metric or curricular complexity framework (i.e.,referring to the variables composing the overall metric), including a webtool called CurricularAnalytics [7]. This webtool allows users to import a plan of study as a spreadsheet, visualize theprerequisite networks inherent in the course organization, and calculate the structural propertiesof the network that impact student persistence. As shown through experimentation [e.g., 2,8] andempirical work [e.g., 5], there is a negative correlation between curricular complexity andcompletion rates.Because of the new insights that quantifying a curricular structure could bring, authors havebegun using the curricular complexity framework to assign values to the accessibility ofcurricula [e.g., 9,10,11
&MUniversity (FAMU) [5]. The NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI) Phase I project had the following objectives: (a) create learning materials ontesting tools, (b) increase the number of students who have access to testing tool tutorials,and (c) train instructors on how to use testing tools and WReSTT in the classroom.WReSTT-CyLE is a NSF Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science (TUES) IIproject that aims to provide a cyberlearning environment that facilitates the improvementof students’ conceptual understanding and practical skills in software testing. The maingoals of this project are to create new learning materials and develop faculty expertise tosignificantly increase the number of undergraduate students that
poverty”, which was defined by the World Bank in 1990 as the earning of an equivalent income of $2 a day or less. TO9D attempts to accomplish this goal through focusing development efforts on products that either allows people to earn their way out of poverty or allow people to spend less time, money and/or effort on the necessities for life. Among the products developed to date are: • Solar-powered flashlight for nighttime illumination (replacing kerosene lamps) • Low-cost drip irrigation and water storage systems (for locations with both rainy and dry seasons) • Donkey carts (for material deliveries in roadless areas) TO9D is now accepting proposals for new products
and instructorinvolvement and concern. Some of these comments are identified below:“The instructors were fun and presented their material well.”“The instructors were very concerned with making sure that everyone understood everything.”“The instructors really made me feel that it was important to understand the material and theywere very encouraging.”“Huge shout outs to all of the physics instructors, they each brought something fun andinteresting to the table when they were helping us learn some new concepts.”Lastly, students submitted positive comments regarding the curriculum, but many characterizedthe course as hard or challenging. Here are some of the comments regarding the curriculum:“…I may not have done that well on any of the homework
teaching career by teaching several labs as a graduate teaching assistant and later on as an adjunct faculty. While at Towson University, he also cultivated good friendships with his advisors and now mentors: Dr. Rajeswari M. Kolagani and Dr. David Schaefer. His research led to his first publication a few years later. Forced by destiny, he ended up at Norfolk State University where he is now pursuing a PhD degree in Material Science focusing on optical characterization of materials for energy harvesting. Through the IGERT fellowship, he is pursuing his ultimate goal of becoming a professor and intends to carry on research in optical materials. - See more at: https://www.asee.org/public/person#sthash.lcrL5s3P.dpufMr. IRVING
students and some faculty are not aware of the data visualization process, the valueof visualization, the purpose of visualization or the benefits of visualization in academia,research, and industry. The 2014/2015 NSF REU Site (Award 1359223) summer researchexperience for undergraduates in collaborative data visualization applications was designed toaddress this need. Goals of the program are to: (1) introduce data visualization at theundergraduate level, (2) strengthen student skills and capabilities in data visualization, (3)broaden participation in visualization among women, members of underrepresented groups andstudents from institutions with limited research infrastructure, and (4) encourage students topursue graduate degrees in STEM
AC 2007-2837: ASSESSING PARTICIPANT ENGAGEMENT IN A MIDDLESCHOOL OUTREACH PROGRAMJessica Matson, Tennessee Technological University Jessica Matson is a Professor of Industrial Engineering at Tennessee Technological University. She received her BS from Mississippi State University and her MS and PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology, all in industrial engineering. She has previously served on the faculty of Mississippi State University and the University of Alabama and as industrial engineering department chair at Tennessee Tech. She is a registered PE.Kristine Craven, Tennessee Technological University Kris Craven received her BS, MS, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from West
always been a concern for engineering faculty nationwide.1 Whilepost secondary organizations and federal agencies constantly make efforts to this end, someresponsibility must be taken on the part of secondary organization to provide students withengineering backgrounds or ensure that the engineering knowledge they may have acquiredelsewhere is maintained. Some useful practices that could be adopted in high schools include: Incorporating the subject of engineering in the school curricula in addition to basic science courses. Page 12.659.5 Providing teachers with special training for teaching engineering. Involving students in
AC 2010-780: INCREASING GIRLS' INTEREST IN ENGINEERING BY MAKINGIT FUNJeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her academic area of distinction is in Embedded Systems Design. Jeanne received a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Clarkson University and an M.S. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Dallas. She worked in industry as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) designer prior to joining the faculty at RIT.Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth Dell is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing &
