degrees offered by NMAA are in Civil and GeneralEngineering.As part of its rebuilding efforts in Afghanistan, the U.S. military has been heavily engaged inoutreach, support and mentorship to the NMAA faculty. In the summer of 2009, the authorsdeployed with a joint Army/Air Force team as part of this on-going mission. The team membersused Bloom’s Theory of cognitive development and Joseph Lowman’s model of college teachingin assessing levels of student and faculty development, as well as formulating and executingplans for continuing engagement.This paper gives a brief overview of NMAA, its current status, what the authors did while there,what is still needed, and what issues must be considered when conducting this type of globaloutreach. It
. Currentengineering students will play key roles in the development of the Smart Grid and electricvehicles. Unfortunately many of these same students already fail to see a link between what theyare currently learning in the classroom and their role as a professional engineer. The energyengineering community needs to determine topics and instructional techniques that will helpstudents connect their classroom experiences with the future opportunities they will encounter inthe unfolding development of the electric vehicle and its supporting infrastructure.This paper reviews electric vehicle development as well as examples of previous learningexperiences and Economic Stimulus funded initiatives for electric vehicle course and curriculumdevelopment. The paper
perseverance and motivation to completebaccalaureate studies in an engineering-oriented field. The SBP has enrolled freshman andsophomore level students from TAMUK, as well as community colleges and other universitieswithin the south Texas region. Team-based design projects were one of the major componentsincluded in each year of the SBP. These short design projects centered around the disciplines ofthe participating faculty, chemical, civil, mechanical, electrical, industrial engineering, computerscience, and industrial technology. This paper presents the outcomes for students based on theirparticipation in one of the SBPs held during the past four years at our Hispanic-majorityinstitution [1].The first two years of this SBP (2020 and 2021) were
emotional involvement or identification that producelasting impact. Knowledge of professional ethics in principle thus provides a necessary but ofteninsufficient condition for the end result of ethical behavior in practice. The internal fostering ofwhat was once called conscience is also needed. That is the challenging goal of the techniquepresented here, one that reaches back to the philosophical and mythical roots of ethics to stir theconscience of the student by seeking emotional identification with the source of our moral sense. This reaching back to philosophical roots depends upon a storytelling technique thatfocuses on presenting philosophical and mathematical topics both familiar and interesting to theengineering student, topics that
and technology pull across many domains• Developing and integrating software-based models of habitats with system-to-system interdependencies• Enabling maturation of select habitat systems• Integrating physical hardware where available• Distributed testing to link to other facilitiesThe DSH Testbed provides a place to build the instance of the DSH vehicle, and as a result provideintegration testing of habitat subsystems and technologies in a vehicle-like context. Some of thesetechnologies include: wireless sensor nodes (WSNs), power, avionics, software, impact detection,communications, and crew systems (displays, tele-robotics workstation, and programmable lighting).Testing in an incremental fashion, subsystems can be added on to
, and a Ph.D. From Simon Fraser University, Canada. Dr. Cherif ’s professional work includes curriculum design, development and re- form, instructional and assessment design, evaluation techniques, faculty, and academic leadership. He has published more than fifteen science lab kits, a number of student laboratory manuals, coauthored and coedited a number of science textbooks, and published many articles in professional journals and newspapers. He has received a number of teaching, curriculum development, instructional strategies, and Page 24.98.1 leadership awards. Dr. Cherif serves on the executive and
revise earlier thinking in order to move forward. ● Articulation of limitations: Engineering design often requires years of iterative research, development, and testing, with access to, and consumption of, abundant resources. In the absence of adequate time or human and material resources, students should identify and explain the resultant impact on their design and discuss what could be done additionally to justify the viability of their design and ideas. The inclusion of supporting detail, such as the recommendations of experts, in similar contexts will enhance the validity of the students’ articulation of limitations and the means of addressing those that the students propose and justify.The
