Marjorie Letitia Hubbard, PhD North Carolina School of Science and Math, Durham, NCAbstractEarly exposure to engineering coursework can increase the persistence of students, particularlywomen and minorities, in STEM fields in college and beyond. Secondary school instructorshave a golden opportunity to approach engineering curriculum design with a student-centeredperspective that fosters engagement since many curricular resources for high school studentsmust be uniquely tailored for students with different levels of exposure to engineering.This paper describes the development of a biomedical engineering curriculum for high schoolstudents that integrates design thinking using the framework of student-centered
SESSION #: 1526 Integrating BME into ECE Curriculum: An Alternate Approach for Robi Polikar, Ravi P. Ramachandran, Linda Head and Maria Tahamont Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028 Abstract: A time honored technique for introducing students to new and emerging topics is to offerelectives; however, there are a few major drawbacks to this approach: the topic must be very fo-cused, either depth or breath must be sacrificed, and in either case, only a very limited amount ofmaterial can be covered, and students who may not have prior
charts. • Creating a program management structure that embraces existing legacy structures while creating new structures to support specific interdisciplinary needs. • Creating curriculum boundary conditions that well define the program’s academic and research focus while allowing students maximum flexibility to define curricula to support their career ambitions.These methods and techniques are not innovative when taken individually, and in fact individualmethods can be found widely adopted in industry and academics. The innovation of the microEP Page 9.913.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society
Session 2648 A Versatile Experiment in Electrical Engineering Technology Ahmad M. Farhoud Engineering Technology Department University of ToledoAbstract An experiment used to implement multi-electrical course knowledge is described. Theexperiment is an automatic control system in nature with ties to electronics, digital system andcomputer hardware and software. The idea is to design and build a simple temperature controlsystem, to maintain the temperature inside an enclosed box within a specific user selected range.The
How does Software Engineering fit into a College of Engineering? Thomas B. Hilburn, Massood Towhidnejad Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University hilburn@erau.edu, towhid@erau.eduAbstractSoftware Engineering (SE) is a new degree in most academic environments. Currently, there areless than 25 undergraduate SE degrees offered by US universities, and only six have beenaccredited by ABET. There are a number of challenges for faculty and departments who areoffering these SE degrees. Some of these challenges include a) finding qualified faculty, b)designing an appropriate curriculum that serves the stakeholders needs, c) satisfyingaccreditation criteria
resource engineering, as does the expanding field ofknowledge. Attention must be devoted to hiring appropriately trained instructors to actualize thetransition.Background The main thrust of the presentation will be oriented towards presenting an analysis of thearea following an accepted protocol for examining curriculum questions1. Specific problems thatdevelop the above definition of the natural resources engineer will be presented in this context. Page 6.322.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001. American Society of
Session 3650 A Proposed Approach to Design an Efficient Program in Industrial Technology Dr. Mohamed Gadalla Kean University, Department of Technology, 1000 Morris Ave., Union, NJ 07083 Tel: 908-527-2284, E-mail: gadalla@kean.eduAbstractTechnology education at the university level can be grouped into: Engineering Technology (ET)and Industrial Technology (IT) Programs. These programs are primarily focusing on applicationsin Engineering Science. A typical IT curriculum includes: hands-on type of experience courses,courses on humanities, liberal arts
Paper ID #29577Towards A Multi-dimensional Biometric Approach to Quantifying StudentEngagement in the STEM ClassroomDr. James Christopher Foreman, University of Louisville Asst. Professor at University of Louisville, previous appointment at Purdue University. Teaching calculus, power and energy, and industrial control systems related courses. Research in artificial neural networks, expert systems, and new methods of teaching math/calculus. 15 years in industry control systems and power generation industry prior to academic career.Dr. Aly Farag, University of Louisville Aly Farag, Fellow, IEEE and IAPR: received B.S. in EE
Paper ID #26212A Holistic Approach for Enhancing Distributed Education with Multi-CampusCourse Delivery MethodsDr. Mahmoud K Quweider, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley M K Quweider is a Professor of Computer & Information Sciences at the U. of Texas at UTRGV. He re- ceived his Ph.D. in Engineering Science (Multimedia and Imaging Specialty) and B.S. In Electrical Engi- neering, M.S. in Applied Mathematics, M.S. in Engineering Science, and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering all from the University of Toledo, Ohio. He also holds a Bachelor of English and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Texas
Engineering and Engineering Technology and gives the studentsa more technical program using applications in an energy and environmental curriculum. In thisprogram, the students are instructed in applications used in industry, be it forms of energysavings approaches, new materials and processes, or new sources and needs in the production ofenergy. The Energy and Environmental Systems Technology program will provideundergraduate students with an understanding of the application and needs in areas as well as Page 25.151.5new advances which better the environment and new technologies that utilize green principles,and green transportation topics. The
environments and remotely/robotically controlled physical laboratory exercises for distance learning settings including associated pedagogies. Dr. Schaefer has published approximately 80 papers in journals, books and conference proceedings on Computer-Aided Engineering and Design as well as Engineering Education. In addition, he has substantial experience in curriculum development, ABET preparation and assessment. Page 15.111.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Virtual Factory Approach for Design and Implementation of Agile Manufacturing
