Mechanical Engineering and the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He holds a BS degree in civil engineering from USMA (2001), and MS and PhD degrees in civil engineering from North Carolina State University (2011 and 2019). Brad is a licensed Professional Engineer (Missouri). His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, sustainable construction materials, and engineering education.Col. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a
Engineering Education and the Director of the EPICSProgram at Purdue University. He was one of the founding faculty members of the School ofEngineering Education. He has had courtesy appointments in Mechanical and Environmentaland Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education.He is a fellow of the ASEE and NSPE. WORKSHOP INFORMATIONProposed Title:Design Can/Should Be Fun, Easy, Affordable and Focused On PeopleAbstract: Please provide a concise description that includes the workshop’s learning objectives(maximum 750 characters). The abstract is used on the ASEE website, program materials, andotherK-12 Workshop promotional activities.Design offers opportunities to integrate STEM
greaterbenefit to both the child and caregivers, but typically comes at a high cost due to wages fordesign and labor. University students developing these adaptations, however, can providecustomization benefits to children and the community at a materials-only cost, while also gainingvaluable design and teamwork experience. Examples of customizations that were made byengineering students include extensions for utensils and writing implements, extension andsimplification mechanisms for toys and games, and specialized tablet and assistive electronicdevice mounts and holders.During the initial semester, engineering students were able to tour an exceptional educationfacility and see first-hand the challenges students and teachers faced. Since only a few of
AC 2007-517: IMPROVING ENGINEERING LABORATORY EXPERIENCETHROUGH COMPUTER SIMULATIONS AND COOPERATIVE LEARNINGNing Fang, Utah State University Ning Fang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education, College of Engineering, Utah State University. His areas of interest include engineering education, manufacturing processes, and product design. He earned his PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 1994 and has published 30+ papers in refereed international journals. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and a senior member of SME.Gary Stewardson, Utah State University Gary A. Stewardson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education
].Musculoskeletal injuries can be treated using invasive and non-invasive methods. Both invasiveand non-invasive methods usually include prolonged immobilization of the injury, which maylead to delay in the recovery [5], [6]. It has been scientifically proven that PulsedElectromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy decreases the immobilization period by mimicking thebody’s natural healing process, which increases the blood flow to the injured area to speed up thehealing process.PEMF therapy devices use electromagnets to direct a series of magnetic pulses through damagedtissue in order to stimulate cellular repair. The body’s natural healing process is accelerated byutilizing this mechanism [7], [8]. The intent of PEMF therapy is to reduce the pain of the
biological systems. This highly interdisciplinaryarea integrates knowledge from traditional fields of study such as engineering, chemistry,physics, biology, material science and medicine. The advent of bionanotechnology is changingthe way traditional nanotechnology courses are taught. These courses are shifting from purenanoparticle (NP) synthesis and characterization to include the interaction of NPs in biologicalsystems.Laboratories provide students the opportunity to apply new knowledge in a simulated situationand enable the student to achieve learning objectives not easily obtained in the classroom. Fieseland Rosa identify several general learning objectives for laboratory courses includinginstrumentation, modeling, experimentation, data
Session 2793 Using Model Rocketry to Introduce Students to Aerospace Engineering Eugene E. Niemi, Jr. Mechanical Engineering Department University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell, MA 01854Abstract This paper summarizes five years of experiences with a mini-design module intended todevelop the interest of freshmen in aerospace engineering as a career. Model rocketry was oneof several modules that students participated in during the course Introduction to
Session 1566 A Micro-Controller Based Robotics Course for ME Students Wayne Walter, PhD, P.E. Gleason Professor of Mechanical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623IntroductionFor many years the emphasis of our robotics course has been on projects where students design,build, and test tooling to accompany an industrial robot in a workcell. At the end of a ten-weekquarter, students were expected to demonstrate a working prototype that integrates sensors,actuators, and feeders together
