Paper ID #30436Evaluation of evidence-based teaching techniques in a graduate fluiddynamics courseDr. John Palmore Jr, Virginia Tech John Palmore Jr is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Tech. He specializes in multiphase thermo-fluid flows. Dr. Palmore’s technical research focuses on developing numerical algorithms for simulating these flows using high performance computing. His educational research focuses upon incorporating technology into the classroom. Dr. Palmore is an active member of several professional societies including the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
were apparentlyviolated by employees of Enron and how that lead to financial disaster for Enron, its employees,and many others.I also provided them with copies of the NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers)Engineers’ Creed as another example of a Code of Ethics and the class discussed how thoseprovisions were violated at Enron. In particular, some of the trading schemes that Enron usedwere described and discussed. I pointed out that some of the work to implement those schemeshad to involve engineers and programmers. During the past year I added a case study from theNSPE for the students to discuss. This involved a graduating student who planned to work forone company but decided to take a recruiting visit and ski trip to another
, B. Adamson and M. Mason, “Comparative Education Research: Approachesand Methods. CERC Studies in Comparative Education”, vol. 19, ComparativeEducation Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2007.Biographical InformationJEREMY (ZHENG) LIJeremy (Zheng) Li is an associate professor in the department of mechanical engineeringat University of Bridgeport. Dr. Li received his B.S. and M.S. degree from Eastern ChinaPolytechnic University, and Ph.D. degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology.Before joining University of Bridgeport as a full time faculty, he worked for severaldifferent industries with extensive R&D and engineering experiences
Dubuque, Iowa.Prof. Shan Jiang, Iowa State UniversityDr. Shan Jiang is an Assistant Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering department atIowa State University. He obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. After graduation, he studied at MIT as a postdoc. He then worked at the DowChemical Company Coating Materials as a research scientist and Dow Certified Green BeltProject Leader. Dr. Jiang has published more than 50 peer reviewed journal articles and bookchapters and 3 patents. He also established an Active Learning workshop series at Iowa Statecampus. Dr. Jiang is a recipient of Early Achievement in Teaching Award, ACS YoungerChemists Committee Leadership Development Award, 3M Non-Tenured Faculty Award
Emily Lawson-Bulten is a PhD student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a research focus on equitable access to infrastructure, especially for WASH services in non-industrialized nations. She has served on the leadership team of Allies in STEM at UIUC since May 2022. She has been heavily involved with racial equity issues since she was a John M. Perkins Fellow at Calvin University. There she received her BSE in Civil/Environmental Engineering and International Development Studies. Her work in industry as a civil engineer and for the Natural Resource Conservation Service have made her passionate about creating an equitable environment for historically underserved populations in STEM. She is a 2021
15.1001. Datafrom these programs is not considered by this research. For this study, only the two four-yearconstruction management programs accredited by ACCE in Louisiana offered by LSU and ULMare considered. Because both institutions are public higher education institutions owned andoperated by state government, the service area of the institutions will be considered the state itself.It is recognized that the overall graduate production of these institutions may be insufficient tomeet the needs of the state itself and this will be briefly considered. However, the intent of thisstudy is to understand minority completion rates for these programs as compared to the minoritypopulations of the state and the demand for minority construction
perceive the meaning in their lives, as people can derive different meanings fromtheir unique experiences [12]. This raises questions, including: What is the state of meaning inlife among graduate students who have encountered unprecedented life experiences during thepandemic? How does the level of meaning in life relate to their well-being and mental health,considering the increased prevalence of major depressive disorder and generalized anxietydisorder among them?To address these inquiries, the present study focused on engineering graduate students enrolled ata midwestern research university. The objective was to investigate their overall well-being, stresslevels, and meaning in life during the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, the study aimed
studiesthat examine the effectiveness of this mode of delivery and the impact on student satisfaction andperformance. A study by Beqiri, et. al.3 provided some insights into factors that impact students’ Page 23.586.2satisfaction with online courses. The research concluded that online courses might be betterreceived when offered at the graduate level (involving adult populations) than undergraduatelevel. Since course familiarity seems to play a significant role in student satisfaction, it wasrecommended that core and prerequisite courses be offered in a more traditional format. A finalconclusion was that schools and universities lean toward a blended
interdisciplinary faculty team from mechanicalengineering, civil and environmental engineering, biomedical engineering and chemicalengineering, and electrical and computer engineering created a Scholarship Program forUndergraduate Retention and Success (SPURS) in Spring 2016 through the NSF S-STEMProgram.The program is specifically designed to develop outstanding graduates through training inrequired workshops in critical thinking, communication, professional development and researchin addition to providing students with optional opportunities in research, internships or K-12STEM outreach programs. On average, each scholarship is $8,000 a year and covers about 90%of the yearly tuition cost. This paper discusses the mentoring provided, the workshop
Paper ID #29156Investigating the experiences of military professionals who return toengineering graduate schoolDr. Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Dr. Elizabeth Gross, Sam Houston State University Elizabeth A. Gross MLIS, PhD is currently assistant professor of Library Science and Technology at Sam Houston State University and engineering education researcher. She achieved her doctoral degree in learning design and technology from Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. Her research interests include engineering education in