students’ ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly defined technicalproblems.Outcome G: In the following questions - rate the student's ability to apply Mitten, oral, and/orgraphical communication in both technical and non-technical environments: and an ability toidentify and use appropriate technical literature.Outcome H: Rate the student's understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development.Outcome I: Rate the students understanding of and a commitment to address professional andethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity.Outcome J: Rate the student's understanding of technology’s impacts on society and the world.Outcome K: Rate the student's commitment to and
theparticipants perceived that the use of student groups/teams to solving the problems presentedin the case studies is helpful. They “enjoyed working together” and “shared ideas” orreceived a “contribution of ideas from all the members of the group”. The students suggestedthat learners need group work for improving learning experience in this course while theinstructor need to have good communication skills, analyze and summarize the cases. Insummary, “the case studies will be absolutely useful in my career,” as one of the studentssaid.4.4.2 Evaluation of NIT Calicut Workshop The 54 participants in the NIT Calicut workshop were provided Questionnaire II. InQuestionnaire II, we will assign A, B, C and D value 4, 3, 2 and 1, that means a=4,b=3,c=2and d=1
]. For the purposes of thisstudy, focus was on college level approaches to character education.Much of the character education at the college level has been a response to a call from policymakers for renewed focus on character [14]. For the most part, the response has been on theperiphery of college life where volunteer service centers, community activities, and othersimilar type constructs are intended to draw in student participation and provide theenvironment and experience necessary to develop student character for the good throughparticipation [17]. There are exceptions to this passive approach. One of these exceptions isat Wake Forest University where character is an integral part of student development throughtheir Program for Leadership
engage the students in both on-site and online/remote laboratory experiments,although this endeavor is just in its initial phase. The next phase is related to the developmentand implementation of a computer-based CNC (Computer Numerical Control) controlsimulators, software applications, as well as exemplary associated learning modules. Virtual,remote or hands-on laboratories by themselves can’t guarantee successful student learningoutcomes; each has its advantages and disadvantages. However, virtual labs offer cost savingsand active learning, but they are not real and present limited opportunities for trial and error.Remote labs provide real experiments with real equipment at lower cost but lack the “feel” ofhandling real equipment and can be
initiative, Dr. Mentzer prepares Technology and Engineering candidates for teacher licensure, conducts research and mentors graduate students. Nathan has taken an active role in guiding the evolution of the undergraduate teacher education program, an Integrated STEM education concentration and a minor in design and innovation at Purdue informed by his National Science Foundation funded research on Design Thinking. Nathan is strategic in connecting theory, practice and research. He engages P16 educators in research efforts to develop innovative pedagogical strategies situated in STEM education classrooms. He is active in the International Technology and Engineering Education’s Association through national and international
teams) that will be learned by students taking the course.Each CDC prepared an “outcomes accountability” checklist for their course that showed theTable 1. Desired Program Outcomes for the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Program Description Outcome PO 1 Apply knowledge of math and science PO 2 Design, conduct, analyze experiments PO 3 Design a system, component, or process PO 4 Function on multi-disciplinary teams PO 5 Identify, formulate, solve engineering problem PO 6 Understand profession and ethical responsibility PO 7 Communicate effectively PO 8 Understand global/societal impact of engineering PO 9 Engage in life-long
the fellowship. The program should also facilitate the formation ofa community engaging current fellows and program alumni. Additionally, fellows reported thatexpectations for the fellowship could and should be better laid out and that fellowswanted opportunities to meet and learn from the experiences of other fellows. Those issues areexplicitly addressed in the recently awarded grant proposal entitled, “NSF InnovativePostdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF), NSF #1853888” in 2019. Based onadditional programs developed specifically for IPERF, the ASEE team was able to improve boththe program quality and fellows’ satisfaction levels. Details will be published at the end ofIPERF in 2023.The project team focused on developing
preprocessor step for the following steel connections has been completed for: double webangle; top and seat angle; and flush end plate. The screenshot of a typical flush end plateconnection is shown in Figure 8 in which FEM models take advantage of the plane of symmetry.The plane of symmetry is selected such that the model is capable of being tested for static andcyclic tests. Figure 8 Top and Seat Angle Connection – Isometric View Impact on Structural Engineering EducationOne of the goals of this project is to show how the use of advanced technologies can lead to amore stimulating and engaging structural analysis and design experience both at theundergraduate and graduate levels. To accomplish this, in the
