). Page 26.1292.4 Figure 1. World IPv6 prefix allocation data14.Core Network - Measured by looking at the percent of IPv6 transit Autonomous Systems (AS).This is accomplished by digging the BGP Routing Table and computing a weight and rank foreach AS based on the number of times it show up in the AS path for all IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes.13Currently, all Tier1 providers have enabled IPv6 transit service.12Content - Measured by looking at the number of websites reachable over IPv6. 6Lab looks intothe DNS system to find how many domain names have a bounded AAAA record and checks thatthe site is actually reachable over IPv6 by opening an HTTP session to the home page over IPv6.According to the World Content Data presented on
teacherand researcher observations on social and emotional responses of students. Note that thisexample is not intended to set any limit on the grade-/age-levels that a robotics lesson, in general,and this lesson, in particular, can potentially address. Finally, recommendations for future Page 26.1679.3research, implementation, and assessment are provided. Table 1: An overview of technology integration, pedagogical benefits, and disciplinary content addressed through the
ensemble players to makethe ensemble itself look good; therefore, generosity is the goal. Notably, generosity begets moregenerosity. A single very generous offer can help everyone to bring better offers to share withthe ensemble 2,3.For an illustration of generosity, consider the following two offers: 1. “We’re here.” 2. “We’re finally here at the San Diego Zoo—but I don’t see a panda anywhere.”Most people would agree that in a game of pretend, the second offer is much easier to respond to,even though the first offer has more possible responses. That creative second offer also requiredmore cognitive labor to produce. It is often more difficult to make a generous offer than anungenerous offer. This is as true in life as it is in the
technical workforce. Using actual critical engineering design challenges toinspire and engage students in design solutions to real problems is the path to achieving a highdegree of student engagement. Sustainability, living better on less, and team projects that directlyimpact people’s lives speak to this generation of engineering students. Energy usage is one of themost critical engineering challenges we face today. Global warming due to harmful emissionsfrom burning fossil fuels and rising gas prices as well as national security issues have drivenpeople to look for new ways to reduce their fuel consumption and to live better on less. It hasbeen known for some time that streamlining vehicles can dramatically improve their fueleconomy and in
: 10.18260/1-2--29796.[10] J. H. Falk, “Invention Education: Outcomes for STEM Learning. Camp Invention® 2017 Evaluation Summary,” Institute for Learning Innovation, 2017.[11] ChangeMaker Consulting LLC, “Camp Invention Evaluation Executive Summary,” 2014.[12] Kent State University, Bureau of Research Training and Services, National Inventors Hall of Fame, “Camp Invention Evaluation Report,” 2004.[13] A. Scarisbrick-Hauser and B. Hauser, “Camp Invention 2009 Program Evaluation,” H.A. Praxis Solutions, Unpublished Technical Report, 2009.[14] J. H. Falk and D. D. Meier, “Camp Invention Evaluation Report,” Institute for Learning Innovation, 2018.
