supervisor-supervisee relationships,are excluded. Using these nodes and edges, we constructed an unweighted, undirected network of theuniversity’s research collaborations with the NetworkX library. The initial network contained6,186 nodes and 49,289 edges, making it too large for meaningful analysis. To examine thecore collaboration network, we removed all nodes and edges not connected to the largestconnected component, resulting in a single connected network spanning the university. Thisrefined network was visualized using the sfdp [26] layout algorithm, with nodes colored redfor faculty and green for other researchers. The resulting graph serves as a snapshot of theUniversity of Arizona’s collaboration network and forms the basis for subsequent
AC 2012-3395: DESIGN FOR THE OTHER 90% AND APPROPRIATETECHNOLOGY: THE LEGACIES OF PAUL POLAK AND E.F. SCHU-MACHERLindsey Anne Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lindsey Nelson is a doctoral student in engineering education. She has a B.S. in mechanical engineer- ing from Boston University and a M.A. in poverty and development from the Institute of Development Studies housed at the University of Sussex in England. Her research interests include sustainable de- sign, engineering design methodologies, the public’s understanding of engineering, poverty mitigation, global participation, and engineering education. She is a passionate advocate for inclusive and socially just engineering professional practice
AC 2012-4530: USING WRITING ASSIGNMENTS TO IMPROVE CON-CEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN STATICS: RESULTS FROM A PILOTSTUDYMr. Chris Venters, Virginia Tech Chris Venters is a Ph.D. candidate in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His primary research in- terests involve studying conceptual understanding among students in early undergraduate engineering courses. He received his B.S. in aerospace engineering from North Carolina State University and his M.S. in aerospace engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Assistant Department Head for Graduate Education and co-directs the
Paper ID #10980A community of practice approach to becoming an engineering education re-search professionalDr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. Her research is in three interconnecting areas: cross-disciplinary thinking, acting, and being; design cognition and learning; and theories of change in transforming engineering education.Ms. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Paper ID #45477Science, Business, and Public good: Competing Priorities in Engineers’ ProfessionalOrganizations [Research Paper]Dr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering ethics, equity, and leadership in university and workplace settings. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Title: Science, Business, and Public good: Competing Priorities in Engineers’ ProfessionalOrganizations [Research Paper]Abstract:The primary objective of this paper is to examine how
Microrobotics byworking on multidisciplinary projects of mutual interest at various levels. This paper discussesour experience in teaching microrobotics by designing multidisciplinary projects forundergraduates and their integration with research and graduate students. It also discusses thebroader impact of these activities on various levels of students. The activities can be categorizedin three levels: undergraduate teaching, graduate research, and clubs and organizations.This paper explores our experience in developing these projects and related research, includingour lessons learned so far, and our plans for the future. Some statistical data are also provided toshow the broader impact of these multidisciplinary microrobotics teaching and research
methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Qualitative Methods Primer: A Resource to Assist Engineering Education Scholars in Mentoring Traditionally-Trained Engineering Faculty to Educational ResearchAbstract This research methods full paper presents a primer on qualitative analysis methodsintended to be a resource for experienced qualitative engineering education researchers tocommunicate the basics of qualitative research methods to traditionally-trained technicalengineering faculty embarking on educational research initiatives. The recognition and growth ofengineering education has drawn new
material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors thank the surveyparticipants for their insights and contributions to our research. The authors thank Study 1advisory board member Dr. Alison Godwin, who provided an example draft of a CIprotocol which we closely followed in developing the protocol for our initial Study 1cognitive interviews.References[1] P. C. Beatty and G. B. Willis, “Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 287-311, 2007.[2] R. Tourangeau, L. J. Rips, and K. Rasinski, “The psychology of survey response,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.[3] T. Li, E
Applied team scienceWorking collaboratively to compete effectivelyfor funding and to drive innovation Gretchen L Kiser, PhD Executive Director, UCSF Research Development Office ASEE ERC 2017 6 March 2017 What is a Scient i fic Research Team? …..think of it as a continuum….. LOW Level of Interaction and Integration HIGH Investigator - Research Collaboration Integrated Research Team ‐initiated research • Group works on a scientific •Team works on a
management, lean systems, decision analysis, designed experimentation, and systems design and optimization. His current research interests include on the education side development of simulations and cases for active learning, and on the model- ing side supply chains and logistics management, and production systems planning and optimization, and applications in different industries. Page 23.946.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Online Teaching Best Practices: Faculty PreferencesAbstractOnline education is a strategic initiative that has been applied for
AC 2007-1754: THE DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENTOF AN ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR PHYSICS TEACHERSLeyla Conrad, Georgia Institute of Technology Leyla Conrad is the Director of Outreach in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She has been developing and leading programs for high school students and teachers, as well as ECE female students that supports the ECE’s undergraduate recruitment and retention efforts. Before her current appointment, she was the Education Director of the Microsystems Packaging Research Center (a NSF Engineering Research Center) where she created and implemented a highly integrated and