acumen,” In American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 2017.[9] E. A. Gross, D. L. Peters, & S. L. Mann, “Synergies between experience and study in graduate engineering education,” In American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[10] E. A. Gross & D. L. Peters, “Comparison of returning and direct pathway graduate engineering students,” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 1-20, 2021.[11] M. Alias & N. A. H. M. Hafir, “The relationship between academic self-confidence and cognitive performance among engineering students,” In Proceedings of the Research in
Paper ID #25796Assessing Interdisciplinary Competency in the Disaster Resilience and RiskManagement Graduate Program using Concept MapsJessica R. Deters, Virginia Tech Jessica Deters is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in Applied Mathematics & Statistics and a minor in the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs from the Colorado School of Mines.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research
, we designed a survey, and a quantitative research study as part of the Florida ITPathways to Success (Flit-Path) NSF grant. The Flit-Path grant supports student scholarships,curricular/co-curricular activities, and research studies on evidence-based practices onpersistence, success, and graduation in IT-related and computing disciplines. A survey wasdesigned and conducted, and a multi-group SEM was performed to further investigate diversedemographics and contexts such as gender and level of school education.2- Theoretical frameworkThis study is guided by two theoretical frameworks. Disciplinary Identity theory was the maindriving theory, and social cognitive career theory was used to understand some of the results.Identity has been a topic
in engineering. Currently, minorities have the lowest percentageof graduates who receive advanced degrees in engineering. By embedding advancedtechnical training during a student’s freshmen and sophomore years of an undergraduatecurriculum, students are not only motivated, but also have the skill sets needed toparticipate in research. After training, the student applies technical skills learned to anadvanced research project provided by collaborative relationships with industry, theuniversity, or faculty members. The integration of research and training increases thestudent’s confidence to compete academically among fellow peers, improves graduateretention, and improves a student’s academic performance. Because of the demands ofthese added
Paper ID #40196Advances in Graduate Training in Integrative Bioinformatics forInvestigating and Engineering Microbiomes (IBIEM)Dr. Glenda T. Kelly, Duke University Glenda Kelly is Director of Evaluation and Assessment for the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr), Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University. She previously served as Associate Director for Assessment and Outreach for the Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT), Duke. For both Centers she designed the overall evaluation plan and collaborated with
of the professional skills gap that existsbetween employer’s expectations and the qualifications of their new engineering hires. To dothis, a 2-part study examined both evidence in the literature regarding education methods andevidence of course work required of engineering professional graduates in their pursuit of abachelor’s degree. Based on the findings of this research, while engineering professionalprograms are making progress toward better professional skills, it appears that there is still muchwork to do to ensure that graduates are well qualified for professional practice. Evidence suggests that written communication skills are the most widely addressedprofessional skills in engineering professional curriculum. Many programs
Paper ID #29438The Role of Teaching Self-Efficacy in Electrical and ComputerEngineering Faculty Teaching SatisfactionMr. Kent A. Crick, Iowa State University Kent Crick is currently in his third year as a graduate student at Iowa State University. He is currently a PhD candidate in Counseling Psychology and conducts research in self-determination as it relates to student and faculty motivation and well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State, he obtained a Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychology from the University of Indianapolis. He then worked as a research coordi- nator for the Diabetes and Translational Research Center
those departments. Formany graduates, those managers will come from industry; for others, some of those managerswill be research faculty in graduate school. In essence, we recommend the direction taken byAller and Norback et al., which is to determine from these managers the specific traits ofsuccessful engineering communication in that setting. One important consideration, though, forsuch studies is that what managers from industry report back in such surveys can easily bemisinterpreted. For that reason, communication faculty with an understanding ofengineering should help interpret the comments. A second consideration is that with a fewaspects of communication, industry practices may lag behind what communication research isdiscovering to be
Effective Assessment Plan Leading to Strong Reform of Petroleum Engineering Graduate Program Charlotte Stockton, Talal D. Gamadi, and H. Emadi Texas Tech University/ Bob L. Herd Department of Petroleum Engineering 807 Boston Avenue, Box 43111, Lubbock, Texas, 79409, USA E-mail: talal.gamadi@ttu.edu Abstract design, analysis, and presentation of research projects The Bob L. Herd Department of Petroleum Engineering that are consistent with the focus of their program.at Texas Tech University has made a lot of significant Scholarly
undergraduate andgraduate engineering education. At Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) a Hispanic-serving institution, aspects of leadership and ethics are explored in the capstone senior designcourse sequence for chemical engineering, and in master’s thesis and doctoral seminar courses.Instruction in leadership is achieved primarily through project- or research-based learning, whileinstruction in ethics is achieved by case study review and discussion. The objective is to presenthow these sometimes-overlooked topics are addressed at an institution with a majority Hispanicstudent population, noting that Hispanic graduate engineers are underrepresented in theengineering workforce. IntroductionThe