being identified and external experts with subdiscipline engineeringexpertise are being contacted. As such, the form and content of new PtD text for any of thetextbooks have not been finalized. However, NIOSH and the project team is willing to workwith all authors interested in including PtD principles and examples in future engineering textbooks.It is not yet known in what final form PtD concepts will be introduced by authors in engineeringtextbooks. The types and formats of new materials will vary between books and authors. Forexample, one author of a fluid mechanics book that is working with the project team isdeveloping subtle PtD examples that convey specific learning objectives in different sections ofthe book. Another author working with
posting of static course materials. A campus distance education linkprovides links to campus resources as well as a page for posting introductory course informationfor students.Both the state and the campus pursued a relatively broad market based primarily on facultyinterest. This approach ensured that participating faculty had a strong interest in technology-enabled learning and provided the greatest opportunity for breadth of innovation. Thedisadvantage is that with limited resources such an approach makes it difficult to concentratesufficient resources necessary to penetrate a particular market niche.Program Level PlanPrior to the distance education initiative, the TM program already had strong support from non-traditional graduate students
Engineering from National In- stitute of Technology, Warangal, India. She earned her Master of Science and doctoral degrees in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. Her research interests lie in the area of sustainability in asphalt pavements using material considerations, green technologies, and efficient pavement preservation techniques. Her doctoral work focused on improving the performance of recycled asphalt pavements us- ing warm mix asphalt additives. As a postdoctoral scholar at North Carolina State University, she worked on several NCDOT sponsored research projects including developing specifications for crack sealant ap- plication and performing field measurements of asphalt emulsion application
the quality of the welds. As size and weight decrease and the factor of safety islowered, more and more emphasis is placed on better raw material control and higher quality ofmaterials, manufacturing processes, and workmanship. A producer of raw material or a finishedproduct frequently does not improve quality or performance until that improvement is demandedby the customer. The pressure of the customer is transferred to implementation of improveddesign or manufacturing. Non-destructive testing is frequently called on to deliver this newquality level.10Non-destructive tests are used to determine the direction, amount, and gradient ofstresses in mechanical parts as applied in the field of experimental stress analysis. These play avery
currently working on the development of a hybrid, alternative fuel militarytransport and a transportable alternative energy demonstration unit. Furthermore, thesestudents are involved in minor projects studying other forms of alternative energy,alternative energy applications, or energy integration. This project is in its fourth year andtypically enrolls about thirty chemical, mechanical, and electrical engineeringundergraduates.IntroductionAlternative energy is a topic of current interest due to rising oil costs due to increasedworldwide demand and political instability in the Middle East. During the 2004 electioncampaigns, both President George W. Bush and Senator John Kerry discussed as part oftheir platforms an increased focus on alternative
they appreciated thesignificance of the course for them personally.Of the wide range of reflective practices we experimented with, several seem to have made alasting positive impression on students. Nearly all of our respondents said that they continued towrite in private journals regularly and found it rewarding, and more than half of them alsopracticed team conversations, team retrospectives, and the awareness of personality types in theirinteractions with colleagues.Since the feedback we received was in response to questions about the techniques we applied inthe course and the reflective practices we introduced but not the actual course material, and sincenothing about these practices seems domain-specific, we believe they can be
origin of the author’s efforts here is physicist John Krupczak’s “TechnologyLiteracy” course developed for students at Hope College, a small, selective admissioncollege with a dominance of liberal arts majors7-10. The present author’s pathway toestablishing this latter course for non-technical majors at NCSU has been anything butsmooth, in contrast to the earlier course incarnations of “device dissection” for technicalmajors cited above. Our previous 2004 ASEE paper reported the bumpy road andlessons learned while installing our technology literacy course at NCSU, in hopes that itcould assist other interested faculty in initiating similar ventures. The present paperdescribes the process of creating the lecture and lab materials for the new
