Research and Development Program. He has published over 150 technical papers and made numerous presentations at national and international forums. Page 15.1356.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 WATERSHED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE STORM WATER ASSESSMENTAbstract:The Sustainable Development and Next Generation Buildings class worked with ArlingtonCounty Virginia to assess impacts and alternatives for a sensitive storm water project in thecounty. This was a real world application of the subjects and technologies used in the class roomfor storm water management and planning. Within Arlington
AC 2010-2388: ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS DESIGNMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior
GC 2012-5605: COURSE ASSESSMENT; A CONSISTENT MODELDr. Sabah Razouk Abro, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Sabah Abro is an internationally educated math professor and program Director at Lawrence Techno- logical University. He graduated with a Bachelor degree from the University of Baghdad, pursued a post graduate diploma in planning from the United Nations institute in the middle east, Went to Wales in the United kingdom to get his Master’s degree and then to Belgium for his Ph.D. He has also international work experience; he served as Faculty at Al Mustansiria University in Baghdad, a regional consultant at the Arab Institute for Statistics, a position that enabled him to lecture in a number Arab countries
Educative Self-Assessment Using Web Technology Sivand Lakmazaheri, Ph.D. Educative Technologies LLC McLean, Virginia 22101 {sivand@EducativeTechnologies.net}IntroductionStudent performance assessment can serve two purposes. It can be used as a measure of learningoutcomes and as a tool for improving student learning. In the latter case, the aim of assessment isto identify students’ misconceptions and subsequently offer them timely corrective feedback. Asan outcome-measuring tool student assessment occurs a limited number of times during thecurriculum. As an educative means, assessment is a
Session: 3548 Academic Quality Management Based Assessment C.R.Sekhar, O.Farook, Jai. P.Agrawal, and E. Bouktache Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Purdue University CalumetAbstractThis paper describes an Academic Quality Management (AQM) based assessment process andthe outcome results that showed positive student’s acquired knowledge and retention.Continuous improvement is the theme emphasized by ABET 1 and our AQM based assessmenthas worked for us and is used in the continuous improvement of course delivery to improve thelearning and
Session 2432 An Electronic Web-based Assessment System Raina Petrova, Abhilasha Tibrewal, Tarek M. Sobh Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Bridgeport Bridgeport, CT 06601, USAAbstractIn keeping with the outcome-based assessment outlined by ABET's Education Criteria2000, the School of Engineering at the University of Bridgeport has defined fifteengeneral student outcomes. These outcomes form the basis of its instructional program andassessment activities. In assessing and monitoring the attainment of these outcomes,formal assessment
Session No. XXXX Assessment and Technology Enhanced Learning Mysore Narayanan Miami UniversityAbstractAssessment practices currently employed normally focus on two critically importantaspects. Student learning styles and instructor teaching methodologies. But, inreality, assessment techniques should actually analyze and examine the interactionbetween the two key players, namely the student and instructor. (Grasha, 1990,1996). Many tools used in assessment of learning often document students'knowledge. However, they do not examine how classroom practices havecontributed to specific learning
Session 2430 Skills Assessment in Hands-On Learning and Implications for Gender Differences in Engineering Education Daniel W. Knight, Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, Susan J. Poole and Lawrence E. Carlson Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory and Program College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado at BoulderAbstractA comprehensive course evaluation plan is a helpful tool for the development and revision ofnew curricula. One component of an evaluation plan is the assessment o
Session _____ The Tulane University Biomedical Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Validity and Reliability Data Lisle S. Hites, Jr. 1, Kay C Dee 2, Glen A. Livesay2, Eric A. Nauman 2, Edgar O’Neal1 1 Department of Psychology, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118IntroductionAt present, there are no statistically validated and commonly used assessment instrumentsdesigned to evaluate the specialized content and student learning required in biomedicalengineering (BMEN) courses. Accordingly, rigorous assessment and
Session 1648 Outcomes Assessment in an MET Program Professor Kenneth Rennels, P.E. Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indiana University Purdue University, IndianapolisEngineering technology programs are now faced with the challenge of implementing outcomesassessment based on the TAC/ABET criterion in the TC2K accreditation document. Whilecontinuous improvement has been a common theme in prior accreditation requirements, theTC2K criterion takes the assessment of student learning outcomes to the logical next level. Thispaper will address the
Session 1532 Web-Based Tools for Assessment Automation Jim C. Harden, Michael G. Lane Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762AbstractIn this paper we describe a computer-assisted automated system for EC2000 assessment.Calendar scheduling is used in conjunction with web-based assessment instruments using webscripts to funnel data into an SQL database. Though we offer no easy, all-encompassingsolution, this paper does share our experiences in moving toward a maintainable system forsupporting
