senior year tobegin exposing students to real world applications? At The University of Texas at Austin, ProjectPROCEED is encouraging the “trickle down” of real-world application projects through themechanical engineering curriculum. Real world applications are being integrated into thecurriculum beginning in the freshman year.Instructor Expectations and Shifting PedagogiesEngineering education is going through a shift from traditional teacher-centered lecture-basedcourses to more student-centered pedagogies such as project-based learning. But differentpedagogies mean different roles for both instructors and students. Students may be caught in themiddle of this shift. Too frequently students have been ingrained in a lecture-based system
establishing the revolutionary EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. He is a two-time award winner of the Best Paper in Cash Management awarded by the Bank Administration Institute.Mr. James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West LafayetteMr. Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette Benjamin Ahn is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests relate to higher education reform, graduate teaching assistants’ roles in engineering classes, undergraduate engineering syllabus and curriculum development, and professional engineering practices in universities and industries.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland
Asian and European countries by both governmental and non-governmental organizations. Acharya has a M.Eng. in Computer Technology and a D.Eng. in Computer Science and Information Management with a concentration in knowledge discovery, both from the Asian Institute of Technology in Thailand. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Acharya is a co- author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals- 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall”. He is a
, and ocean sciences, 3) Page 24.144.4mathematics and computer sciences, 4) physical sciences, 5) psychology, 6) social sciences and7) engineering. Health fields such as nursing, pre-medicine, pre-dentistry, pharmacy, andnutrition were not included. In addition, neither architecture nor graphic design was included.This created a sample of 698 undergraduate college students majoring in STEM fields whoresponded to a 2007 administration of the NSSE. Sixty-two percent of the students in our samplewere women and 38% were male. Eighty-eight percent were Caucasians, 5.9% were Blacks andonly 1.1% were Hispanics. Most participants were seniors (55
potential technologies for self-improvement. In Proceedings of the CHI annual conference.28. Bateman, S., Teevan, J., & White, R. W. (2012). The search dashboard: How reflection and comparison impact search behavior. In Proceedings of the ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems annual conference.29. Grimes, A., Tan, D., & Morris, D. (2009). Toward Technologies that Support Family Reflections on Health. In Proceedings of ACM GROUP 2009 conference.30. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2), 16-23. Page 24.776.1531
9.950.2 2Figure 2. Example of non-hierarchical concept map.Regardless of their structure, map elements identify key concepts and define the nature oftheir relationships (i.e., direction and quality). Clear map segments suggest knowledgedifferentiation while crosslinks among segments suggest knowledge integration. Becausethe technique is a useful way of making thinking explicit, it has been used as a teachingtool, an assessment tool, and a tool for curriculum development [3-8]. In this study, weused concept mapping to identify expert and student conceptions of the biomedicalengineering design process, and as a tool for supporting students’ awareness of
why. In order for thenew professor to smoothly integrate their course into the culture of the department, theauthors also suggest gaining familiarity with the entire departmental curriculum. Oneway to do this is review prerequisite classes with faculty or to read through the last ABETpacket submitted.During this information gathering phase, it may be beneficial to ask what worked andwhat did not work. For example, after teaching his course for one year, JMK realized thathis students had difficulty applying mathematical concepts to course material,particularly on exams. This may have been avoided by finding out more information fromother faculty prior to the start of the semester.To try to alleviate the problem, a handout was prepared for
Development of Heat Transfer Laboratory Experiments Utilizing Student Design Teams Robert F. Harder, Ph.D. Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering George Fox University Newberg, OR 97132AbstractTeams of students designed and developed experiments for a new four-credit course in heattransfer at George Fox University as a part of their initial laboratory experience. Over the pastthree years, students have developed eight experiments that cover a broad range of conduction,convection and radiation phenomena. The new heat transfer
Session 3155 Guidelines for the Industry-Academic Transition Sigurd L. Lillevik Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of Portland Portland, OR 97223AbstractRecently, practicing professionals with several years of industry experience have joined theacademic ranks. This experienced, but new faculty member faces many of the same challenges asthe recent Ph.D. hire plus one additional issue: his colleagues assume that he knows what he isdoing and how to teach. This may or may not be
theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), the Accounting EducationChange Commission (AECC), and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of HealthCare Organizations (JCAHO), among others, are requiring higher education institutionsto introduce teamwork activities into their curriculums 6,7,8. Collaborative learning, cooperative learning and other forms of active learning arebeing used in classrooms as ways to promote teamwork among students and enhancetheir learning. Studies on these approaches, as well as on the use of groups in classroomprove that trying to incorporate teams into the classroom is a highly complex task 9. Themany elements involved in the process of introducing teaming to a classroom setting,make such