learning spaces equipped with state of the art audio-visual and computing facilities. Faculty discussions on PBL pedagogies paid scant attentionto the epistemological issues of the engineering profession but concentrated on theepistemology of engineering education. The following discussion introduces theepistemological dimension of the profession to provide a context for the review of PBLpedagogy.Education for ProfessionsThe implementation of a new teaching approach and curriculum in engineering educationneeds to be seen in the context of education for the professions and for professionaldiscourses.Unlike purely academic education, the preparation for professional life requires bothacademic and vocational educational elements. The evolution of
usually be paid by the professor himself. It’s all an investment; a little blood,sweat, and tears in the early years will usually pay off handsomely later.Continuing education, professional development, and ongoing productivity are important,particularly as the new engineering educator approaches middle age. After promotions and tenure,it’s easy to fall into a rut of taking things easy. Although Academic Balance 5 is critical to anengineering educator, one must be careful to avoid stagnation, obsolescence, and the status quo.Given the rapid "half life" of 3-5 years for engineering knowledge, this obsolescence can sneak upupon an engineering professor not only in research but in all phases of the job, for example,computer techniques in instruction
Web-Based Computer-Aided Engineering Tutorials Across the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Jonathan Wickert and Jack Beuth Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PAIntroductionA skill in demand for graduating engineering students is the ability to combine computationaltools, intuition, and fundamentals effectively. Those factors are arguably more critical now thanpreviously because today’s engineers are often expected to make significant design decisionsbefore any product testing can be done. This reality of industrial practice, where
and watching the pre-lecture videos, andstudents who took the tests and/or watched the videos. The final exam grades and the surveyresults were used as the assessment tools for analyzing the effectiveness of the new componentsadded to the course and the revised structure of the course in the Spring quarter. Additionally,instructor reflections on the process of revising the course from Winter to Spring quarter areprovided in this paper.Literature ReviewThere has been an ongoing effort to improve engineering instruction and create learningexperiences that echo practical skill-sets in the field (Felder et al., 2000). Accordingly, there hasbeen a breadth of research that examines various teaching methodologies in the discipline. Toframe this
. We captured data fromdepartmental archives, then continued entering new data throughout 1999-2000. In Fall 2000,we used the system to produce six Assessment Memos which were then acted upon by theresponsible faculty member or the Curriculum Committee. This approach was fully- Page 12.102.3demonstrated in our 2000-2001 Self-Study, was reviewed by our program visitor for the Fall2001 Accreditation Visit, and continues to produce useful information in a consistent andefficient way.Development of IE Department’s EC 2000 Outcomes Assessment SystemTo prepare to develop the department’s Outcomes Assessment System, it was clear that at
, and this global workplace in turn isintroducing new imperatives not only to engineering practice but to engineering education aswell.For nearly 20 years, numerous journals, articles, reports and studies have been prepared by theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, the Academic Press, the National Science Board,the National Science and the American Society Civil Engineers which discuss the critical needfor change to engineering education. Yet despite the numerous literary library on the subject ofengineering education reform, the engineering curriculum of today still does not provide thefoundation necessary to ensure the engineer’s success in the 21st century. A report by theAmerican Electronics Association in 2007 notes that the 21st
, Curriculum and Laboratory Initiativegrant, the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Utah State University has under-taken an initiative to increase the competence of its graduates in the area of computational engi-neering. Toward that end, an optional, formal emphasis in computational engineering is beingadded to the department’s undergraduate mechanical engineering degree. Initial graduates fromthe program are expected in May 2006. To graduate with the emphasis, students must complete 4elective courses pertaining to high performance computing. To support the degree emphasis, thedepartment built and operates a computing cluster based on dual processor AMD Opteron tech-nology. Initial implementation of the new material into the
interpret data, and use positive societal impact are included within the engineering judgement to draw conclusions. curriculum. (7) An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as 4.4 The school’s curriculum facilitates meaningful needed, using appropriate learning strategies. learner-to-learner and learner-to faculty academic and professional engagement.3.2 Assessment InstrumentsThe second step in the backwards design is to determine acceptable evidence for the learningoutcomes. To do so, we developed assessment instruments which include a mix of multiple choiceand open-ended questions to assess the learning modules. Questions can be written to
AC 2008-2108: PROFESSORS’ INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACHES ANDSTUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF NANOHUB SIMULATIONS AS LEARNINGTOOLSAlejandra Magana , Network for Computational Nanotechnology Purdue University Alejandra Magana is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a M.S. Ed. in Educational Technology from Purdue University and a M.S. in E-commerce from ITESM in Mexico City. She is currently working for the Network for Computational Nanotechnology at Purdue University as a Research Assistant and as an Instructional Designer.Sean Brophy, Purdue University Sean Brophy is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a Ph.D. in Education and
