Paper ID #37877Producibility and Future Artifacts: Students ConsideringManufacturing Lightsabers, Magic Wands, and OtherFantastical ProductsJarod White (Mr.) (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology) Jarod recently graduated B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from SD Mines. While at mines Jarod participated in undergrad research related to engineering education with Dr. Micah Lande in the HELLO Lab.Micah Lande (Assistant Professor) Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines &
Session 0575 Suggestions for Teaching the Engineering Research Process David J. Lilja University of MinnesotaAbstract: In the process of becoming engineering educators, most professors have successfullydeveloped some fundamental skills that are necessary (although not sufficient) to become asuccessful researcher. However, they often have no clear idea of how to pass this knowledgealong to their students beyond the general approach of carefully guiding their students’individual research efforts. A sense of not knowing where to begin this type of mentoringprocess can
educational methods, students are forced to process infor-mation and learn predominantly with the brain’s left hemisphere. Most of what engineering students mustlearn, however, requires them to develop right-brain processing skills. This leads to a fundamental incompati-bility in the general learning process, an incompatibility which is particularly acute in engineering education:right-brain processing funneled through left-brain "sequential I/O" (i.e., printed text). In contrast, visual mediaprovide a direct, "parallel I/O" path to the brain’s right hemisphere. Clearly, in an increasingly vigorous visualculture, use of visual media as an integral part of instructional delivery — for presentation of lecture material aswell as for interactive, self
AC 2012-3970: 3RS FOR ENGINEERING SCHOLARS: RESPONSIBILI-TIES, REPERCUSSIONS, AND REMEDIES ASSOCIATED WITH PRO-FESSIONAL PLAGIARISMMs. Susan H. Sarapin M.A., Purdue University Susan Sarapin is a doctoral candidate in Purdue University’s Brian Lamb School of Communication Divi- sion of Media, Technology, and Society. She studies the effects of TV viewing on the public’s perceptions of and attitudes toward crime, criminals, and the justice system. This extends to the exploration of persua- sion in the courtroom and the lay public’s understanding of scientific concepts, statistics, and techniques. Sarapin intends to combine teaching, research, mentoring undergraduate and graduate research, and con- sulting
process for the program differs at eachuniversity. However, each university maintains the same foundational selection criteria.Students who have expressed an interest in engineering or computer science are selected for theprogram based on their Pell Grant-eligibility, graduation from a Washington high school where30 percent or more of the students receive free or reduced-price lunch, and the review of theirprogram application. The application involves an interest form, three essays, and an interview.At WSU (which is on a semester system), owing to the limited information provided onapplications, a list of students who are potentially eligible was not generated until May when PellGrant eligibility becomes available. Consequently, eligible students
general progress. ¾Students have an opportunity to look at and reflect on everything that they have been doing. ¾For programmatic assessment, the nonselective portfolio provides an overview of the types and amount of writing required in a particular course. ¾Students could use the portfolio to their advantage in “selling” their prospective Page 2.481.2 employer or graduate school on the types and quality of writing they have been doing.However, there are also disadvantages to using the nonselective portfolio approach: ¾The sheer bulk of the portfolio may be overwhelming
in the classroom is crucial and contagious, new teachers from industry must“lighten up” and relax. The overall atmosphere is set primarily by the instructor. New educatorscoming directly from industry must quickly make the transition to a type of work that is verydifferent and employs different methods of achieving the desired objectives. Students react bestto a friendly setting with controls employed only as required to maintain class discipline.Without sacrificing quality and quantity of material covered, new instructors may need to slowthe pace and demands on students, for they are not graduate engineers working full-time on anassigned project. On the other hand, educators with industry experience have a distinct advantagein the classroom
ofthe analysis or be an independent attribute. These are real differences which reflect actualindustry practice.However, this insight reveals two problems in engineering economics education. The first is thatATA is not part of the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam (see reference7 page 551) and thesecond is that CEA and MAA are generally not taught in undergraduate engineering economicscourses.A trend in engineering economics education is to teach undergraduates Fundamentals. A reviewof typical fundamental engineering economic texts7 and widely used engineering texts6 indicatesthat topics like Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Multi-Attribute Analysis (MAA) are notincluded. Also not included are realistic examples or cases which
. dissertation was on germanium preamorphization and rapid thermal annealing for formation of ultra-shallow source/drain junctions. After graduation, he joined the faculty at North Carolina State University where he is now a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. He became a presidential faculty fellow in 1995. Dr. Ozturk authored over 100 papers in journals and conference proceedings and holds 8 US patents. His current research interests center around advanced processes for new silicon based nanoelectronic devices, and innovations in undergraduate education in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Michael Escuti, North Carolina State University Michael Escuti received the BS degree in Electrical and
offering graduate school research experience, improving students’ academicperformance and confidence, and having a lasting impact on their career paths2. Hirsch et al.suggested that their REU program could provide preparing undergraduates to be more capablemembers of their profession3. Further, it was found that most participants in a summer researchprogram in electrical engineering for minorities at Georgia Tech were either enrolled in graduateschool or were planning to enroll within the next two years4.Sores stated that Florida A&M University senior design projects used C-Stamp microcontrollersrather than topic-specific microcontroller for robot design. He also stated that C-Stampmicrocontrollers are more student-friendly and allowed
administrationoutcome are incorporated into new outcome on engineering economics, along with the teamworkand leadership outcome and the aforementioned professional responsibilities outcome. TheCEBOK3TC, based on input from constituency groups and review of related literature, did notfeel these topics rose to the level of importance to the entire civil engineering profession to bestand-alone outcomes [2, 3, 9].Why is affective domain included for some outcomes?The affective domain was introduced for the CEBOK in Appendix G of CEBOK2; however, itwas not included as a formal part of the CEBOK2 [8]. The CEBOK3TC felt it important in theevolution of the CEBOK and for the development of the next generation of civil engineering, toformally include both the cognitive
introduction of teamwork skills. Early in the semester the students aredivided into teams to complete several assignments including building a simple robot.II. University College 101The university college course (UC101) is required for all beginning freshman and transferstudents with less than 24 hours of course credit who are enrolled full-time. All sections use atleast 50% of class time to cover core content and approximately 25% of class time on the LibraryMedia Education component. This course is designed to enhance student success, retention andgraduation. Through active learning, students develop effective study skills, library researchskills, management of time and resources, and enhance personal lifestyles through wellnessactivities and campus
Paper ID #22872Usability of a Mobile Augmented Reality Application to Teach StructuralAnalysisDr. Aliye Karabulut Ilgu, Iowa State University Dr. Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu is a lecturer in the department of Civil, Construction and Environmental En- gineering at Iowa State University. Her background is in Curriculum and Instruction, and her research interests include online learning, hybrid learning, and technology integration in higher education.Elizabeth MillerMs. Suhan Yao, Iowa State University Suhan Yao is a graduating master student in the Curriculum and Instructional Technology program at Iowa State University. She
education for student growth and societal advances. While directing the Micro Medical Device Engineering Research Labo- ratory (M.D. – ERL), she has managed, as PI or co-PI, ˜$13 million, yielding 93 research graduates*, a patent, and >100 publications [*12 PhDs (64% women, 18%UR)]. Her favorite quote is by Ray Mc- Dermott, ”Culture is not a past cause to a current self. Culture is the current challenge to possible future selves.”Sonia Goltz, Michigan Tech Sonia Goltz earned her PhD in industrial/organizational psychology at Purdue University and is the Mickus Endowed Faculty Fellow of Business Impact in the College of Business at Michigan Tech, where she has served as Co-PI on two NSF ADVANCE grants.andrew storer
inspection)• machine vision for quality and process control• reliability, as related to, for example, hot spots developed by printed circuit boards and solar modules operating in the field.The skills and knowledge gained with these topics will reinforce a host of supporting andrelated STEM subjects, meeting the needs of a diverse undergraduate engineeringaudience. All of these topics can be profitably taught in a unified manner by analyzingsolar cells or solar modules in various stages of fabrication using a CCD or CMOScamera, widely available image analysis software, and increasingly affordable high-performance thermal cameras. These educational modules may serve as the basis ofcourses in photovoltaics, image processing and machine vision, and non
and then equipping them with the ability to engage that workwith competence and insight. Learning taxonomies are tools that can be used to categorize thecognitive levels at which learners are engaging with material as a means of providing structureand metrics to the educational process, with achievement at higher levels of a taxonomygenerally corresponding to the desired intellectual abilities for practicing engineers [1, 2, 3].The general consensus among engineering educators has long been that creative, practical, andactive educational methods are needed in order to produce engineers who are well-prepared forthe workplace. Presenting students with problems and projects, laboratory experiences, designchallenges, group work, and other
. Page 25.1009.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Online Teaching of Senior ProjectsAbstractThe senior projects course is an important assessment tool for technology related majors. Almostevery university uses this course for evaluating graduates. The requirements for onsite teachingcan vary from university to university. Often, the course consists of research on a selected topic,design, presentation for review by judges (faculty, staff, and industry representative), and a finaldocument. Although there is much information about senior projects requirements, there are nosuggestions for teaching this course online. The following paper is a proposal of a model forpurely
aftertreatment.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers
upfront time investment to prepare the online content and delivery methods,as well as generate new example problems for class, the flipped classroom approach allowed thestudents and instructor to discuss a wider variety of applications in class. The instructorwitnessed more critical thinking as the students discussed solution techniques and appropriatesimplifications for changing systems. Peer learning occurred both in intra- and inter-groupdiscussions in class. Students had more opportunities to learn from applying the material and © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 31629making mistakes. The instructor found this to be particularly
-robot interactions [10-12]. Despite therapid growth of this field, accessible educational resources for both students and faculty remainlimited. To meet the evolving demands of U.S. companies and government agencies, theengineering workforce must be equipped with advanced skills and knowledge that supporteconomic growth and sustain competitive advantages. Engineering education, therefore, mustevolve alongside rapid technological advancements, especially in next-generation disciplines likesoft robotics where traditional rigid-body assumptions no longer apply. Soft robotics presentsunique challenges in dynamics, material properties, and control systems, requiring an educationalapproach that bridges theoretical concepts with practical
, contextual characteristic is that our students spend most of their first twoyears taking foundational Math, Physics, English, Science and other general university-requiredliberal arts courses. Therefore, as a program we are constrained to placing Introduction toCircuits in the second semester of junior year. While this is later than at some other institutions`(where a course like this can be taken at the sophomore or even freshman level), it presentsopportunities to cover topics in the context of other Mechanical Engineering subjects. Someexamples are fluid flow/pressure analogies, dynamic characteristics of DC motors andapplication of the design process towards the circuit design project.While general demographics and academic characteristics of
as well asthe engagement and peer collaboration it drove. The majority also identified the relevance ofthe course to their futures, including both industry and graduate school. The course was also afirst-time introduction to smart grids for several of the students.References[1] ABET, "Mapping Between ABET Criteria," [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/C3_C5_mapping_SEC_1-13-2018.pdf. [Accessed 13 January 2019].[2] R. Clark and S. Dickerson, "A Case Study of Post-Workshop Use of Simple Active Learning in an Introductory Computing Sequence," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 167-176.[3] K. Neuendorf, The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.[4
thederivation and the application are embedded in the regular engineering mathematics course inthe third semester of undergraduate study.In addition, a computer program has been presented that visualizes user-defined and, ingeneral, oblique-angled basis vectors, and plots the associated dual basis vectors. These basisvectors can be manipulated interactively by mouse drag and the associated dual basis vectorsare modified simultaneously by the program. Position vectors can be inserted and their co-and contravariant components are computed and displayed. Furthermore, general rotations ofa Cartesian coordinate frame, described by Euler angles, can be performed.This approach provides an early and playful access to higher semester topics without
Engineering at Valparaiso University. Dr. Freeman joined the faculty in 2003. As a graduate student and Lecturer at Iowa State University, Dr. Freeman worked with three engineering-oriented learning communities. Dr. Freeman is currently the Vice-Chair of the Calumet Section of IEEE. Page 11.105.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION TOOLFOR AN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LEARNING COMMUNITY Page 11.105.2IntroductionIn the changing technological environment of the early 21st century, all technical and non-technical
1 Managing and Assessing Senior Project Capstone Design by Implementing ABET Criteria Hani Sait1 and Raja, Hamzah,R.I.2 1 Kung Abdulaziz University- Rabigh 2 University of Technology MalysiaAbstractPrior studies on educational engineering has shown that the graduates from engineering collegeswere lack of practical skills which are not given enough attention in the existing curriculum ofengineering. From this study, it has been shown that Senior Project Capstone
. 59 Figure 3: Curve matching of enlarged type-curve and drawdown plots3. An Instructional Tool for Teaching Theis Graphical Method of Estimating Aquifer Parameters Theis method of estimating aquifer parameters is a major topic in groundwater and/orhydrogeology courses. The method requires matching a type-curve to a data generated curve asdescribed in the previous section. Teaching Theis method is often cumbersome because of thedifficulty of showing the curve matching using graph sheets, one transparent and one opaque.We have demonstrated a method of accomplishing good curve matching using exclusivelyMicrosoft EXCEL software which is generally
others) work together.Their work starts early in the design process and extends through the time of full scale production. Theseteams are known to decrease time-to-market, reduce costs, and improve quality. Terms such as concurrentengineering, simultaneous engineering, and integrated product development have been used to describe thework performed by these product design teams. Engineering education has been slow to follow this trend. For the most part, students take courses andperform laboratory exercises in their chosen major, with little exposure to other disciplines. They rarely, ifever, work together with students from other disciplines. There are numerous reasons for this phenomenon.On one hand, the scope of required topics has
unadopted view Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society of Engineering Educationin academia. This paper discusses how inner conflict helps learning. We also provide a simplemodel with strategies how to create a course around this thesis and how to regulate the level ofconflict in the course. We support our assertions with examples from a junior-levelundergraduate software-engineering course taught at the University of Washington in 2002.By conflict, we mean the inner feeling when, informally speaking, a person is not getting whatthey want. This is closest to Merriam-Webster’s12 definition 2b: 1: Fight, battle, war 2a
Paper ID #27217Student Perspectives on the Use of iPads for Navigating Construction Draw-ings: A Case StudyDr. Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University Tom Leathem is an Assistant Professor in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn Univer- sity where he teaches courses in Estimating, Construction Documents, Scheduling, and Project Delivery. He has 11 years industry experience in commercial construction management, holds a Ph.D. in Educa- tion, an M.S. in Integrated Design & Construction, and a B.S. in Construction Management. His areas of research include construction education, assessment, accreditation
. At thisinstitution, 32 credit hours of general education are required, not including the math and sciencerequirements which are already covered by ABET. This is above the national average forengineering programs which is 26.7 hours7. The joint nature of the engineering programsrequires each student to take 16 to 18 credit hours via ITV from the partner institution. These 3constraining factors account for approximately 110 to 112 credit hours of the engineeringprograms. With each of the programs requiring just over 130 credit hours, this providesapproximately 8 courses in which technical electives, advanced topics, and capstone courses canbe delivered. So while it has been shown that cross disciplinary projects can be very effective,proper