. Martinazzi, R., Samples, J., “Characteristics and Traits of an Effective Professor”, Proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education, 2000.MAHER MURAD is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh atJohnstown. Dr. Murad was a visiting assistant professor at Bucknell University. He also worked as a highwayproject manager for Acer Freeman Fox International (Hyder Consulting). He received M.S. degree in CivilEngineering from the University of Toledo in 1987 and a Ph.D. in Engineering Science from the University ofToledo in 1994.ROBERT MARTINAZZI is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University ofPittsburgh at Johnstown. He possesses a B.S. Aerospace Engineering from the
Paper ID #40864Discussion Questions As Metacognitive ExercisesProf. Autar Kaw, University of South Florida Autar Kaw is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of South Florida whose scholarly interests include engineering education research, adaptive, blended, and flipped learning, open courseware development, composite materials mechanics, and bascule bridge design. His work has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Florida Department of Trans- portation, and Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Under Professor Kaw’s leadership and funding from NSF, he
accessing resourcesduring the pandemic (shown earlier in Table 2), a higher proportion of the respondents favouredthe engineering school’s internal teaching support over campus-wide support (Table 7).Table 7. Likelihood for accessing various instructional development resources in the future % of those having Resources n indicated 5, 6 or 7 Online resources provided by the engineering school’s education technology office 76 58% Newsletters offered by the engineering school’s education technology office
further data to be gathered. However, we hope this work showcases howindustry can support curriculum development to further ensure young engineers’ success.References[1] T. T. York, C. Gibson, and S. Rankin, “Defining and measuring academic success,” Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 5, 2019.[2] G. D. Kuh, J. L. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek, What matters to student success: A review of the literature, vol. 8. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Washington, DC, 2006.[3] “IET skills and demand in industry 2021 survey,” 2021.[4] D. I. Spang, “Curriculum design and assessment to address the industry skills gap,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference &
University at Albany), RPI’sNanoscale Science and Engineering Center (funded by NSF), the GE Global Research Center,nearby IBM laboratories, the Wadsworth Center (a NYS operated biology and biotech researchlaboratory), the east coast laboratory of International Sematech (a global consortium thatrepresents about half the world’s semiconductor production), the U.S. research arm of TokyoElectron, Ltd., Evident Technologies (a developer of Quantum Dots and associated with SienaCollege – itself another local resource) and a number of others. Those whom we haveapproached have been willing to cooperate with Union College since they view the currentUnion nano-course as potentially educating a needed emerging class of “nano-savvy” graduates.As can be seen in
. 78, no. 11, p. 1218, oct 2010.[11] N. Mchenry, A. Martin, A. Castaldo, and D. Ziegenfuss, “Learning Assistants Program: Faculty Development for Conceptual Change.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 258–268, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/[12] A. P. Barrasso and K. E. Spilios, “A scoping review of literature assessing the impact of the learning assistant model,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.[13] Y. Min, G. Zhang, R. A. Long, T. J. Anderson, and M. W. Ohland, “Nonparametric survival analysis of the loss rate of undergraduate engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 349–373
advisor, and international consultant with close to ten years of record in sustainable construction engineering and management (by method and material). Dr. Keyvanfar is a dedicated team leader with a current focus on diversity in research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Progressive Insights in use of Machine Learning to Support Student Engagement Diversity: The XYZ EduOwl chatbot Arezou Shafaghat1,2, Mohammad Jonaidi3, Hoseon Lee4, Craig A Chin4 Ali Keyvanfar11 Department of Construction Management, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State University
. 32, pp. 296-301, 1998.5. Barr, R.B. and Tagg, J., From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education, Change, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 12-25, 1995.6. Mazur, E., Peer Instruction, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J, 1997.7. Nash, W.A., Shaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Statics and Mechanics of Materials, International Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 101-103, 1992.ANG KOK KENGK.K. Ang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the National University of Singapore.He received his BEng degree from the University of Singapore, MEng from the National University of Singaporeand PhD from the University of New South Wales, Australia. Professor Ang has been a staff member of theDepartment of
Discipline Boundaries to Improve Mathematics Education, National Science Foundation. 3. Governor Rick Perry’s Math Initiative (2001). 4. Calculus, Concepts, Computers, and Cooperative Learning, The Purdue Calculus Reform Project. 5. Greenberg, William (1999) “Mathematical Analysis in Engineering: Reform of Calculus in the United States, Virginia Tech. Dept of Mathematics. Circuit Maker®, is a registered trademark of Protel International Limited, 5252 N. Edgewood Dr. Suite 175, Provo, Utah 84604 USAJOSE AMIEVAMSEE Jose Amieva currently serves as an Assistant Master Technical Instructor, at the University of Texasat Brownsville, Electronic Engineering Technology Dept. He is, at this time chair of the
manufacturing skills gap: Innovation education solutions’, In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Elsevier.[4] Lynch, P., and F. Aqlan, (2016) ‘Filling the skills gap in U.S. manufacturing: Promoting internships and co-op experiences and integrating Industrial Engineering courses to improve student design and manufacturing knowledge’, Frontiers in Education, IEEE, Erie, PA.[5] Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., and Rockland, R., (2006) ‘Bringing engineering into K-12 schools: A problem looking for solutions’, In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.[6] Wingerter, J., McCorkle, M., Jalali, F., DeVarney, A., and Aqlan, F., (2018) ‘Development of a
