sub-tasks andassembled the various parts. Most students had demonstrated mastery of the key concepts at thislevel of learning. However, the instructors were interested to see whether the course had resultedin students “learning how to learn” new programming skills. An inquiry arousal approachseemed perfect for this type of student assessment.6.1. Inquiry Arousal Assignment:A final project was designed using the inquiry arousal approach. The students were given aprogram for a game that worked, but with limited functionality. The code that they were givenwas not significantly longer than any other program they had already written, but it used a fewconcepts that had not been covered by the class. However, the textbook owned by all of thestudents
integrated manufacturing system for a medical deviceThese projects were relatively successful in terms of meeting the studentaccomplishments, course requirements, and company expectations.The least successful project was the integrated manufacturing system. Upon review, thecompany was not located locally and required a one hour drive each way for the students,required the integration of electronics and software, and may have been beyond the scopeof the students. It was mutually decided that we would not pursue another student projectat this time.We were successful in retaining three of the four partners for 2006/07 and integrated fouradditional partners for the following projects: - a test system to assess deployable spacecraft structures
the “big ideas” and designinsight associated with engineering. We are exploring and assessing the proper “mix” of lecture,paper & pencil, computer module and experimental activities that best helps the student to graspthe fundamentals and achieve the desired learning outcomes. These new templates of multimodalactivities will continually be evaluated and refined throughout the project and will ultimately bedisseminated in a manner similar to that which Rensselaer’s original studio model was introduced,adapted and since adopted by others. David Kolb found that the four combinations of perceiving and processing determine the fourlearning styles. According to Kolb, the learning cycle involves four processes that must be presentfor
designated sections of courses, a summer math course, andrevisions to the math curriculum. The new non-academic programs consist of: creating anengineering residential college, and mentoring by peers, faculty, and practicing engineers.Figure 1 outlines the various aspects of both programs included in this project. A description ofthe two programs as well as the methods to assess the total overall project is presented in thefollowing sections.Academic Programs:Introduction to Engineering Course:Currently, each department in SIUC College of Engineering offers their own introduction toengineering course. These courses vary widely; one department introduction to engineeringcourse teaches computer software programs, another course has laboratory
. Two points were allocated for a correct answer and one point was given toany competing team who chose the correct answer after an initial incorrect response. Gift cardsto the University bookstore were offered to the game winners as further incentive to participateand think more about questions that they didn’t immediately know the answer for. Questionswere designed to gauge student background knowledge in biofuels-related topics. The gameserved not only as a pre-assessment tool, but also as an engaging forum for educating thestudents about potential biomass energy sources and the related economic and environmentalimpacts. This was seen as especially beneficial for the students from the group who would beworking on projects other than bio-fuel
computation, be treatedas a supplementary "add-on", for example assigned as a homework exercise, or should thematerials and presentations be "re-thought" in the light of computational possibilities? A relatedquestion is whether part of the grade for a course should be determined based on computationalacumen of students, or should the computations be treated more like illustrative examples thatmay help understanding and appreciation, but for which students are not separately assessed andevaluated? Another consideration is the degree of students' preparedness. At entry, most all haveused computers. However a prevalent if not predominant use, most particularly for males, is ingaming. The primary academic computational context in high school has most
ideas about engineering. 8,9 , 10 , 11 For example, researchers at the University of South Carolina used a “Draw-an-Engineer”instrument and semi-structured interview in pre- and post-tests of 3rd -5th grade students in aclassroom with an engineering graduate student visiting instructor. The researchers found thatstudents generally presented fewer “misconceptions” of engineering on post-assessments thanpre-assessment drawings and interviews. Researchers at the Museum of Science in Boston andTufts University developed a Draw an Engineer Test for students from grades 3-12. The drawnresponses included images such as tools, cars, computers, trains, and desks. Drawings andinterviews enable students to communicate their ideas about
. A screenshot ofthe virtual oscilloscope customized for the needs of the RASCL unit is shown in Figure 6. Figure 6. StudentScope: a LabVIEW virtual instrument built for the RASCL kit.Initial Learning ExperienceTo gauge early student responses to the RASCL platform and to assess its potential as a learningtool, the authors of this paper prepared an extra credit laboratory for the Fall 2006 section ofEECE 512 – Linear Systems, a course with an enrollment of 38 students. The exercise, intendedto take approximately two hours, briefly addressed different areas of RASCL functionality byrequiring students to build a predefined circuit and analyze its properties. Specifically, studentswere asked to (a) build a 2nd–order, lowpass, voltage
encourages the students to make use of the machine shop and prototypingfacilities when developing their initial design plans, and allows rapid transition from design toconstruction or prototype. This application of skills from the earlier courses in the sequence is Page 12.499.9self-motivated. 8AssessmentThis four-course sequence will be completed for the first time in the Spring of 2007. Hence,there has not yet been opportunity for rigorous assessment of the impact of this approach on theBiomedical Engineering Curriculum. Observationally, it is clear that students are applying theskills that they
