Roles Events Artifacts Product Owner Sprint Product Backlog Scrum Master Sprint Planning Sprint Backlog Development Team Daily Scrum (standup) Sprint Review Sprint RetrospectiveScrum is used in some curricula, but often not applied holistically and in the manner ofindustry[10, 7, 9]. Some of the most recent work looks specific components of the agile processto assess and validate their effectiveness in a software engineering course[12]. Given the successand popularity of this developmental methodology, software engineering education could beimproved by reducing this delta
learning and knowledge assessment systems. Currently, he is involved as a knowledge engineer in various private and publicly funded projects. Dr. Iseli holds a PhD and an MS in electrical engineering from UCLA and from ETH Z¨urich, Switzerland.Ms. Tianying Feng, University of California, Los AngelesDr. Gregory Chung, University of California, Los AngelesZiyue RuanMr. Joe Shochet, codeSpark Joe Shochet has been developing award-winning interactive experiences for 25 years. In 2014 he co- founded codeSpark, an edtech startup to teach kids the ABCs of computer science. His career started at Disney Imagineering building virtual reality attractions for the theme parks and designing ride concepts. Joe was a lead designer and
(if they chose to) during alternatingweeks.Student teams were formed using the CATME [16] software like previous semesters. The onlymodification was that if students notified the instructor in advance that they would join the classvirtually exclusively, they would be teamed up with other entirely virtual students if possible.Teaching materials and assessment in Fall 2020 were largely kept the same as in Fall 2019.Quizzes and exams had to be done online instead of in-person. Project presentations and demoswere switched to Zoom. Rather than students working with their teammates side by side in atraditional lab setting, they were assigned to their team’s Zoom breakout room for discussion andgroupwork. Instructor and teaching assistants
initiatives for graduate teaching assistants (TAs) and Postdocs as well as help faculty incorpo- rate active learning, formative assessment, and inclusive teaching practices in both in-person and online courses. She is also an instructor in Undergraduate Biology and the First Year Student Seminars. Her postdoctoral research is focused on developing and evaluating the effectiveness of online vs. face-to-face graduate teaching assistant pedagogy training. Kimberly earned her PhD in Genetics from Stony Brook University, MS in Neuroscience and Behavior from University of Massachusetts Amherst, and BS in Psychology/Biology from Stony Brook University.Dr. Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University M´onica F. Bugallo is the Vice
Literacy needs aswell as to assess their access to computers and to the internet in their homes. Part of the fundingreceived for the project was used to purchase computers for motivated students who did not haveone to allow them to participate in the program.While only a total of 17 students participated remotely in interactive workshops led by mentors ona range of digital topics, it was still considered a success since the students who participatedwere very motivated. Students were particularly excited to learn how to create a Web-page, asthis was a skill they could immediately use to promote their family businesses. Another workshopthey enjoyed was the online communication and content creation as they were asked to promotethe Galapagos Islands
imperatives in a timely and cost-effective manner. This paper reports theexperiences of students making engineering, business, manufacturing, and supplier relateddecisions to deliver the medical ventilators for patient use. The assessment consists of sequentialactivities that are commonly utilized in innovation, production, and launch processes for a newconsumer product. The course instructor formulates student teams such that individual skills,interests, and competencies are balanced. The educational objectives from prerequisite and co-requisite manufacturing courses are utilized.Keywords: Global Manufacturing, Engineering Applications, Medical Ventilators, Student-Centered Learning Projects1.0 IntroductionThe healthcare industry experienced a
and is currently the Editor and Circulation Manager of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. She received her B.S. from Missouri State University, and M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University.Dr. David Clippinger, Pennsylvania State University Dr. David Clippinger is a faculty member in Mechanical Engineering Technology at the Pennsylvania State University, Erie–the Behrend College. His interests are ship dynamics, measurement and instru- mentation, and assessment, especially of student writing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Developing an Equally Effective Alternate Access Plan for VisionImpaired and Blind Students Enrolled in Mechanical