the study“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &ExpositionCopyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”was divided into two sets of hypotheses: Hypotheses Set I dealing with students’perceptions of their experiences and Hypotheses Set II dealing with actual studentbehaviors and outcomes. The results of the study yielded both quantitative andqualitative support for the first set of hypotheses; in other words, students in theexperimental section indicated that they experienced higher levels of both academic andsocial integration than did the students in the control section. Table 1 presents asummary of the FSSES items of significance. T-test values for FSSES – Section II item#1
the past 30 years. Professor Zilouchian is currently an associate editor of the International Journal of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering out of Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity (FAU) and a graduate faculty member in both the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the College of Science at FAU.Her research interests address meaningful learning in complex STEM do- mains, applying a learning sciences lens in addressing issues ranging from
Paper ID #25609Board 84: Associations between Veteran and Non-Veteran Student Percep-tions of Social ResponsibilityDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an assistant professor in the civil engineering department at Kansas State University. Dr. Kulesza teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical engineering and is a licensed engineer in the state of Kansas.Dr. Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University Jia Grace Liang is a faculty in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (USA). Her research interests focus on school leadership, professional development
Engineers:Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED) Program Solicitation.” Accessed:Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/iusepfe-red-iuseprofessional-formation-engineers-revolutionizing/nsf24-564/solicitation[2] F. Aloul, I. Zualkernan, G. Husseini, A. El-Hag, and Y. Al-Assaf, “A case study of a college-wide first-year undergraduate engineering course,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 32–51,2015, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.903229.[3] M. V. Jamieson, A. S. Ead, A. Rowe, and J. Miller-Young, “Design at Scale in a First-YearTransdisciplinary Engineering Design Course,” International Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 14--24, 2022.[4] A. Nuñez-Thompson, A. Saterbak, C. Rincon, J. Stelling
issuperior to the traditional tell-and-practice sequence. Journal of educational psychology, 110(4), 596.[3] DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.[4] Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics.International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427-446.[5]Prusty, B. G., & Russell, C. (2011, August). Engaging students in learning threshold concepts in engineeringmechanics: adaptive eLearning tutorials. In 17th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE) (pp. 21-26).[6]Coller, B. D. (2008). An experiment in hands-on learning in engineering mechanics: statics. International Journalof Engineering Education
Analysis; ABET Criterion 1.a, 1.f) ¾ Quiz #8 - Measurable Course Outcome: Calculate internal forces in members of simple structures. (Blooms Taxonomy - Knowledge, comprehension, and Analysis; ABET Page 10.708.3 Criterion 1.a, 1.f) “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” ¾ Quiz #9 - Measurable Course Outcome: Calculate the reactions for simple frame structures. (Blooms Taxonomy - Comprehension and Analysis; ABET Criterion 1.a, 1.f) ¾ Quiz #10 - Measurable Course Outcome: Determine
how I am teaching and how I can improve.” Over 60% of therespondents found the mentoring within the EGSM program the most valuable. It is interesting tonote that all of the respondents who are currently working in industry as a research scientist orengineer found the internal mentoring as one of the most valuable aspects to the training. Webelieve the mentoring that a newly hired engineer or scientist could receive, and subsequently thementoring that these engineers or scientists could provide to others as they progress through theircareers in an industrial setting, can help explain this result.Participation in the practice teaching facilitation training may be perceived as less valuable to thementors (36%), because they are more likely to
University Craig Baudendistel has been teaching for 10 years in the Mechanical Engineering department at Wright State University. He has been heavily involved in first year courses focused on retention. This includes courses in applied mathematics, first-year seminar, programming, and computer aided design. Additionally, he advises 2-3 senior capstone groups per year related to SAE competitions or industry partners like GE Aerospace. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress: College-Wide First Year Seminar Building the Foundation for Career SuccessAbstractThis Work in Progress paper was motivated by understanding the unique challenges
Paper ID #45899BOARD # 422: Post-graduation outcomes of and supervisor satisfaction withgraduates of a National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT)Dr. Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez, University of Kentucky Dr. Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez is PI and project coordinator of a National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) program designed to enhance graduate education by fully integrating research and professional skill development within a diverse, inclusive and supportive academy. Originally from Mexico, Dr. Santillan-Jimenez joined the University of Kentucky (UK) first as an undergraduate research intern and then as
