to learn from their experiences, facilitate an ideaexchange, and to create new collaborations. Typical attendance in these community meetings hasmore than doubled from 5 to 12 over a period of one year. We are adopting a strategy from themusic department when they host guest performing artists, having a public engagement event aswell as master class offerings. Our engineering interpretation on this approach is to have ourspeaker of distinction offer a 45-minute interactive lunch talk for all faulty, accompanied bymultiple small sessions of group interaction, with a limited number of participants to promotedeep discussion.To ensure ease of access to shared resources, the initiative is also building a Microsoft (MS)Team ESCL@Te Community site
mentors and mentees – one focusedon learning about potential engineering majors and choosing spring semestercourses, and the other an evening social following a college of engineering event.For further details on the program refer to AuthorC et al. 5.SubjectsWith the addition of the new mentoring programs, the number of first-yearstudents participating as mentees increased from 126 in 2004 to 381 in 2005. Ofthe original 381 participants, 61 chose to not participate – resulting in 320participants. Of the 320 mentees, 310 were first-year students accounting for26.8% of the entering first-year CoE population.Table 1 shows demographic data for the mentees from the Fall 2005 enteringfirst-year engineering cohort (“Post response”) and the 114 who
The Internet as Infrastructure for EducatorsOne means of supporting this effort is the Internet and the WWW (world wide web). The projectwe report on in this paper, which was recently funded by the National Science Foundation, is tocreate an electronic infrastructure to support design and manufacturing educators. Thisframework will provide a mechanism by which the many computer-based resources alreadycreated can become accessible to an expanded, global community. It will be a place wheredevelopers of new educational materials, case studies, databases and applicable knowledgeresources may immediately obtain feedback on new contributions and education methodologies.A network-centric approach will help ensure that those materials are more widely
of the program of the Resilient Infrastructure and Sustainability Education Undergraduate Program (RISE UP). As you can see, I am a student with a great passion for knowledge and learning new things. During my life, I have had the opportunity to learn and enjoy learning, not only in the academy, but also in the day-to-day activities that arise. From planting and caring for animals to taking classes and doing research, everything that allows me to learn and develop new skills pleases me.Rocio Juliana Sotomayor-irizarry (Student)Elmer Miguel Irizarry RosarioLaura Sofia Garcia CantoHumberto Eduardo CavallinCarla Lopez Del Puerto (Professor)Luisa Guillemard (Dr.) © American Society for Engineering
acknowledged, andduring physical laboratory sessions, the safety precautions that need to be taken are outlined.Another example might be the communication aspect. According to the ABET guidelinescommunication involves relaying information about laboratory works effectively, both orally andin writing, at levels ranging from executive summaries to comprehensive technical reports. Thishas been incorporated into course curriculum in the form of the assigned homework anddiscussion conducted during laboratory sessions [15].Conclusion and Future WorkIn this paper, we discuss multi-faceted approach for promoting active student learning on theintroductory level manufacturing engineering course. The author focus on the plastic injectionmolding process and
-innovative solutions require theintegration of introductory computer programming and microcontroller functions with electricaland mechanical engineering applications. These unique interdisciplinary activities are designedto reinforce classical control theory learned in a prerequisite course. Students cite the hands-onactivities in course feedback as relevant applications that help develop deeper understanding andgreater appreciation for the theory learned in the classroom. Working through the experiments inorder builds student confidence to solve open-ended problems in interdisciplinary teams. Theinitial assessments of our hands-on approach have been positive.1. IntroductionAt West Point, a Mechatronics course wasdeveloped to teach subject matter
entryand exit points; and each develops employment pathways for students.The overall curriculum for proposed HVM certificate program is displayed in Table 3. It combines existingstudent success courses (LEAD 1370; MATH 1314) along with manufacturing courses to provide thenecessary technical background. These courses include a basic print reading course (MCHN 1302) as wellas manufacturing process courses (MCHN 1338; MCHN 1308; MCHN 1313; INMT 1345), andinstrumentation basics (INCR 1302). For students to appreciate the needs and unique demands of the energyindustry, students must understand the uses and importance of the products they will be responsible for inenergy E&P. Four existing Petroleum Engineering Technology courses are included to
