mentoringprogram, student mentoring program, student learning communities, institutional academicsupport structure, student leadership development, and embracing diversity through effectiveteamwork. Methods used to establish and support of the EXCEL-SC student cohort and learningcommunity, as well as impacts on student learning and academic success, have been of greatinterest for possible replication by other departments on campus including: ElectricalEngineering, Math and Computer Science, Chemistry, Biology, Physics, School of Education,and The Citadel STEM Center. The EXCEL-SC scholarship program has recruited a number ofwomen and minority students into Civil Engineering. These students have joined The Citadel’scollegiate chapter of the Society of
the Development of Metacognition in Engineering Students in a Problem-Based Learning Program with a Think-Aloud ProtocolThis evidence-based practice paper focuses on how an engineering education program thatpromotes self-regulated learning impacts students’ problem-solving skills. Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) is an innovative, problem-based-learning (PBL) engineering program inVirginia, Minnesota. Throughout the curriculum of this program, students learn about and applymetacognitive skills necessary for self-regulating their learning. For the past several years, wehave been conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation1 to (1) identify themetacognitive skills inherent in self-regulated
with manyissues never before seen on this scale; from a sense of isolation to mental fatigue. It will be up tothe professors to engage the students at every turn to reestablish the student community. Ifreestablished soon; the attitudes, mental health, and overall success of every student will beimproved. And the university community will be stronger than before the pandemic disruptions.References[1] N. Meda , S. Pardini , I. Slongo , L. Bodini , M. A. Zordan , P. Rigobello , F. Visioli and C. Novara. “Students’ mental health problems before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown in Italy”, Journal of Psychiatric Research 134 69–77, 2021, doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.045 © American Society for
Paper ID #8578Ms. Hines and the Sick 5th Graders -– Making hands-on outreach and learn-ing about the Environment engaging through the use of Case Stories!Mrs. Janie Gina Locklear, NC A&T I am a Senior Civil Engineering major with 5 years experience teaching elementary science. I returned to school to obtain a second degree in engineering after learning that I have a stronger passion for design and problem solving. As a teacher, I emphasized to my students daily the importance of science and en- gineering and promoted love and passion for the related work by using hands-on experience with EVERY lesson taught. My
has recently been put towards improving the experiences of people frommarginalized groups pursuing graduate degrees in engineering. In response to a call from theNational Science Foundation to establish a center for equity in engineering, a collective, namedPROTEGE, focused on organizational change at the graduate level is being established. One ofthe guiding principles for PROTEGE is to empower graduate students. This principle ismotivated by community engagement, where by involving community members in the decision-making and outcome-production process, they can feel more invested in the results of the workand feel a sense of ownership in the outcomes of the initiatives. However, PROTEGE recognizesthe tension between not wanting to
Promotional Video: Student Diversity (left) and Economic Competitiveness (right)11In characterizing K-12 engineering programs as operating according to a logic of engagement,we do not mean to suggest that such initiatives are prominent within K-12 educational settings oreven that a majority of university engineering students have participated in such programming.They are on the rise, certainly, but K-12 engineering initiatives still reach only a fraction of K-12students in the US. This limited impact is due to a host of factors, including the historicalexclusion of engineering content from K-12 education as well as lack of earmarked budgeting forsuch programs. Teachers who have the interest, opportunity, and incentive to pursue K-12engineering
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 First Year Engineering Student Expectations and Experiences: College, Community, and CurriculumAbstractThis is an evidence-based practice paper whose purpose is to analyze the impact of service-learning in a first-year engineering course on students who choose to enroll in these sections.The paper will also look at the level of engagement the students experience and their connectionto an urban community. Past literature revealed that students understand an engineering designprocess better when the practice is implemented in a service learning environment. The focus ofthis research is to see if these findings hold true at Northeastern University, if service
should be noted that students appreciate, and should be told why theyare participating in the exercises and the relevance of the exercises both to the development ofthe project and to the development of their teams. As teams progressed through the project they maintained a high regard for the activitiesnecessary to generate a quality project for the client. In general, teams developed a usefuldecision making methodology through a communication network of information transfer. Theyrecognized the value of fostering team unity through activities that engaged and supported theseteam decisions. Production of a quality product and team satisfaction depends on a balance of both task andteam functions. The rope geometry introduces teams to the
