Paper ID #9626Teaching interdisciplinary teamwork through hands-on game developmentProf. Scott A Kuhl, Michigan Technological University Scott Kuhl is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Cognitive & Learning Sciences at Michigan Technological University. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Utah in 2009. He has been the faculty advisor for Husky Game Development En- terprise since Spring 2010. His research interests include immersive virtual environments, head-mounted displays, and spatial perception. A link to his web page can be found at http
the requirements of ABETEC2000 in preparation for an ABET visit in September 1998. The assessment plans weredeveloped by four-person committees with on-going input from the other chemical engineeringfaculty. The NCA assessment plan was developed by the department’s Curriculum Committee.The ABET assessment plan was developed by an ad hoc ABET/Assessment Committee. Two ofthe faculty on this committee had worked on the NCA assessment plan developed by theCurriculum Committee.The department’s assessment plan consists of four major goals that can be related to the ABETEC2000 outcomes (a) through (k) and to the AIChE Program Criteria: (1) Students shouldmaster chemical engineering fundamentals necessary to function as a professional in
students.Curriculum Development ParticipantsAE program personnel include faculty from the Colleges of Engineering and Education,graduate students in engineering and education, undergraduates in engineering, andmiddle grade mathematics and science teachers from urban, suburban and rural schooldistricts in Oklahoma. Curriculum units are developed by subject specific (e.g., earthsciences) curriculum teams. Each AE curriculum development team consists of one tofour graduate and undergraduate engineering fellows from various engineering sub-disciplines, one to two graduate education students, and four to six middle grademathematics and science teachers from the selected subject level. Faculty members fromboth Colleges provide quality feedback pertinent to their
there was much discussion at the general facultysessions concerning what is more important in a Construction Management faculty position-professional field experience or a PhD in an appropriate area (such as Civil, Mechanical,Electrical Engineering, Architecture, Business, etc.). Since Construction Management is anapplied profession the majority of the attendees believe that the professional field experience ismore relevant than the PhD.Even though practicing Construction Management professors carry this belief back to theirrespective campus’ there is a current need to develop new Construction Management professorsdue to the expanding professional need of the construction industry. It was reported at the 43rdInternational Conference of the
focused section of Freshman Engineering Projects.R. Scott Summers, University of Colorado-Boulder Professor Summers is a Professor of Environmental Engineering. His teaching and research interests are in the area of drinking water quality and treatment. He is working with other faculty to start a new emphasis in Engineering for Developing Communities at both the graduate and undergraduate levelsAngela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado-Boulder Dr. Bielefeldt is an Associate Professor and a licensed P.E. in the State of Colorado. She teaches Civil and Environmental Engineering courses for freshman, seniors, and graduate students on topics including design, hazardous waste
limited exposure, the faculty recognizedthat an independent course should be tailored to provide hands on exposure to dynamic systemswith the goal of connecting the gap between the material taught in dynamics and the conceptsfrom system dynamics. After developing and implementing the course, we identified number ofunique aspects of this laboratory course that could be incorporated, in whole or part in our otherlaboratory courses. Additionally, we felt that some of the unique features of this course could beuseful for faculty in other institutions responsible for laboratory style courses. The purpose of thisGIFT is to share the features we felt were most significant.Placement of the lab within the ME program / Order of the labs within the
-private partnerships particularly efforts that enhance employment opportunities for engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Creating an Inclusive Ecosystem through Professional DevelopmentAbstractAn inclusive ecosystem within engineering education has been developed, having evolvedaround a series of stratified professional development courses spanning working professionals,university faculty, and university students. This ecosystem has allowed us to engage industrypartners in the academic enterprise, fostered an environment for faculty renewal, andconsequently created a venue for engagement of an ethnically diverse student populace fromdisparate economic backgrounds.It is
and W.D. Reece, McGraw Hill, 2005 (ISBN: 0-07-282199-X). f) Introduction to Engineering, P. Wright, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edn., 1994, (ISBN: 0- 471-57930-0) g) Engineering Fundamentals, S. Moaveni, Brooks/Cole, 2002 (ISBN: 0-534-38116-2).Team Approach in Teaching and Writing We have rediscovered at least two very important lessons in developing a freshmantextbook. The first is that one person alone cannot write a broad interdisciplinary text, so acreative interdisciplinary faculty team effort is required, and second you cannot publish atextbook appropriate to its intended audience unless you test it in the classroom first. The firststep is the task of assembling a suitably motivated interdepartmental group of
activities of each relationshipare different, and are continually negotiated to affect the greatest impact and benefit to bothparties. The MOU begins with a statement indicating that both parties will, to the best of theirefforts, affect the visits and collaborations from one to the other by teachers, engineers,scientists, students, and administrators for the purpose of student recruiting, research,innovation center projects, continuing education, and professional development. This statementis the overarching goal for establishing a partnership. The nature of the relationship is differentbetween UDCI and each of its industry partners.Additional responsibilities outlined for UDCI include providing faculty and practicingprofessionals to teach classes
experiment as well as conclusions drawn fromthe measured data.The two-credit course format is a one-hour lecture on Monday by a faculty member covering theweek’s topic followed by a three-hour lab. The laboratory meeting begins with a short briefingthat reviews the material presented in the lecture and the hands-on lab session follows,concluding with a short de-briefing summarizing the experience. Written reports are required formost of the labs and are prepared outside of class time. A quiz is administered after thecompletion of each three-week block. The textbook utilized in the course is Introduction toEngineering Experimentation1 along with a set of course notes written by the developers of thecourse. Grading is composed of thirteen lab reports