paperdescribes the process of creating the lecture and lab materials for the new technologyliteracy course, teaching the pilot course in fall 2004, and plans for a second semesteroffering in spring of 2005.Spring results will be reported at the June 2005 ASEE meeting.Formatting the Course In more detail, we have developed a two lecture and single lab per week formatwith the following characteristics: Lecture 1: CONTEXT: define the historical origin and technical evolution of priordevices which served the same or related functions (e.g, for digital camera, survey optics,drawing, camera obscura, Daguerrotype, black and white film, Kodak and the personal(Brownie) camera, color film, Polaroid camera/film, and video camera). Lecture 2
active learning of the materialand provides a framework that illustrates the importance of the material. In the game, eachstudent starts with an identical sum of money, and is presented with a list of investmentopportunities. Students apply the principles learned in class to the possible investments and makedecisions such as how much to bid on a particular mine or factory in an auction. Additionalinvestment opportunities are introduced weekly throughout the semester, with the requiredanalysis growing in complexity as the students’ knowledge base increases. The game isinteractive in nature- for example; the owner of a factory must negotiate the price of raw materialshe/she needs with the owner of a mine. Student response to the exercise was
Paper ID #23564Exploring Engineering Major Choice and Self-concept Through First-yearSurveysMs. Stacey Leigh Kelly, Virginia Tech Stacey Kelly is a doctoral student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She re- ceived her M.S. in Materials Engineering from Purdue University and her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University. Her research interests include access to higher education, broaden- ing participation in engineering, and student success and retention.Darren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His
connections between the course exercisesand their expected future studies both during the course and one year after completing the course.IntroductionIn the first-year engineering course sequence at Norwich University, students of civil andenvironmental (CEE), electrical and computer (ECE), and mechanical (ME) engineering, alongwith construction management (CM) learn and practice professional and technical skills thatunite engineers across all disciplines in a common, general introductory course [1]. Historically,students completed a second, common introductory course that was developed around fourmulti-week projects—one predominantly from each discipline. In this operational mode, manyinstructors felt uncomfortable supporting the larger projects
chapter use alone, over the two years that the sites tested the chapters, overall number of activities focused on women in engineering and science done at 8 sites increased from 60 to 104. By the end of the project period, test sites also clarified and expanded the number of goals for their Women in Engineering/Science Programs. Many universities that were just beginning programs did not have their own written materials.• WEPAN Pilot Climate Survey, 1998, disseminated to over 29,000 students at 29 WEPAN member institutions. This national pilot survey was designed by WEPAN and funded by the Engineering Information Foundation. The primary purpose was to develop a method to assess male and female engineering student perceptions of the
can becompiled together for the groups to use in step 4.4) Explore alternative concepts. During concept exploration, divide the students into groups (groups of fourrecommended) and have each group come up with a different conceptual design solutions to theproblem. This involves looking at existing designs, brainstorming, and coming up with analogiesto the problem at hand. Choosing among options fosters what Harel and Papert call "cognitiveflexibility" - the ability to search for different (and better) alternatives to a design problem, andeven discard ones that aren't efficient (Harel, Papert, 1996). Along with concept exploration cancome a discussion of what the 'design parameters' are: variables such as size, material,mechanism, shape
According to Orville Chapman, CPR’s Page 13.708.2creator, the tool enables students to “develop key skills such as abstracting, persuading(proposals), developing arguments, describing, assessing, criticizing, analyzing, and reviewing.”2Furthermore, the tool facilitates students’ acquisition of these skills without overwhelming theirinstructor with additional grading.To use CPR, students work through a five-stage process that includes Text Entry, Calibration,Review, Self-Evaluation, and Results. For the Text Entry stage, students first reviewinstructional source material designed to help them complete a particular assignment. They thenproduce an