Paper ID #47821Exploring the Intersection between Lifelong Learning and Workforce Developmentin EngineeringMr. Arsalan Ashraf, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Arsalan Ashraf is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include AI ethics, ethics and social responsibility, and lifelong learning. He has broad experience in academia and industry, which motivates him to do research on these vibrant areas. He is a first-generation student from a small village in Punjab, Pakistan. He completed his B.S. in Aviation Management from Lahore in 2017, and
compatibility with the natural surroundingsand uses a wide spectrum of principles modeled on the homeostatic and self-regulatingbehavior of biological and ecological systems. The overall design objective is to ensuremaximum energy efficiency, low construction and maintenance cost, thermal comfortwithout air-conditioning, high aesthetic quality and intimate contact with the naturalelements.The paper describes the architectural and engineering principles used and our attempt toprovide an inspired student group an opportunity to fully exercise their creativeimagination and “learn by doing”.“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for
(TPD) opportunities in engineering education 2. And there is apaucity of engineering curricula for teachers to implement in their classrooms 3. It is important to Page 26.1050.2overcome these limitations in engineering teacher preparation for several reasons. New nationalscience standards identify engineering as a core discipline in science and technical fields 4,industry employers want employees who are technologically literate 5 6 7, research on how peoplelearn identifies design-based learning as an effective method to engage students in authentic, realworld learning tasks 8, and teachers value engineering activities as contexts for students
an integratedmulti-media approach that reflects present day technological and socio-cultural aspects. Thethree learning modules developed thus far address diverse topics such as machine tool circuits,geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GDT), and hydraulics, all geared towards thedevelopment of established competencies of the trade. The overall intent of this project was tocreate an application that would serve as a complete self-learning tool that not only deliverssubject matter content but also helps the learner engage in trouble-shooting exercises, examineand manipulate the application to analyze several what-if scenarios, and perform self-testing inorder to gage individual success in learning.This paper will focus on the three major
of 2019. The program aims to reach and assess impact on asmany faculty and students as practical worldwide and to determine the next set of standards andtarget courses for further development.Introduction:Roughly 80% of global merchandise trade is affected by standards and by regulations that embodystandards (ANSI 2002). Standards virtually effect all products and services used or traded by theU.S. while also providing the nation’s industrial base with opportunities to influence internationalmarkets (Khan and Karim, 2016). Standards play a key role in innovation and the transfer oftechnology, from the research and development stage, to production, and the marketplace. As aresult, the workforce and future workforce in all sectors need to have
standards, leadership portfolios, individual development plans, Next GenerationScience Standards, effective professional learning communities (PLCs), professional learningcommunity facilitation, and participatory action research (PAR). PAR acknowledges the livedexpertise of individuals by engaging them as co-researchers and knowledge creators [6,7]. Asliving experts in the experience of learners, students can identify areas for improvement ineducational settings [8] and are ripe for involvement as PAR co-researchers. The teachers willdevelop and implement PAR projects in their classrooms and disseminate their results at arelevant conference. Years 3-5 will include local and state-wide teacher-led PLCs on topicschosen by the teachers and developed
theassessment of instructors, parents and other professional observers (one of the observers had a doctorate ineducation) during 2006-07. Table 1 Learning level (Basic, Intermediate, Advance), underlying STEMS areas (S, T, E, M), expected impact (Low, Normal,High), learner interest (Low, Normal, High), possible audience types (Families, Children, Adults, College Students, Teachers,Professionals, Underserved, Retired, Boy Scouts, Hobbyists and Explorers), and possible locations (Museum, Science &Technology Center, Community Center, Mall and Shopping Center, Library, Websites, After-School Locations). Gen. Learning STEM Expected Learner Audience Possible Unique Aspect Area
paper is based on teaching at theundergraduate/graduate (formal) and K-12 (informal) levels. It may be pointed out that no formal educationresearch was conducted to generate the Table 1. Thus, the data provided here is qualitative and is based on theassessment of instructors, parents and other professional observers (one of the observers had a doctorate ineducation) during 2006-07. Table 1 Learning level (Basic, Intermediate, Advance), underlying STEMS areas (S, T, E, M), expected impact (Low, Normal,High), learner interest (Low, Normal, High), possible audience types (Families, Children, Adults, College Students, Teachers,Professionals, Underserved, Retired, Boy Scouts, Hobbyists and Explorers), and possible locations (Museum, Science &
