Session 2266 CQI for Mechanical Engineering Education: A Two Year Experience Craig W. Somerton, Diana G. Somerton Michigan State University/California Manufacturing Technology CenterI. IntroductionFor over two years the undergraduate program in mechanical engineering at Michigan StateUniversity has operated in a continuous quality improvement process mode. A CQI processknown as ME 2000 has been developed for the undergraduate mechanical engineering degreeprogram at Michigan State University in response to two primary motivations: 1) changes in the accreditation requirements for engineering programs 2
program.The cooperative education program is an alternating semester program that the studentparticipates in during the last two years of the academic curriculum after secondary admission.Students work with the same company/organization for each of three four-month-long semesters.A typical sequence for a student is shown in Table 1. Table 1: Academic/Co-op Sequence at GVSU Fall Winter Spring/Summer (Sept.-Dec.) (Jan.-April) (May-Aug.) Year 1 Year 2 Co-op I Year 3 Co-op II Year 4 Co-op III
Page 9 ASEE 2000Co-Op Experience Essay Quotes:“Overall, my co-op session at AVX was extremely valuable to me because I was exposedto more science in the engineering field and was able to see an application of engineeringon many levels.” (Chemical Engineering)“I was able to observe how people and personalities work together and how politics in acompany can affect everything from the morale of the workers to the product itself”(Mechanical Engineering/Economics)“I need to work on time management and putting more detail into my work. I also need towork on getting to know the politics of the work place and learning more about thecompany itself.” ((Mechanical Engineering/Economics)“I believe my Rose-Hulman education was put to
as close to industry as possible, (ii) practice interpersonal and commu-nication skills, and (iii) develop lifelong learning skills. These goals are what Waitz and Barrettterm “implicit curriculum”, those educational topics students are expected to know (oftenrequested by employers and alumnae/i), but not taught in any course [16].The design experience is offered at the senior and introductory graduate students as a sixteen-week semester three credit-hour course. The course was organized into two hours lecture andthree hours laboratory each week. Since the later design tasks require much time, lecture periodsare scheduled for every meeting early in the semester to cover subject material required in the lab-oratory portion of the course
2010-2011 B Transferred 2.00EGT 200T Elective Transfer Credit 2010-2011 B Transferred 1.00EGT 265 Manufacturing Processes and Operations 2010-2011 B+ Transferred 3.00EGT 300 Statics and Strength of Materials 2010-2011 B Transferred 3.00ENG 110 English for International Students I 2010-2011 C Transferred 3.00ENG 111 English for International Students II 2010-2011 A Transferred 3.00ENG 200T Elective Transfer Credit 2010-2011 B Transferred 3.00GGV 200G General Education Credit 2010-2011 A Transferred 1.00INF 120 Elementary Programming
implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2013, respectively. She received her BS from Georgia Tech in 2006, double-majoring in Psychology and Management.Mr. Jeffrey H Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology After 14 years in the middle and high school math and engineering classroom where Mr. Rosen was working on the integration of engineering and robotics into the teaching of the core curricula classrooms. He has now been at Georgia Tech’s CEISMC for the past 8 years working on curriculum development and research on authentic STEM instruction and directing the state’s FIRST LEGO
Arizona State University and has served in this capacity since 1999. He is active in ASEE and several of its Divisions, including serving as 2004-2005 Division Chair of the Mechanics Division. He serves on the Society of Manufacturing Engineers’ Manufacturing Education and Research Community steering committee member. He is currently serving on the Technology Accreditation Council (TAC) of ABET, representing ASME. Previously, he had been at North Dakota State University where he was a faculty member in the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering department. His research interests include machining, effective teaching and engineering mechanics. Before coming to academia, he was a design
-Time Formative Assessment to Enhance Student Learning. Proceedings: 2012 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.31. Hall, S., Amelink, C.,& Hu, D. (2012). Designing and Implementing an Online Offering of a Nuclear Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings: 2012 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.32. Grasman, K., Long, S., & Schmidt, S. (2012). Hybrid Delivery of Engineering Economy to Large Classes. Proceedings: 2012 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.33. Abdelmessih, A., & Gendelman, I.(2012). Synchronous Distance Learning for Undergraduate Thermal Engineering Courses: Trials
variousABET-accredited Bachelor of Science degrees in engineering of which Manufacturing SystemsEngineering is one. The Kettering system of education is unique with its five-year, fullycooperative program featuring alternating 12-week academic terms and cooperative assignmentsin industry. Although in its early days the Institute had only one sponsor, today the universityhas over 550 cooperative employers with over 700 locations nationwide. During the final phaseof the program, each student undertakes a thesis on a significant problem faced by the Page 4.252.1cooperative employer, under the joint supervision of a faculty member and an industrial
Paper ID #33987The Growth of Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Education in the 21stCenturyDr. Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She has a joint appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and Management & Engineering for Manufacturing Program (a collaboration between School of Engineering and Business) as an Assistant Professor in Residence in University of Connecticut. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity in Automation, Industry 4.0