investigates fundamental questions critical to improving undergraduate engineering degree pathways. . She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education researcher when she was selected as an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Literate Programming Approach for Hardware Description Language InstructionINTRODUCTIONDigital devices are ubiquitous in modern life. Over the last several decades, nearly all aspects ofsociety are dependent on digital devices from entertainment devices to convenience
Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University./ He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact
) through the BS-CS curriculum. Our approach assumes a mapping of our SOs tothe ABET/CAC 2010 Student Outcomes1, and evaluates them by application of a rubric.However, our rubric has a different structure to the one presented by Bailie et al.6.2.2 Assessment of Senior ProjectsClear et al.7 present a report that assists instructors to design, implement and assess capstonecourses. The report is a valuable resource for departments starting a new capstone course.Richards9 describes the key design choices of a project-based course, focusing on thecomposition of the groups and the issues surrounding assessment. Both Clear et al. 7 andRichards 9 provide comprehensive descriptions of the assessment of projects but there is nodescription of how the capstone
Delaware Center for Contemporary Art and The New Galley (Calgary, ON).Kirk W Cameron Kirk W. Cameron is a Professor of Computer Science and a Research Fellow in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. The central theme of his research is to improve power and performance efficiency in high performance computing (HPC) systems and applications. Prof. Cameron is a pioneer and leading expert in Green Computing. Cameron is also the Green IT colum- nist for IEEE Computer, Green500 co-founder, founding member of SPECPower, EPA consultant,Uptime Institute Fellow, and co-founder of power management software startup company MiserWare. His advanced power measurement software infrastructure for research, (PowerPack), is
2006-1354: THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT: CATALYST ORINHIBITOR TO STUDENTS' CONFIDENCE IN SUCCESS?Deborah Follman, Purdue University Deborah K. Follman is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University in 1994 and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University in 2000. Her research interests include engineering education and gender equity, specifically regarding self-efficacy, issues of gender on student cooperative learning teams, and curriculum development.George Bodner, Purdue University George M. Bodner is the Arthur E. Kelly Professor of Chemistry, Education
“and that's why we’re emphasizing math and science. That's why we’re emphasizingteaching girls math and science.” This was followed by the White House creation of theSTEM Master Teacher Corp as a new initiative in July 2012. However, it is still not wellunderstood exactly what factors affect persistence in undergraduate STEM majors andwhere the focus should be placed in order to improve persistence. There is a need forfurther research to help shape policies directed at improving the participation of womenin STEM undergraduate studies.NSF-20122 data for the 2009 high school graduating class showed that women are nowwell represented in advanced math and science high school courses. Table 1 presents thepercentage of male and female students that
students’ achievement in theirengineering discipline. Educational background is been identifying as a determinant factor toreach a success career. Concerns about weaknesses in HS education that limit students successin the initial years of study in an engineering school, have generated research interest. Severalstudies have been undertaken at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez around this subject,utilizing different methods of data collection like, surveys, professor’s observations, datainferences and statistics, but no one has used a focus group approach. The next section brieflydescribes de methodology used. Page 12.818.5III
the Heart Monitor-EKG Modules Page 12.285.13 Heart Monitors 2003-06- What did you learn in this module? Specific Soldering Engineering Safety Heart College Life/ New Language/ Engineering Building Issues Function/ Social Terms Science Content Science Medical Process ApplicationsF 5 6 5 1 5 0 1 22% 26
contrast to human graders. The objective of this study is to evaluate thestrengths and weaknesses of both human and software grading of student's 3D CAD. The humanand software grading practices are evaluated by comparing scores on grading items for threeassignments which accounts for 9% of the course grade. Software and TA disagreement wasinvestigated by one of the experienced faculty instructors of the class. Next, the TA graders wereevaluated by comparing the number and types of errors that they made relative to each other. Adescription of the methods used to compare the human graders with the software graders isprovided with results for three assignments.MethodsTo evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of both human and software grading of
have yetto be realized, but there is hope that at least some of the proposed policies will beapproved by the conclusion of this last no-cost extension year. Assessment suggests thata significant portion of faculty (both male and female) do not feel that the campuscurrently has an adequate number of worklife policies, with less (15%) female facultyversus male (54%) faculty agreeing that existing policies are sufficient. Similarpercentages (15% for female faculty and 46% for male faculty) felt that faculty in theirdepartment are well-informed about campus worklife policies. Interviews suggest thatsome campus administrators are concerned that the lack of worklife policies may impedetheir ability to attract and retain new faculty, especially
track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
