number of engineering/design projects that canbe integrated into the structure of classroom activities,4 such as, Rube Goldberg Contraptions,Leonardo da Vinci: The Engineer, Lego Robots, Battle Bots, etc. Specifically, within theconstruction management discipline, few examples of first-year classroom applications areprovided in the literature. These hands-on application within construction education areprimarily focused on the senior capstone experience.10,12,13The basic purpose of this project is two-fold: first, to document current first-year constructionmanagement courses, and second, to develop and deliver a hands-on first-year “constructionmanagement experience” within the framework of CM&E 111
knowledge related to first-year “construction management experience” courses and to disseminate that knowledge to all Construction Management programs that are accredited by the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE).2 To use a construction “toy” (Tektōn Hotel Plaza Set) in innovative ways in the classroom that introduces students to the entire array of construction management functions and responsibilities1,9,11 that are required for a typical construction project, i.e., a “construction management experience.” To promote team building skills and team work15 in an environment that mimics the actual construction management process. To integrate within the revised course the following topics
AC 2007-1926: TEACHING DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE OF MECHANICALSYSTEMSWilliam Waldron, Grand Valley State UniversityPramod Chaphalkar, Grand Valley State UniversityShabbir Choudhuri, Grand Valley State UniversityJohn Farris, Grand Valley State University Page 12.1352.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Teaching Design and Manufacture of Mechanical Systems Using Multidisciplinary TeamsAbstractThe goal of this work is to increase the emphasis on the design and manufacture of mechanicalsystems. To aid in this effort, Mechanical Engineering (ME), Product Design and Manufacturing(PDM) faculty in the School of Engineering at
Chief Technology Officer in the private sector and currently a partner in a small start-up venture. He received his BS degree in electrical engineering (1975) from California State University, Sacramento, and his MS (1980) and DE (1983) degrees in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His educa- tion and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development.Mr. Hassanein Jaleel Radhi, California State University, Fullerton Page 26.533.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Development of
regarding tactical contribution on specific educational issues. • Focus Group – has individuals with a specific demographic mix brought into the university to evaluate or discuss a specific topic. Page 11.327.2Types of advisory boards within the university setting: • Customer Advisory Boards – often a group of the most strategic customers (students and firms that typically hire graduates) gathered to offer perspective concerning curriculum, facilities, or industry issues. Unlike user groups, the intent of this type of board is to build relationships with customers or segments that will most directly impact the future
). Electrical and computer engineering (ECE) was added in 2007 and civilengineering admitted its first class in Fall 2016. As of Fall 2016, the program total enrollment isover 300 students with 16 tenure-track faculty. This institution is a mid-sized, mid-Atlanticinstitution that is primarily focused on undergraduate education. As part of the engineeringcurriculum, all engineering students are required to engage in three semesters of cooperativework experience. Student’s initial co-op semester is the fall after their sophomore year, and thenstudents alternate academic and co-op semesters until graduation. Table 1 below shows thegeneral course layout.Table 1: Schedule of academic and co-op semesters within engineering Fall
Paper ID #20248Lean Six Sigma Case Study within a Public School DistrictMs. Emily M Salmon, Mississippi State University Emily Salmon is a recent graduate of Mississippi State University (MSU) with a bachelor’s in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Research Engineer for MSU’s Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER) located in Vicksburg, MS. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, and modeling and simulations. She received her Six Sigma Black Belt from MSU’s CAVS Extension Center in June 2016 and is currently pursuing her Masters of Engineering at MSU
designed. CAD, which is the use of a wide-range of computer-based tools fordesigning and developing products, is an important geometry-authoring tool for the productlifecycle management. It ranges from 2D vector-based drafting systems to 3D parametric surfaceand solid design modeling systems. In the product lifecycle a physical prototype can be producedfrom drawings or from a computer-aided manufacturing system (CAM). The prototype is thentested for design compliance and produced for mass production in the manufacturing division.When Internet technologies were adopted in the engineering design industry in the 1990's, workin engineering design was restructured. Collaboration is the trend of today in order to benefitboth higher education and
Paper ID #10356Enabling Institute-wide Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Ex-periencesDr. Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. He graduated with a Bachelors Degree in Production Engineering from the University of Mum- bai, India with honors in 2005 and received Masters of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2007 from IIT Bombay, India. He was awarded a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2013, with minors in Entrepreneurship. Dr. Jariwala has more than
Paper ID #17756A Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Experiment to Investigate the Fre-quency Analysis of Bells and Chimes with AssessmentMr. Cody McKenzie, Clemson University I am currently a graduate student pursuing a master’s degree.Dr. Todd Schweisinger, Clemson University Senior Lecturer of Mechanical Engineering and Undergraduate Laboratory CoordinatorDr. John R. Wagner P.E., Clemson University JOHN WAGNER joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson in 1998. He holds B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo and Purdue University. Dr