front of experiencedinstructors who provided me with valuable feedback. Page 7.1005.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002 American Society for Engineering Education During ISW, I was exposed to a vast curriculum of teaching principles including Felder’slearning styles, Bloom’s Taxonomy, classroom assessment techniques, effective questioning, andactive learning. As a new instructor, I was not expected to master all the valuable informationthat went racing past me. But this formal training left me with a binder of
& Exposition Copyright ?2003, American Society for Engineering Education”sampled was 2.65 years. This appears to be quite young relative to common battery uses. As abasis of comparison, the average age of 681 datable AAA batteries that had been removed frompagers was computed to be 5.01 years by “best if used by” dating. The batteries had reportedlyaccumulated within the 6 months prior to the dating analysis, so they may have been as young as4.5 years. This is still significantly older than the feral batteries collected. The “best if used by”age was also computed for 734 batteries that were removed from Adelphia remotes at theirmaintenance center, and from 1,262 batteries that were removed by the CWRU research teamfrom disposable cameras
constituencies,which are often in conflict. While industry would prefer engineers with greater understanding ofall facets of product design and development, graduate programs favor students with greaterscientific skills, as thesis and dissertation topics have become more and more theoretical andcomputational in scope.In view of these concerns, the curriculum of the Aerospace Structural Design course wasmodified to include topics related to manufacture of aircraft structures. At present, four lecturesare devoted entirely to the discussion of various design paradigms, such as design formanufacture and assembly, design to/for cost, integrated product and process development, etc.,highlighting the importance of early design decisions on manufacturability
isimportant to note that the engineering students did not have any formal training in risk analysisand assessment in their curriculum.2 Challenger Disaster BackgroundThe Physical CauseThe physical cause of the disaster originated in the aft field joint of the right solid rocket booster(SRB). These solid fuel boosters were the largest of their kind ever used for manned spaceflight. The O-ring seals were used in the joints between fuel segments to maintain internalpressure and prevent hot gas or flame from escaping during the ascent of the flight. Once anSRB is fired it cannot be shut down until its fuel is exhausted. In the Challenger launch, bothprimary and secondary seals failed due to the cold temperature and resulted in the eventualexplosion of
well asexposing students to a greater variety of approaches. Additionally, the peer-review is utilized in astrictly formative fashion, and score peers give to another group are not included in the finalgrade computation. Rather students groups are graded on the quality of the peer-review feedbackprovided. So peers have no incentive to grade harshly (skew the “curve”) or to grade easily(benefit their “friends”).The instructions for review given to the peer groups include the rationale for doing the reviewand are given below: “Part of your team’s responsibility will be to review the work submitted by another team in your class. Reviewing the work of another engineer with a critical eye is an important skill that you will use frequently in
contingent ofscience students or math students fill out the roster. An agreement is in place with the otherengineering departments for the course to count as a capstone class for their seniors in lieu oftheir more traditional course.The response to budgetary constraints has changed the historical mix of departments represented.Currently there are 50 students in the class representing the following majors: Bioengineering(n=8), Electrical Engineering (n=3), Mechanical Engineering (n=1), Computer Engineering(n=2), Chemical Engineering (n=5), Civil Engineering (n=4), Computer Engineering (n=4),Physics (n=1), Mathematics (n=1), Finance (n=2), Management and Operations (n=2),Management Information Systems (n=1), Marketing (n=1), Communications (n=1
computational engine 6behind the MEPDG software were explained. For example, the focus for flexible pavements canbe summarized as follows: 1) Elastic mechanical responses were calculated for each time slot, accounting for traffic loads, material properties, and climate. 2) The mechanical responses are superimposed over the design life, and 3) The mechanical responses are then empirically-correlated with pavement distress to develop mechanistic-empirical modelsAfter the pavement design and other supporting concepts were explained in detail, the MEPDGsoftware was run based on real highway sections. For example, at
form of pedagogy, curriculum development, and faculty support and programming in implementing evidence-based best practices in teaching and learning.Prof. Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State UniversityColleen Seifert, University of MichiganRichard Gonzalez, University of Michigan Page 25.394.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Design Heuristics Support Two Modes of Idea Generation: Initiating Ideas and Transitioning Among ConceptsAbstractDesign Heuristics is an empirically driven design ideation tool intended to support variation andnovelty in concept generation. The set
’ changing ideas about STEM and STEM pedagogy through interaction with a pedagogically supportive STEM curriculum. Paper presented at the K-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Seaside, OR.4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.5. Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. A. (2008). Teachers, teaching, and teacher education: Comments of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Report. Educational Researcher, 37, 565- 572. doi:10.3102/0013189X083288776. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.7. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323-337.8. Gibson, S
. Institute for Economic Empowerment, “Ability One (sic) Network Design Challenge,” retrieved 27 December 2011 from http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-challenge (2011).18. Jamieson, L.H. (moderator), “Service Learning in Computer Science and Engineering,” Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 133 – 134 (2002).19. Massachusetts Department of Education, Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education (2006).20. Meyers, K.; Uhran, J.; Pieronek, C.; Budny, D.; Ventura, J.; Ralston, P.; Estell, J.K.; Hart, B.; Slaboch, C.; and Ladewski, R., “Perspectives on First Year Engineering Education