or depression in this industry that seems to be very common so you need to make sure that whatever you're doing it seems to make you happy and to make sure that you don't stay in it if it’s not making you happy.” (Grace, Women’s)A large number of individuals interviewed spoke to Extreme Pressure on the job. 44% expressedthis negative work environment issue in either their past or present employment experiences andindicated that Extreme Pressure is a significant concern for their ability to balance work andpersonal life, perform, meet deadlines, and stay healthy.Men as well as women had experiences in all but one of the five primary negative workplacecategories. In combination, results from Tables 3 and 4 are used as
Transformation Guided by a Multi-Frame Organizational Analysis ApproachAbstractThe goal of an ongoing institutional transformation project (NSF ADVANCE #1209115) at alarge private university (hereafter referred to as LPU) is to increase the representation andadvancement of women STEM faculty widely by removing barriers to resources that supportcareer success and by creating new interventions and resources. An additional goal is to adaptinterventions to address the needs of key subpopulations classified by ethnicity or hearing status.The work of the project, which began in 2012, is to: 1) refine and strengthen targetedinstitutional structures; 2) improve the quality of women faculty’s work lives; 3) aligninstitutional
embarked on a targeted growthprocess in these four areas, by creating new faculty positions and supporting those new positionswith a commensurate growth in student body and new research facilities. The increased focus onenergy and environment research has also brought into play a closer partnership with theUniversity’s Bendheim Center for Finance, because of the inherent challenges in financialengineering posed by carbon trading or the effects of bio-fuel production on commodity prices.These new and emerging research areas required enhanced collections, and in 2007, duringinformal discussions with departmental chairs and with faculty members, it was acknowledgedthat the library’s journal collection (print and electronic) was comprehensive in
depend on the availability of skilled andcompetent engineers. In response to the increasing demand for engineering professionals, severalinstitutions of higher learning that traditionally offered degree programs in the liberal arts havestarted or are now planning to offer engineering degree programs1. This paper discusses thedevelopment of a new Electrical and Computer Engineering program within a long establisheduniversity.The establishment of a new program in any area demands consideration of several options andleads to choices on many different issues. Accreditation of the new program in due time is aprimary concern; therefore, some guidance is drawn from various requirements for accreditationas provided by the Accreditation Board for
my reputation within the university Improved research proposals Use my research in practice Better quality publications Gain new insights for research Concern for students and employees Contribute to the mission of the university Provide stable employment for PhD students and Address societal challenges and issues postdocs Spinoff experience steppingstone for jobs Iorioa Labory Rentocchini, 2017 Technology diffusion Funding Dissemination of research beyond the university Financial compensation of the
. Page 25.75.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Multidisciplinary Global Health Course with an Integrated International Field ExperienceAbstractA new global health course was recently developed and implemented at Western New EnglandUniversity. The course brought together students from a variety of disciplines and academiclevels to study issues related to healthcare from a global perspective. The centerpiece of thecourse was a faculty-led field experience in Guatemala that occurred at the end of the semester.During the field experience, the students visited clinical care facilities where they conducted aneeds assessment by interviewing and surveying administrators
undergraduate students in their researchwork. This is a work in progress, but 50 responses have been collected so far across fouruniversities. Figure 2 shows faculty responses to the question: “What is your biggest concernabout working with undergraduate students?” The results indicated the most significant concern(45% of the responses) is “Short duration (no deep / prolonged engagement)” Many students findout about research opportunities when they are juniors or seniors, and close to graduation. As aresult, it is worthwhile to communicate research opportunities to students earlier in theirundergraduate study to address this common concern. Figure 2. Faculty Responses to Question “What is your biggest concern about working with
the transport and fate of contaminants in groundwater and surface water systems, as well as engineering education reform.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion
will still be delivered in the revisedworkshop, however, based on the recommendations of the Mentor TAs, additional effort will bemade to provide more content regarding feedback and normalization of grading.Looking beyond the current introductory course, the authors would like to extend this program toall TAs within the College of Engineering. Providing students with a foundational understandingof what is expected of a TA, and how to be an effective TA can only improve the experience forthe TA, the faculty member teaching the course, as well as the students taking the course.Furthermore, given the recent concerns about cross-listed courses within the University’s LMS 2with respect to privacy laws, similar issues could ultimately limit what
graduate school 3.76 3. Able to prepare students for work experience 3.55 4. Able to work one-on-one with a student 3.42 5. Receive help from undergraduates on research 2.97 6. Students bring new ideas to research 2.50 7. Viewed positively for merit/annual review 3.21 8. Receive credit toward tenure 2.76Many faculty get personal satisfaction working with undergraduates on research which is at thetop of the list. Supervising undergraduates gives the faculty member professional andintellectual growth. Biddie and Collins also surveyed barriers to faculty working withundergraduates in research. The list below uses