active learning session to students, placing heavy emphasis on the breadth of information resources available for engineering design research beyond what can be found through Google. The session was designed to build on university general education information literacy outcomes. Student research assignments completed after the library session were analyzed using an information literacy rubric. Based on the results, librarians collaborated with the course instructor to modify the Fall 2013 library session to place the heaviest emphasis on search strategy development, rather than the breadth of information resources, and adapt the research assignment requirements. The revised session also aligned with the Searching as Strategic Exploration
hasspecifically been demonstrated that the incorporation of failure case studies into this course hassupported the “Professional Component” of the engineering technology curriculum4.A study of the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 (WTC 1 and WTC 2) collapse has beensuccessfully used in this course to illustrate a number of key concepts supporting technicalcourse objectives, as well as reinforcing professional components of the engineering professionand forensics. This particular case study is seems to be particularly engaging to students becausethe event occurred during their lifetime, and the impacts of this event are still being felt.Presented during the first two sessions of the course, the WTC collapse case study immediatelyengages students
classroom sessions. To handle the larger enrollment in Spring2015, distinct separation of lectures and flipped classrooms (discussions) was needed. Upperadministration has become involved to bend the rules, allowing the course to be scheduled as 2lectures and 2 discussions per week in order to continue to evaluate the flipped classroominnovations. In addition, cross-campus scheduling demands do not allow for much considerationof specific classroom needs. To ensure that all flipped classroom sessions could be held in asuitable space, we renovated a classroom that was under the scheduling control of the departmentfor this purpose.In our opinion, our generation is on the cusp of a revolution in engineering education, withregards to technical content
emphasis and 12 or more credits in a pre-approved concentration either within orexternal to engineering (Figure 1). Figure 1: The Engineering Plus (e+) program design.Concentrations must be a meaningful sequence of courses, either technical or non-technical innature, and traditionally culminate in a 4000-level course. To date, 17 concentrations have beenapproved for the major, including CU Teach Engineering (the first concentration), environmentalpolicy, entrepreneurship, Spanish and Latin American cultures, pre medical, and technology arts& media, with the option for students to propose new concentrations, subject to programapproval (see Appendix B for a complete list of approved concentrations).The first students
detail below.Lectures Currently, the course is based on the textbook Electronic Communications: A SystemsApproach by Beasley, Hymer, and Miller and published through Prentice Hall.6 The courseessentially covers the first eight chapters of the text. Because the book is written at a fairly highlevel, the course is augmented by more in-depth material on actual communication electronicsdesign. Table 1 outlines the weekly topics that are introduced in the two weekly lecture sessions. Table 1. Weekly Lecture TopicsWeek Topic1 Signals in the Time Domain, Log Units, Noise2 Information, Mixing3 Modulation, Analog4 Modulation, Digital5 Basic
systems and techniques, as well as to teach them about the effects ofwelding parameters on quality. In order to improve the lab experience, a survey was takenregarding the student anticipation of the experience, and the results are shared and discussed.Suggestions for the improvement of the lab experience for the students using this system aremade.Introduction and BackgroundVirtual reality (VR) is an interactive computer-generated experience taking place within asimulated environment that incorporates mainly auditory and visual sensory feedback [1].Typically via a worn headset, a VR system ‘immerses’ the user in a computer-generatedgraphical user interface (GUI) that can be interacted with. Though it is most widely used in theentertainment
design, sustainable design, and energy auditing. Reviewing architectural, mechanical, or electrical plans and specifications to evaluate energy efficiency or determine economic, service, or engineering feasibility. Compiling, analyzing, and interpreting graphical representations of energy data, using generic as well as application-specific engineering software. Performing energy modeling and validating results with appropriate measurements. Making recommendations regarding energy fuel selection. Preparing feasibility reports and other technical documentation. Page 26.357.2 Promoting awareness