introduction into each of Yale’s engineering and applied sciencemajors (biomedical, chemical, electrical, environmental, and mechanical engineering, andcomputer science). Figure 2 illustrates a version of the engineering design process (developed byDesign for America) that is applied in this course.22 Figure 2. Design for America ProcessThe first half of the course is devoted to “theory and skills” while the second half is devoted to aclient-based “project.” For each engineering discipline, part of a lecture is devoted to discussingthe discipline in general, and then a specific theoretical aspect of the discipline is covered indetail in 1-2 additional lectures. This specific area is reinforced in a lab session (in
to collaborate on course content and tolearn from each other, often engaging in discussions that focus on intrinsic motivation andgrading. These meetings serve to create a cohort of faculty who are learning alongside students.There are generally two working principles: 1) honor the whole, and 2) the quality of therelationships (shared commitments) defines the quality of the work done together. Throughoutthis paper when referring to SUSTAIN, interviewees and researchers mean the local learninginitiative SUSTAIN SLO.BackgroundThe basis for the development of SUSTAIN SLO is grounded in several theories on change andeducation. The work on systems theory by Senge5, Hall6, and Meadows7 influenced the design.The aim is to intervene compassionately
markup, to model a scenario where inhouse additive manufacturing technology is used for prototyping. The 3D print log has also allowed the generation of usage and reliability data for each of the operational printers. Page 26.106.8Patterns of failed prints are interpreted as a potential technical problem with one of the machines, and can be addressed immediately. Pedagogical Approach After creating a system for the printers to operate and be used by the students, it was necessary to instruct the students on how to use the technology properly and effectively. It was important to teach the students all of the steps and procedures
technical problems encountered during the project? 1 – Ineffective 2 - Slightly effective 3 - Moderately effective 4 - Very effective 5 - Extremely effective Describe a significant problem your team encountered and how you solvedApplication of Engineering Principles: On a scale of 1 to 5, how well did you apply engineering principles to design and implement your project? 1 – Poorly 2 - Below average 3 – Average 4 – Good 5 – Excellent Which engineering concepts were most helpful in your project? (Open-ended response)Business Model Canvas ApplicationValue Proposition: How effectively did your project address a real need or provide value to a target consumer? 1 - Not effective 2 - Slightly effective 3
interdisciplinary medical product development course. She also serves as Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively involved in engineering outreach for global health. Miiri received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to Needs Assessment1. AbstractA summer Bioengineering Clinical Immersion experience for rising seniors who are enrolled in atwo-semester capstone design sequence is offered to provide exposure to the
detection tubes, and a 4-gas/photoionization detector(PID) to help identify and characterize the emergency.The scenario involves repairing two different leaks on a 1 ½” PVC piping system. One leak isdue to a damaged gasket in a piping flange; the second leak is a pair of holes drilled into thepipe. Students are given a short course in pipe fitting techniques covering how to change a flangegasket and how to utilize band clamps to seal a hole. During the scenario, the piping assembly isconnected to a garden hose and is pressurized with water, allowing the responders to affect therepairs under more realistic conditions. The decontamination team is taught proper techniques toexecute technical decontamination of responders in PPE. Students participating
design and implementation and connections to studentself-reported evidence may help individuals (e.g., graduate deans, faculty developmentprofessionals, and program evaluators) at other institutions design effective professionaldevelopment seminars to prepare future engineering faculty at their institution.Bibliography1. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academiccareer. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.2. Austin, A. E. (2010). Reform efforts in STEM doctoral education: Strengthening preparation for scholarly careers.In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 91-128). Springer Netherlands.3. Arreola, R., Theall, M., & Aleamoni, L. M. (2003
Paper ID #14419Understanding the Reasons for Low Representation of Ethnic Minority Stu-dents in STEM FieldsDr. Rajeev K Agrawal, North Carolina A&T University (Tech) Dr. Rajeev Agrawal has been teaching in the Department of Computer Systems Technology at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCAT), Greensboro, North Carolina for last six years. His current research focuses on Big data Analytics, Cloud Computing, and social-media analytics. He received the best paper award for his paper on Image Clustering Using Multimodal Keywords in the International Conference on Semantics and Digital Media
of extensive industry experience in Silicon Valley working in the semiconductor industry performing software development, application engineering, de- sign, testing and verification of digital integrated circuits. He has taught electrical and general engineering classes at Pitt-Johnstown since 2004. His research and teaching interests include Semiconductor circuit Testing and Verification, Low Power Design Analysis, Digital and Embedded Systems, Electromagnetic Wave Scattering, and IC Design Au- tomation Software development. He has authored or coauthored 26 publications and he holds one US patent and another under review. He can be reached at maddu@pitt.edu 225 Engineering and Science Building University of
