fromthe Faculty of Arts and Science (Psychology, Drama and Physics), and from the Faculty ofEngineering and Applied Science (Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, GeologicalEngineering, and Mechanical Engineering) consented to participate in the project.This four-year study is following a cohort through an undergraduate program using fourapproaches to assessing TIS as illustrated in Figure 1, including: • standardized instruments • meta-rubrics used to score artefacts created by students for academic purposes • in-course assessment of TIS • group problem-solving sessions independent of academic workThe study is documenting the costs, time commitment, participation rates, and correlationsbetween these approaches, and evaluating the
segments of six weeks each. An examination is given at theend of segment 1 and segment 2. After the last six weeks a comprehensive final exam is also given toall students. During both years of the 3D technology impact study, the 3D printing projects andexercises were only included during the second six weeks of the course.Class Content Research - First Six Weeks For the first six weeks of the course for both years of the study, the first part of theexperiment was to teach the same content to the seven classes without the 3D printer projects andthen compare their performance. This was done to generate a baseline for the differences incomprehension of the same content between the classes. At this point, the class where the 3D printerwas not
and homework is moved from home to classroom. We chose one of thefoundation courses in engineering and engineering technology, ENGR 2110: Statics formodification so that this model could be expanded to other engineering courses. Our revitalizedcourse differed from a traditional in-class and a complete online course in the following ways: (1)Lectures were summarized in 5-20 minute videos that include important concepts from thechapter/topic, one/two worked examples, and 3-4 homework/practice problems. These synopsisvideo lectures were made available to students in advance so that students could learn and preparefor the lectures/problem sessions. The lecture time was devoted to reciting the key concepts,working problems in class and identifying
academic experience.Keywords: Mentoring Relationships, Emotional Intelligence, Hidden Curriculum, GraduateStudent Development, Engineering Education1. Introduction: The landscape of engineering education is undergoing a significant transformation, movingbeyond the traditional focus on technical expertise to recognize the critical importance ofinterpersonal dynamics in mentoring relationships [1]. At the heart of this evolution lies thegrowing recognition that successful mentoring in engineering education requires emotionalintelligence, particularly when supporting underserved doctoral students [1]. Emotionalintelligence is a psychological competency that plays a crucial role in helping mentors andmentees navigate the complex hidden curriculum
what is taught at the engineering undergraduate level and skills needed inthe workforce [4].As Desing et al. highlight, on-campus resources exist to help engineering students with jobattainment [5]. Some campuses provide an engineering-specific career center, while others havea general career center that serves all students. Common resources offered by career centersinclude information sessions, resume reviews, and access to career advisors. At highly resourceduniversities, career centers will often host job fairs and bring employers to campus for otherevents. In a prior study, career services professionals recognized that students benefit fromdifferent types of events (workshops vs. one-on-one consultations) depending on their needs
1 time previously. Both the lowerGPA and the experience of the instructor could result in lower overall scores found in this study.Although it is interesting to note that the Satisfaction subscale in both classes are the same.We controlled for the effect of the instructor by analyzing two different courses taught by the sameinstructor. Both courses are technical courses but one is a required course and one is an elective course.In addition the GPA in the elective course was lower than that in the required course. Instructor 1 wasalso more experienced teaching Course E. These difference in student grades and instructor experiencecould also explain some difference we observed here.Conclusions:The results show that overall the flipped class
to conceptualize, create, and refine their designs.Additionally, the course equips students with essential skills in computer-aided design, simulation,technical writing, oral presentations, and project management, ensuring they are well-prepared forfuture academic and professional pursuits.In this WIP paper, we propose a study to quantitatively assess the success of the cross-disciplinarycourse in motivating students at NJIT to persist in engineering, relative to the discipline-specificcourses. In particular, the study aims to answer the following hypotheses: 1. Students who complete the cross-disciplinary course are more likely to persist in their engineering studies than their peers who enrolled in a discipline-specific course. 2