literarysearch is included to examine the research on this topic in similarly formatted courses.Additionally, it will describe how the course is integrated into the curriculum, will present thecourse outline and topics covered, and will discuss loading topics that were omitted in theinterest to prioritize more essential knowledge. For assessment of the course, student surveyfeedback and instructor observations are used to evaluate the success of the teaching strategiesfor the initial offering of this course.IntroductionThe introduction of a Structural Loadings course into the Architectural Engineeringcurriculum at Oklahoma State University (OSU) aims to teach three objectives: 1) the abilityto understand how loads move through structures 2) the
Shiloh James Howland is a doctoral candidate at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Mea- surement, and Evaluation. She received a master’s degree in instructional psychology and technology as well as a bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in geology. Her current research interests are in educa- tional assessment and measurement.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and
versions in Fall2020 than the traditional face-to-face version in Fall 2019. Specifically, a greater percentage ofstudents enjoyed the course, felt engaged and valued, were more prepared for lessons and sawvalue in the course and the skills they learned in the course.IntroductionDuring their first year of study, students enrolled in engineering at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity (Michigan Tech) complete a common set of core classes including calculus,chemistry, physics, composition, global issues, and engineering. A student’s pathway throughthese first-year courses, specifically the First-Year Engineering (FYE) courses (shown in Figure1), is determined by their score on a math placement assessment. Students who place intoCalculus 1 or higher are
cylinders Tipping example in Statics Calculating speeds of armsFluid power course examples: Understanding hydraulic schematics Designing fluid power circuits Functions of fluid power systems Components review and sizing exercises Fluid power control (meter out circuits)Electrical Circuits course examples: Understanding electric circuits and their implementations How a microcontroller communicates with a circuit App design and creation / Bluetooth communication Arduino Coding and Visual ProgrammingLearning OutcomesThe proposed metric for assessing the learning outcomes of using this tool is a questionnairesurvey comparison using a Likert scale. This scale is measured using five
could show their concept quickly and not bemired by learning to use new tools. It was also an important opportunity to connect with thetechnician to review their work for feedback and iterate on new versions.The remaining class sessions related to the project were devoted to collaborative group workwith opportunities to discuss design ideas with the instructor. This included a session oncollaboration and team skills where students practiced scoring collaborative contributions usingthe Comprehensive Assessment of Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME) [13] for a fictitiousteam [14] and norming their scoring in a small group. Then, they conducted a self-evaluation oftheir collaborative performance at that point in the project.DiscussionStudents were
studentswho have stronger spatial visualization skills are more likely to achieve educational andvocational success in STEM fields.The malleable nature of spatial visualization skills motivates researchers and educationalpractitioners to develop spatial visualization skill assessments and training programs to facilitatestudent improvement. For example, Sorby developed a workshop using choice-based andfree-hand sketching questions to train students’ spatial visualization skills and showed significantpost-test improvement in a 6-year-long study [3]. However, the strong demand for STEMeducation poses a new challenge to such in-person workshops -- the ability to scale. In recentyears, many computer-based training programs have been created in response to
after shipping the required project kits to the students, thereby providing step-by-step instruction of performing the project virtually while also proving hands-on experience for betterlearning. To our knowledge, this mode of virtual summer camp that provided a hands-on experience to K-12 students was uniquely implemented in the nation by UTPB College of Engineering. This paper providesthe ideas implemented to overcome several challenges, the techniques that rightly helped in conductingthe virtual summer camp with hands-on experience, and methods to assess student learning. 1. IntroductionEngineering summer camps for K-12 students are widely implemented in the nation during summermonths every year, typically between June and August. These
: evaluating content knowledgein a group context or creating a learning environment. To assess individual ability, an exam isgiven to each student. The individual exam is evaluated and typically forms the majorityc e f he de c e. Af e he d d a e a , he e a g c e , h chcan either be a required part of the exam (evaluation goal) or considered a bonus (learningenvironment goal). Groups of 3 to 4 students collaborate on the group test. Larger groups reducethe impact of individual voices, and groups of two often suffer from a dominant (but notnecessarily stronger) partner. The group exam can be given in the same class period, if time isavailable, or in the following period. Providing a gap between the two exams can be