Paper ID #14533Perceptions and Applications of Honors Contracts in Developing an Under-graduate Engineering Research ExperienceDr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Harbin Institute of Tech- nology (China), and the M.S. degree in Applied Statistics and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University. She is an assistant professor in engineering and technology at Western Car- olina University. Her research interests are statistical signal processing, diagnostics, and particle swarm optimization.Prof. Sudhir Kaul, Western
Paper ID #14755Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Method to Inform and Improvethe Traditional Aerospace Engineering DisciplineDr. Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette Antonette T. Cummings earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She earned her Bachelors and Masters in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She functioned as an aerodynamicist for military and civilian tiltrotors at Bell Helicopter for seven years, earning airplane and helicopter private pilot ratings. She has a Professional Engineer license in Texas in Thermal/Fluid Systems.Dr
. In addition, she is an NSF CAREER Awardee, has served as co-PI on an NSF REU site, PI on grants from NSF and DOE, and was the faculty advisor for MSU’s chapter of the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers (NOBCChE). Her research is in medical microdevice diagnostics & dielectrophoresis.Rafael Hernandez, Mississippi State University Rafael Hernandez is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering. He has a BS (1993) and MS (1995) in chemical engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, and a PhD (2002) in chemical engineering from Mississippi State University (MSU), Mississippi State, MS. He worked for
Session Number : 3561 Linguistic Evidence of Cognitive Distr ibution: Quantifying Lear ning Among Under gr aduate Resear cher s in Engineer ing L. Donath, R. Spr ay, E. Alfor d T. McGar r y and N. Thompson Univer sity of South Car olinaAbstractThe Research Communication Studio at the University of South Carolina nurtures undergraduatelearning in engineering through guided interaction among student peers, near-peer graduatementors, and faculty members. The RCS bases its pedagogical approach on Dorothy Winsor’sconcept of thought and knowledge as a network distributed among members
from research studies, they also express it increative hobbies which ranged from drawing and fashion design to creative writing and fiberarts. However, despite engaging in creative hobbies, Chopper, Dwight, and Felicia initially saidthat they did not consider themselves to be creative people. Dwight and Chopper shared the sameview as Felicia, who stated that they associate creative people with the arts. “As far as when I describe people as creative, I am not like those people… it's often someone that is very into the arts… My first instinct is to link creativity with artistic, but that’s not necessarily the case all the time, but that's where my mind immediately goes to.” — FeliciaHowever, after a series of follow-up
Paper ID #43141Addressing Societal Challenges through Graduate-level Community-engagedDesign Projects (Traditional Research Paper) ˜ George Mason UniversityDr. Samuel A Acuna, Samuel Acu˜na is a research professor in the Department of Bioengineering at George Mason University. He is a biomechanical engineer interested in rehabilitation engineering and human-centered product design. He develops new technologies to address movement disorders that develop after injury, such as stroke, amputation, or traumatic brain injury. He is particularly interested in solving engineering problems for the hospital &
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Mentoring Relationships in Engineering Undergraduate Apprenticeship-Model Research: Students’ Perceptions of Faculty Mentors Nosakhare I. Idiaghe and Dr Jessica Deters University of Nebraska-Lincoln / University of Nebraska-LincolnAbstractAs the landscape of higher education evolves, the importance of undergraduate researchexperiences has become increasingly recognized for enhancing students' academic andprofessional development. Through close collaboration with research mentors, students areimmersed in real-world research contexts, acquiring knowledge and skills directly
reported low percentage of high schools who offer CS courses.For example, in California [10], only 39% of the high schools offer CS courses. Some reasons forthis include the lack of rigorous CS teacher preparation [10], limited resources to expand CS ed-ucation capacity [11], and research gaps in analyzing efficacy of CS education at the high schoollevel. Initiatives like “AI4K12” and “AI4ALL” are aligned with this need.AI programs for high school students: Educators and professionals have taught AI to high schoolstudents at various levels, scales, and duration [12, 13]. Here, we review a selected number of suchprograms and refer the reader to other systematic reviews for more details. Notably, we do not re-view educational programs at the
someone has support the kinds of initiatives that the community is interested in?” (p. 7, 00:33:41-00:34:22)However, instead of collaborative problem defining and solving, existing systems may stillincentivize the academic researcher entering a community to solve a problem, which is a systemicproblem that in some local cases has roots in colonialism. Furthermore, academic systems tend tovalue quantifiable results like publications and future grants, which may be at odds with the needsof the community being engaged; within the academic system, this lack of quantifiable output canbe problematic, as Summer noted: “So from a perspective of the university it’s like, ‘Oh, therewas no output to this research.’” (p. 10)Tara (Engineering)Tara’s
words, which are wholly salient. However, as discussed in the background, ourbeliefs exist in complex sets, only one aspect of which are our espoused beliefs. Often, ourespoused beliefs are aspirational because they relate to our values but do not represent the fullcomplexity of our beliefs, including those which are implicit, which also inform our behavior.Thus, the selected and adapted data generation methods address this limitation by using indirectapproaches to situate meaning in a relatable social context (in our research, engineering servicelearning or working alongside community partners) and allows the participant to initiate sharingof their personal experiences, including espoused beliefs and values and self-reported behaviorand