geographic boundaries3. The most important and relevanttopics were breakout sessions and included application, users, education, and future researchdirections. Part of the education breakout sessions addressed the appropriate academicbackground or experiences and also how to structure HRI education in the future. There was aconsensus that a variety of academic backgrounds or disciplines are necessary for a successfulteam in HRI research. It was also integral that there was a common language so that thesevarious disciplines could communicate and collaborate. One of the challenges to education is theability of technical and non-technical students to take coursework in other disciplines to educatethemselves on other relevant aspects of HRI. The course
Page 26.485.3by following PD of a learning analytics dashboard for undergraduate engineers. Figure 1. Summary of a human centered learning analytics approach, which guides our work.Data and MethodsIn this paper we report on the approach we took in our first PD session held in Summer 2014with a group of eight engineering students enrolled in a first year general engineering course.Our objective is to demonstrate the PD process and describe example findings that emerged fromthis kind of design approach that traditional learning analytics approaches may have missed. Wedo not seek to generalize findings nor are at the stage of full dashboard development andimplementation.Researchers in attendance who participated in discussions and took field
team. Table 2: Engineering skills assessment Importance for Self-DevelopmentSkills Engineering Score (Rate yourself (Rank 1-22) on a scale of 1-5)1) Problem solving skills a) Ability to be creative b) Think globally c) Think analytically d) Attention to details e) Technical understanding (knowledge of subject) f) Math and science skills2) Project management a) Organizational skills (tasks, deadlines, etc.) b) Organizational skills (people) c) Time management (meeting deadlines and submittals) d) Utilization of resources3
- 8 Antennaslab assignment. For instance, Figure 2(a) 9-10 Heterodyne radioshows the LTspice circuit schematic for a 11-13 Radio enhancement projecttwo stage audio amplifier, while Figure2(b) shows the same circuit after a studentconstructs it on their breadboard.Students begin working in teams of two orthree students when designing and buildingthe antenna. This is good practice for themas the team must then work together for theheterodyne version of the radio, and for thedesign project to enhance their radio. After Figure 1: Block diagram of a generic singlesuccessful completion of this simple station AM radioversion of the radio, students proceed inweeks 9-10 (a
Page 26.333.7tutors are “experts” in their areas (Java, Database, Networking, Programming, etc.). Tutors alsowork with students over two semesters although they are not assigned specific mentees. Theyhold office hours in an open lab, where the students would approach them for technical questionsregarding their courses. Mentors provide guidance for first-year students on their new journey intheir first time at a four-year institution. Each mentor is assigned to a group of mentees, whowould meet with them on a regular basis and provide them guidance on the courses to take andinformation related to the major. To help female students, special sessions were organized in theweek before the final exams in addition to the regular tutoring schedule
to implement N=1 principle. At the end of thecourse, we asked students about the course elements that offered them better learning. Thefeedback highlighted the impact of the principle. While some researchers have questioned theefficacy of learning style assessments 21-22, some others have found them to be helpful 8- 23. Inour experience, they indeed added value. We also asked students about their learnings andfound that they had both technical and non-technical learnings. Their feedback indicates thatwe could leverage the evolving nature of the discipline and provide enough opportunities forself-learning.We argue that principle N=1 will help faculty members in adding value to their students inthe upcoming MOOC (Massive Online Open Courseware
transmitted by thewheel, and bending moment produced by its self-weight, the weight of the wheel and the radialforces of the water jet. The system was designed save money by generating free supplementalelectricity while having a minimal impact on the environment. Table 1. List of the design projects and main components System Components Water Wheel water wheel, the shaft, and the belt system, journal bearings Wind Turbine blades, shaft, tower, Nacelle Tidal Stream cup, axle and vertical shaft and float Generator PV with tracking gimbal, frames, column, beams, housing, base pad and fastener a) Water
participants apply what they learn intheir own teaching context. The advantage of written reflections is that research onmetacognition has shown gains in student learning, performance, and appreciation for the writingskills needed in their field.16, 17This paper will primarily focus on the first ongoing professional development option, thepedagogical workshops offered by the teaching and learning center. In Fall 2013 term, the GSIscould choose one out of the five workshops that were selected by the program organizers to berelevant to engineering GSIs. Page 26.1092.3Table 1 highlights the range of topics and includes the description of each session
