, 2008 A First Year Seminar for Surveying Engineering and the Effects on RetentionAbstractA first-year seminar for surveying students in the college of engineering was added to thesurveying engineering curriculum in 1998. The course is used to introduce students to collegeacademics, the scholarly community, and the surveying profession. Class sizes are limited to 20students in order to keep the student-teacher ratio low and provide the students an opportunity tomake friends with 19 other students in their major. Team exercises are used in several elementsof the course. One of the purposes of the course is to build a comfortable academic relationshipbetween the first-semester surveying student and a
tutorials could be substituted fortraditional lectures without impacting what a student learns- at least for teaching accountingfundamentals. For both groups, a major improvement in learning occurred as evidenced by thefinal mean scores.BackgroundThere are various methods students use to solve problems in the classroom. Pitman, Gosper andRich (1999) report that different students use different course related materials (paper vs.computer) in differing ways and to different degrees. Use of varied teaching resources is veryimportant to match individual student learning styles and thus could have important implicationsfor future educational programs and curriculum contents Holman (2000).There are different methods used in teaching accounting. This
Paper ID #23886Building a Networked Improvement Community (NIC) around Engaging Mi-nority Males in STEMDr. Jumoke Oluwakemi Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Dr. J. ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias is Associate Professor and Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the De- partment of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in computer engineering. Dr. Ladeji-Osias earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Rutgers University. She is the Principal Investigator for
getting all instructors to agree to collaborate on content and assignments, whichafforded us the opportunity to investigate the effects of co-enrollment alone on the academicsuccess of first-year mechanical engineering students taking the same sections of a 2-credit-hourME 1001 and a 3-credit-hour ENGL 1101. Academic success in ME 1001 among the studentswho were co-enrolled and those who were not co-enrolled is compared in this study. Thesuccess of the students was tracked using the following rubrics: attendance, course grades, peerevaluations during the design project, and retention for the following semester in the mechanicalengineering program. The students that were co-enrolled had similar attendance and peerevaluation rates in the ME 1001
indeed provide an additional lense through which to assessour program’s impact on program effectiveness and student learning, this disparity in studentperformance on the pre/post test signals us to use caution when interpreting the test results at thislevel of detail.That said, general improvements in the overall class average performance measured pre/postprogram indicate that student competency in mathematics and science process skills appears toincrease as they progress through the project. Again, if we limit our analysis to this one test, thedegree to which our program is responsible for this increase is unclear, since no adequate controlmeasures have been identified or applied.Student interest in STEM. The relationship between student
Session 1455 The Importance to Economic Development of Improved University-Industry Engagement in Research and Professional Education Stephen J. Tricamo, Donald H. Sebastian New Jersey Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe key to the strength of the U.S. economy has been industry's ability to capitalize ontechnological innovation. At American research universities, an inherent objective of Ph.D.programs in engineering is innovation related to new or existing technologies. Despite such anobvious mutuality of interest, industry has typically
DIVERSE MINDSAbstract:The use of course management systems have resulted in a growing trend among faculty to provide studentswith course materials to augment lectures. This can include lecture notes, example problems orsupplementary reading. In engineering courses, instructor-provided notes are often handwritten -- even inonline courses. There is an assumption that handwritten notes are preferred by students and have apedagogical benefit over typed notes.Access to course materials for students with disabilities is also improving due to advancements in bothtechnology and awareness. Students with disabilities often receive custom accommodation plans for coursework when the original class format does not adequately support their learning. In courses
and accounting model for analysing the economic effects of an intervention at a workplace,” Ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 764–787, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1080/00140130210136053.[4] A. M. Genaidy, M. M. Rinder, R. Sequeira, and A. D. A-Rehim, “The Work Compatibility Improvement Framework: Theory and application of improvement action and intervention strategies,” Ergonomics, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 524–559, 2009, doi: 10.1080/00140130802395638.[5] A. M. Dale, L. Jaegers, L. Welch, E. Barnidge, N. Weaver, and B. A. Evanoff, “Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of ergonomic solutions in construction,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 295–305, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1002/ajim.22693.[6] I
. Please see Bishop & Verleger 6 for moredetails.Aiming towards exploring different methods and scenarios for effective flipped classroomsetting, this paper explores the impact of traditional classroom and flipped classroom in anengineering laboratory on student learning effectiveness. The later sections of this paper explainthe objective and perceived student learning outcome of the flipped engineering laboratory , apart of Green Energy Materials and Manufacturing course developed as a deliverable of DoEd-Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP)Grant for fostering 21stcentury Hispanic sustainability leaders. Framework used for analyzing student learningeffectiveness is then explained in detail which includes how students