companies value those competences very high [4]. AtAalborg University a work has going on since the University start about 30 years ago to improve thePBL pedagogic approach. Development of the PBL model is a continuous process. New demands instudy regulations, new generations of students and teachers need to be considered. In spite of thecontinuous improvements of the pedagogical approach the PBL has some ground rules which are thebasic for all projects [5] but one aspect of the PBL model has not yet found a stable solution, namelyhow to assess and evaluate the process competences. Several assessment models have been tried out,but we still need a model which can conclude (encompass) the complex aspects of processcompetences al o called of com e
computationally in pseudo-code 2. Be able to qualitatively predict the macro-level dynamics of concentration profiles (i.e. where concentration will increase/decrease) and be able to connect these predictions to the symbolic forms of Fick’s Laws 3. Be able to explain why the macro-level dynamics emerge from the submicro-level random-walk behaviorA second goal is to expose students to computational materials science techniques and engagethem in computational modeling practices by having them explore models and then write smallextensions for them. We want to give students experiences with exploring, assessing and creatingmodels of phenomena, as these are all core parts of science and engineering practice.Specifically, we want students
the“How well have you improved...” self-assessment questions in the survey, the students withdisability responded significantly (p=0.004 for response of “very well improved” and p=0.048for “extremely well improved”) more positively than the majority. Moreover, the group ofstudents who transferred or the group of students who were international, we found these twogroups of non-majority students also gave more positive responses than the majority. We foundthese three student groups shared a commonality: their common areas are the ability tocommunicate and explore from viewpoints of more than one academic field. Lastly, greaterpercentages of students with disability found “Course(s) outside my major” had the most impacton their improvement than
, collaborating with the Faculty Center for Teaching andLearning (FCTL), MSU faculty could reach out to the GREAT Program for additional onlineresources and assistance to design internationalized online teaching and learning materials. Avideo series of GREAT Online Teaching Tips were created having MSU professors to share theirfirst-hand globally online teaching experience. The videos offered practical advice on classpreparation, teaching strategies, language barriers, technical and logistic issues, assessment andother adjustments for global online teaching.“Developing global citizens with the aspiration and ability to think globally and act locally is oneof the ultimate goals for our global engagement mission” [15]. To encourage and support MSUfaculty
Paper ID #30386Sustainable bridges from campus to campus: Aggregate results forEngineering Ahead Cohorts One to Three (#1525367)Dr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coordinates the Sustainable Bridges NSF IUSE project (Peter Butler, PI). Previously, she was the project coordinator the the Toys’n MORE NSF STEP project (Renata Engel, PI).Dr
classificationsystems. The course does not include lab classes; BIM software systems are covered as asubsidiary topic and developed by the students along the course as hand-on team assignmentswhich are presented at the end of the course.The course is organized in three modules. The first module comprises BIM and the builtenvironment and discusses the application of BIM for product development and valuemanagement, production management and 4D modeling, cost management and QTO, facilitiesmanagement and performance assessment. The second module covers openBIM andinteroperability, including object-orientation, data representation, and classification systems. Thethird module is dedicated to BIM and novel project management approaches, specifically BIMand supply
concrete testing. Her research has been in fiber-reinforced concrete overlay pavement design and has tinkered in specialty concrete materials and evaluating test methods that assess quality of constructed materials. She is currently actively involved in professional societies and committees through the American Concrete Institute National and Intermountain Chapter, Transportation Research Board, and International Society for Concrete Pavements. She enjoys leading hands-on labora- tory learning of how construction materials are made and helping the new civil engineering students learn the tools to design roadway infrastructure.Dr. Susan L Thackeray , Utah Valley University Dr. Susan L. Thackeray is tenured-track faculty