Director of the Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Before joining UNL, Dr. Rojas was a Professor in the Department of Con- struction Management at the University of Washington (UW), where he was also the Executive Director of the Pacific Northwest Center for Construction Research and Education and the Graduate Program Co- ordinator. Prior to joining UW, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering at the University at Buffalo (SUNY). Dr. Rojas holds graduate degrees in civil engineering (M.S. and Ph.D.) and economics (M.A.) from the University of Colorado at Boulder and an undergraduate degree
Paper ID #33076Introducing the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Freshman Engineering StudentsThrough an Agriculture Sector ProjectDeana R. Delp Ph.D., Arizona State University Deana R. Delp has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Arizona State University. She is a lecturer at Arizona State University for Engineering Academic and Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. She is the chair of the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society Continuing Education sub- committee. She has industry experience as a systems engineer for General Dynamics Mission Systems, and as a research and development product engineer for
. Differentmethods for evaluating courses under the ABET 2000 criteria have been discussed. Themethodology outlined in this article is designed to provide a quantitative method for comparisonof options for changes within a course as well as a comparative basis for different courses. TheIEE course is used as an example of how this methodology works.Discipline specific introductory courses such as an Introduction to Environmental Engineeringplay an important role in meeting the new criteria because they offer the flexibility of contentand the ability to experiment that core courses do not. Specifically, the ABET 2000 criteriaspecifies that graduates be able to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context and to have a
AC 2008-2882: NETWORK PROCESSES COMMUNICATION: CLASS PROJECTSMohammad Dadfar, Bowling Green State University MOHAMMAD B. DADFAR Mohammad B. Dadfar is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science Department at Bowling Green State University. His research interests include Computer Extension and Analysis of Perturbation Series, Scheduling Algorithms, and Computers in Education. He currently teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in data communications, operating systems, and computer algorithms. He is a member of ACM and ASEE. Page 13.925.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Network
organization;(4) select low-cost consumer-grade UAS/sensor suites capable of performing proof of concept flight operationsfor mission validation; (5) construct actual flight plans to accomplish the mission and satisfy data productrequirements; and (6) plan and conduct actual mission campaigns considering flight and team safety, logistics,communications, weather and other factors.Motivation. The creation of this course was meant to satisfy several emergent university opportunities andneeds. First, it provides a valuable education/training opportunity for students in a relevant and timely field.With the soaring popularity in UAS, graduates with general experience in UAS/aerospace design and operationsare in high demand. UAF and the University of Alaska
priorgenerations could not imagine. The current generation of students will do the same as disruptivetechnologies change the problems they tackle and the technologies they use. To avoidobsolescence, new graduates need to become lifelong learners and continuously learn suchcompetencies as design thinking, systems thinking, strategic thinking, and teamwork.Kuh (2008) identified “helping America’s extraordinarily diverse students reap the fullbenefits— economic, civic, and personal—of their studies in college” as “what is arguably themost important challenge in higher education today” (p. 1). Preparation of students to enter theprofessional workforce has traditionally emphasized the development of technical skills.However, studies have shown that when some
manufacturing large-scale components in space using space- derived resources.Phase 4: Space-Based Construction Technology Company: • Use venture capital to develop large-scale production facilities in orbit and on the lunar surface. This will support the construction of the next-generation Space Station at the Lagrangian point L-5 (a region where the gravitational forces of the Earth and its Moon cancel). It will also help build the paraphernalia for ventures to Earth and lunar orbit, Mars and beyond.Phase 5: Technology Provider: • Evolve into a leading-edge technology provider in the long run, fostering development of the construction industry in space.IV. Project Presentationsa. Teleconference, Midterm
. Berk, “Survey of 12 Strategies to Measure Teaching Effectiveness” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol 17, No. 1, 2005, pp. 48-62.5 F.A. Brandner, A Test of the Significance of the Difference of the Correlation Coefficients in Normal Bivariate Samples” Biometrika, Vol. 25, No. 1, May, 1933, pp. 102-109.6 G.D. Garson, "Correlation", from Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis. Retrieved 12/20/2009 from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm. 3/24/08. Page 15.628.17
fields. Increasingly, he has turned his attention to the assessment of technological capability and understanding. He received his Ph.D. from Bowling Green State University and his master’s and bachelor’s degrees at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Immediately before coming to Purdue, he served as graduate coordinator for the Industrial Education and Technology Department at Iowa State University. Previously, for 20 years, he was on the faculty of the University of Missouri’s Department of Practical Arts and Vocational Technical Education in various professorial, coordinator, and leadership roles. Internationally, he has worked in Germany, South Africa, Poland, the USSR, Saudi Arabia, Canada
decide that engineering is not for them. A greater fraction, being goodat anything they do, find themselves following their classmates, the majority of whom areenrolled in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering. They hear too often that these disciplines aremuch more “general” than A.E., and that A.E. is “too hard”. These superstitions are general, bothworldwide and through the decades. In the mid-90s, attrition rates climbed as bad news keptpouring in from the traditional employers of A.Es.Getting into TroubleThe Introduction to Aerospace Engineering course has existed for a long time, intermittently. Itsadvocates pointed to the perspective and motivation it provided; its detractors called it an “easy-A” waste of a good 3 credit hours on PR
