, The Learning Factory – Integrating Design, Manufacturing and Business Realities into Engineering Curricula – a Sixth Year Report Card, Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Engineering Education, August 6 -10, 2001, Oslo, Norway4. Morell, Lueny, Ramón Vázquez-Espinosa, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho, Rosa Buxeda, Learning by Doing: Integrating Undergraduate Research, and the Remote Sensing & GIS Curriculum, 2001 IGARSS Conference Proceedings, Hawaii, July 2001.5. Morell de Ramirez, L, Jose Zayas-Castro, John S. Lamancusa, Jens Jorgensen, A Summative Assessment Strategy for a Multi-institutional, Multi-Task Project: the Case of the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership, Proceedings of 1996 Frontiers in
. Page 24.67.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Method for Assessing Engineering Leadership Content in the Engineering Curriculum: A First Look at Civil Engineering Project Management CoursesAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering, industry, educators, and professional engineering societiescommunicate the need for the 21st century engineer to understand the principles of leadership and to beprepared to lead in a variety of venues, including government. While many engineering schools supportthis proposition, many also lack an explicit functional mechanism by which to achieve it. Some schoolsmay seek implicitly to foster leadership development in students through co-curricular group
teach students the aesthetics and critical thinking with creativity. In thisstudy, we merged two design-based courses modules into the original course curriculum topromote the creativity of students in the field of material engineering. The course module (I)“User-Centered Design-Problem Definition” was offered based on the product and useroriented design aspects. The other course module “Experiential Manufacturing and MaterialAesthetics” was proceeded through project-based learning activities. The two course modules were combined into relevant course, Project Laboratory (1) &(2), on the spring semester (2016) as an elective course to undergraduate students. Studentsshould submit their research portfolios and final report of the program
2001 the ARHS Technology Education department completed curriculum maps4 foreach course. In doing that the department was directed to complete the maps reflecting currentpractice and content and to match that content with the concepts in the curriculum frameworks.With that as a benchmark the school would begin a course by course departmental review tocompare current curricula to frameworks. Individuals and/or teams of teachers would thenresearch options and make suggestions as to how to best meet the broad concepts outlined in theframeworks and then initiate a rewrite of the map and curriculum for that course. The twocourses relating to this paper are the single trimester courses; Engineering & Technology I andII. Discussions were held
development and adaptation [11] may get insidetraditional curriculum development drivers’ (e.g. NCEES and ABET) review cycles. In thesecases, changes to ABET criteria may lessen educational valuation from the perspectives ofstudents locked into a dated curricula and their future employers.In this work, we posit that genAI will cause environmental engineering curricula to add, shift, orabandon topical priorities. More significantly, we compare the length of time for review cyclesof curriculum development drivers to genAI development timeframes and engineering firmgenAI adoption decision cycles. Lastly, we propose a responsive framework that can be adoptedto keep program curricula relevant in the new age of genAI.GenAI in undergraduate environmental
Page 26.945.1 Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Florida. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Incorporating Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum in Engineering and Engineering Technology-(E/ET) Lessons Learned.AbstractUndergraduate research has been found to provide an essential component of engineering andengineering technology education and therefore belongs in the undergraduate curriculum.It has a positive effect on individual research programs and the university's researchenterprise.It contributes to the intellectual life of individual departments and the campus as a whole,while it raises the level of research activity, and helps recruit stronger undergraduates
State Univer- sity. His research focuses on college access and pathways to STEM degrees, especially among women and underrepresented students. He served as interim director of the Center for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education.Dr. Melissa Chapman Haynes, Professional Data Analysts, Inc. Page 23.113.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Study of the Impact of a National Project Based Learning Curriculum (PLTW) on Student Continuation to Postsecondary InstitutionsAuthors: Rethwisch, D.G., Chapman, M., Schenk, T., Starobin, S
provided a high level of mentorship and direction. With the Index Terms—Eporfolios, internship, experiential learning, growth of engineering, technology, manufacturing (and manyassessment, ABET other areas) with industrialization, urbanization, modern warfare, and needs of large populations, academic programs I. INTRODUCTION were designed to rapidly provide engineers in large numbers. A. Experiential learning and assessment challenges Unfortunately, this reduced the opportunity for direct
AC 2008-2281: LIVING WITH THE LAB: A CURRICULUM TO PREPAREFRESHMAN STUDENTS TO MEET THE ATTRIBUTES OF "THE ENGINEER OF2020"David Hall, Louisiana Tech UniversityStan Cronk, Louisiana Tech UniversityPatricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyMark Barker, Louisiana Tech UniversityKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Page 13.855.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Living with the Lab: A Curriculum to Prepare Freshman Students to Meet the Attributes of “The Engineer of 2020”AbstractA project-based, freshman engineering course sequence has been developed and implemented forall new freshman engineering students with support from
educational settings,the use of strategic doing in such environments is growing. Some recent examples includedeployment at individual universities seeking to reform their curriculum, as a technique forstudents to better organize teams in classes like capstone design, the transformation of academicdepartments, and the formation of cross-disciplinary research teams to address “grandchallenges.”This paper describes the process and its application to engineering education, specifically in aneffort to increase the range and quality of innovation and entrepreneurship offerings forundergraduate engineering students.Program descriptionThe Pathways to Innovation (Pathways) program is an initiative of the National Center forEngineering Pathways to Innovation