engineering because of theacademic rigor, hard work, and long hours of study required. There is little chance they remainin these programs because of the same factors. A reputation for inspiring students, will likelyaddress the underlying reasons that recommendation 14 is included.ABETABET continues to strive to improve the accreditation process as reflected in the existence ofboth a criteria for 2006-2007, as well as a proposed criteria for 2007-2008. Completeinformation is readily available on the ABET website. Of special note in Criterion 3: ProgramOutcomes and Assessments (in 2006-2007) and Outcomes (in 2007-2008) which states (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningThe importance of life long
organizational perspective in achieving improved performance in the information or technology-based workplace. Students will learn the role assessment and evaluation in developing world class project teams.Course Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Demonstrate knowledge of the different levels within which project teams work. 2. Identify best practices for project teams from an individual level. 3. Identify best practices in project team development from a team level perspective
the diversity of engineering students and improving education for all engineering students. Some of Beth’s current projects are: an NSF planning project for the Collaborative Large-scale Engineering Analysis Network for Environmental Research, an AAUW project assessing the effectiveness of Expanding Your Horizon’s Conferences and a water resources curriculum project using CADSWES software. She is the Frontiers in Education 2006 Program Co-Chair.James H. Johnson, Howard University Dr. Johnson is the Samuel P. Massie Professor of Environmental Engineering and dean of the College of Engineering, Architecture and Computer Sciences at Howard University. Dr. Johnson received his B.S
project. (The characteristics arepaired with their effects.) real-world connection → motivation; lack of specific constraints →student choices; testable product → data for evidence-based reasoning; and iterative →evaluation → re-design.11The teacher has the following assessment rubric: (For brevity’s sake, only the OUTSTANDING column is completed here.) ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN PROJECTS CRITERIA OUTSTANDING GOOD ADEQUATE POOR NOT ACCEPTABLE 10 points each 9 points 8 points 7 points 0 points problem Students presented
examination of schoolperformance related to relevant student performance criteria used in theaccreditation process. It includes a review of the seismic design content ofarchitecture programs and the methods used to teach seismic design in an effort tochart how students learn seismic design concepts at various institutions. Findingsinclude information about regional influences and the professional profile ofinstructors as well as faculty assessment of currently available teaching materialsand identification of future teaching materials needs. Most significant is evidencesuggesting that although most schools of architecture address the concepts centralto seismic design across the curriculum in a variety of courses, there are barriersthat may prevent
2006-1770: EXPERIENCES WITH AGILE TEACHING IN PROJECT-BASEDCOURSESValentin Razmov, University of Washington Valentin Razmov spends time in the classroom as often as he can. He is interested in methods to assess and improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning. Valentin is a Ph.D. candidate in Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Washington (Seattle), where he received his Masters degree in Computer Science in 2001. Prior to that, in 1998, he obtained a Bachelors degree with honors in Computer Science from Sofia University (Bulgaria).Richard Anderson, University of Washington Richard Anderson is a Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the
7 8: Union Meeting 2 8 8: Committee 2 8 7, 8: Office Hrs 2 8 7,8: Class Prep 2 7, 8 7,8: Contact 6 7, 8 TOTAL RAT ~50Figure 3: Summary of a Demand Log JamThe Load Budget can also be used to assess the effect of proposed changes in policy related tofaculty load. For example, almost every semester, demand difficulties will cause the Registrar tocancel a number of sections after registration opens and try to redistribute
Women = 4.3, IP = 4.4, and non-IP = 4.5). Analysis of (1) students’ definitions of success in the program and (2) the factors cited asexplanations for their confidence in overall program success and their assessment of their currentsuccess in the program, reveled seven overarching categories. A description and example ofeach category are presented in Table 2.Table 2. Categories developed to describe students’ responses to open-ended survey items.Category Title Description Example “Finishing the project.” Student discussion of completion of or an Completion
2006-1653: IDENTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING DIFFICULT CONCEPTS INENGINEERING MECHANICS AND ELECTRIC CIRCUITSRuth Streveler, Colorado School of Mines RUTH A. STREVELER is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education at the Colorado School of Mines and Research Associate Professor in Academic Affairs. Dr. Streveler holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Master of Science in Zoology from the Ohio State University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Indiana University at Bloomington. She is co-principle investigator of three NSF-sponsored projects: Developing an Outcomes Assessment Instrument for Identifying Engineering Student
Smith, Johnson, and Johnson’s model, cooperative learning must include individual accountability, mutual interdependence, face-to-face interaction, appropriate practice of interpersonal skills, and regular self- assessment of team functioning4. Felder14 provides a summary and recommendations for adopting cooperative learning. Collaborative learning need not be as structured and may not include all of the features of cooperative learning. Individual accountability is not a necessary element of collaborative learning. Many examples of these types of learning are found in the literature. The experiences could range from simple in-class exercises where students form temporary groups and work on problems to cooperative
vehicles.Human Services:Locations: Purdue University, University of Notre Dame and the University of Wisconsin-MadisonCommunity Partner: Habitat for Humanity International Having EPICS programs at multiple universities has created the opportunity to collaborate on commonprojects across campuses to address needs of regional, national, or even international scope. A Memorandum ofUnderstanding was signed in 2002 between EPICS and Habitat for Humanity International (HFHI) to developnational-scale projects. The first multi-site project was a database for local HFHI affiliates to use for gathering,storing, and analyzing assessment data of homeowners from across the country. This project was jointly developed