summary and changes reflection Review and Final self comment by 2 reflection LC faculty and Instructor review (video with peer comments) Figure 1: The VAPR ProcessThe first stage requires faculty to select which of their class sessions to record for peerreview using MediaNotes software. MediaNotes is a program owned by The Center forComputer-Assisted
format. Most commonly, significantimprovements in exam scores are not observed, but students report preferring the flexible andinteractive nature of the flipped structure13,22. Applications of the flipped classroom environmentin engineering courses have also been observed and recorded25. In this paper, the curriculum assessment of the six discipline-specific topic lessons in E-GIRL is presented. In addition to topic lessons, E-GIRL components include a real-worldmultidisciplinary group project, professional sessions and university information sessions.Detailed descriptions and a general E-GIRL program evaluation are presented in Monaco et al.(2016a)16.MethodologyThe curriculum for E-GIRL aimed to promote interest in engineering among female
, engineering design-based approaches, context-richproblem solving strategies, and real-world applications. All of the foci were ideally suited forhelping K-12 students learn the interdisciplinary integrated STEM concepts now called for in theK-12 standards (e.g. Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards - NGSS). Althoughnot traditionally used in STEM subjects (or explored in this paper), astronomy concepts such asblack holes, distances to other stars, and planets in star systems beyond our own, are inspirationalto K-12 students while being explainable at a technical and quantitative level. Quantitativeassessment methods for the LASSI PD included an external evaluator who asked daily surveyquestions of the participants in the yearlong PD
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto for his work characterizing the motion and mixing of droplets in Digital Microfluidic Devices. He continued as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Toronto where he focused on the design and commercialization of a point of care Digital Microfluidic device. During this time, Dr. Schertzer was also a sessional lecturer at Ryerson University (Toronto, ON) where he taught (1) Integrated Manufacturing and (2) Design of BioMEMS. Since joining RIT, Dr. Schertzer has had the opportunity to teach (1) Thermodynamics I, (2) Engineering Measurements Labo- ratory, and (3) Laboratory Applications in Mechatronics.Dr. Patricia Iglesias, Rochester Institute of
an example of the types of activitiesinvolved. For the shell and tube heat exchanger, Section 1 had two 50 minute sessions withArmfield DLMX apparatuses and the worksheet. In this time the instructor and a number of TAswere present to respond to questions, ask guiding questions, and coach the students through thelearning process. Meanwhile Section 2 received two lectures on the same material. As theinstructor has previously and successfully taught the course with very minimal lecture[1, 10, 18, 19]this was expected to be an equivalent coverage of material between the two sections. For theextended area heat exchanger, both sections had two sessions with the equipment
hardware platform, a trainerboard, to deliver this technical based subject. This trainer board allows all participants to havethe same technical learning environment. In this project, a PIC training system was designedthrough the support of a previous NSF supported grant. The refined microcontroller laboratoryboard includes the following features:All component parts are available from vendor purchases. 1. The system could be used with Microchip (PICKit2, PICKit3)7, NXP/Philips (LPCX)9, and Ardunio systems for programming, simulation operation, and debugging. 2. Power options include +-5V, +-12V, +3.3V, digital and analog I/Os, LCD, and LED displays, RS232 and USB communication capabilities, 2.4GHz wireless module, and high
environments comprising of a democratic or committee nature while goingthrough the entire course.As pointed out by Chung et. al. [2], the most important attributes of a capstone course are [2] thatstudents in general should: 1. Have an insightful design project to be done as a team. 2. Be required to focus on knowledge gained throughout the curriculum. 3. Solve problems that represent real-life engineering. 4. Acquire an understanding of the professional aspects and culture of being an engineer. 5. Learn and practice project proposing, planning and control.The same paper also outlines efforts to understand how students perceive their capstone coursethrough the use of surveys that employ knowledge mapping. This method has limitations of
twoquestions involving either concept understanding or problem solving. The tests had ten to fifteenquestions with similar question format to quizzes. In addition, the exams had a PSpice problemtesting student’s simulation software usage and circuit analysis skills.In the second year implementation, the students were instructed to watch the pre-recorded on-line lectures for each module before face-to-face lecture sessions. The in-class session for eachmodule included: 1. Updated CUSPTM lecture materials to provide additional information. 2. Sample problems and interactive solutions. 3. PSpice simulation examples running on-site from the instructor’s computer.After the completion of each module, a short online concept quiz through BlackboardTM