possessingthese soft skills could indeed be beneficial to them.In January I began my course prep for this upcoming fall semester’s class by evaluating thecurrent engineering job market dynamics. My primary goal of this research was to betterunderstand how hiring managers make their decisions. My rationale for this was that if Iunderstand the hiring process I will better appreciate how these soft skills might affect a hiringmanager’s decisions. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 127 2016 ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference A. Abundance or ShortageI began this evaluation by
segment. Toward this end, this paper will discuss major biorefinery concepts, specificapplications, and curriculum modification and incorporation techniques that can be used toachieve these efforts. The trends discussed here and their implications are critical for educators,because in coming years biorefining will be used to simultaneously meet the needs of our societyas well as that of environmental stewardship.IntroductionAs we move into the 21st century, it has become apparent that human societies are over-taxingglobal resources, and that we are rapidly depleting their finite supplies. This is especially true inthe petroleum and petrochemical sectors. Science and technology, however, have progressed tothe level that biorenewable materials can
as indicated by a state of In Progressor Revisit Required. Table 1. Student State Information for the Curriculum Knowledge Map in Figure 4. Node State Circuits I Completed Circuits II In progress Electronics Not reached Digital Logic In progress Advanced Digital Logic Not reached Microprocessors Not reached Computer Architecture Not reached Probability and
Innovation and Organizational Sustainability: An Addition to the Engineering Management Curriculum?Abstract and IntroductionThe Baldrige National Performance Excellence Criteria (2013 -2014) 1 places increased emphasison organizational sustainability in terms of societal, environmental, and financial impacts; andinnovation as a discontinuous change in engineering designs and/or business models. Suchconcepts may become important considerations for engineering managers in today’s globalmarketplace. Engineering management educators may become a major player in transformingcompliance with performance specifications into an enhanced competitive business advantage byoffering a total systems approach to managing innovation while ensuring the
I .— Session 2547 MECOMTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY - EDUCATING TECHNICIANS FOR THE 21st CENTURY Jack L. Waintraub, P.E. Middlesex County College The New Jersey Center for Engineering Technology Education, NJCATE, is restructuringengineering technology education in order to produce engineering technicians who are equippedwith the capabilities needed to meet the demands of industry in the 21st Century. Central to thiseffort is the
University of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignIntroductionThe potential for interdisciplinary approaches to education in efforts to inspire learners has beenshown to be fruitful in K12 and college level curricula1-7. A movement combining Art & Designwith STEM has promoted the benefits of STEAM8. In addition to the improved performance ofstudents who are engaged in this type of curriculum, there are opportunities to develop projectsthat embody the interdisciplinarity of these practices9. Workshops held in 2014 and 2015successfully promoted engagement and collaboration, and inspired learners who attended tobuild their own touch synthesizer. By emphasizing the aesthetics and musicality of the end result,the promotion of the event aimed to broaden K12
. Several novel applications of hybrid CI techniques proposed earlierby the author in engineering, manufacturing, biomedical and health care systems are discussed. Theexperiences of offering CI as a graduate course and a summer research project involving high schoolstudents are also presented. The importance of introducing CI techniques and their multidisciplinaryapplications as a senior level interdisciplinary engineering elective course and integrating these inresearch experiences for undergraduates and STEM education is discussed.1. Introduction Recently in US universities, there is a growing emphasis on multidisciplinary education and research,especially involving science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) [1-8]. The
engagement Relevant Background Why should we care? Recent FindingsBefore we really get into anything, I think it’s important you know a bit more about We’ll move on to talking a bit more about relevant background information forus and how we came to this work. When I was first starting my PhD at Virginia understanding rurality in engineering education. So we’ll talk a bit more aboutTech, I worked on one of Jake’s grants that
Graphics I and II* b. Strength and Materials Lab* c. Mechanics for Technology: Statics d. Dynamics e. Production Design Lab* f. Senior Design Sequence* g. Measurements & Instrumentation* h. Vibration for Technologists* i. Rapid Prototyping * j. Materials Design Course k. Finite Element Applications I* l. Manufacturing Materials and Processes* m. Fluid Power* n. Electrical Circuits* o. Thermodynamics 2. What were some challenges in shifting instruction over the past year? a. The biggest challenge was how to convert material that was meant for in-person to
, adapting to the change hascaused many programs to become increasingly aware of what similar programs are doing inother parts of the country or even other parts of the world. A part of all strategic planningincludes comparing oneself to one’s competitors. In the educational world, we are notnecessarily so concerned with competition but with improving and serving students. Hence,institutions frequently collaborate, so the term benchmarking is used for the initial comparisonbetween programs. This paper benchmarks two urban Mechanical Engineering Technologyprograms and compares their background, objectives and outcomes, curriculum, and laboratories.It is hoped that this benchmark will encourage other programs to perform similar comparisons inan effort
Entrepreneurial Engineering CareerAbstractIf an engineering program has superb technical content, what, if anything, can be done to raisethe level of educational excellence in its graduates? Especially, if a key intent is to increase thedegree entrepreneurial-mindedness of its graduates and promote innovation? We believe theanswer is to truly integrate the core professional competencies cultivated by general educationinto the engineering curriculum and to have general education courses more specifically connectto issues that engineers need to be more aware of in a career climate of extensive globalization.General education is an essential educational component to be embraced as being on par inimportance in an engineering curriculum with technical topics