21st Century; Volume I: David L. Wells, Editor, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1995.6. Panitz, Beth, “The Integrated Curriculum,” ASEE Prism, September 1997.7. Cherrington, B., “An Integrated Approach to Graduate Education in Manufacturing Systems--The U.T. Dallas Model”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 1993.8. Pardue, M.D., “Architecture for a Successful Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Program in a 4-year College or University”, Journal of Engineering Education, Janruary 1993.9. Lamancusa, J.S., Jorgensen,J.E., and Zayas-Castro, J.L., “The Learning Factory— A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1997.10. Goldberg, D
2006-489: AN UNDERGRADUATE POWER ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: AUNIQUE AND PRACTICAL APPROACH TO BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEENACADEMIA AND INDUSTRYRavel Ammerman, Colorado School of Mines Ravel F. Ammerman (Member IEEE) received his BS in Engineering in 1981 at Colorado School of Mines (CSM), Golden, Colorado. He also received his MS in Electrical Engineering (Power Systems and Control) at the University of Colorado in 1987. He has over 24 years combined teaching and industrial experience. Mr. Ammerman has coauthored and published several technical articles on Engineering Education, Curriculum Development, and Computer Applications related to Power Systems Engineering. Mr. Ammerman is an accomplished teacher
experiences. To help prepare for these experiences, theauthors thought it sensible to perform an early search of recent (~2008 and newer) engineeringeducation literature focused on design projects supported by undergraduate BME curricula. Thegoal is to use lessons learned from earlier hands-on design efforts to guide the BME curriculumcommittee in their choice of projects and educational venues that map to the learning outcomesand skillsets emphasized in this BME curriculum. Such projects should be suited forundergraduate students with little-to-no design experience and preferably be appropriate thematicmatches to the emphasis areas in the degree program. Further, project elements should align wellwith effective student-learning assessment methods
educational and research programs related to sustainability; coordinates and assists in the implementation of greening efforts for the campus; and participates in campus planning for sustainability. She is actively involved in programs and education surrounding renewable energy, climate action planning, and climate adaptation and resilience.Dr. Li Ding, California State University - Northridge Dr. Li Ding is a Lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management at California State University Northridge. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Vertical Integration of the Liberal Arts in Engineering Education WIP
AC 2012-4481: EDUCATION APPROACH IN JAPAN FOR MANAGEMENTAND ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMSProf. David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University David Cochran is a professor of industrial and systems engineering management. He is Founder and Prin- cipal of System Design, LLC, Visiting Professor with the School of Business, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan and faculty of systems engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Cochran devel- oped the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition (MSDD) to determine the underlying design of the Toyota Production System (and ”lean”) from a systems engineering viewpoint and was Founder and Director of the Production System Design Laboratory in the
, research and development, and business development. He studied at Murray State University and the University of Alabama at Birmingham where his research was on immersive virtual learning envi- ronments for educational training purposes. Furthermore, Dr. Webster has received various professional certifications from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, SolidWorks Corporation, the Project Management Institute, and NACE International. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Industry Supplied CAD Curriculum and Team Project-Based Learning: Case Study on Developing Design, Problem-Solving, Communication, and Group SkillsAbstract:This case study investigates the extent to which industry
Philadelphia, PA, where she completed B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 2005, 2007, and 2010, respectively. She joined UNC Charlotte in 2010 as AssDr. Paras Mandal, The University of Iowa Paras Mandal is an Assistant Professor of industrial, manufacturing, and systems engineering at the Uni- versity of Texas, El Paso. Mandal obtained a doctoral degree in interdisciplinary intelligent systems engineering. His teaching and research interests iSukumar Kamalasadan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 NSF Grantees Poster Session: Power Engineering Curriculum Update: Preliminary Evaluation of Student Concept Maps on Energy
AC 2008-531: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF FAILURE CASE STUDIES ON THECIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS CURRICULUM:PHASE IINorb Delatte, Cleveland State UniversityPaul Bosela, Cleveland State UniversityRosemary Sutton, Cleveland State UniversityJoshua Bagaka's, Cleveland State UniversityWilliam Beasley, Cleveland State University Page 13.232.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessing the Impact of Failure Case Studies on the Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Curriculum: Phase IIAbstract This paper is the second in a series documenting work to assess the impact of theintroduction of failure case studies into
Paper ID #8696The RepRap 3-D Printer Revolution in STEM EducationDr. John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University John Irwin earned a doctorate in curriculum and instruction from Wayne State University, Detroit, Michi- gan, and in 2006 joined the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University and is presently a tenured Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Technology (with a strong manufacturing focus). Irwin was a Program Manager for a NSF grant from 2002-2006 to develop a Manufacturing Simulation Technology associate degree program, and from 2009-2010, Irwin served as PI for a Michigan Depart