institutions have struggled to adapt to the diversity oftheir student bodies, especially minority students’ needs [9]. Even though literature indicatesthat oral communication has been identified as a learnable skill, and some institutions attemptto provide extracurricular communication skills training sessions, such training remainsseparate from the technical curriculum. Moreover, most of the STEM coursework is heavilyskewed towards writing, which ultimately hinders active engagement [10]. Due to this recentincrease attention on changing expectations from practicing STEM professionals, there is anurgent need to successfully develop new skills sets throughout students’ academic careers[12]. Although communications have recently been incorporated into
impact of teacher profes- sional development programs on student achievement and attitudes.Ms. Christina Anlynette Crawford, Rice University As Assistant Director for Biology and Life Sciences of the Rice Office of STEM Engagement, Christina leads the Rice Excellence in Secondary Science Teaching (RESST) biology program. In this capacity, she guides Houston area high school Life Science teachers in weekly meetings on Rice’s campus to explore both biology concepts and the ways in which they can be taught using inquiry methods. As a high school teacher with Southwest Schools and Cypress-Fairbanks ISD she has taught AP Biology, Pre AP Biology, as well as regular Biology for 6 years. As a Teacher Development Specialist
engagement in the traditional knowledge-based secondary STEM settingmay predispose students to mastery-based curricula focused on solving open-ended problems,which by their nature reward “grit” or resourcefulness. To date, student and educatorengagement and enthusiasm reinforce that the Discovery platform blurs the gap betweensecondary and post-secondary learning meanwhile fostering development of critical thinkingskills crucial for the success of future STEM generations. Our current findings suggest learningculture influence, presenting opportunity to tune program structure to meet individual studentlearning needs. We anticipate continued positive impact of this program on secondary schoolscience student outcomes in future offerings, regardless of
- Common sense of trust, respect, understanding - Positive, past experiences with interdisciplinary among individuals collaboration - Individuals are valued as people, outside of their discipline as well as a discipline specialistFigure 1: Components and influences of interdisciplinary collaborationInterdisciplinary research groups as a faculty learning community. A Faculty LearningCommunity (FLC) is a group of interdisciplinary faculty members (typically between 6-15)engaging in an active, collaborative program of significant duration designed to foster scholarlyteaching and enhance student learning [18]. FLCs are considered a special
community among new graduate students in a COVID world prompted the developmentof a two-week virtual orientation program for engineering and applied sciences graduate studentsat a research university. Despite the complexity of multiple time zones, technology challenges, andthe virtual space, the program sought to accomplish three goals: (1) community building amongstudents; (2) intellectual engagement with faculty in the home departments; and (3) careerdevelopment as a foundation for their overall graduate school experience. Participants (N=350 MSor PhD students) were introduced to support services (e.g., health and counseling, ombuds) andstudent organizations, attended workshops on digital literacy and technology tools, gainedperspective from
keyopen question in the field [10, 27, 28]. In order to allow the majority of STEM students andinstructors to reap the demonstrated benefits of oral assessment, it is therefore critical that wedevise and validate an effective and realistic means of implementing oral assessment in largeclasses. As STEM courses at many US universities (particularly the core courses) routinelycontain hundreds of students, there is a significant gap in existing research on oral assessment.The purpose of this study was to understand the practical approaches to implement oral exams inengineering classes as effective summative assessment components (as complements to existingassessments) to positively impact students’ learning, while mitigating the potential
the VaNTH NSF ERC forBioengineering Educational Technologies. The CBI instruction was developed and implementedin the areas of reverse engineering, statics, dynamics, energy (including renewable energy), andforward engineering. Additionally, the paper describes the initial impact of the CBI curriculumon the students, including initial assessment results, and the impact on the faculty and the course.A controlled experiment was performed with a control group following a more traditionallaboratory setup. From the initial positive results obtained in this project, it is argued that theVaNTH principles are effective in motivating and engaging freshman engineering students inmechanical and civil engineering majors and that the CBI materials and