California, Davis. The lab also has Sankyo SR8438 SCARA robot, Allen Bradley5/05 PLC and miscellaneous mechatronics devices.Process for Generating Industry-Sponsored Student ProjectsIn our Mechanical Engineering curriculum, each master’s student must take either a master’sthesis or a master’s project as a partial requirement for completing his/her master’s degree. In amaster’s thesis, strong theoretical analysis is emphasized and a student can obtain 5 units ofcourse credit. In a master’s project, practical application is emphasized and a student can obtain2 units of course credit.Topics for industry-sponsored projects for master’s theses and projects related programs areusually generated by faculty members using their network with industry. Most of
secretarial duties of collecting, collating and recording communications, or cap-turing discourse during face-to-face meetings. These are often captured as minutes, letters,reports, and recommendations. These activities can be supported in a more free-flowing manneron a Wiki where anybody is welcome to add/modify/delete content, changes can be tracked, andundone when necessary.This paper will describe the use of a Wiki to act as a central point for a professional group devel-oping new curriculum standards. The topics will include a prototype structure for the site, govern-ing principles, encouraging user involvement, and resolving differences of opinion.IntroductionThrough collaboration we able to produce more valuable works and share information
a hands-ondesign/build project typically found in junior or senior level engineering curriculum, first-yearengineering students are given an experience entirely unique and extremely beneficial to theircollegiate engineering career and their futures as productive engineers. The FEH program hashad notable success and continues to assess its own progress to foster change for keeping pacewith changing needs and student population. Changes may be needed in the near future to keepup with the ever-increasing first-year population and diversity, but by continuing the tradition ofunconventional thinking, experimentation, and frequent feedback, there is much evidence thatindicates the future of the FEH program will continue to be bright.Bibliography1
Session 2793 University-Industry Partnerships for ABET EC 2000 Preparation: A Case Study Andrew Swift, Gregory Lush, Connie Kubo Della-Piana, Isadore Davis University of Texas at El Paso/Raytheon Corporation AbstractPreparation for a first ABET EC 2000 visit requires new ways of thinking and organization.Industrial partners can be of strategic help in making the transition from the old to the newCriteria for an Engineering Program or a College of Engineering because most corporations haveembraced the “Quality” transitions of the last
5.194.2enabling an iterative revamping of the entire curriculum.III. Approach: The Runway Across DisciplinesThe first challenge to address is that of teaching students to design a vehicle before taking anycourse in the various disciplines involved. In addition, the students come in with no knowledgeof calculus, only high school level physics and chemistry, and no engineering mechanics. This isthe traditional problem which daunts teachers who try to use this course to save time in the restof the curriculum. However, by careful examination of the course content, and suitable use ofcomputer software such as Microsoft Excel, it was found to be feasible to reduce all of thesubject matter to a level which could be logically presented and comprehended by an
AC 2008-1698: PREPARING GRADUATE STUDENTS TO BE SUCCESSFUL ASTEACHING MENTORS AND AS FUTURE PROFESSIONALSTershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan Tershia Pinder-Grover (tpinder@umich.edu) is the Coordinator of Engineering Graduate Student Instructor (GSI) Initiatives at the Center for Research on Learning in Teaching at the University of Michigan. She oversees the Engineering GSI Mentor (EGSM) Program, plans teacher training for new engineering GSIs, develops workshops and seminars, and consults with faculty and GSIs on pedagogy and engineering education research projects. Dr. Tershia Pinder-Grover earned her B.S. degree in Fire Protection Engineering from the University of Maryland and
experience across multiple face-to-face and distance formats. Her research interests include curriculum design, active learning pedagogies, and online engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Toward a Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy for Statics Problem Classification and Problem-SolvingAbstractThis work builds upon prior work in developing robust concept inventories and skill assessmentsfor statics instruction. While these instruments provide valuable tools that allow instructors toassess student progress, there is still need for learning materials to scaffold student learning fromdisconnected procedural and conceptual knowledge, to more