student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her PhD in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in engineering education. Samantha completed a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University in 2008 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Design for Manufacturing from Stanford in 2010.Mr. Mark Cuson Mark Cuson is a sophomore studying Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. After several ed- ucation related jobs in the past, he decided to spend the summer after his freshman year working on engineering education, specifically Stanford’s Introduction to Solid Mechanics, E14. In addition to the Longboard Lab & Case Study, Mark worked on a series of online vector math tutorials to
with The MathWorks, Inc. in Natick, Massachusetts working on software quality engineering for embedded DSP programming using MATLAB and Simulink. He has experience with European Union funded projects and served on several organizing and review committees. He is fluent in English, German and Arabic. His interests include unmanned ground vehicles, electromobility, robotics, image analysis, and color science. Dr. Rawashdeh is a Senior Member of the IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design of a Portable Levitating Ball PID Control Trainer System and Curriculum for Electrical Engineering
]. discipline. Light bars indicate those same Scholar articles per 1,000 graduates producedHowever, in all the helpful material in each discipline in 2018. Chemicalreferenced above, a mention of chemistry or Engineering is conspicuously the lowest onchemical engineering’s place in established each measure.maker culture is very difficult to find, if notcompletely absent. It is not, of course, that chemical engineering educators have not madesignificant and substantive contributions to understanding how best to incorporate fabricationtools and maker-like spaces into chemical engineering curriculum; they certainly have [24]–[27].However, we have not been as quick as other engineering
Academy hasresearched the benefits of using a project-based robotic project in introductory courses6. Thisresearch indicates positive results in the student’s engagement, but did not examine the impactthe course had on future courses in the curriculum. Additional research at Rose-Hulman Instituteof Technology studied improvement in the understanding of “a more realistic mode of theirfuture work place demographic”7. The results, while positive, where mostly anecdotal in nature.Finally, research on the benefits of cohort in engineering education is limited8, but indicates theimportance of cohort development on the development of a positive “attitude” towardsengineering.This paper presents the findings of a two part impact study. The remaining
Paper ID #24435”Full Paper: Stimulate PRIDE* in Freshmen with Reverse Engineering”Mr. BALRAJ SUBRA MANI, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyProf. I. Joga Rao, New Jersey Institute of Technology 2018 FYEE Conference: Glassboro, New Jersey Jul 25 “Full Paper: Stimulate PRIDE* in Freshmen with Reverse Engineering”Introduction:Every successful outcome needs a first step: Freshmen entering any university do so with lots ofanxieties and lofty expectations. In a technology or engineering institution, FED-101 is the firstcourse a freshman would enroll in their chosen major, in their first semester
prevalent as well. At the U. S. Air Force Academywe have been using RP to enhance our design curriculum for the last three years. In thispaper we give a brief overview of RP technology, and discuss how we use both classical(non-rapid) and rapid prototyping in our design classes. Assessment results from bothfaculty and students are presented which provide insight into the role of RP inundergraduate education. This assessment shows that students have an initial reluctanceto using the RP technology. However, after they have used RP, they report that theprocess is surprisingly easy. In addition, they report that prototyping significantlyenhances their design and more importantly, enhances their learning of the design toolsand methodologies taught
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society, the Fiber Society, the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, the Textile Institute, and is a fellow of the Institute of Textile Science in Canada. Page 23.515.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Engineering Librarians as Partners of Faculty in Teaching Scholarly Inquiryto Undergraduate Students through Curriculum Integration: The Biotextiles Product Development Course BlogAbstractGroup projects are frequently utilized in undergraduate course curricula at the NC
students”, ”Development of Student Assessment Software”, and ”Improving Student Engagement through Active Learning”.Miss Olivia Tronchin c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using LEGO® Mindstorms and MATLAB in curriculum design of active learning activities for a first-year engineering computing courseThis paper is an evidence-based practice research study to improve course delivery in computerprogramming. Courses and materials in computer programming tend to be abstract, which canlead to many students having difficulties learning and being engaged with the material. With amore hands-on practical approach, students may find themselves immersed in the material andmotivated to understand and
The Ohio State University (OSU) where she oversees programs to recruit and retain women engineering students and also outreach to K-12 students to introduce them to the exciting career opportunities in engineering. Glenda joined OSU in 2003 after working over ten years as a water resources engineer. She received a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio. Page 14.1363.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 What Can an Engineering Outreach Program Offer Young Women That They Can’t Find in an
, promoting work-life balance and global competition inthe manufacturing sector [12]. Nevertheless, looking into the areas where I4.0 is focused, onecannot miss noticing that these challenges are addressed to attract and retain the next generationof work force, both Millennials and Generation Z. Figure 1: Timeline of the four stages of industrial revolutionAccording to Pew research [13], the new generations, Millennials and Generation Z are raciallyand ethnically more diverse than the preceding generations. The rapid globalization alsodemanded the need for diversity and inclusion. Besides these factors, the new generations areexpected to be more educated than their predecessors. Converging all these factors, one canargue the new
variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he has been a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Modifying a junior year machine design project to break down knowledge silos in themechanical engineering curriculumAbstractA common feature of Mechanical Engineering curriculum is an integrated Capstone projectwhere students must combine knowledge from various courses to complete a design within ateam. However, in many curricula, this culminating project is the first time students are forcedto