environments.MethodInstrument A rubric-based approach for assessing energy literacy was first developed by Langfitt,Haselbach, & Hougham15 based on the DOE’s7 framework for energy education. The structure ofthe rubric was borrowed from a rubric used to assess senior design projects in a civil andenvironmental engineering program, and then refined based on work conducted in the area ofscientific understanding and writing24. Subsequent examinations17 and refinements16 of the rubricled to the rubric under examination in the present study. The rubric adopted an analytic style19,with scores assigned to each of six energy literacy dimensions—1) Issue, 2) Solution, 3) Impacts,4) Stakeholders, 5) Technical Concepts, and 6) Outside Information. Appendix A displays
tutoring, as well assurveys administered to the peer tutors. The data collected was analyzed to determine how the center was being utilized. Thepopulation of students utilizing tutoring services through the engineering tutoring center wascompared with the general College of Engineering student population. Additionally, student andtutor survey results showed that both students and tutors believed that the students’understanding of course material was stronger after a tutoring session. Initial analyses show thatstudents who attend tutoring perform slightly better than students who do not attend tutoring in aspecific course, but future work will focus on fully understanding the effect of tutoring on astudent’s grade point average and
) Figure 1: M.Eng. Program Focus ComparisonAnother challenge surfaces when comparing the differences in program flexibility of ourprofessional master’s programs. As shown in Figure 2, our four M.Eng. programs vary slightly inhow they are delivered. The Technical Entrepreneurship program can be completed on-campusin one year and has perhaps the most rigid scheduled curriculum. As such, there is currently nopart-time option for working professionals. Thus, recent graduates who are seeking a graduatedegree before either starting their own company or heading into industry are the primary targetfor this program.On the other end, the Healthcare Systems Engineering program has both on-campus and onlineoptions. In addition to actively recruiting recent
concepts are introduced followed by one or two example problems that are solved duringthe class session [1]. It was long felt by engineering professors that this method was the mosteffective in covering the large amount of required material in time periods allotted for the course[2, 3] . Since large amounts of information can be given by the lecturer in relatively short periodsof time, the historical belief has been that this is the most effective means of teaching thematerial. Mejias [3] argues that this belief, however, is predicated on the assumption thatstudents are “empty receptacles waiting to be filled with knowledge.” Borrego and Bernhard [4]found that “lectures are an efficient means of delivering material to large numbers of
thoseprocesses, quality assurance, and safety; followed by more in-depth study of automation andinstrumentation, metrology, process improvements, total predictive maintenance, technicalmanagement competencies, as well as quality work practices utilizing Lean and Six Sigmaprinciples. Students develop both technical skills and the management competencies needed toadvance efficient and effective performance within advanced manufacturing entities. Theprogram is structured such that a student typically takes general education courses and atechnical core in their first year of study. This is followed in the second year by taking technicalcourses in an area of specialization that meets local needs.The Maintenance Combination Craft Apprenticeship program
courses offered in the program.IntroductionTechnology and engineering programs in many higher education institutions are developingalternative energy-related curricula in classes, projects, training, and certification programs. REteaching systems and projects help students to better comprehend complex concepts by includinga renewable energy project or series of laboratory experiments. The importance of experientialactivities such as laboratory sessions is highlighted by many authors [1-8]. Energy knowledgeand renewable energy-based projects are important in order to prepare students to be competitivefor careers in the growing fields of energy related engineering, science, and technology.Preliminary projections from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
students to collectinformation about the course. Moreover, during the Fall 2015 semester, survey data wascollected from the students following each of the lab experiments. The lab benches for theexperiments as well as the USRP equipment from NI are illustrated in Figure 1. (a) Lab benches with USRPs. (b) USRP from National Instruments. Figure 1 Lab benches for experiments with USRPs, and a closer view of USRP SDR from National Instruments. The course involves two components: In-class lecturing (two 75 minute sessions perweek), and bi-weekly lab experiments. The students are grouped in pairs. There are a total of 5lab experiments that the students need to finish. Each lab