“customer” and provides feedback at all formal reviews and status briefings. In additionto these two faculty members, the faculty course administrator participates in and assesses allformal reviews and reports. The faculty team mentors the students on both the technical andprogram management aspects of the project. Page 11.75.2Project Description Students InvolvedFormula SAE Car Develop, integrate and test an engine control, 3 Electrical EngineeringElectronics electronic gear shift, and telemetry system for the 1 Computer Engineering
.12Assessment Plans Page 11.1040.11To date only qualitative assessment of the modules have been carried out. Written feedback onstudent evaluations have indicated that, in general, most students enjoy learning about thetechnologies and working on the projects. Students also recognize and appreciate the fact thatthe fundamental material is repeated in the modules helping them see it from differentperspectives and understand it at a deeper level. Negative comments indicate some students arebothered by not following the textbook order and having to learn extra material outside of thetext. Extensive quantitative assessment is planned for the 2006-2007
quiz as a traditional paper quiz with the results entered via opticalscanning of bubbles on an answer form. Their claim is that this approach did much more thandiscourage or inhibit students from copying or cheating on exams – it allowed them to makeconsiderable use of quizzes as unannounced tasks at the end of lectures, thus resulting in a largedecrease in absenteeism and correlating positively with student performance. In addition, theymade use of this technology by allowing students to rework problems missed on exams forpartial credit – thus turning the summative exam assessment into a formative assessment tool aswell.There does not seem to be a consensus in the literature on whether or not online homework canproduce a measurable
ofTechnology. CEE 3000 focuses on applying systems and sustainability concepts and analyticaltools in planning, design, operations, maintenance and renewal of civil infrastructure facilities.These concepts are introduced in three modules. The first module exposes the students tosystems and sustainability concepts through directed readings and discussions of global trends inpopulation growth, composition and urbanization, human resource consumption and wastesgeneration; environmental impact assessments, social equity analyses, and infrastructure assetmanagement tools. The second module presents mathematical optimization methods forevaluating system performance and a third module introduces engineering economic analysistools. A term project requires
entrepreneurship concepts and skills to engineeringand science students is to encourage them to participate in extracurricular activities that helpfoster their entrepreneurial skills. This approach has been tried at SJSU through the Neat IdeasFair, a campus-wide forum to celebrate creativity and innovation.The purpose of this paper is to describe and assess the extracurricular approach to fostering anentrepreneurial perspective among students, to assess the level of interest in learning aboutentrepreneurship among engineering students, and to describe a process of selecting appropriatecourse material based on the engineering student responses. Page
school teachers connecting math, science and engineering.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop new assessments to to reveal and address student misconceptions in introductory materials engineering classes. Page 12.540.1© American Society
known. Students are alsodirected by the instructor to additional sources of information, such as plat maps from the countyGIS office, publicly-available aerial photography, and field visits to the project area, which isapproximately two miles from campus.Students are asked to first develop a schematic understanding of how stormwater flows over andthrough the project area. This includes a site assessment of how many residents currently haveconnected roof drains, student-estimated rational runoff coefficients for lots, the flow capacity ofthe existing drainage network, and time of concentration relationships.After gathering information and documenting a conceptual hydrologic scheme for the area, thisinformation is translated into a computerized
issues that truly interest them.24Using this understanding of the prevalent issues that appear to hinder the effectiveness ofengineering ethics instruction, and potential paths to improve effectiveness, a new course wasdesigned to support the ethical decision making of industrial engineering students at MSU, aCarnegie I Research University.Course DesignAs part of the assessment and subsequent major redesign of the industrial engineering curriculumat MSU, the need for additional student exposure to management materials was identified. Inorder to substantially close this gap, an existing two credit junior level course on professionalpractice and ethics was redesigned to a three-credit course focused on engineering managementand organizational
of material for a given purpose (evaluation)1. In addition to content learning, the inquiry-based pedagogy claims to develop importantskills that include critical thinking, problem solving strategies, self-regulated learning, andcollaborative learning in teams, the skills which are not always assessed in traditional, lecture-based classrooms. Some studies suggested that the inquiry-based approach is an effectivepedagogy to help students become self-regulated learners and develop problem-solvingskills15,27,31. Other studies noted some weakness of this pedagogy. Dahlgren and Oberg arguedthat the students generated very few solution-oriented questions (only 6% of the total number ofquestions)9. The majority of the questions generated by
analog and digital sensors andthen communicates to the Internet through a webpage. The simple webpage is hosted by a web-server on the microcontroller, which illustrates both the capability and the limitations of a typicalCPS system. Thus the students experience several aspects of CPS and are encouraged to developcognitive relationships between CPS and IT. Details of the lab design are included in the paper.Pre- and post-assessment tests were carried out to evaluate the degree of student understandingof the lab concepts and their relationship between IT and CPS. Proposals and justification forincluding CPS as part of an IT curriculum are presented.IntroductionEmbedded or Cyber-Physical computer systems are gaining increasing prominence in