to increase engineering self-efficacy and sense of belonging amongst first- year underrepresented minority engineering students? 3. Can a small intervention during the beginning of the first semester improve a student’s sense of belonging, engineering self-efficacy, and student-professor interaction?Review of LiteratureSocial Cognitive Theory To understand the effect of self-efficacy and sense of belonging one must understandBandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (1). Social cognitive theory posits that people are not driven Page 24.803.3by inner forces or controlled by their environments. Rather, they motivate their own
andadministrators as they devote resources to bridge programs.2. Success in Bridge: Improvements in Math PlacementWe first tabulated data to document improvement in math placement resulting from participationin a summer bridge program. The commonly reported measures of success were the number oflevels by which placement increased (e.g., by one or two courses), and advancement to calculus.The results are reported in Table 2. Note that most data in Table 2 is not compared with acontrol group. We conjecture that this is because establishing such control groups is not trivial.Ideally, this requires collecting data from non-bridge students who are academically comparableto bridge students and who retook the placement test during the summer, but this is
being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Identifying Features of Engineering Academic Units that Influence Teaching and Learning ImprovementAbstractIn this research paper, we use case study analysis to identify the features of three academicengineering departments at a research-doctoral university that influence the improvement ofteaching and learning. Calls for improvement in engineering
administrative issues such as boot-up time at the start of class andnetwork connectivity issues from time to time, Tablet PCs were found to be appropriate for usein certain engineering courses and they can serve as effective multi-functional teaching andlearning tools.IntroductionMeans of instruction at a university can range from the simplest and traditional, black orwhiteboards, to sophisticated Tablet PC-based settings allowing full student-student and student-instructor interaction1. A Tablet PC allows the user to annotate or draw directly on a variety ofwidely used software programs such as Word, Excel, or PowerPoint, together with programsspecifically written for the Tablet PC, including Windows Journal and Classroom Presenter2,3.In addition
Session 2557 Improving Audience Analysis of Real-World Clients in Industrial Engineering Senior Design Judith Shaul Norback, Lisa DuPree McNair, & Garlie A. Forehand School of Industrial and Systems Engineering School of Language, Communication & Culture Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractSince ABET requirements have increased, more colleges and universities are focused onenhancing students’ communication skills. At Georgia Tech, workforce interviews conductedwith industrial engineers, supervisors and senior
North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. STEPHEN KUYATH is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has taught engineering technology courses at the college level for over 26 years. He has a strong interest in and dedication to improving both traditional and distance engineering education and to encouraging those students typically underrepresented in STEM fields to consider engineering technology as a career. Page 15.1225.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 The Effect of Panopto on Academic Performance and Satisfaction
Session 2132Beyond ABET: A new school-wide process for continuous improvement in engineering education Professor Dick K.P. Yue and Barbara Masi, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractHaving brought 13 programs successfully through ABET’s challenging new EC2000accreditation requirements, the most interesting outcome of that process was the identification ofhow much more could be done to create a streamlined, effective continuous improvementprocess for all. In the year following MIT’s 2001 ABET review, the School of Engineeringbegan implementation of a new school-wide continuous
participants to follow-up on what hadhappened during the course of their searches. One respondent noted that, "The two Page 12.1257.8sessions were useful; the first gave some important data and the second a useful way ofchecking that ideas had been implemented." In a similar vein, another suggested that in thesecond session, "results and problem-solving discussions become relevant." A fewrespondents suggested that differences between departments and inconsistencies with thetiming of searches across departments limited the effectiveness of this aspect of theworkshop.Overall, the feedback from the post-workshop survey indicates that the two-sessionworkshop was
put together one required module for allfaculty and three additional modules for all faculty who might be teaching remotely due to pre-existing conditions (Table 1) or if all courses had to be taught remotely. More training moduleshave been developed as areas of instructional improvement were highlighted. Table 1 details thetrainings that were created for selected faculty groups. Table 1: Remote Learning Faculty Training Type of Training What Faculty Live Streaming (Canvas/Zoom/Swivl) Required training for all faculty teaching on-campus/face-to-face Canvas Fundamentals-QOT #1 Required training
successes. FIG seminar panels areaverage less than 2.0 (disagree) for their self-efficacy designed based off of Stephens and Destin (2014)ratings for teamwork. Improving teamwork ability and difference-education intervention module that can providemindset are a key student outcome for BME 303L, as students with an identification with panelists. [6] Whenstudents worked in teams on various projects throughout students understand that their background or other relatablethe semester. These data indicate that the students’ factors matter, and they see other students like themexperience with teamwork in BME 303L had little effect on persisting through similar challenges, they can oftentheir
level. In 2010, Kara began teaching courses and supervising student teachers at ASU. Kara is TAP certified, an evaluation system designed to improve teaching effectiveness and student achievement. The TAP evaluation involves classroom observations, coaching, and feedback/reflection for professional growth. Kara has worked with 60+ student teachers in various subjects at the pre-K through 12th grade level, and conducted over 100 TAP classroom observations. Since the fall of 2016, Kara has been working with the JTFD Project, an NSF grant working to improve active learning in engineering education. She has completed 300 RTOP classroom observations in ASU engineering courses (civil, environmental, construction