paper is based on teaching at theundergraduate/graduate (formal) and K-12 (informal) levels. It may be pointed out that no formal educationresearch was conducted to generate the Table 1. Thus, the data provided here is qualitative and is based on theassessment of instructors, parents and other professional observers (one of the observers had a doctorate ineducation) during 2006-07. Table 1 Learning level (Basic, Intermediate, Advance), underlying STEMS areas (S, T, E, M), expected impact (Low, Normal,High), learner interest (Low, Normal, High), possible audience types (Families, Children, Adults, College Students, Teachers,Professionals, Underserved, Retired, Boy Scouts, Hobbyists and Explorers), and possible locations (Museum, Science &
provide information to many people regarding the nature of the task that should be completed by the student. Without this statement describing the nature of the assignment, there would be no basis for assessment. The need for learning objectives in assessment is illustrated in Karen Yoshino’s definition of the theory of assessment: “The systematic, intelligent generation and evaluation of student learning outcomes whose characteristics and properties achieve stated objectives and satisfy specified criteria.” Yoshino describes learning objectives and performance criteria as the grounds for assessment of student learning.18• Convey instructional intent to others. In addition to the impact that learning objectives have on
, and Micro-Credentials. AC are an important part of segment of the education landscape focused on non-degree,the university’s mission because they can expand the university’s alternative credentials, including certificates and “micro-role in providing flexible and accessible life-long learning, credentials.” Driven by the rise of online education, theseprovide additional revenue streams, support non-traditional alternative and micro-credentials have found a niche marketlearners, broaden the reach of education to rural or underserved especially among adult learners who value the flexibility,communities, and open up educational pathways to students
by enhancing students’logical and critical thinking through the use of visual programming tools such as RAPTOR inintroductory computing courses. RAPTOR is a visual programming development environment based onflowcharts. Students can build simple procedural programs without learning the details of a language.These features of RAPTOR has helped us in providing an Interdisciplinary Integrated Teaching andLearning experiences that integrates team-oriented, hands-on learning experiences throughout theengineering technology and sciences curriculum and engages students in the design and analysis processbeginning with their first year. The objective of this paper is to discuss our experiences with the use ofRAPTOR in various science and technology
adiscussion of best practices for NTT faculty career development and promotion in Fall2011. Promotional policies that have already been adopted at the University level will bediscussed, including those related to letters of support, expectations for national and internationalvisibility, and department voting. Future work at NCSU will focus on NTT faculty careerenrichment in addition to the development of more standard procedures for recognizing andevaluating the external impact of research, teaching, and outreach efforts of NTT faculty.Experiences of Women Faculty in STEMThere has been a renewed focus on exploring gender differences in academia. While increases infemale graduate students have occurred at the doctorate level, this has not translated
to elementary teachers’ fear of teachingengineering and skepticism about integrating engineering into their classrooms 15. Research on theeffects of professional development yielded findings showing the positive impact of professionaldevelopment on both elementary teachers’ engineering content knowledge and their teachingpractices 16, 29. Despite these positive impacts, research revealed that, although professionaldevelopment training paved way for the development of engineering pedagogical contentknowledge (PCK), elementary teachers developed their PCK only slowly and gradually byexperiencing how engineering teaching interacted with students and specific classroom and schoolcontexts 45.Individually, each of these research studies
, James Kiper, Debra Davis, Andrew Allen, and Geoffrey Potvin. Evaluating theImpact of Combination of Engagement Strategies in SEP - CyLE on Improve Student Learningof Programming Concepts, The 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer ScienceEducation, SIGCSE 2019. February 27 - March 2, 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA.[33] Ingrid A. Buckley and Peter J. Clarke. An Approach to Teaching Software TestingSupported by two Different Online Content Delivery Methods. 2018 LACCEI InternationalMulti-Conference of Engineering, Education and Technology. Accepted 04/11/18.[34] Vijayalakshmi Ramasamy, Urvashi Desai, Hakam W. Alomari, and James D. Kiper. TP-GraphMiner: A Clustering Framework for Task-Based Information Networks. InternationalConference on Systems