students.Literature ReviewWhile the value of experimental design projects has been emphasized in engineering curriculums,participation of underrepresented students in engineering competition teams is often low whencompared to the engineering enrollment in the schools [6, 7]. Much of the literature about theexperience of underrepresented groups in engineering team projects has assessed severalchallenges that may prevent students from engaging and participating in team activities. Priorresearch has attributed the low participation of underrepresented students to recruitment strategiesand the retention of students [6]. In many engineering competition teams, the teams arestudent-selected, which leads to homophily (the tendency for people to have (non-negative
reproduced in Appendix A. This scale assesses 3 intrinsic motivation (intrinsicmotivation to know, intrinsic motivation toward accomplishment, and intrinsic motivation toexperience stimulation), 3 extrinsic motivation (identification, introjection, and externalregulation), and amotivation. We asked participants to what extent each item corresponds to areason why they go to college on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (“Does not correspond at all”) to7 (“Corresponds exactly”). They were also randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In theintention intervention condition, we asked participants to write about specific strategies theycould use to be more successful in the course. In the control condition, they wrote about theirthoughts and feelings
aware of a widespread effort or adoption to apply these exams in modern engineeringclassrooms. However, the physics education community has maintained an effort to provide forbest practices in teaching and assessment of learning via Physport [8]. Perhaps one of the mostwidely cited and used concept inventories is the Force Concept Inventory which measuresstudent understanding of basic Newtonian physics [9].An electromagnetics concept inventory, the Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics Diagnostic –Coupled Multiple Response (CUE-CMR) [10] was applied to the electrostatics portion of thisupper-level engineering electromagnetics course at a public regional university. The CUE-CMRtests student understanding of electrostatics concepts and is not
School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/utilitarianism. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2020].[5] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994.[6] J. Moon, “Resources for Reflective Learning,” in A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning, London: Routedge Falmer, 2004.[7] D. Kember, J. McKay, K. Sinclair, and F. K. Y. Wong, “A four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 369–379, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02602930701293355.[8] D. R. Krathwohl, “Chapter 8: sampling, representation and external generality,” in
., Reubenson, A& Carter, A. (2019) Resilience inhigher education students: a scoping review. Higher Education Research & Development V38(6), 1105-1120Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. (1977) Reproduction in education, society and culture (London, Sage).Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G. O’Rourke, T, Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W., andvon Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities.Earthquake Spectra 19(4), 733-752.Carnell P.E., P. H., & Hunsu, N. J., & Ray, D. F., & Sochacka, N. W. (2018, June), Exploring the Relationships BetweenResilience and Student Performance in an Engineering Statics Class: A Work in Progress Paper presented at
Paper ID #32169Faculty Integration of Social Justice Issues into Courses andCo-Curricular Activities for Engineering StudentsDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a
RTParea of North Carolina. A blog article on this trip can be found at: http://renci.org/blog/nsf-funded-undergrad-researchers-get-a-taste-of-life-at-renci/ . Students also had the opportunity tohear a two hour talk via video from Dr. Eric Brown, a pioneer in Computing Technology fromIBM Research. As a part of our outreach, the students toured the Greensboro Civil RightsMuseum and volunteered at a nearby farm that serves mentally and physically challengedindividuals.3.6 program assessment resultsAccording to the internal and external evaluators for the project, overall, the EMCoR@NCATREU Site was successful in meeting most goals in the 3-year period based on the results of theassessment. It is most important to note that this REU Site, run at an
variousstatements on a five-point scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree). Survey responses were100%. The data presented below are taken from the 2019 assessment results.Prior to the program, students’ career aspirations all seemed to include becoming an engineer,pursuing advanced education, or teaching about engineering. They ranged in their specificity:some students knew the exact field or position they were aiming for and others had vagueconceptions. Examples of how the undergraduates described their career aspirations included: To be a researching RF and Microwave engineer Become an educator Be an engineer who masters the fundamentals of a chosen field in order to be capable of solving challenging design problems I