prior to the course that they were participating in a pilotprogram. They were notified that these design projects were new and that their feedback wouldbe used to improve the projects and the course. The distribution of the majors is shown in the Page 22.720.3table below. Many of the students choose either electrical or mechanical engineering. A fewstudents have not selected an engineering major or were not College of Engineering students.Table 1. ENG1001 Engineering Major As part of this pilot project, the team design projects Distribution completed were: wind energy, biomechanics andEngineering Major
thoseoutcomes where an instructional challenge may exist. It is clear from this assessment that studentsperformed poorly in meeting outcome 1, which deals with their ability to interpret and modifyG&M code. This finding is consistent with other recent offerings and with the observations of theinstructors. Even before the shift in emphasis away from manually written programs, this aspectof learning and skills acquisition was weaker than other areas. Some of this undoubtedly has to dowith the assessment mechanism of using quizzes and exams where time pressure and the need tomemorize material proves challenging to some. But there is also evidence that a greater emphasison using computer-aided techniques and the automation they provide when juxtaposed
EWI Public Private Partnership March 15, 2010 Chris Conrardy Chief Technology OfficerTopics EWI Overview Founding and transition from I/UCRC Ongoing university collaboration Ongoing private/public partnership examples EWI Overview EWI Overview EWI Overview Independent nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation Most extensive materials joining expertise and capabilities in US 140 staff; 132,000 sq. ft. facility; >$25M in Capital Equipment > $25M annual revenue Member based > 200 member companies; thousands of plant locations Industry Advisory Board identifies needs and research
EWI Public Private Partnership March 15, 2010 Chris Conrardy Chief Technology OfficerTopics EWI Overview Founding and transition from I/UCRC Ongoing university collaboration Ongoing private/public partnership examples EWI Overview EWI Overview EWI Overview Independent nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation Most extensive materials joining expertise and capabilities in US 140 staff; 132,000 sq. ft. facility; >$25M in Capital Equipment > $25M annual revenue Member based > 200 member companies; thousands of plant locations Industry Advisory Board identifies needs and research
interpret what is given in ascenario, identify the goal, and connect the two using probability tools. This paper summarizes the effort of a probability course instructor in spring 2022 and spring2023 semesters to actively involve students in their own learning process and enhance the teachingand learning effectiveness. More than half of the students enrolled in this course are working eitherfull time or part time. Therefore, the goal is to design a pedagogical framework with materials andstrategies to efficiently engage them before, during, and after lecture, but not overwhelm themwith too much workload. The strategies explored include the following: 1) Encouragingparticipation and feedback. Participation credits are added encompassing both
stakeholders. One example of a typical vision statement might be: “The University of Tennessee offers graduate engineering management education to meet the needs of the local industry and community, state and nation. This university offers degrees using both on-site and distance learning delivery mechanisms. ” Now consider an example where the vision is embellished as: “The University of Tennessee will provide the highest quality of engineering management education for a competitive price to our customers. Our program will target, reach out and meet the market opportunities and needs of local, state, mtion and global communities
Journal. She received her B.S. from Missouri State University, and M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: Incorporating GDT into Engineering Graphics CoursesAbstractThis work in progress describes efforts to enhance the pedagogy in engineering graphics courseswith respect to geometric dimensioning and tolerancing.The Mechanical Engineering Technology curriculum at Penn State Behrend includes severalcourses in engineering graphics, covering topics ranging from hand sketching to advancedtechniques in computer aided design. One of the topics in the advanced course is
of the of the magnet relative to the pull rate of the cord.Once the team gained enough of an understanding of the mechanisms that allowed this productto work well, they manufactured their own coils and metal prongs to scale the mechanism for useto power the 200 LED lights. Coils of varying diameters, heights, and wire gauge were made toexplore the design space and performance. An electric hand-drill was used to wind the coilsfrom a spool of enamel coated copper magnet-wire. The metal prongs were cut out of 1/16”sheet steel using sheet-metal shears and hand-fit to the coils. The magnet arrangement in thecommercial product was reproduced by cutting disks out of a pressed paper-board material anddrilling holes symmetrically around the