,” Thomas Kalil, Office of Science, Technology and Policy-OSTP• “This is a great idea. Let me know how I can help,” Pramod Kharonegar, Director of Engineering, NSF
Page 8.1199.3 Allocated to ABET Subject Categories Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationTo become accredited, engineering programs are requested to distribute curricula into the foursubject categories and report the results in Table I-1 of an institutional self-study. ABETrecently reformulated its accreditation criteria to an outcome-based system. In a move awayfrom prescriptive requirements of the past, schools must now demonstrate that their graduates aremeeting a series of 11 outcomes, in addition to discipline-specific criteria. A few programsincluded in this study
Global Sourcing,” 2011 American Society of Engineering Management (ASEM) International Annual Conference, October 20114. Maher, D., Phelps, R., Urane, N., Lee, M., (2012), “Primary school teachers’ use of digital resources with interactive whiteboards: The Australian context,”Austrailasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(1), 138-158.5. Quillen, I., “Battle for Whiteboard-Market Supremacy Heats Up,” Education Week, Feb. 8, 2012: http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2012/02/08/02whiteboard.h05.html6. Russell, Jean, “Thrivability: Breaking Through to a World That Works,” Triarchy Press, 2013, ISBN: 978-19094702867. Senor, D., & Singer, S., “Start-Up Nation,” Twelve, New York, NY, 2009, ISBN: 978-0-446
, International Journal of Engineering Education, V.37, No.2, pp.1-15[11] G. J. Visser-Wijnveen, R. M. van der Rijst, and J. H. van Driel, "A questionnaire to capture students’ perceptions of research integration in their courses," Higher Education, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 473-488, 2016.Appendix AStudent Perception of Research Integration Questionnaire (SPRIQ) Survey QuestionsReflection:1: I assimilate knowledge about research findings?2: I learned to pay attention to how research is carried out.3. I developed an academic disposition. (feel more academic than industrial)7. The scientific research process was an essential part of the curriculum9. My understanding of engineering technology concepts has increased10. Attention was paid to
also beneficial for students. In addition, students enjoyed having hands-on experiencescoordinated with concepts presented in the second course. A new circuits sequence was developed,and the new lab sequence is shown in Table 1.References[1] Lenoir, Joel, and J. Russell. "The Roles of the Student in a Project-Based Engineering Curriculum." Proceedings of the International Conference on Practice-Oriented Education: Transforming Higher Education, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 2001.[2] J.W. Pardos, “Engineering Eduction in the United States: Past, Present, and Future”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Eduction, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 1998.
Anwar, Texas A&M University Saira Anwar is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering, Texas A and M University, College Station. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, USA. The Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and industry sponsors fund her research. Her research potential and the implication of her work are recognized through national and international awards, including the 2023 NSTA/NARST Research Worth Reading award for her publication in the Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2023 New Faculty Fellow award by IEEE ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2022 Apprentice Faculty Grant
. Now with online evaluations suchas Google form, it is much easier to collect the data and calculate scores for each students.Fig. 3 shows the Google form for internal evaluation. There are similar ones for external evaluationand teammate evaluation. Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 5 Figure 3. Google form for project evaluation (internal) Figure 4. Graphical display for evaluation result for Buoy BoysAdditional Comments from external reviewers are displayed as
engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Pre- viously, he received an M.S. in earth and planetary sciences studying geospatial imaging, and an M.S. in physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR spectroscopy in heavy water, both from the University of California, Santa Cruz. He holds a B.S.E. in engineering physics with a concentration in electrical engineering from Case Western Reserve University. His academic interests include longitu- dinal analysis, visualization, semantics, team formation, gender issues, existential phenomenology, and lagomorph physiology.Dr. Md Rashedul Hasan Sarker, University of Indianapolis Md Rashedul H Sarker is an Assistant Professor at R.B
of California, Irvine. He is currently a Professor of electrical engineering at the University of San Diego, San Diego, CA and came there as a founding member of the engineering faculty in 1987. He previously served on the electrical engineering faculty at the University of Portland, and Portland State University, and on the engineering staff at Hughes Aircraft Company. Prof. Schubert is a member of ASEE and IEEE and is a registered professional engineer in Oregon. He is the 2012 winner of the ASEE Robert G. Quinn award for excellence in engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Estimation of Experimental Errors Using Monte Carlo Analysis
“I became interested in robotics as a middle school student.available to all students [21]”. I have always loved computers and mechanical engineering. I found robotics encompassed both fields. When I learned that AITE had a robotics club, I decided to join it. In fact, this was978-1-4799-5233-5/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEEProceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1)a major factor in my decision to go to AITE in the first place. I D. Teresa Piliouras, Founder; Raymond Yu, Vice-am taking an AP Computer Science course and an
., Lattuca, L., Hadgraft, R., Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-15012 Besterfield-Sacre, M., Cox, M., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changing engineering education: Views of U.S. faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 193- 21913 Maturana, J., Tampier, G., Serandour, G., & Luco, R. Developing teamwork skills in first and second year engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(5), 1225-123314 Perez-Martinez, J., Martin, J., & Lias Quinter, A. (2014). Integrating generic competencies into engineering
the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a Fellow of the IEEE, a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), an ABET Program Evaluator, a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education, and an Associate Editor for the International Journal of STEM Education.Dr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University Dr. Deborah Grzybowski is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at The Ohio State University. She received her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering and her B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University. Her research focuses on making engineering
Education, 95, 1, 2006, pp. 39-47.[2] Knight, D, W, Carlson, L, E, & Sullivan, J, F, “Improving Engineering Student Retention through Hands-On, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects”, 31st International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, June 22 – 24, 2007.[3] Felder, R, M, Felder, G, N, & Dietz, E, J, “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 4, 1998, pp. 469-480.[4] Sorby, S, A, & Baartmans, B, J, “The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing the 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering
–700, 2006.[18] E. Conlon, “Towards an Integrated Approach to Engineering Ethics,” In 3rd Internal Symposium for Engineering Education, Cork, 2010.[19] E. Conlon and H. Zandvoort, "Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering: Beyond the Individualistic Approach", Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217-232, 2010.[20] A.R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, N. Canney, C. Swan, and D. Knight. “Ethics education of undergraduate and graduate students in environmental engineering and related disciplines,” Environmental Engineering Science, 35(7), 684–695, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2017.0308[21] A.R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear