Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
17
10.18260/1-2--41644
https://peer.asee.org/41644
268
Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and making processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University.
Jarod recently graduated B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from SD Mines. While at mines Jarod participated in undergrad research related to engineering education with Dr. Micah Lande in the HELLO Lab.
Engineers often make great entrepreneurs. This is because they are to rapidly prototype and design products for any number of markets. Although most engineers have the aptitude to directly influence the economy, they often need training with business ideas. The idea of the triple constraint is integral in the business and manufacturing worlds. This is the idea where production can happen with the features of fast, good, or cheap (time, scope, cost); one is optimized, the second constrained, the third left to be. A different but similar concept are the design ideas of feasibility (technological capabilities), viability (profitable), and desirability (do people want it). In any basic conversation one may begin to link the design concepts (design triad) and iron triangle.
This exploratory research project introduces a class implementation of a future-oriented redesign project in a design for manufacturing (DFM) course. The ideas of the triple constraint and design triad are used to review how junior level engineering students design and think about future products. Research was geared toward the outcomes students produced using basic design for manufacture concepts and how they thought about future products based in a coupling of design and business ideas. The artifacts allowed for a dive into how engineering students conceive the future and their understanding of what is currently possible, soon to be so, and incredibly far off.
Lande, M., & White, J. (2022, August), Producibility and Future Artifacts: Students Considering Manufacturing Lightsabers, Magic Wands, and Other Fantastical Products Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41644
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015