and humanities requirements, one could introduce more complex models of howengineers interact with society, and how politics actually works. With a more activelearning model, students could be required to track public policy on local issues over thecourse of a year. By participating in the public process, government and the inevitabletradeoffs that happen in a democracy might be made more transparent. Send theengineering students to City Hall.Additionally, a stronger emphasis could be placed on informal communication skills.While ABET mandates, and rightfully so, a large component of report writing and oralpresentation, there is often little space in the curriculum for development of negotiatingand public debate skills, as well as
technical answers made agreat impact. This site has not only provided useful information for the Engaged inThermodynamics material, but has expressed an interest in future class visits, student internships,and possible senior projects.A third avenue that has opened up is for the fuel cell scenario. Feedback from students duringthe original proof-of-concept indicated that they were looking for more detailed and in-depthinformation in how the engineering equipment actually worked and was put together, rather thanjust theoretical equations. Additional efforts were therefore placed on creating or obtainingadditional schematics, cross-sections, and animations of systems. During a professionaldevelopment tour with a fuel cell manufacturer, the project
described in the next section is toward developing and understandingthe impact of an instructional intervention that is focused on helping students to consider the roleof professional competencies in technical problem solving.3.0 MethodologyWe conducted a mixed methods pre/post study in which student performance on mock interviews,as evaluated by engineering professionals, was the outcome measure. The research question ofinterest is: What effect, if any, does professional competency reflection scaffolded around problemtypology have on students’ ability to synthesize and communicate their experiences? While themock interview comprises a total of five questions, we focus on the question related to theprofessional competency of teamwork in the
member of the IEEE, a member of the IEEE MTT-10 committee, and a member of the ASEE, Bioelectromagnetics Society and Society of Women Engineers. She serves on the editorial board of the Bioelectromagnetics Society.Tim Robinson, University of Nevada Reno I am a former elementary and middle public school teacher who is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in STEM Education. My research interests are in the areas of science and engineering education where I look at student interest as well as the use of technology such as digital data collection devices and the impact they have on students’ ability to argue scientifically.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
Paper ID #14402Can Service Learning Impact Student Learning and Motivation in a Re-quired Engineering Probability and Statistics Course?Dr. Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado - Boulder Dr. Abbie B. Liel is an associate professor of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder.Timothy J Clarkin, University of Colorado - Boulder Mr. Clarkin is pursuing a M.S. in Civil Systems Engineering at University of Colorado at Boulder, with a focus in Water Resources and a certificate in Engineering for Developing Communities. Eventually, he would like to work on water supply systems in
knowledge and skills leading to credentials and degrees andeventually jobs. The STEM Pathways Model was developed during the Engineering PathwaysPartnership Project (EP3): A Rural Model for a Modern World, Grant Award No. 1003847,2011-2015 and is shown in Figure 2. Loosely categorized into three components, the programsand activities of a STEM Pathway are anchored by the community colleges and closely tied tolocal employers. The three components are (1) Outreach and Career Exploration; (2)Foundational Knowledge and Skills; and (3) Transferable Certification and Degree Programs. Figure 2: STEM Pathways Model ComponentsOutreach and Career Exploration focuses on engaging and exciting students about STEMcareers at an early age
,” “innovative learning environments,” and “a context-richapplication of English, Communications and Technology” 1. Specifically, this project aims toimprove students’ writing skills, oral communication skills, and presentation skills by reinforcingthe importance of these skills in realistic, project-based design contexts. Administrators andinstructors within all 3 departments hope the integration will improve students’ learning in alldisciplines, increase academic engagement overall, and create a stronger sense of communityamong students. Large-scale integration on this level is an intervention in the traditional university model,which often times includes strict discipline-based divisions of coursework. In this newarrangement, students in each
contributing to increases in retention. We foundthat follow-up activities and constant communication between instructors and students yieldedthe best retention results. Instructors initiated follow up visit to students’ schools and continuedto involve past participants in activities that kept the students engaged. 15 students receivedscholarships and grants for future summer camps and after school programs and were distributedto students based on a financial sliding scale, past participation and grade improvement. Parentconsultation and involvement also assisted in the retention of student participants. Teachertraining workshops were implemented to assist teachers in continuing the STEM based efforts aswell.3.2 Pathways to collegeIt has been shown