Paper ID #23124Capturing Narratives of Graduate Engineering Attrition through Online Fo-rum MiningCarey WhitehairDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including inter- and multidisciplinary
back at an experience; it is a process that helps us to makemeaning of experiences that can be applied to and used for the future. Reflection as a processmust be taught to students so that they are guided to better understand and utilize this skillattributed to successful engineers and professionals in general. An initial framework offered bythe CPREE team includes specific elements of reflection – experience, features, lens, meaning,action, intentional, and dialectical – and provides examples of how these elements might framestudents use of reflection in a homework assignment. Context and examples of these elements ofreflection are found in Integrating Reflection into Engineering Education.4Reflection and DesignThe use of reflection in
, National Science Foundation9. Department of Education, Iowa, Individual Teacher Career Development Plan, Sample I. 2003.10. Professional Development Initiative Implementation Work Group, 2004, Professional Development Initiative Proposal for Action, Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University11. National Science Board, 2004, Broadening Participation in Science and Engineering Research and Education: Workshop Proceedings, National Science Board, National Science Foundation12. Moody, J. Rising Above Cognitive Errors: Guidelines for Search, Tenure Review, and Other Evaluation Committees. [Accessed November 16 2006]; Available from: http://nae.edu/nae/caseecomnew.nsf/0754c87f163f599e85256cca00588f49
California Polytechnic State University with a B.S. and M.S. in AeronauticalEngineering in 1977 and 1985, respectively, before receiving his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from theUniversity of Southern California in 1988. He was recently named Professor of Aeronautics at the U.S. Air ForceAcademy and previously was Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Cal Poly from 1986 through 2004.JOHN H. McMASTERSDr. McMasters joined Boeing Commercial Airplanes in 1976 as a research aerodynamicist, and currently serves as aprogram manager for the Ed Wells Initiative, a joint program between Boeing and the Society of ProfessionalEngineering Employees in Aerospace charged with enhancing the excellence of the SPEEA represented Boeing
the widespread use of integrated project teams, they are not always effective [1]. This istrue in both industrial and educational settings. One factor associated with team effectiveness isteam composition [2]. Because of the increasing number of women joining the work force overthe years; the gender effect on team performance has received attention. The results of previousstudies have been conflicting because some researchers have found homogeneous teams to bemore productive, whereas others have found the opposite to be true. Moreover, a recent studyfound the gender to be an insignificant variable for its effect on the performance of productdesign teams [3]. The duration of the design task included in this study was only 45 minutes.The effect
AC 2011-1383: AN ASSESSMENT OF CREATIVE CAPABILITIES IN TECH-NOLOGICAL DESIGNLeslie Reed, Purdue University Ms. Reed is the founder and CEO of Reed Environmental, Inc., a comprehensive safety, industrial hygiene and environmental consulting firm founded in 1989. She is presently working on a PhD in Technology from Purdue University.Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, College of Technology, West Lafayette Michael Dyrenfurth is professor in the Department of Industrial Technology at Purdue University. He is co-PI of the DETECT and Atlantis Concurrent MS degree projects. Active in international aspects of the profession, he teaches and researches in the areas of technological innovation, technological literacy
of life.The goal of this procedure is to prove that motion capture analysis for educational purposes canstill be accomplished without purchasing expensive commercial motion capture apparatuses.1. Design of a camera-based setup and acquisition of raster image data.It is well-known that high-end motion capture solutions have only been readily available tosuccessful research laboratories, large production firms, or motion capture industries. Theequipment is expensive, and often prohibitive when pursued by small educational enterpriseshoping to gain a greater insight into motion analysis.Optical motion capture devices can be divided in two sub categories: active and passive. Anactive device is composed of a set of markers which actively transmit
during the experiment in raw model units.They were given the second part of the project, which asked them to analyze the resultsgenerated during the experiment and compare them to their initial predictions. Using the tactilepressure sensors, they derived the actual stress distribution in the soil mass and compared that totheory. The data from the foundation push was used to produce the bearing capacity of thesystem. The students then compared this value to the one they computed in the first assignment.They needed to draw upon centrifuge modeling concepts in order to properly scale the data tofield units.Pilot Testing AdvantagesThe students at the host school participated as part of an undergraduate research program. Theywere assigned to the
opportunity tolearn compared in-class discussions. We present a summary of the survey results, along with thetheoretical underpinnings of the approach and some details of the prototype implementation. Wealso present our design for the next set of experiments with the CONSIDER tool.1 IntroductionThe type of conflicts of opinions and the ensuing argumentation seen in the broader public spherewould make it difficult for one to imagine that any type of conflict could ever be collaborative, letalone a driver of effective learning. But researchers in learning sciences have been studying whatAndriessen 1 calls collaborative argumentation, which “can help students learn to think criticallyand independently about important issues and contested values