of patents, with particular attention to issues of patentability ofsoftware. The course concludes with the law of copyright, including fair use. Some of the casesare more fun for the students than others. The classroom session on the fair-use case of Campbellv. Acuff-Rose Music, which involved 2 Live Crew’s parody of Roy Orbison’s recording of“Pretty Woman,” featured excerpts of both recordings. Table 1 presents an outline of thecourse’s content. Table 1. Outline of Course Content 1. IP overview and common-law misappropriation of “hot news” (1 week). The case law on misappropriation (e.g., INS v. AP (1918); National Basketball Ass’n v. Motorola, Inc. (1997)) provides a basis for understanding the nature of
column is the percent of CE programsthat offer a course on this topic (either required or an elective.) It should be noted that includedin the list of topics are design and technical electives, broad categories that provide significantflexibility in many programs.The subsequent sections report the percent of programs that cover each topic on the five CE PEexams. In each case a weighted average is computed for every topic based on the percent ofprograms that require and offer classes in each subject that corresponds to the subtopics on eachCE PE Exam.Table 1. Percent of Programs offering Required and Elective Courses in Civil EngineeringProgram Subject Areas [14] Required Required and/or Elective
included “bad golfer,”“video gamer,” and “dog dad” (Figure 3). Figure 3. Word Cloud: Who are we? (professional identity/identifier)The next questions used a slider to indicate agreement 1) “My company supports flexible workhours,” and 2) “My company allows part-time work for engineers” (Figure 4). In general, therewas agreement with both statements. It is evident that the flexible work hours concept was moreacceptable than part-time work. Figure 4. Company Work-Life-Fit Alternative HoursAgain, using a slider, participants were asked to indicate agreement with the followingstatements: 1) My company allows work from home/remote work, and 2) There are limits toflexible work hours or remote work at my company. The
create. Once the professor completes the screencast of the concept, the ExplainEverything™ iPad app does all of the technical work to convert that into the desired videoformat. This course used the MP4 video format. The videos were made available to students on adaily basis, through the course Blackboard site. The daily information posted on the course siteincluded a description of which sections in the textbook were related to the same foundationalconcept, along with the newest video. In addition, a foundational level homework problemrelated to the concept was also posted.A screen shots from the Fin video is shown in Figure 1. These screencasts have the ability toinclude the handwritten component along with imported images from the textbook or
experience in the military where missing details could lead to death ordismemberment due to Improvised Explosive Devices.Results Page 26.1246.9Following the workshop, the participants were asked to complete a short survey. The surveyincluded the following questions: 1. What elements of the workshop were most effective? 2. What elements of the workshop were least effective? 3. What suggestions do you have for improving the workshop?Thirteen responded to the survey and the results (all generally positive) are included in theAppendix. Thematic analysis was used to identify and organize the themes from the survey data.The workshop elements that were
customer who was a technical novice the in the area.A weekly conference call was established to maintain communication between faculty andindustry sponsors throughout the course of the project. The liaison from the lead industrysponsor organized and led the meetings while also maintaining full minutes which weredistributed shortly after the conclusion of each session. The consistency provided by a singlekey figure from industry has been particularly helpful as events including domestic andinternational travel, mandatory meetings or university holidays and breaks impacted faculty’sability to participate in every meeting.The liaison served as the primary for all scheduling and project management activities. Hecoordinated with their company’s
and additional materials provided by theinstructors. Some peer mentors sat in the class with the students if their schedules allowed. At theend of each semester, peer mentors were interviewed by an external evaluator and asked tocomplete surveys. Table 1: Targeted STEM gateway courses in the enhanced mentoring program Semester STEM Gateway Courses Fall 2021 University Physics I & II, General Inorganic Chemistry I, College Algebra, Calculus II Spring University Physics I & II, General Inorganic Chemistry I & II, General 2022 Introduction to Chemistry, College Algebra, Trigonometry, Calculus II Fall 2022 University Physics I, General Inorganic Chemistry I, College Algebra
related tostudents' design processes (i.e., key aspect #1), each with its own set of subthemes. 1. AI’s Role in Enhancing Project Development and Problem-Solving (41.15%)The data in Table 2 illustrates the various ways AI contributes to project development andproblem-solving in engineering design. The most significant impact is seen in resource andparameter identification (19.16%), suggesting that AI is particularly effective in helping studentslocate relevant information and constraints for their projects. AI also plays a notable role inproblem-solving (7.94%), assisting students in generating solutions and refining their approachesto complex challenges. Procedural guidance (4.21%) and project breakdown (2.34%) furtherindicate that AI helps