Paper ID #12046Improving Online STEM Education through Direct Industry Classroom En-gagementDr. Mark Angolia, East Carolina University Mark Angolia, PhD, is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator for the Industrial Distribution and Logistics degree program in the College of Engineering and Technology at East Carolina University (ECU). Prior to entering academia in 2005, he held industrial positions in engineering, manufacturing, quality, materials, and operations management for manufacturing companies within the automotive sup- ply chain. Dr. Angolia’s teaching focuses on Enterprise Resource Planning with SAP
AC 2009-82: WEST AFRICAN TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION, ANDRECIPROCITY IMPLEMENTATION IN BENINBradley Striebig, James Madison University Dr. Bradley A. Striebig is an associate professor of Engineering at James Madison University. He has a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Penn State University, where he was the head of the Environmental Technology Group at the Applied research Laboratory. Prior to accepting a position to develop the engineering program at James Madison University, Brad was a faculty member in the Civil Engineering department at Gonzaga University. He has worked on various water projects throughout the US and in Benin and Rwanda.Susan Norwood, Gonzaga University Susan
executed by the controller to thetheoretically computed motion profileInterpret results based on the comparison of theoretical andactual motion profilesCurriculum module, lectures and lab module Strongly Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree 1 2 3 4 5The curriculum module was interestingI feel that I learned a lot by reading this curriculum moduleThe curriculum module was at an appropriate level ofdifficulty given my knowledge and experienceThe curriculum module took
Sciences, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. He holds a Bachelor’s in Mechatronics Engineering, a Master’s in Manufacturing Systems, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Sciences from Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. He is part of the Research Group of Industrial Transformation and a member of the National Research System (SNI) at Level 1. His research focuses on Additive Manufacturing, Manufacturing Systems Automation, Robotics, Educational Innovation, Advanced Materials, and Medical Devices.Ing. F´elix Mart´ınez-Jim´enez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences F´elix Mart´ınez-Jim´enez is a Master of Science in Engineering student at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. He holds a B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering from Tecnol´ogico de
much attention in recent years due to theeffectiveness of such attacks to cause physical harm. Cyber attacks on critical infrastructure,specifically the Industrial Control Systems (ICS) by which critical processes are controlled,affect water, power, critical manufacturing and many other areas vital to society. Therefore, theeducation of new engineers to mitigate these attacks is also critical. One key problem that hasexisted for some time is the separation of cyber-security education, in the Computer InformationScience (CIS) discipline, from that of ICS education, in the electrical and other engineeringdisciplines as ICS engineers. This separation results in misunderstanding between CIS and ICSprofessionals who typically remain divided within
of Design in Chemical Engineering,” ThePennsylvania State University, 199812 Aminmansour, A., “SteelDEM: An Interactive Multimedia Intelligent Tutor and Teaching Aid for StructuralSteel Design,” First Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers,Washington, DC, June, 1994.13 John s. Lamancusa, Jens e. Jorgensen, and Jose l. Zayas-castro, “The Learning Factory – A New Approach toIntegrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” The Journal of Engineering Education,Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 103-112. (1997).14 Larry C. Burton, Jeffrey G. Soper, Jack V. Matson, Penn State's Engineering Leadership Development Minor
Results, in PC Power Play Hot HardwareGuide, vol. 2, 75- 75, (1999).23. S. Mueller, Upgrading & Repairing PC s, QUE, (1997).24. M. A. Mazidi and J. G. Mazidi, The 80x86 IBM PC & Compatible Computers, Volumes I & II, AssemblyLanguage Design and Interfacing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 294- 295, (1995).25. S. P. Maj, T. Fetherston, P. Charlesworth, and G. Robbins, Computer & Network Infrastructure Design,Installation, Maintenance and Management - a proposed new competency based curriculum, presented at TheProceedings of the Third Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education, The University ofQueensland, Brisbane, Australia, (1998).26. P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London, Routledge, (1992).PAUL MAJDr S P
; Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationVII. Summary and RecommendationsSummaryI do not believe those proposing a tendency towards more market pull approaches wouldclaim the subject is at the apex of engineering educational topics. I submit, however, thattrending towards market pull curriculum content obfuscates precisely what those moreimportant issues are. Among those issues is the strengthening of America.While useful to some degree, the market pull approach is necessarily reactionary,shortsighted, and works not to strengthen America’s economy but to weaken it. Anacademic market pull approach shortchanges academia’s most important customers…itsstudents, and America at large. It subjugates
camefrom self-study or employment, not from courses at university. Again student responsesindicated that such knowledge would be useful. We therefore examined developments incomputer and network technology curriculum.2. Computer and Network Technology CurriculumThe problems associated with teaching computer technology are not new. Units inmicrocomputer systems are fundamentally important to students 3, 4. These address issuesthat include: computer organization, memory systems, assembly language, digital logic,interrupt handling, I/O and interfaces. Mainstream computer science education is wellsupported by journal articles on various aspects of re-programmable hardware foreducational purposes 5 and assembly language 6. Simulation has proved to be a