," Psychological Review, vol. 84, pp. 191-215, 1977.[15] President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, 2012.[16] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen and E. Seymour, "Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal and professional development," Science Education, vol. 96, pp. 36-74, 2007.[17] S. Tobias, They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier (occasional paper on neglected problems in Science Education), New York: Research Corporation, 1994.[18] S. V. Franklin, E. Hane, M. Kustusch
-engineer-in- sustainable-development/4. Bondehagen, D., Villiers, C and O’Neill, R. 2014. “Evaluation of a New Approach to Life-Long Learning in Civil and Environmental Engineering Curricula”. Frontiers in Education/Engineering Conference in Madrid, Spain October 22-25, 2014.5. Bondehagen, D., Komisar, S. and O’Neill, R. 2016. “Assessing Achievement of Sustainability Skills in the Environmental and Civil Engineering Curriculum”. Paper accepted for ASEE conference in New Orleans, LA June 26 – 29, 20166. Mourtos, N. 2003. “Defining, Teaching and Assessing Lifelong Learning Skills.” Proceeding so the ASEE/ISEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder CO.7. Lu, M. (2014). "Integrating Sustainability into the
Machining handbooks Systems automation. Manufacturers catalogs Specification sheetsTable 3 Competencies Required by the Various Courses in the Engineering Technology ProgramThe basic goals of adopting a constructivist approach are very simple. The goals are retention,understating, active use of knowledge and skills, hence the integration with other classes isessential to this strategy. Engineering Technology curriculum should be designed to direct towardsa more attentive approach in valuing knowledge integration [17], bearing in mind that from
. Page 11.1313.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The NCME Instructional Design Model: A Constructivist Approach to LearningAbstract In January 1995 the National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education(NSF-ATE) Program funded the creation of the National Center for Manufacturing Education(NCME) to develop curricular materials for a novel manufacturing education associate degreeprogram. The primary deliverable included 62 instructional units (modules) that create a novelassociate degree program in manufacturing engineering technology. The program wasconsidered innovative in its pedagogy, organization, and content[1]. This paper focuses on theconstructivist framework
engineering level areadvocating the introduction of systems engineering BS degrees and an increasing systems levelapproach to the teaching of various engineering topics. A systems level approach to teachingtechnicians means that fundamental electronics devices are not dealt with on a part level to anygreat extent. This does not mean that students are not taught basic fundamental concepts orintroduced to the analog and digital components and devices that are used to construct electronicsystems. However, the amount of time spent on skills that only designers of electronic circuitsneed is drastically reduced. Also, the curriculum must look at the big picture and includecoverage of topics in communications, computers, controls and embedded
Paper ID #31605Building Better Worlds: An Interdisciplinary Approach to EngineeringEthics PedagogyDr. Amy Schroeder, University of Southern California Dr. Amy Schroeder has been teaching communication in the Viterbi School of Engineering at the Uni- versity of Southern California for the past six years. She developed a new course focused on science, literature and ethics; it has become a consistently successful course in USC’s general education program. She holds a PhD in literature and creative writing from USC; her first book received the Field Prize and was published by Oberlin College Press. Her prose appears in the Los
Paper ID #39539Developing a Streamlined Approach to Manage Program Documents andAssessment Data (Work in Progress)Dr. Jacob Allen Cress P.E., University of Dayton Dr. Jacob Cress is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Program in the De- partment of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology at the University of Dayton. Dr. Cress’ research interests focus on developing pedagogical methods for effective engineering communication in the engineering curricula. Prior to joining the faculty at UD, Dr. Cress worked at Stress Engineering Services Inc. in Mason, Ohio, and at GE Aviation in Cincinnati
Paper ID #9633Work-in-Progress: A Novel Approach to Collaborative Learning in the FlippedClassroomDr. Neelam Soundarajan, Ohio State University Neelam Soundarajan is a faculty member in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at the Ohio State University. His research interests include software engineering and engineering education.Swaroop Joshi, The Ohio State University Swaroop is a PhD student in Computer Science and Engineering at the Ohio State University. His interests include a range of problems in software engineering as well as the use of technology in the classroom.Dr. Rajiv Ramnath, Ohio State University
Classroom: An Analysis of CurrentPractices & Guidelines for the Future, based on the proceedings from the 2004 LeadershipWorkshop on K-12 Engineering Outreach is available3. The ASEE Engineering K-12 Centeroffers portals for students and educators. The MAA has many resource materials for motivatingMathematics at the K-12 level4. Cornell University sponsors an award winning website5 with Page 14.879.9links to educators and students in grades 9-12. ITEA is a professional association for technologyeducation teachers who teach a problem-based learning approach utilizing math, science andtechnology principles, their web site includes teacher
integration of product/tool design andmanufacturing to which manufacturing engineering technology students are not commonlyexposed[6][7]. Basic FEA concepts and machining process modeling with FEA were addedinto this upper level manufacturing course and enabled students to make the connectionamong physics, static/dynamics, and material courses in the curriculum in an integratedlearning environment.Knowledge on new technologies including FEA and DFM were covered in this course.Projects utilizing emerging technologies such as cutting process modeling with FEA, CNC(computer numerical control) verification with VeriCut® software helped students “recognizetheir need for an ability to engage in lifelong learning”, which is emphasized in AccreditationBoard