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Improving Engineering Education in Developing Countries: A Study in IndiaAbstract:Multi-media case studies have been shown to improve higher-order cognitive skills and teamworking skills in classrooms in developed countries. In this study, we wanted to find out theimpact of such case studies by conducting workshops with students and faculty members inIndia. This article describes two workshops conducted in India, analyzes two surveys thatwere completed by the participants of these workshops, and presents findings from the study.The results show that the multi-media case studies developed by LITEE were well acceptedin India and were perceived to
Session 3513 Development of a Dynamic Curriculum Assessment Examination John Wagner, David Finley Dr. John J. McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering Tri-State UniversityAbstractProgram assessment has become increasingly important for obtainingaccreditation. Furthermore, ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 mandates the useof multiple assessment measures. One important objective measure of programperformance is a comprehensive examination given to students in their senioryear. Many engineering programs now use the Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) examination as this comprehensive
performance inproject-based team settings. Faced with the complexity of trying to assess the attainment oflearning outcomes for each individual on a team based on an unclear blend of technical merit,communication, project planning, data analysis, and teaming behaviors, faculty members andstudents both fall short. It is unreasonable to expect students to achieve specific learningobjectives from a series of courses, when the faculty members themselves are unclear about whatthe learning objectives are and how to measure themAs a first effort to address the assessment of team performance in project-based researchexperiences, the faculty of the Chemical Engineering Department, as a pilot study, developed fourprimary areas of importance for assessment
sophomoreengineering undergraduates at Boston University. The program enables engineeringundergraduates to incorporate a study abroad experience in their undergraduate degree programswhile continuing to make normal progress toward their degrees. Prior exposure or facility withGerman is not expected before starting the program, but students must participate in an intensiveGerman-language course while in Dresden. The TUD was chosen as a partner in developing thisprogram because Boston University already had a small program and a resident directorestablished at this site. In addition, the TUD had appropriate faculty and laboratory facilitiesavailable to teach the requisite science and engineering courses in English. While in Dresden,students take three of four
the Outstanding Graduate Teaching Assistant Award, which is awarded based on student nominations, four consecutive years (2007-2011). Upon graduation, Elliott plans to pursue a faculty position at an American Council of Construction Education-accredited construction management program.Dr. Mara de Jess Torres, Universidad Iberoamericana Tijuana Page 25.131.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Addressing Global Development Challenges Through Construction EducationAbstractConflict, chaos, environmental degradation, and humanitarian
Session 2548 Internship Development for a New Baccalaureate Degree Program: Student Preparation, Sponsor Development, and Internship Follow-Up Sohail Anwar, Frances Winsor The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona CollegeAbstractPenn State Altoona College is in its third year of offering a Bachelor of Science program inElectro-Mechanical Engineering Technology (BSEMET) which is a 2+2 engineeringtechnology program. Students matriculate to the BSEMET program from the ABET-accreditedassociate degree program in either electrical or mechanical engineering
Paper ID #42143A Framework for Students’ Professional Development When Meeting withEmployers in a Microelectronics Workforce Development ProgramBenjamin L Burson, Michigan State UniversityProf. Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Prof. Eric Holloway currently serves as a Professor of Engineering Practice in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. He also holds a courtesy faculty appointment in the School of Engineering Education. His research focuses on assessment development and the professional formation of students. ©American Society for Engineering Education
center.Initially this collaboration focused on how instructors could improve their grading andinstruction of writing within engineering courses. As the relationship matured, focus was shiftedto the importance of educating the writing center staff on the unique attributes of engineeringwriting as well as the engineering-specific writing skills expected of students by faculty. Unableto locate a writing guide that specifically met our undergraduate engineering needs, the writingcenter and Engineering faculty developed a handbook that outlines an effective engineeringwriting process and style for students, faculty, and writing center tutors.This paper provides an overview of the challenges the authors have experienced teaching writingwithin engineering
Engineering Department (Toulouse,France). In 2009/10 he was an Invited Researcher at the Institute of Electronics and TelecommunicationsResearch - IETR (University of Rennes, France).Barry J. Sullivan is Director of Program Development for the International Engineering Consortium. Priorto joining the IEC, he spent nine years at Ameritech, where he served as Director of Emerging Technolo-gies. He has developed and delivered continuing education courses in communications technologies, andhe guided the technology strategy for a start-up company delivering packet voice services. He was afull-time member of the faculty of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science atNorthwestern University for more than six years, and has taught there
AC 2009-657: TRAINING ENGINEERING LEADERS THROUGHINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTSMeagan Vaughan, University of Texas, Austin Meagan Vaughan is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin. While researching lower limb prosthetic socket design, she also helps oversee community development projects as a teaching assistant.Janet Ellzey, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Janet Ellzey is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In addition to conducting research in combustion, she is Assistant Dean for International Engineering Education. She is also faculty adviser to the University of Texas chapter