Session #3157 Instructional Effectiveness: A Real-time Feedback Approach using Statistical Process Control (SPC) Leonard A. Perry University of San DiegoAbstractAre students satisfied with their courses? Students are typically requested to assess the courseand instruction at the end of the semester. Course evaluations report student ratings of instructionin order to provide feedback to the instructor and administration. Although this feedback mayprovide long-term insight into instructional effectiveness, it cannot be used to provide real
disparities such as the underrepresentation of women and minorities in STEM. Specifically: individual differences in motivations to pursue STEM careers; the psychological processes underlying the underrepresentation of women and minorities in STEM; and effective interventions for diversifying STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Improving Student Spatial Skills: Using Life Experiences and Motivational Factors to Inform Instructional InterventionsSpatial thinking refers to the ability to create and hold an object in the mind’s eye and manipulatethat object via sectional cuts, three dimensional rotations, and other mental operations. Priorresearch suggests that the
Paper ID #21076Professional Development Program for Improving the Diversity of Faculty inElectrical and Computer Engineering (iREDEFINE ECE)Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been
engineering students enrolled in a course, they persisted anywaywithout being affected by scholarship requirements.Merit-based scholarships increased the likelihood of taking at least one summer course for totalresident students in all sample institutions. The effect was also significant for engineeringresidents except at two institutions located in Florida. Since scholarship programs in Georgia,Florida, and South Carolina accepted summer credits, residents including engineering studentshad the opportunity to improve their first-year GPAs by taking summer courses. Increases in thelikelihood of course withdrawal and summer course-taking were highly correlated. Residentstudents became more likely to withdraw from courses probably because they perceived
. Eisenhower Mathematics and Science Education) to prepare secondary school teachers to effectively teach mathematics through problem solving with practical applications. Page 23.275.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 CCLI: Evaluation of a Cost Effective Program for Augmenting Calculus with Engineering ContentAbstractEngineering educators have been working to increase student persistence by improving thecalculus experience. This has primarily taken the form of augmenting calculus with engineeringcontent. Data indicates that these programs have a real and
Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer- sity of Louisville. He graduated from Furman University in 1992 with degrees in Computer Science and Philosophy. After 10 years working in industry, he returned to school, completing his Ph.D. in Computer Science Engineering at the University of Louisville’s Speed School of Engineering in 2008. Since com- pleting his degree, he has been teaching engineering mathematics courses and continuing his dissertation research in cyber security for industrial control systems. In his teaching, Dr. Hieb focuses on innovative and effective use of tablets, digital ink, and other technology and is currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom
AC 2012-4969: IMPROVING CONFIDENCE LEVEL AND PERFORMANCEOF FIRST GENERATION AND FEMALE STUDENTS USING METACOG-NITION STRATEGIESDr. Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint Quamrul Mazumder is a professor of mechanical engineering at University of Michigan, Flint. His re- search interests includes computational fluid dynamics, metacognition approaches of learning, active and experiential learning, renewable energy, and global engineering education. His teaching areas are fluid mechanics, renewable energy, introduction to engineering, and senior design. Page 25.743.1 c American
teaching methods and study habits affect the absorption and long-term retention of class material in the hopes of best preparing students for their future as engineers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Effect of Assessment Frequency on Long-Term Retention of Engineering ContentAbstractThis work-in-progress paper presents some preliminary data from a study investigating the effectof assessment frequency on students’ long-term retention of engineering course content. In thisstudy, a variety of hypotheses designed to identify the factors that impact students’ long-termretention of course content are tested. However
treatment plants, which helped students to relate theknowledge they learned in the classroom to real-world applications. Since 9/11/2001, as asecurity measure, municipalities across the country have closed water treatment plants to visits ofthe general public. Furthermore, increased students’ participations in the teaching process areneeded to improve the effectiveness of students’ learning. To response to above challenges, theauthor carried out a project, sponsored by a SIUE teaching enhancement grant, to assess if videosof water treatment subjects could be used to create significant and positive impacts on students’learning experience in these courses. This paper reported the experience and findings of this
Civil Engineering. Yilmaz Wodzinski offers a broad range of courses to engineering program students and conducts research on renewable energy, water treatment and water resources.Dr. Namyong Lee, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Namyong Lee has specialty in industrial and applied mathematics. He is the current president of North Central Section of Mathematical Association of America and the research director of the Minnesota Modeling & Simulation Center. Dr. Lee has served many journal editorial boards, including the associate editorship in Frontiers in Systems Biology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Improving Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) Performance1