Session 2647 Classroom Assessment in Engineering Technology (Two Examples) Mohamad H. Ahmadian Electronics Engineering Technology Eastern New Mexico University Portales, NM 88130 Mohamad.Ahmadian@enmu.eduAbstract Accountability has become a national concern in higher education. In response,accrediting agencies require the development and implementation of academic assessmentmodels designed to assure and enhance institutional
Session 2306 Architecture Education: Issues in Assessment Elizabeth Petry, AIA Assistant Professor and Assessment Coordinator University of HartfordAbstractArchitectural education has always been a complicated issue. "To prepare students to meet thecomplex demands of the profession, the degree focus and structure as well as the curriculummust facilitate the relationship between general education and specialized study." In 1996,Thomas Fisher, dean of the University of Minnesota, noted, architects must "assimilate largeamounts of
Session 2330 Assessing Team Functioning in Engineering Education Theodore A. Powers, Judith Sims-Knight, Raluca A. Topciu, Sara C. Haden Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts DartmouthAbstractThe present study used a series of team process checks modeled on those developed at ArizonaState University to assess team functioning. Team members completed these forms individuallyand then collectively the members assessed the team as a whole. These process checks werecompared to faculty ratings of the teams. The students’ individual knowledge about
Paper ID #45304Syllabus Review Assessment: Technical Contract ReviewDr. Tracey Carbonetto, Pennsylvania State University, Allentown Professional skills continue to be found lacking in early career engineers despite efforts to improve suggested and implemented by faculty, administration, and ABET. Utilizing the early career engineering population as a source of information and specifically, feedback on the ability to meet the professional skills expectations, engineering faculty can include suggested recommendations for improve professional skills development within the undergraduate engineering curriculum
ASSESSMENT STRAGIES FOR SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION MODULES Rebecca Arielle Citrin Lafayette College 111 Quad Drive, Box #8407, Easton, PA 18042AbstractIn order to evaluate the effectiveness of informal environmental engineeringeducation for students ranging from grades K – 12, assessment techniques will beresearched and developed. Environmental engineering modules implemented ininformal settings, such as in after school programs or museum-based settings,with a specific focus on sustainability, will be used as a basis for this research.Literature reviews will be conducted in order to determine what a goodassessment tool consists of for
ETD 365 Student Outcomes: Improved by External Assessments? Adam Carlton Lynch and Vatsal Kamleshbhai Maru Wichita State University/University of Texas at DallasAbstractBackgroundWe evaluated the effect of using a globally recognized professional certification exam as anexternal assessment of the effectiveness of an engineering course in addition to studentperception surveys of teaching effectiveness.Purpose/HypothesisTo identify the impact of knowledge of subject matter independent of the institution andinstructor by use of an external professional certification exam at the end of each
Paper ID #40316A Comparison of ABET Assessment InstrumentsDr. Celeste Chavis, Morgan State University Celeste Chavis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies and the Interim Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. She is a registered professional engineer in the State of Maryland.Dr. Petronella A. James, Morgan State University Dr. Petronella James is a faculty member at Morgan State University in both the Electrical Engineering and Transportation departments. Dr. James has experience in
Assessment for Accreditation and Beyond Peg Pankowski, Ed.D.AbstractThis paper details the story of one division’s efforts to update program assessment based onABET and NWCCU accreditation requirements. During a fall term, the college required allprograms to submit and implement new assessment plans, with results analyzed and reported atthe end of the spring term. This coincided with our application for ABET accreditation of two ofour engineering technology associate degree programs. The paper outlines the steps taken alongthe way to accreditation, highlighting efforts to articulate a program assessment plan. Collegeassessment forms are referenced and sample plans
Assessment By Design: The Satisfaction Index By Christopher C. Ibeh, Marjorie Donovan, Oliver Hensley, James Otter Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66762AbstractOne of the key components of CUES-AM (Consortium for Upgrading EducationalStandards – Assessment Model) is the EKE (Essential Knowledge Elements) Protocol forrating of programs and course/instructional delivery. The CUES-AM protocol for ratingof programs and course/instructional delivery uses such essential knowledge elementsfactors as efficacy, usefulness, comprehensiveness, validity, interest and difficulty toassess participants’ satisfaction level based on program/course-specific
Direct Versus Indirect Assessment Methodologies Steve Menhart Department of Engineering Technology University of Arkansas at Little RockAbstractThe paper discusses direct and indirect student assessment methods, used by the Department ofEngineering Technology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR), and their possibleapplications, including the limitations of their use. Faculty members are familiar with the directassessment of their students via exams, quizzes, and reports etc. Indirect assessment methodsinclude surveys and questionnaires. At the conclusion of almost every college-level coursestudents are asked to