groups in STEM and transform the powers of technology to advance social justice.Dr. Joyce Yen, University of Washington Joyce Yen, Ph.D., is the Director of the ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change at the University of Washington where she focuses on advancing women and underrepresented minority faculty in STEM fields and leading faculty professional development programs. Her diversity and faculty work has received over $6.7 million in grant funding. She holds a M.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Nebraska- Lincoln. She was awarded the 2012 University of Washington David B. Thorud Leadership Award and
Session 2366 DEVELOPING A 21st CENTURY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY CURRICULUM Charles Knight, University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaAbstractElectronic instrumentation and computer data acquisition has revolutionized the experimentallaboratory. Universities with limited funding face major challenges in upgrading theirlaboratories. Industry advisors tell us they expect our engineering graduates to have modernlaboratory skills. Many engineering faculty members do not possess the modern skills requiredto develop and/or teach laboratory curriculums required in the 21st century. This situation hasdeveloped
, sensor integration,and servo motors, as well as other technologies and various industry standards with primaryfocus on packaging machinery technology. This paper provides a chronicle of the program development and implementationfocusing on the active participation of industry partners and, the nature of industry-educationpartnership for long term sustainability of the program. This paper also provides specificexamples on how industry-education partnership can be leveraged in securing resources at thelocal level.Industry leadership It all started with one faculty member’s longtime involvement with packaging industry.This involvement created mutual awareness of industry workforce need and opportunitiesavailable at an academic
Session 1526 Initial Steps in Establishing a Community to Develop Engineering Courseware Joseph G. Tront1 Brandon Muramatsu2 1 Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA 2 University of California, Berkeley, CAAbstractEducational courseware modules are beginning to find broader use supplementing traditionalengineering lectures as well as distance learning classes. Developing high quality materialrequires a considerable amount of effort compelling faculty to share modules
civil, chemical, electrical and mechanical engineering. 2. To improve the system of governemntal planning and regulation of thenumber of engineering schools and students, and the quality of engineeringprograms and courses. 3. To initiate and formalize a continuous process of faculty training,curricular development and theproduction, distribution and use of impro-ved instructional materials and equipment. 4. To plan and establish a sound foundation for the later developmentof specialized and advanced engineering courses.Common to all these aims is to make the engineering graduate of a qualityacceptable by international standards and particularly adapted to the needsof the Philippines.The Project with the assistance of an international
consumption, the economics of oil markets and the nature ofgiant and super-giant oil field production curves, answers should migrate toward a reasoned peak,“unlikely.”Outcome 4: Students will understand and practice the scientific method through experiencewith a research projectTo reiterate, in each of the four semesters, respectively, students will: research and write about aninteresting topic within the broad research theme; develop a hypothesis that links two or morevariables in their topic; propose a research plan (including a small budget) to examine thehypothesis; and execute the research plan under faculty guidance. The theme will be “The campus asan energy-efficiency and alternative energy laboratory.”There are three principal mechanisms to
,and act as test beds for development and deployment of new practices and tools. A thirdfeature is a shared language and set of concepts that span boundaries within and betweenuniversities and sponsoring companies, to the benefit of faculty, universities, students andtheir companies. A fourth feature is the ability to tailor a robust curriculum to the uniquerequirements of a particular region or industry, as mentioned earlier. Finally, it wasenvisioned that PD21would facilitate the flow of two powerful streams of information into t hecurriculum and classroom: the latest practices and tools provided by university research andthe experiences of industry provided through case studies.For companies and students, the aforementioned characteristics
, c) to develop lifelong learning capacity through real-world projects andindustry-based training, and d) to train well-rounded software engineers adept in industry-relevant professional skills.This paper will detail the development and implementation of the consultation and redesignprocess, including final curriculum content changes and related delivery recommendations.Consultation ProcessThe taskforce consulted several subcommittees and stakeholder groups to adequately assess thechanging landscape of software engineering. These stakeholder groups included faculty memberswithin the department, faculty members in related departments who may be impacted by thecourse changes, industry advisors, and faculty administrators. Consultation was done
Session 1793 A Case Study: Development of a Practice Oriented Engineering Program with Implications for Regional Economic Development Paul Kauffmann Ralph Rogers Phil Lunsford East Carolina University, Greenville, NCIntroductionThis paper describes an engineering program planned for implementation at East CarolinaUniversity in fall 2004. The program presents a unique design synthesis of concentration areasrequired to enhance regional economic development and the best practices
Session 2548 Internship Development for a New Baccalaureate Degree Program: Student Preparation, Sponsor Development, and Internship Follow-Up Sohail Anwar, Frances Winsor The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona CollegeAbstractPenn State Altoona College is in its third year of offering a Bachelor of Science program inElectro-Mechanical Engineering Technology (BSEMET) which is a 2+2 engineering technologyprogram. Students matriculate to the BSEMET program from the ABET-accredited associatedegree program in either electrical or mechanical engineering