Paper ID #14478Integration of Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Products within theEntire Civil Engineering CurriculumDr. Yusuf A Mehta, Rowan University Dr. Mehta is a Professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University and Director of Center for Research and Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATEs). Dr. Mehta has extensive experience in teaching pavement materials and pavement systems. Dr. Mehta has published several technical and educational papers in leading professional organizations.Dr. Parth Bhavsar, Rowan UniversityDr. Ayman Ali, Rowan University
innovation to better prepare a diversepopulation of engineers capable of addressing the sociotechnical opportunities and challenges ofthe future [1]. Much of this conversation has traditionally centered on preparing engineeringstudents with both the technical and professional skills needed to tackle these sociotechnicalchallenges, particularly engineering leadership. However, this goal depends not only on how andwhat we teach students but also on the perceptions engineering faculty have of leadership andleadership development. In their roles, faculty shape curricular change, model professionalbehaviors, and influence department and institutional cultures. Yet, many faculty do not receiveformal leadership training and frequently learn through
to society offer a highly effective vehicle for motivatingstudent interest in engineering and other STEM fields. Additionally current science standards –Next Generation of Science Standards (NGSS)1 - incorporate engineering design into thelearning objectives of science in grades K-12. However few classroom teachers have had thebenefit of exposure to engineering design before beginning their teaching career. Just like theirstudents, early exposure in the undergraduate curriculum that enriches future teachers’knowledge of engineering and technology and its relationship to the world would benefit thesecandidates.Project based learning (PBL) and the engineering design process are a natural pedagogical fit.PBL is focused on knowledge and
printed gel comb in a pipette tip lid. (B) Practice demonstration ofgel electrophoresis after 20 minutes of runtime. (C) Representative examples of the slidedeck explaining gel electrophoresis presented to students before the experiment.Survey DesignParticipating student feedback was collected through surveys eliciting 1. Quantitative responses employing the Likert scale to gauge participants’ interest in STEM and assess their perceptions of the program’s effectiveness, 2. Qualitative, open-ended questions given a relevant prompt, such as their notions of STEM and opportunities for general feedback, and 3. Clear, multiple-choice questions that request demographics, educational aspirations, and
general goal for thisstudy was to determine what types of activities the chapters perform and how well members areperforming, measured by indicators of student success (GPA, retention, and graduation rate).Four major questions guided this study: 1. What are the characteristics of each chapter? 2. What activities do the chapters engage in, by type? 3. What assessment methods do the chapters employ to track success? 4. What outcomes are the chapters achieving, by type?The first three questions were designed to paint a holistic picture of the chapters—who they areand what they do—whereas the final question seeks to understand the impact the chapters haveon their members.MethodsResearchers created two surveys (one for
programs preparestudents with expertise in the area of their dissertation very well but miss out on providing non-technical skills that are particularly important to be successful in industry [4, 9]. Also, due tolack of exposure to industry and limiting their research to academic circles, the graduate studentswere generally unaware of the working environment in industry. Consequently, initial attemptson improving doctoral curricula such as the Accelerate-2-Industry (A2i) program initiated by Fig. 1. Trend of various STEM PhDs to employment in industry or business during 2003- 2023.North Carolina State University and later adopted by many others, provided the students withshort modules of lectures on career exploration, business
is generally considered having a good reliability, while alphas below 0.5 areunacceptable. Overall Cronbach’s alpha for all items of the survey was .79. ComputedCronbach’s alpha for each subscale is reported in Table 1. In the primary analysis, we conducteda one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to examine differences between the twogroups on all the constructs measured.Table 1. Reliability of Subscales Cronbach’s Sub-Scales Mean SD α Intrinsic Goal Orientation Rehearsal 5.35 0.83 .59 Extrinsic Goal