are sometimes required for all freshmenstudents. The needs common to freshmen students can be summarized into three groups: 1) generaltools for success; 2) major-specific tools for success; and 3) vision of chosen major.Development of Course When an introductory course for Electronics Engineering Technology (EET) students wasfirst proposed, one of the primary concerns was to avoid adding further requirements to analready full curriculum. At the same time, it was believed that such a course was greatly needed,so further attempts were made to define and fit the course into the curriculum. In order to make room in the curriculum for this cornerstone course we moved some ofthe leveling previously done elsewhere into this
advancement in the classroom. Recently, the facultyrestructured its academic degree curriculum for undergraduate students and, as a result of this—and with the help of Microchip Technology Inc., is pleased to introduce a new area of academicconcentration called “Embedded Controllers.” The coursework identified for this curriculum byboth participants (ASU and Microchip Technology Inc.) is shown in Figure 1. Page 13.1317.4 Figure 1: Curriculum and Coursework for ASU Poly Degree, Concentration in Embedded ControllersAdditionally, ESD students will have an opportunity to participate in RTC workshops, to learnthe latest
a dynamic and competitiveenvironment1. Each engineering program seeking accreditation must have in place a processbased on the needs of the program’s various constituencies in which the objectives aredetermined and evaluated1. For this purpose, a systematic approach for educational processimprovement and reengineering is needed. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a quality improvement tool for determiningcustomer requirements and translating them into product or service specifications. QFD hasbeen applied for extracting customer requirements, as well as for designing elements based onthose requirements in both university settings and other educational institutions in previousstudies 2,3,4,5. However, only the question of what is
andinterpersonal skills. Such civic engagement is important specifically to engineering students and educators. Inreformulating the fundamental criteria for engineering accreditation in terms of studentoutcomes, the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) replaced sets ofcourses passed with sets of learning outcomes achieved and assessed. In other words, programsseeking ABET accreditation must now demonstrate that their graduating students can function asbeginning professionals in eleven different areas of performance—not just pass courses. At leastfour of these new performance outcomes in Engineering Criteria (EC) 2000, Criterion 3,Program Outcomes and Assessment, can be achieved through civic service learning: 1. an
for this course (as shown in Section 2). Insummary, the projects were intended to support new course objectives that re-emphasizemachine elements as a course to bridge engineering analysis and engineering design courses.Since the traditional approach to covering numerous elements and their failure characteristics ismaintained in homeworks, tests, and lecture, we are interested in knowing if the projects aremore effective approaches to the new course objectives. To assess the benefits of the project, ashort survey was given to the students after finishing both Project 2 and Project 3 in both the falland spring semesters of 2004. Of the 96 students who took the class, 85 of them filled out thesurvey after Project 2 and 77 after Project 3. These
an arithmetic review class and how these ways of thinking interacted with the curriculum. Other research interests include teachers’ professional noticing of learners’ mathematical thinking and organizational change. Ann works on both the implementation and research sides of the ESTEME@OSU project. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15296Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional
: Project Proposal: This is a written report that is submitted at the beginning of the semester that outlines the tasks that the team plans to accomplish during the semester along with a method of approach. A schedule and preliminary budget must be included in this report. It must be submitted to, and approved by, the sponsor. Page 8.282.6Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Progress Memorandum: Approximately every two weeks
-Connect to assist new PIs and their teams acquiregrant management skills that includes applying the principles of project management as theyimplement their funded project.National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education ProgramThe NSF initiated the ATE program in 1992 to help strengthen science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) technician education programs across the country (Craft, et al., 2017). What isunique about this ATE program is that, instead of being focused on scientific research projectstypically housed at four-year, graduate-degree granting institutions, ATE is designed to help two-year technical and community colleges (hereafter referred to as two-year colleges) build STEMofferings associated with technician