deviations within each categorical variable. A threshold of themean plus one standard deviation was used to identify the faculty behaviors where there wasstatistically significant disagreement of the importance of that faculty behavior. Under theassumption that the “most” important behaviors will receive the highest importance score, weselected the top three behaviors for further inspection. Further, we used the mean plus onestandard deviation of the standard deviations across the categories for each question andcategorical variable to identify the behaviors where there was the lowest agreement (highestvariance in categorical mean) and offer a reflection on those as well.ResultsThe survey considered in this analysis generated 342 responses. Tables 1
design.19 SE topics, inparticular, provide an interdisciplinary opportunity to design and build while also consideringtradeoffs in a collaborative activity.20 Knowledge of SE is also important for students’technological literacy, enabling them to understand how all the components of a system—technological, human, and natural—affect the others in positive and negative ways. In Sweden,technical and social-technical systems are part of the compulsory curriculum.21 In the U.S., theInternational Technology Educators Association’s second Standard for Technological Literacy isthat students can recognize the core concepts of technology. 22 This includes specific learningobjectives about systems engineering for each grade level: for example, 6th-8th
research experience by uniting diverse disciplines, partnerships andproject roles.Through interactions with peers who represent different academic backgrounds, studentsrecognize the benefit of gaining other perspectives when approaching both the course project andin future endeavors. Gaining a broader view helps students realize the complexity of the problemand how the solution must consider more than technical design.Bibliography 1. Riley, D., & Bloomgarden, A. H. (2006). Learning and Service in Engineering and Global Development. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, 2(2), 48–59. Retrieved from http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/ijsle/article/viewArticle/2084. 2. Witmer, A. (2015). The
courses.IntroductionThe AIChE Education Division’s Survey Committee regularly surveys courses in chemicalengineering. Transport and related courses were most recently surveyed in 2014 [1], so theywere due for a follow-up survey. Separations has never been surveyed by the committee or thepredecessor Education Projects Committee [2]. To avoid bumping the survey cycle to 11 yearsto add separations to the survey list, separations was included with the transport course survey.The results of these surveys are presented so that departments may see what others are doing.Faculty at NJIT 2017 surveyed the curriculum at 148 US institutions in 2017 [3]. Departmentshad a median of 7 credit hours in transport topics. The credits were divided among six differentcourse types as
educational multimedia: IEM, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 50-60.[8] S. Vonderwell, X. Liang and K. Alderman, "Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning," Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 309-328, 2007.[9] S. K. Vonderwell and M. Boboc, "Promoting formative assessment in online teaching and learning," TechTrends, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 22-27, 2013.[10] I. F. Akyildiz , W. Y. Lee, M. C. Vuran and S. Mohanty, "NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey," Computer Networks, vol. 50, no. 13, pp. 2127-2159, 2006.[11] IEEE Communications Society Breaking News , "Telecommunication Engineering Now Has Official Accreditation Criteria," 30 March 2014. [Online
at the University of Florida (UF). She is also an affiliate faculty in UF’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She received her B.S. in chemistry from Seoul National University, M.S. in biomedical engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. As an instructional associate professor, she was awarded several grants from the National Science Foundation (IUSE Level 1, IRES Track 1, I-Corps, and I-Corps for Learning) as principal investigator. She transitioned to tenure track in Fall 2023 to pursue her research interests in convergence in engineering education, global engineering education, and social issues in STEM research and
educational process.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to sincerely thank to College of Engineering and Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering for their support of the inversion of this course. Special thanks go tothe always reliable Victoria Minerva, College Coordinator of E-Learning for facilitating themaintenance of videos on the Mediasite system and for personally generating numerous usagereports. This study would not have been possible without her assistance.Bibliography 1. Mills, J.E. and Treagus, D.F. (2003) “Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer?” Australian Journal of Engineering Education. 2. Perrenet, J., Bouhuijs, P., and Smits, J. (2000) “The Suitability of Problem-Based
Paper ID #49188Mentoring Practices Lessons Learned: A Seven-Year Case Study of the NHERIResearch Experiences for Undergraduate ProgramDr. Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Karina I. Vielma is a first-generation college student who dreamed big. As the eldest of five children, Dr. Vielma became very resourceful, attributing her skills to growing up in poverty. Her parents had high expectations for school and this prepareDr. Robin Lynn Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio Robin Nelson has a PhD in Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching with a cognate in Instructional Technology from the