) mirror the styles covered in theprerequisite advanced composition course. Peer evaluations and team reflections are alsogathered with the final report. In the evaluations, students identify strengths, weaknesses, andareas for improvement.These goals collectively aim to provide a comprehensive educational experience that blendstheoretical knowledge with practical skills, fostering a new generation of civil engineers adept inboth traditional and innovative construction technologies.Timeframe and AssessmentThe timeline for the project reflects a scaffolded approach where the first half of the semester isspent on fundamental knowledge of concrete materials, and the second half is dedicated to theproject. The core information is presented in lectures
%; IPEC switchers = 60%) ranked in the top 20% oftheir graduating class. However, these differing percentages for the groups clearly showdiscrepancy between the two IPEC groups: the IPEC switchers did not achieve academically as did Page 4.68.4their persisting counterparts.Understandably, based on their families’ level of education, students in all three groups indicatedthat they intend to pursue graduate degrees (comparison = 67%; IPEC persisters = 78%; IPECswitchers = 88%). It appears as though IPEC students in general have higher career aspirationsthan the comparison group, and the IPEC switchers have the highest expectations of all
%; IPEC switchers = 60%) ranked in the top 20% oftheir graduating class. However, these differing percentages for the groups clearly showdiscrepancy between the two IPEC groups: the IPEC switchers did not achieve academically as did Page 4.68.4their persisting counterparts.Understandably, based on their families’ level of education, students in all three groups indicatedthat they intend to pursue graduate degrees (comparison = 67%; IPEC persisters = 78%; IPECswitchers = 88%). It appears as though IPEC students in general have higher career aspirationsthan the comparison group, and the IPEC switchers have the highest expectations of all
. since 1980. He is a graduate of Lehigh University and worked for several years at Kawecki-Berylco (now Cabot Specialty Metals). His current interests include the development of web-basedinstructional materials for use in a variety of engineering courses. The material is contained in “TheVirtual Chemical Engineering Laboratory”, found at www2.widener.edu/~crn0001/VirtualLab.html. Thesite is open to all for examination and use. He is married and has two children.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Page 6.91.9 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering
assessment data areincluded so that interested groups can begin their own programs.1.0 IntroductionSmall universities with primary undergraduate programs have historically been teaching-focusedwith research being a secondary priority or even non-existent. In recent years, there has been ashift toward involving undergraduate students in mentored research activities.1 The benefits andrewards for the students, faculty mentors, the institution, and the greater scientific andengineering community have been recognized. However, there are many challenges toimplementing a successful teaching research program at the undergraduate level. Within theengineering education community, the topic of undergraduate research, and in particular theissues facing
teaching interests include development of solid communica- tion skills and enhancing laboratory skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Simple Lab Exercises Using Composite MaterialsAbstractMany engineering programs include a course in composite materials, usually as an electivecourse at the advanced undergraduate or graduate level. These courses typically focus on themechanics of fiber-reinforced composites. At East Carolina University, the elective compositescourse also contains some laboratory exercises that give the students a hands-on experience inthe layup and testing of carbon-epoxy specimens. In this paper, the authors share lessons learnedin making and testing these
Paper ID #21651Bridging the Gap: a Co-taught Field Course with Integrated History andCivil Engineering ContentDr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He imple- ments classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of an
Paper ID #42768Engineering Data Repositories and Open Science Compliance: A Guide forEngineering Faculty and LibrariansAdam Lindsley, Oregon State University Adam Lindsley is the Engineering Librarian at Oregon State University. He teaches graduate research ethics, science/information literacy for undergraduates, and library research skills for both. Research interests include information literacy, data management, photogrammetry, pedagogy, and learning technology.Dr. Shalini Ramachandran, Loyola Marymount University Shalini Ramachandran is the Research and Instruction Librarian for STEM at Loyola Marymount University in
Team Design Project.Topics covered will include:Personal responsibilities and interpersonal relationships involved in a team projectTeam projects from a current industrial perspectiveCAD tools to automate Project Management, i.e. PERT charts, critical pathanalysis, resource management, report generation and project trackingENEL 583 – 4th year Team Design Project, Part A (3-0-6). This course introduces thetheory, experience and practice of project management. Theory includes generallyaccepted project management principles, the structure of both project and team, togetherwith ancillary topics that commonly affect project outcome. The experience is gainedfrom a series of engineering relevant case studies and guest lectures by
- ership in international peace building Initiatives in 2005. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The State of IPv6: Measuring Global AdoptionOn September 24th, 2015 the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) became the fourthRegional Internet Registry (RIR) to run out of IPv4 addresses. With four of the five RIRs nolonger making general IPv4 address allocations, adoption and use of IPv6 is taking place at anaccelerated pace.The research presented in this paper is an extension of the previous work published by Czyz,Lekel-Johnson, Allman, Osterweil, Zhang in 2014. The goal of this study is to empiricallyunderstand the adoption of IPv6 as the Internet transitions to the next