Assessment and Improvement – Defining Best Practice William E. Kelly The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064IntroductionIn 2005, the Association for Institutional Research (AIR) published two volumes on assessmentin the disciplines; these two volumes deal with the business disciplines.1 A third volume onmathematics has recently been published and a volume on engineering is scheduled for 2007.The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the AIR engineering volume.The vision of the engineer of 2020 presented by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) intheir recent report goes well beyond the ABET outcomes
1 PEER ASSESSMENT (JURY) OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Nathaniel Jensen, Civil Engineering Technician, FHWA Philip Brach, Ph.D., P.E., F-NSPE Distinguished Professor, Emeritus Ahmet Zeytinci, Ph.D., P.E., Professor University of the District of Columbia Washington, DC Abstract The use of a student’s work experience involving the investigation, inspection, collection, and analysis of data for the rating of park service bridges in the United States, is presented as a Senior Capstone Project for Civil
252 A HARD JOB: ASSESSING “SOFT” OUTCOMES David A. Vaccari, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE dvaccari@stevens.edu Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ 07030Abstract: Under criterion 3 of the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET,engineering programs are required to have eleven documented student outcomes1, commonlyreferred to as “a through k.” Five of these student outcomes represent technical attributes thatengineering educators are familiar with teaching and assessing. However, six of these studentoutcomes are, for many faculty members
PEAR: Peer Evaluation & Assessment Resource Steven Magluilo, Abdullah Konak, Sadan Kulturel-Konak Penn State Berks Ivan Esparragoza Penn State Brandywine Gül E. Okudan Kremer Penn State University ParkAbstractEffective teamwork is an important aspect of value creation in many organizations;appropriately, organizations are looking for potential employees who can work well in a teamfrom the start. This has created the need to introduce activities to build collaboration andteamwork skills in many college curricula. Peer
Capstone Design Assessment and Student Motivation Tristan Ericson, Scott Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania, Mechanical Engineering type of project is the design and build of a car to complete in Abstract— This paper presents the ongoing the Society of Automotive Engineers Formula Collegiatedevelopment of student assessment strategies, and how they Design Competition (FSAE)2.affect student motivation and satisfaction, in a mechanical While there is some overlap, the first semester of theengineering capstone course sequence. The capstone sequence
Continuous Loop Assessment in Engineering Communication Deborah Tihanyi, Margaret N. Hundleby University of TorontoAbstractOver the past several years, the Engineering Communication Program has devised a series ofcontent-based communication courses for the Department of Materials Science and Engineeringat the University of Toronto. The series spans Years Two to Four of the degree program, andbuilds students’ disciplinary and rhetorical knowledge. “Continuous loop assessment” is rootedin the socialization of knowing and writing and the notion of evaluation as a meaningful series ofevents. Rather than the traditional, top-down approach to assessment, which measures
273 Student Assessment: Focusing on Tests Hasmik Gharibyan Computer Science Department, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CAAbstractIn the university-level Computer Science courses it is a common practice to assess student learningby evaluating student performance in all components of coursework (homework, lab and projectassignments, tests, etc.) and to assign letter grade based on the weighted average of all these scoresaccording to some pre-defined distribution table5,8. This approach provides a
AC 2007-1399: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ONLINEENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COURSES: A CASE STUDYHarpal Dhillon, Excelsior College Dr. Harpal Dhillon is currently the Dean of the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College. In the past he has taught undergraduate and graduate Courses in Information Systems, Software Engineering, and Project Management at University of Maryland, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, and George Washington University. Dr. Dhillon worked as owner/senior executive in three systems engineering companies over a period of 20 years. His research interests are in the areas of Human-Computer Interaction, Quality Assurance, and Applications of IT in
2006-222: THE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: A TOOL FOR PROMOTINGFACULTY INVOLVEMENTWilliam Howard, East Carolina University William E.(Ed) Howard is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at East Carolina University. Prior to joining ECU, he was a faculty member and program coordinator at Milwaukee School of Engineering. Howard has fourteen years of industrial experience in design and project engineering functions. He received BS and MS degrees from Virginia Tech, and his PhD from Marquette University. Howard is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin.Joseph Musto, Milwaukee School of Engineering Joe Musto is an Associate Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Director at Milwaukee