of switches controlling multiple pieces of hardware in afactory setting, the number of relays required would grow exponentially with the difficulty levelof the industrial process. By the 1960s many factories were filling entire cabinets with theserelays, and while relays were convenient for controlling all the different pieces of hardware, theywere often very dangerous and very difficult to troubleshoot [2]. When the first PLC system was Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 2introduced it was met
Students: Tools for Teaching. Josey Bass Publishers: San Francisco. 1993.2. Delson, Nathan J. Increasing Team Motivation in Engineering Design Courses: International Journal of Engineering Education. Volume 17, Nos 4 & 5, pp 359-361, 2001.3. Fowler, W. and Cohen, A. The Texas Space Grant Multi-Disciplinary Design Project. IEEE FIE Proceedings. 19964. Masten, S.J. and Fleisig, R.V. Engaging First Year Students in Engineering Design through Engineers Without Borders. ASEE Engineering Teaching and Learning Practices presentation, St. Lawrence Section Conference, 2007.5. Mullins, D. and Fowler, W. The TSGC Design Challenge Program: A Systems Engineering Design Projects Program. ASEE June 2008.6. Resnick, M.L., Centeno
surveys from other institutions and consultation with faculty from ourcampus with survey expertise, a five-part alumni survey was developed (See Appendix). Eachpart is described briefly in the following paragraphs.Part I. Educational Outcomes – General: This segment focused on the ABET EC2000 Criterion 3Program Outcomes and Assessment. Alumni were asked to rate twenty-five skills, abilities andattributes generally expected of an engineering graduate in two ways. First, they were askedhow important each has been relative to their needs and employment experience sincegraduation. Second, they were asked to rate each item relative to their abilities. Response forImportance was divided into a five segment Lickert scale. For scoring they were weighted
West Point wants to be part of the process. • The United States Military Academy has one of the more broad-based curricula relative to other undergraduate ABET-accredited Civil Engineering programs in the U.S. and therefore has a unique ability to contribute. The program requires 142 credit hours before counting military science and physical education. Outside of the math, science and engineering courses, every student takes English composition and literature (three semesters), world or U.S. history (two semesters), psychology, economics, philosophy, foreign language (two semesters), political science, geography, international relations, leadership, military history (two
this problem - the scope of offered Page 6.1084.1programs and program curricula. The four-year programs are very often criticized for not Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationproviding graduates with absolutely up-to-date knowledge and skills. First of all, universities areunable to keep pace with every narrow and (frequently) ephemeral need. Furthermore, peoplewith narrow technical skills can be in tremendous demand by industry for a time, but these skillsusually become quickly outdated
have co-authored an important number of scientific papers on software engineering, co-chaired several international workshops and conferences, and served in an important number of program committees for international conferences such as the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) and the International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). I am the leader of the continuous improvement and accreditation processes for the Software Systems Engineering program of Universidad Icesi.Ing. Lina M. Quintero, Universidad IcesiProf. Alvaro Pachon, Icesi University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engaging Faculty in Continuous Improvement: the Context
Engineers, 2010.[5] Meadati, P. and Irizarry, J. BIM – A New Teaching Tool. Proceedings of the ASEE Southeast SectionConference, American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[6] Gao, Z., McIntyre, C., and Ge, Z., AC 2012-4868: Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) inTeaching Project Scheduling and Control. Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2012.[7] Hyatt, B.A., A Case Study in Integrating Lean, Green, BIM into an Undergraduate Construction ManagementScheduling Course. Proceedings of the 47th ASC Annual International Conference, Associated Schools ofConstruction, 2011.[8] Gier, D.M., What Impact Does Using Building Information Modeling Have on Teaching Estimating toConstruction Management
= T2 = T3 = JE JE JE TJ i n1i in general: Ti = JE Shearing stresses may be computed directly: Tr1 n11 Tr2 n12 Tr3 n13 τ1 = τ2 = τ3 = JE JE JE Page 6.192.8Procedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Learning In STEAM Education. in Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2014. Jacksonville, Florida: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).7. John C. Bean, D.M., Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. 3rd ed. 2021: Wiley.8. Oktiawan, W., Hadiwodo, M., and Purwono, P., Enhancement Student Understanding Through The Development Of Lab Module Based On Constructivistic, International Journal of Engineering Education, 2019.9. Top 100 Producers of Bachelor's Degrees. 2020, Diverse Issues in Higher Education.10. Woolston, C., Minority representation in US
(IUPUI).References[1] T. Perez, J. G. Cromley, and A. Kaplan, “The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 315–329, 2014.[2] M. Darbeheshti and D. R. Edmonds, “A Creative First-year Program to Improve the Student Retention in Engineering A Creative First-Year Program to Improve the Student Retention in Engineering,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[3] D. K. D. Alfrey and I. U. P. University, “CLEAR Scholars in Engineering: Academic, Career, and Leadership Development to Help Students with Financial Challenges Achieve their Full Academic Potential,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationPedagogical TechniquesIn addition to self-education, instructors including an ethics component in technicalclasses need to reconsider teaching methodology. Ethics education is perfect for activelearning, by enfranchising students in class discussions and case research. For theinstructor accustomed to the lecture-test technique, however, this means giving up adegree of control over the classroom and allowing students to take the lead.Having taught ethics classes for over a decade and integrated ethics into mycommunications classes for even longer, I have learned some valuable lessons. The