, other faculty at UT Austin and at Texas A&M University willbecome more deeply involved. So far, the team approach is working and we have gained newrespect for each other and our different perspectives and disciplines. It’s actually been quite a lotof fun. Page 3.197.5References Blyth, Carl S., “French in Cyberspace,” Discovery, vol 14, no. 4, 1997. Bonwell, C.C., and Eison, J.A., “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom,” (ASHE-ERICHigher Education Report No. 1), Washington, DC: The George Washington University, 1991. Collis, B., “Pedagogical Re-Engineering: A New Approach to Course Enrichment and Re
hands-on activities were repurposed [3] to serve as and form thefoundation of this new, activity centric model learning approach. This is different fromincorporating lab experiments as had been done previously [4] in that the activities are designedto be gentler and friendlier for first-year students as well as more easily portable. As studentsengage in the activity to collect data, they develop collaboration and cooperation skills with theirclassmates; building a learning support group to help them on their academic journey. The datafrom the activity is then used to build Excel, math, and MATLAB skills through more, activelearning assignments completed in class. The pedagogy has been created for both first-yearengineering students at the
studentoutcomes for electric propulsion aircraft based on industry-developed consensus standards.We believe there are two main reasons for the lack of progress. The relatively new nature ofelectric propulsion technology means there is no established consensus on the subjects that shouldbe included in a curriculum, creating challenges in standardizing its education. Additionally, thecredit hour limits of engineering degree programs make it difficult to introduce new courseswithout displacing existing content. In traditional brick-and-mortar institutions, even when asuitable subject is identified, maintaining consistency across instructors and ensuring up-to-dateteaching materials can be challenging. Online learning, however, offers significant advantages
Session 2602 Adapting Graduate Degree Programs to the Distance Learning Environment Daniel Biezad, Jin Tso Aerospace Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University at San Luis ObispoAbstractA new graduate aerospace engineering program has been implemented for the distance-learningenvironment at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. The program is fullyaccredited and strives to maintain the hands-on “learning by doing” educational philosophy atCal Poly. It has been in operation for two years and
Paper ID #49551NeuralStorm: Training Graduate Students to Take Neuroengineering by StormDr. Xianglong Wang, University of California, Davis Dr. Xianglong Wang is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Biomedical Engineering (BME) at the University of California, Davis, and the program coordinator of the BME Quarter at Aggie Square clinical immersion program. Dr. Wang leads the cube3 lab, an engineering educational lab focused on community building and pedagogical innovations in BME. As a steering committee member, he helps shape the educational programs offered by the Center of Neuroengineering and Medicine at UC Davis
, development, and demonstration activities in government, industry, andacademia1. The program is offered through awards to California State University Los Angeles,Humboldt State University, Michigan Technological University, University of North CarolinaCharlotte and the University of North Dakota. Recognizing the inherent complexity of the topicand a multitude of new concepts, the HFCT programs are integrating laboratory practicum andprojects supporting student learning.This paper provides an overview of each participating institution laboratory practicum designand implementation after one and a half years of executing the program. While the funding wasprovided under the same DOE program, the paths, disciplines, courses, approaches ofimplementation
experimentation, analyze and interpret data, with consideration of public health, safety, and use engineering judgment to draw and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, conclusions. environmental, and economic factors. an ability to communicate effectively with a an ability to acquire and apply new range of audiences. knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.Outside the accreditation process, employers of
new faculty to acquire a thorough understanding ofthe various courses in the curriculum by perusing recent CGRs of relevant groups. Fourth,it ensures that faculty in related courses make it a point to interact with each other on aregular basis, when preparing the CGR for the particular group. And finally, the CGRs Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.208.7 Copyright c 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationprovide the evidence called for by EC2000 to show how we use the assessment results toimprove the effectiveness of the program. I believe