Industrial Engineering at Kennesaw State Uni- versity, a four-year comprehensive university in Georgia. He has a BS degree in Industrial Engineering at the University of Tennessee, an MS degree in Industrial & Systems Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a PhD in Information Systems Management. Prior to teaching, he worked for Lock- heed Martin, Union Carbide, nVision Global, Oracle, and Georgia Tech in various engineering roles from research, to technical sales, to division management.Prof. Thomas Reid Ball, Kennesaw State University Thomas R. Ball joined Kennesaw State University’s Industrial Engineering Technology Department in 2004 and currently serves as Associate Dean for the Southern
environment [1-9]. While theseoutcomes and their importance are widely articulated, there is less discussion about themechanisms by which these benefits actually develop. In other words, because the positiveoutcomes of a liberal education are often observed and articulated in retrospect, the pedagogicalconstructs and cognitive models that scaffold these later behaviours are often unexplored. Amore comprehensive understanding of how and why these skills develop can be gained byobserving the student behaviours and instructional practices that govern some studentexperiences in the liberal arts.Representing Science on Stage, a theatre elective for engineers at the University of Torontoprovides one space in which these interactions can be observed. In
basicidea for the Community Based STEM Program is for students to design, build, and employ realsystems to solve engineering-based problems for local community service and educationorganizations. The program’s design was very simple and required three elements - eachprogram would have a faculty mentor, students, and a community partner who expresses a needfor a solution to an engineering design challenge.In 2013, under the guidance of a new Dean, the Community Based STEM Program wasintroduced to the College of Engineering through various informational sessions and directcommunication to faculty who were already involved in community service work. The programwas chosen because it is deemed a successful model for service learning for engineering
Ziotopoulou was born and raised in Athens, Greece. She joined the Charles E. Via Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech as an Assistant Professor in August 2014 after finishing her Ph.D. studies at the University of California, Davis. Before moving to the United States, she completed her undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Geotechnical Engineer- ing at the National Technical University of Athens, Greece in 2007. For her doctoral research, Katerina worked on the development, implementation, calibration and validation of a constitutive model for lique- fiable soils and to that end worked closely with the Division of Safety of Dams of California and Fugro West Inc. She is
, argumentation, negotiation, compromise, decision making andcommitment12.An STSE-focused curriculum has various goals, which have been synthesized by Aikenhead7: tomake the human and cultural aspects of science and technology accessible and relevant; to helpstudents become better critical thinkers and problem solvers; to increase communication skills;encourage social responsibility; and generate interest and increase achievement in learningtraditional science content. Various efforts have been undertaken to evaluate the outcomes ofSTSE, sometimes in comparison to more traditional methods of teaching science. A synthesis ofresearch in the K-12 sector, conducted by Aikenhead7,13, stated the following conclusions: (1)Students in STSE education classes
102 291 393 (84.3%) Totals 124 (26.6%) 342 (73.4%) 466 (100%)Table 1. Fall 2013 New Engineering and Computer Science Transfers by Division and Gender. 3We note that approximately one-fourth of the new transfer students are lower division students.For fall 2013 this means that these 124 students, in general, did not fit the classification offreshman or upper division. However, many of the students classified as upper division will needthree years or more to complete a Bachelor’s degree in engineering and so are reallysophomores.A very disturbing number is that only 15.7% of the new transfer students were female, which islower than the percentage of females (18%) in the college. One
Learning Modules Developed within the SIRA Framework Stage 1: Stage 2: Stage 3: Stage 4: Stage 5: Stage 6: Learning Establishing Perspective Compare Inducing Decision- Meta- stages knowledge taking & contrast conflict making & reflection justificationContent: Case scenario, Self and other Comparing Expert ethical Debate and Reflection on facts, and expert stakeholder perspectives and technical justification reasoning information perspectives and principles opinions
funding, knowledge of experimental design, and knowledge of research methods 1. Thegreatest gains in skill development occurred generally among those students who had little priorexperience with research. As Bielefeldt indicates, REU programs may be well-placed to targetand recruit such students. A significant gain in the likelihood of pursuing a master’s degree wasalso noted for students completing the REU 1.In a survey of undergraduate students who engaged in a summer research experience, Lopattofound that students participating in such research experiences reported gains in several areas,including those related to an understanding of the research process, scientific problems, andlaboratory techniques 4. Participation in a research experience