analyze customer needs, and transform these into product specifications. Generate, select and test conceptual models. Specify system concept using concepts of operation, use case scenarios and technical requirements. Learn Model-Based Systems Engineering fundamentals. Experience a design review process for the concept phase.The syllabus from the initial course offering is shown below in Table 1.Table 1: Conception of CPS Course Syllabus Topic(s) Class exercises Module 1 Course Overview Module 2 Elegant Design Module 3 Systems and Design Thinking Module 4 Edeation Exercise Ideation exercise Module 5 Identifying Apply to project
acceleration, mm-wave radars and communication systems, mm-wave software defined radios, cybersecurity, and attack resilience. He has published more than 100 technical articles and was the PI and co-PI for several funded projects.Prof. Matt Robert Bohm, Florida Polytechnic University Matt Bohm is a Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Florida Polytechnic University, where he also serves as the Director of Industry Engagement and Capstone Projects. Since joining in 2016, he has developed the capstone program into a thriving multidisciplinary and industry-connected experience. His research focuses on engineering design, design repositories, and automatic concept generation, with an emphasis on improving design
can serve as tools foreffectively navigating future situations. This process persists as long as life and learning continue[15]. While it is important for students to acquire technical skills, it is equally important for themto look beyond a particular technology. For example, students were asked to understandcommunity impacts regarding transportation projects. The upcoming generation of professionalsshould be prepared with technical capabilities and have an understanding of the connectionsbetween people and the environment [17].Along with the positive outcomes, the project has some limitations. Firstly, no follow-up surveyis developed for the participating students. In future research, the program plans to distribute asurvey to the students
1 4% 24 92% Focus GroupsFive focus group sessions were held during the eight-month period of this study. The number ofparticipants at each session ranged from 2 to 9 women, for a total of 25 participants. Of thefocus group participants (N=25), 56% identified themselves as white and the rest (44%) as aminority or multi-racial, including 36% Hispanic and 12% African American students (onestudent selected both Hispanic and African American).The eight groups of focus questions from the guide are shown in figure 4 below: 1. Please tell us a little bit about your self- How would you define your personality? What do you enjoy doing most? How does Science, Technology, Engineering or
after the project.Statistical analysis will be conducted to determine the effectiveness of the two project tracks inhelping GTAs understand the EML framework and improve their teaching abilities.IntroductionBackground of GTA training courseA team of engineering faculty from a public research university piloted a training course forgraduate teaching assistants (GTAs) in 2017, focusing on teaching pedagogy and leadershipdevelopment [1]. The course takes the format of weekly seminars, in which a guest speakerpresents an interactive session within the course scope each week. Topics range from holdingoffice hours and general rubric design to presentation skills and ethics. Early feedback wassought from faculty members who work with a large number of
-directed, and lifelong learners [1]. At the same time, students areemerging from the K-12 education system trained primarily to regurgitate facts from short termmemory [2]. Students appear to arrive at college less prepared for knowledge integration, lessinclined to pursue holistic education, and less equipped with the tools of learning [3]. Addressingthese needs and challenges calls for holistic thinking about engineering education. The solutionmight very well be teaching students “not what to do as engineers, but [rather] what to be asengineers… to think in general, global terms” [4]. Whether through experience or education,engineering students must develop engineering judgment, understanding, and intuition [5].Engineering students need high
to the additive manufacturing resources, capabilities, capacities, and products that could be produced. They were then introduced to several processes underway, including the one with which they would be engaged during the balance of the event. The introduction also included supervised processing and post-processing. Once a level of participant hands-on confidence with 3D printing was achieved, they were provided the opportunity to process canned products, which they could have personalized, and then 3D print the designs they developed. During the end of the last session of the event, the participants were administered a post-event poll to, on a 1-4 scale, gage their satisfaction with the event and to ascertain their plans for the
. Table 1: Percent of questions covering each topic. % Of Robot Drive Robot Sensors Programming Math Science Questions Construction Mechanism Motion By 20.7 27.6 34.5 44.8 27.6 75.9 69.0 Reviewers By 10.3 24.1 20.7 17.2 37.9 55.2 55.2 DesignersThe content questions were generally designed around one topic and frequently also addressedone or two sub-topics. The analysis shows that the reviewers assigned more questions to eachcategory than were intended by the designers, with the exception of