objective student assessmentdata [12]. Such activities may yield a presentation, publication, or episode of publicity onlyevery few years. Compare this with the perceived need for the new/young educator to quicklybuild a voluminous curriculum vitae, not, only for promotion, tenure, and merit raise purposes,but also to build creditability in one’s field for attracting external funding. At this stage, quantityis perceived (and may be) as/more important than quality; i.e., urgency dominates (long term)importance. Tenure decisions usually are made within 5-7 years after hiring and two or threepresentations/publications, even if truly profound in one’s area of expertise, usually won’t beconsidered as favorably by administrators, and promotion and tenure
Paper ID #43350Applying Aspects of Professional Settings to Student Teaming in an Engineeringand Design CourseRobert Benjamin Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology Robert Simon serves as an Academic Professional for the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Georgia Tech. He contributes to our undergraduate Global Engineering Leadership Minor, as well as our new Innovation & Entrepreneurship track, by infusing leadership, innovation, and team effectiveness into our engineering curriculum. He co-instructs our Innovation & Entrepreneurship in CEE Systems course, and is a member of the instructional team
Paper ID #42549Accommodations for Disabled Students in STEM Fields: Research Considerationsand a Literature ReviewSage Maul, Purdue University Sage Maul (they/them) is a third year PhD student in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Sage’s research explores structural factors on student experiences for disabled students and in electrical and computer engineering courses. Sage graduated with a Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering from Purdue and worked in industry for 5 years before starting graduate school. Their experiences with accommodations in undergrad and getting diagnosed with ADHD as an
Paper ID #43087Undergraduate Engineering Education: Creating Space for Multiply MarginalizedStudentsDr. Janne Mishanne Hall, Morgan State University Dr. Janne Hall is an adjunct at Morgan State University and Texas Southern University. She teaches undergraduate electrical and computer engineering courses. She is also a committee member for the implementation of new engineering programs and curriculums for existing programs. Dr. Hall earned a BS in electronic engineering and a MS in computer science from Texas Southern University, and a PhD in electrical engineering from Jackson State University. Dr. Hall worked as a RF
the Voiland School of School of Chemical Engineering and Bio-engineering at WSU. He is married with three children.509-338-5724.Mr. Derek Allen ClineAshley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ater Kranov is Director of Educational Innovation and Assessment for the College of Engineering and Architecture at Washington State University, USA. She is affiliated assistant professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science where she co-teaches the 2-semester senior design capstone sequence. The paper describing her collaborative work with faculty in the WSU College of Engineering and Ar- chitecture, ”A Direct Method for Teaching and Assessing the ABET Professional Skills in Engineering
Bioengineering and Director of the Engineering Education Research Center at Washington State University. He has led numerous multidisciplinary research projects to enhance engi- neering education. He currently leads projects creating and testing assessments and curriculum materials for engineering design and professional skills, especially for use in capstone engineering design courses. He has been a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education since 2002.Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS from Washington State University and recently defended his PhD degree and is currently the Laboratory Supervisor in the Voiland School of School of Chemical Engineering and Bio-engineering
and require different assessment tools. Academic skills incomputation, engineering topics, and computer modeling are all necessary for successfulcompletion of a design project. However, successful design students must also masterprofessional skills such as oral and written communication, project management, teamworkskills, problem solving, and professional ethics. These skills can be difficult to teach in atraditional lecture format, but can be very naturally integrated into capstone design5. Sincecapstone design courses offer many opportunities for situated learning, they allow students tolearn these professional skills in a realistic context6.Given that these professional skills are necessary for a successful capstone design experience,one
the University of Texas at Austin for her Ph.D. work in Higher Educational Administration; Northern Arizona University for her M.A. in Curriculum and Assessment and Arizona State University for her B.A. in Secondary Education: Communications.Alan Jacobs, Quanser As a member of ASEE since 1994, Alan Jacobs has served the Society in numerous leadership roles. He founded the ASEE Corporate Member Council (CMC) Special Interest Group on International Engineer- ing Education and currently serves as co-chair of that SIG. Alan is presently serving his second terms on the ASEE CMC Executive Committee and the ASEE Projects Board. He also serves on the ASEE Journal of Engineering Education Advisory Board and was a
assembled into ateam staffed for a specific project and are supported by a faculty and industry adviser. Thestudents tackle a design process in the first semester and then complete a detailed design andprototype realization in the second semester. The curriculum is organized so students can applytheir technical and non-technical skills in solving their capstone problem and gain knowledge viaa culminating major design-build project. The capstone projects are intended to provide studentswith hands-on learning, continuous practice of a broad set of technical, management, andprofessional skills, ideally in a cross-disciplinary setting.In this project, the students designed a UAV capable of flying under direct manual control andindirect automatic