detailed in the first author’s [12] doctoraldissertation. The study included two phases of data collection and analysis. Phase 1 usedHarvey's [15] process to broadly explore the experiences of two dis/abled STEM graduatestudents through multiple rounds of interviews and analysis with participants. The first authororiginally did not intend to use this research in their dissertation, however, after realizing thesignificance of the findings of Phase 1, they decided to conduct a second phase, to furtherexplore key areas. Phase 2 used narrative interviews, a post-interview survey, and narrativeanalysis to explore the experiences of five additional dis/abled STEM graduate students withregard to postsecondary education culture, policy, and interpersonal
techniques, statistics and applications, data analysis and information methodologies, projects, engineering, economics, and business.Douglas Lee Robertson, Florida International UniversityJulian Rodrigo Sosa-Molano, Florida International University Julian is a graduate research assistant at Florida International University. He holds a BSc in Electronics Engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a MSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Arizona. He is pursuing his PhD degree in Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has professional experience in Information Technology, Semiconductors, and Telecommunications in international companies such
Page 9.1058.2faculty member or professional scientist mentor at an industrial, governmental or“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright© 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”university laboratory site. The objectives of this program are:• To increase the number of students who participate in undergraduate research.• To enhance students’ learning and commitment to their studies.• To increase the number of students attending graduate schools.• To provide students with professional development training. Research in the undergraduate engineering curriculum remains a significantcontributor to the educational preparation of new practitioners for an
Paper ID #8788Equipping graduates for the 21st century workplace: what IT competenciesmatters most to stakeholdersDr. Tanya Stanko P.E., Innopolis University Tanya Stanko is a Vice-Provost of Education at Innopolis University. She specializes in launching new Universities from scratch, including setting up curricula and polices, recruiting faculty and students. She holds PhD in Computational Aeroacoustics from the University of Leeds and worked as researcher at Technical University of Munich. Her current research interests include investigation of the professional competencies, gender diversity in engineering, relations
collaboration, another tenant I found desirable in my choice of grad school. Thiswas not my first choice when I sent out my applications, but it ultimately ended up being the bestfit for me. This is why I recommend that you keep an open mind when applying to and visitingpotential schools because you never know what school will be the right one for you.Furthermore, when deciding to attend graduate school I highly encourage all new students torealized the commitment that lay ahead, with most thesis research involving many years of study,often working long days and longer weeks.In the end, the most important piece of advice that I can give about choosing graduate schoolover an industry job is that you have to really want the MS or Ph.D. All of the members
successful, they not only have to have a solid academicfoundation, but also a wide spectrum of new skills, such as engineering leadership, organization,computer programming proficiency, communication, and rapid adaptation to changes, and thespirits for innovation and invention. Does Chinese engineering education sufficiently emphasizesuch new needs and abilities so that China’s science and engineering students can meet thechallenges of the next century? The purpose of this pilot study is to find out, from theengineering educators’ perspective, how prepared Chinese engineering graduates are withrespect to their abilities for problem solving, innovation and invention. Research Methodology and InstrumentIn order to answer the
teaching and research interests are improving manufacturing productivity through lean principles and the pursuit of quality and variation control through six-sigma principles. Dr. Mehta is a senior member of IIE and Society of Manufacturing Engineering (SME), a member of National Association of Industrial Technologists and American Society for Quality (ASQ). He is a Certified Manufacturing Engineer by SME and is an ASQ Certified Six-Sigma Black Belt. Page 11.42.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Distance Education Graduate Course in Engineering Economics: Results and
faculty member to work on a research projectthat is of interest to both. The student is tasked with research work as well as coursework. Inthis model, little opportunity arises in which to practice the professional skills and strategies inTable 1 and Figure 1. Graduate students are not encouraged to operate as a team.Communication is developed only to the extent of interacting with thesis committees andresearch related personnel. Creative thinking is permitted provided the idea is supported underthe research project description.To addresses particular skill sets, a semesterly directed study course is offered at varying creditlevels. In these classes, the students review literature on leadership, creativity, and other non-engineering curriculum
Paper ID #33254”Racing the Sun”: A Narrative Analysis of Engineering Graduate Students’Journeys Navigating Public-Inspired Science WorkMs. Taylor Lightner, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Taylor Lightner is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she serves as a graduate research assistant. In addition, she is a student in the Disaster Resilience and Risk Management Program. Taylor received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson Univer- sity. Her research interests include broadening participation, interdisciplinary interactions, community
Paper ID #36703Board 423: Using Agile Principles for Cohort Building in a GraduateSoftware Engineering ProgramDr. Stan Kurkovsky, Central Connecticut State University Stan Kurkovsky is a professor at the Department of Computer Science at Central Connecticut State University. Stan earned his PhD from the Center for Advanced Computer Studies of the University of Louisiana in 1999. Results of his doctoral research have been applied to network planning and industrial simulation. Stan’s current research interests are in software engineering, mobile, and pervasive com- puting. He published over 90 papers in refereed proceedings of