facilitator in Azraqnoted, ‘I think we need to be flexible, if the students can go on with the same timetable, then it'sgood, if not then we will act accordingly.’ This quote expresses his concern with course pacingsince a few students were not ready to move on to a new course topic like their peers. Figure 4. Slide example using during the teaching certification trainingDiscussion and future plans This paper is impactful and contributes in two dimensions. First, the novelty of the LEDadds to the engineering education community and education in displacement by examiningeffective teaching and learning in refugee settings. Specifically, this paper contributes to theapplication of diverse pedagogical theories and learning environments
experienceby connecting theoretical knowledge with real-world applications. By sharing personal insightsand experiences, mentors can create a narrative that inspires and engages students, fosteringdeeper understanding and curiosity. This approach has a positive impact on student learning bymaking concepts more relatable, while also enhancing faculty engagement by encouragingcollaboration and shared purpose. Additionally, it promotes course cohesion by providing aunifying theme that ties together different elements of the curriculum. Key takeaways forcreating impactful, story-driven mentorship models in academia include the importance ofauthenticity, the alignment of stories with educational goals, and the strategic integration ofnarrative into
-wide active learning environment for scientific writing,publishing, peer-review, and other scientific communication skills, within our engineeringschool. The particulars are presented in another article at this conference [12], but briefly, manyof these voluntary activities are focused on bringing students together so they can work ingroups, give feedback, and learn from one another. This initiative is based on learningcommunities and communities of practice (as mentioned earlier) which have many educationalbenefits, including getting students actively engaged in their learning [1]–[3], [13], [14].2.2 Integrating our program in a labIn the spring of 2017, our team explored the possibility of offering some of these activities on-site, in
extracurricular and other campus activities, 14o Financial challenges faced by First-generation and other USP students resulting from family economic hardships. This may ssignificantly increase the likelihood of the student having to work part-time/full-time while attending college. This can further reduce the opportunities for campus engagement directly impacting a student’s college experience on both an academic and a social level” (1).o Family related financial challenging may impact the student’s college selection/choice. For example, first-generation college students are significantly more likely to attend a university within fifty miles of their home and significantly less likely to live on-campus
, Budget Impacts on Engineering Education, 2012. 5. Utah Valley University Institution Research and Information web site, http://www.uvu.edu/iri/academicprograms/statistics.html , accessed 1-22-2016. 6. NSF Proposal document, “Strengthening Outcomes for Students in Computer Science and Engineering through Leadership, Engagement, Academic Mentoring, and Preparation (LEAP)”, August 2013. 7. Kuh, G.D., “Organizational Culture and Student Persistence: Prospects and Puzzles”, Journal of College Student Retention, 39(1), 23-39, 2002. 8. Kuh, G. D., et al, “Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter”, Jossey-Bass, 2005. 9. Laufgraben, J. L., “Learning Communities”, Jossey-Bass, 2005. 10. Annual Report on the
in 2016 which was50 percentage points larger than for the lowest SES students (28 percent) [5]. Since a school and/orfamily obligation requires low-income students to work, they cannot engage well in school andafford engagement activities like football games. The underrepresentation of low-SES graduatesmeans that those graduates are missing out on the financial and professional benefits of jobopportunities available through STEM. This underrepresentation also impacts the overall numbersof STEM professionals in the U.S [6]. The Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S STEM) Program is an NSF-funded program that supports institutions of highereducation to fund scholarships for academically talented students with
, 31(1):21–32, 1961. [6] A. Collins. Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Sawyer, editor, Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pages 47–60. Cambridge University Press, 2006. [7] D. Jackson. Software Abstractions: Logic, Language and Analysis. MIT Press, 2012. [8] D. Jonassen, M. Davidson, M. Collins, J. Campbell, and B. B. Haag. Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 1995. [9] S. Kumar and C. Wallace. Instruction in software project communication through guided inquiry and reflection. In Frontiers in Education (FIE). IEEE, 2014.[10] C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. E. Bullock, and J. Fernald. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception